We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In this chapter we will examine the psychological treatments that have been found to be helpful for people with Hoarding Disorder. The main approach used is Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT). This may be with an individual or in a group setting. Although, as with much of the research into Hoarding Disorder, the number of studies of high quality are limited, we have good evidence that CBT does work and can have life-changing impacts both on the hoarding and also the depressive symptoms which often accompany Hoarding Disorder. One of the major issues, however, can be the reluctance of people with Hoarding disorder to enter into treatment programmes and then to stick with the programme. There may be many reasons for this reluctance. One recent development which may be hopeful for the future has been using an approach known as Compassion Focussed Therapy in addition to the standard CBT.
Delphi studies allow for the generaztion of a consensus among experts. This has historically been professional experts in their field. This study aimed to obtain a consensus regarding the most important components of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for depression not only for professional experts (therapists) but also for adult experts by experience. Perceptions of importance between therapists and experts by experience differed in multiple areas including content components such as behavioural activation and experiments, psychoeducation, and homework, which the latter did not agree were important. Experts by experience found several components relating to delivery process important which therapists did not, such as delivery method and session length. The strongest agreement from both groups involved the importance of positive therapist factors such as being non-judgemental, knowledgeable, understanding, and trustworthy. Both groups were in agreement on the importance of cognitive restructuring. Neither experts by experience nor therapists met consensus agreement on the inclusion of mindfulness as part of a wider CBT intervention for depression, being rated among the lowest components for both groups. Findings highlight several aspects of CBT content and delivery which may benefit from review in order to increase acceptability for recipients.
Key learning aims
(1) To identify what recipients and deliverers feel are the most important parts of a CBT intervention for depression.
(2) To compare these responses, and consider reasons why these similarities and differences may exist.
(3) To discuss ways in which these differences could impact acceptability and perceived efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy.
(4) To reflect on ways gained knowledge could be used to consider ways to improve the delivery of cognitive behavioural therapy.
Because pediatric anxiety disorders precede the onset of many other problems, successful prediction of response to the first-line treatment, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), could have a major impact. This study evaluates whether structural and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging can predict post-CBT anxiety symptoms.
Methods
Two datasets were studied: (A) one consisted of n = 54 subjects with an anxiety diagnosis, who received 12 weeks of CBT, and (B) one consisted of n = 15 subjects treated for 8 weeks. Connectome predictive modeling (CPM) was used to predict treatment response, as assessed with the PARS. The main analysis included network edges positively correlated with treatment outcome and age, sex, and baseline anxiety severity as predictors. Results from alternative models and analyses are also presented. Model assessments utilized 1000 bootstraps, resulting in a 95% CI for R2, r, and mean absolute error (MAE).
Results
The main model showed a MAE of approximately 3.5 (95% CI: [3.1–3.8]) points, an R2 of 0.08 [−0.14–0.26], and an r of 0.38 [0.24–0.511]. When testing this model in the left-out sample (B), the results were similar, with an MAE of 3.4 [2.8–4.7], R2−0.65 [−2.29–0.16], and r of 0.4 [0.24–0.54]. The anatomical metrics showed a similar pattern, where models rendered overall low R2.
Conclusions
The analysis showed that models based on earlier promising results failed to predict clinical outcomes. Despite the small sample size, this study does not support the extensive use of CPM to predict outcomes in pediatric anxiety.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative impact on the population’s mental health, particularly for individuals with health anxiety (HA) and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). This is in conjunction with a significant change in accessibility of face-to-face psychological services which have had to rapidly adapt to the remote delivery of therapy.
Aims:
Using a single-arm open trial design, the study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of evidence-based CBT interventions for HA and OCD delivered via a blend of online therapist consultations interspersed with self-study reading materials. A secondary aim was to evaluate remote training workshops provided to therapists.
Method:
Therapists attended three half-day remote workshops after which consecutive participants with HA or OCD were assigned to therapists for treatment. Monthly expert supervision was provided. Patients completed routine outcome measures at each session and an idiosyncratic measure of pre-occupation with COVID-19 at pre- and post-treatment.
Results:
Significant and comparable improvements were observed on measures of anxiety, depression and social adjustment from pre- to post-treatment in both the HA (n=14) and OCD (n=20) groups. Disorder-specific measures also showed significant improvements after treatment. The HA group showed greater levels of change on the COVID-19-specific questionnaire. The training workshops were well received by therapists, who valued the monthly supervision sessions.
Conclusions:
The study provides support for the effectiveness of the online delivery of CBT for HA and OCD supported by the inclusion of additional self-study booklets.
Economic variables such as socioeconomic status and debt are linked with an increased risk of a range of mental health problems and appear to increase the risk of developing of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Previous research has shown that people living in more deprived areas have more severe symptoms of depression and anxiety after treatment in England’s NHS Talking Therapies services. However, no research has examined if there is a relationship between neighbourhood deprivation and outcomes for PTSD specifically. This study was an audit of existing data from a single NHS Talking Therapies service. The postcodes of 138 service users who had received psychological therapy for PTSD were used to link data from the English Indices of Deprivation. This was analysed with the PCL-5 measure of PTSD symptoms pre- and post-treatment. There was no significant association between neighbourhood deprivation measures on risk of drop-out from therapy for PTSD, number of sessions received or PTSD symptom severity at the start of treatment. However, post-treatment PCL-5 scores were significantly more severe for those living in highly deprived neighbourhoods, with lower estimated income and greater health and disability. There was also a non-significant trend for the same pattern based on employment and crime rates. There was no impact of access to housing and services or living environment. Those living in more deprived neighbourhoods experienced less of a reduction in PTSD symptoms after treatment from NHS Talking Therapies services. Given the small sample size in a single city, this finding needs to be replicated with a larger sample.
Key learning aims
(1) Previous literature has shown that socioeconomic deprivation increases the risk of a range of mental health problems.
(2) Existing research suggests that economic variables such as income and employment are associated with greater incidence of PTSD.
(3) In the current study, those living in more deprived areas experienced less of a reduction in PTSD symptoms following psychological therapy through NHS Talking Therapies.
(4) The relatively poorer treatment outcomes in the current study are not explained by differences in baseline PTSD severity or drop-out rates, which were not significantly different comparing patients from different socioeconomic strata.
Insomnia is an ideal fit for treatment using CBT. Indeed, whereas good sleep is supported by largely automated sleep–wake processes, insomnia is driven by maladaptive thoughts and behaviours that inhibit optimal conditions for sleep. It conceptualises insomnia using well-established models with a focus on the attention–intention–effort pathway to describe the manner in which insomnia develops and perpetuates. This chapter sets forth the case as to why CBT is ideal for the treatment for insomnia, and provides a detailed summary of the unequivocal and robust evidence base supporting the effectiveness of CBT in the insomnia context. In addition to evaluating the data for traditional therapist-delivered CBT, it reviews and summarises findings from studies of digitally delivered CBT in the context of insomnia. The chapter goes on to describe the effects of CBT beyond the night-time symptoms of insomnia on both daytime impairments and broader benefits to mental health symptoms. Finally, in the context of the wealth of evidence supporting CBT, it reports on the universal recommendation that CBT should be the first-line treatment for insomnia by treatment guidelines internationally.
Implementation of video call-based cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has increased significantly since the COVID-19 pandemic, enabling more flexible delivery, but less is known about user experience and effectiveness. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of individual video call-based CBT for adults with mild to moderate mental health conditions (Prospero CRD42021291055). Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched until 4 September 2023. The Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool (EPHPP) assessed methodological quality of studies. Meta-analysis was conducted in R. Thirty studies (n=3275), published 2000 to 2022, mainly in the USA (n=22/30, 73%), were included. There were 15 randomised control trials, one controlled clinical trial, and 14 uncontrolled studies. Findings indicated feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness (effect size range 0.02–8.30), especially in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for military populations. Other studies investigated depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic with agoraphobia, insomnia, and anxiety. Studies indicated that initial challenges with video call-based CBT subsided as therapy progressed and technical difficulties were managed with limited impact on care. EPHPP ratings were strong (n=12/30, 40%), moderate (n=12/30, 40%), and weak (n=6/30, 20%). Meta-analysis on 12 studies indicated that the difference in effectiveness of video call-based CBT and in-person CBT in reducing symptoms was not significant (SMD=0.044; CI=–0.086; 0.174). Video calls could increase access to CBT without diminishing effectiveness. Limitations include high prevalence of PTSD studies, lack of standardised definitions, and limited studies, especially those since the COVID-19 pandemic escalated use of video calls.
Key learning aims
This review assesses feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of individual video call-based CBT for adults with mild to moderate common mental health conditions, as defined by the ICD-11.
Secondary aims were to assess if the therapeutic relationship is affected and identify any potential training needs in delivering video call-based CBT.
The adjunct meta-analysis quantitatively explored whether video call-based CBT is as effective as in-person interventions in symptom reduction on primary outcome measures by pooling estimates for studies that compare these treatment conditions.
The Thinking Healthy Program (THP) is a multicomponent low-intensity cognitive behavioral therapy-based psychosocial intervention. This intervention has been shown to be clinically effective in perinatal depression (PND) and feasible for implementation in low-resourced settings. It has also been shown to work universally for different phenotypes of PND. However, the mechanism through which THP resolves different phenotypes of PND are unclear. The present investigation presents secondary mediation analyses of a dataset curated from a cluster randomized controlled trial conducted in Pakistan assessing the effectiveness of the THP. Women aged 16–45 years in their third pregnancy trimester, with a diagnosis of PND, underwent 16 sessions of the intervention. The severity of depression was assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). 2-1-1 mediation models revealed that social support exerted significant mediation in driving the intervention effects for improving the severity of depressive symptoms on the HDRS [B (SE) = 0.45 (0.09), 95% CI: 0.30–0.60] and its symptom dimensions of core emotional symptoms [B (SE) = 0.27 (0.06), 95% CI: 0.18–0.37], somatic symptoms [B (SE) = 0.24 (0.04), 95% CI: 0.16–0.31] and insomnia symptoms [B (SE) = 0.04 (0.02), 95% CI: 0.02–0.07].
Several psychological models of bipolar disorder propose that certain types of appraisals can lead to increases in manic symptoms.
Aims:
We tested whether the belief that being ‘high’ is a natural part of one’s personality and correlates with manic symptoms 4 months later when controlling for manic symptoms at baseline.
Method:
This was a prospective 4-month follow-up design using self-report measures. Forty people with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder completed a measure of manic symptoms, a measure of appraisals associated with bipolar disorder, and a single-item measure, ‘To what extent do you feel like being “high” is a natural part of your personality?’, at baseline and follow-up.
Results:
The single-item measure showed modest stability over time and construct validity in its correlation with a standardised measure of appraisals in bipolar disorder. As predicted, the single-item measure correlated with manic symptoms at follow-up when controlling for manic symptoms at baseline.
Conclusions:
The belief that being ‘high’ is a natural part of one’s personality is a potential predictor of manic symptoms. Further research needs to study the potential mediating mechanisms such as activating behaviours, and control for indicators of the bipolar endophenotype.
We examined the efficacy of cognitive and behavioral interventions for improving symptoms of depression and anxiety in adults with neurological disorders. A pre-registered systematic search of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and Neurobite was performed from inception to May 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which examined the efficacy of cognitive and behavioral interventions in treating depression and/or anxiety among adults with neurological disorders were included. Estimates were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed on categorical and continuous moderators, respectively. Main outcomes were pre- and post-intervention depression and anxiety symptom scores, as reported using standardized measures. Fifty-four RCTs involving 5372 participants with 11 neurological disorders (including multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, stroke) were included. The overall effect of interventions yielded significant improvements in both depression (57 arms, Hedges' g = 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35–0.54) and anxiety symptoms (29 arms, g = 0.38, 95% CI 0.29–0.48), compared to controls. Efficacy was greater in studies which employed a minimum baseline symptom severity inclusion criterion for both outcomes, and greater in trials using inactive controls for depression only. There was also evidence of differential efficacy of interventions across the neurological disorder types and the outcome measure used. Risk of bias, intervention delivery mode, intervention tailoring for neurological disorders, sample size, and study year did not moderate effects. Cognitive and behavioral interventions yield small-to-moderate improvements in symptoms of both depression and anxiety in adults with a range of neurological disorders.
Little is known about the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) specific self-help for psychosis, given that CBT is a highly recommended treatment for psychosis. Thus, research has grown regarding CBT-specific self-help for psychosis, warranting an overall review of the literature. A systematic literature review was conducted, following a published protocol which can be found at: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/export_record_pdf.php. A search was conducted across Scopus, PubMed, PsycInfo, and Web of Science to identify relevant literature, exploring CBT-based self-help interventions for individuals experiencing psychosis. The PICO search strategy tool was used to generate search terms. A narrative synthesis was conducted of all papers, and papers were appraised for quality. Ten studies were included in the review. Seven papers found credible evidence to support the effectiveness of CBT-based self-help in reducing features of psychosis. Across the studies, common secondary outcomes included depression, overall psychological well-being, and daily functioning, all of which were also found to significantly improve following self-help intervention, as well as evidence to support its secondary benefit for depression, anxiety, overall well-being, and functioning. Due to methodological shortcomings, long-term outcomes are unclear.
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) or major depressive disorder (MDD), yet there is variability in clinical improvement. Though prior research suggests pre-treatment engagement of brain regions supporting cognitive reappraisal (e.g. dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [dlPFC]) foretells CBT response in SAD, it remains unknown if this extends to MDD or is specific to CBT. The current study examined associations between pre-treatment neural activity during reappraisal and clinical improvement in patients with SAD or MDD following a trial of CBT or supportive therapy (ST), a common-factors comparator arm.
Methods
Participants were 75 treatment-seeking patients with SAD (n = 34) or MDD (n = 41) randomized to CBT (n = 40) or ST (n = 35). Before randomization, patients completed a cognitive reappraisal task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, patients completed clinician-administered symptom measures and a self-report cognitive reappraisal measure before treatment and every 2 weeks throughout treatment.
Results
Results indicated that pre-treatment neural activity during reappraisal differentially predicted CBT and ST response. Specifically, greater trajectories of symptom improvement throughout treatment were associated with less ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (vlPFC) activity for CBT patients, but more vlPFC activity for ST patients. Also, less baseline dlPFC activity corresponded with greater trajectories of self-reported reappraisal improvement, regardless of treatment arm.
Conclusions
If replicated, findings suggest individual differences in brain response during reappraisal may be transdiagnostically associated with treatment-dependent improvement in symptom severity, but improvement in subjective reappraisal following psychotherapy, more broadly.
Edited by
David Kingdon, University of Southampton,Paul Rowlands, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS foundation Trust,George Stein, Emeritus of the Princess Royal University Hospital
This chapter considers how to care for patients who meet the criteria for a diagnosis of personality disorder. We reflect on the role of the psychiatrist in creating a resilient, honest and caring clinical environment, delivering interventions in a considered and coherent manner. Central to this is the relationship between doctor and patient, which includes not only direct clinical care but also the orchestration of work across the multi-disciplinary team and other agencies through clinical leadership.
We approach personality disorders as a relational problem in which the patient experiences their difficulties through their relationships with themselves and the world around them. These difficulties often, though not exclusively, are a developmental consequence of adverse childhood experiences, brought to life within the therapeutic relationship itself. This inevitably means the work is challenging, but it also means that the way we comport ourselves and lead becomes central to the therapeutic culture.
Much has been written on the challenges of working with people who are diagnosable with personality disorder, but perhaps less acknowledged is how these challenges represent not only the very material fundamental to our primary task but also the reason it is such rewarding work given the right circumstances.
By describing the essentials of five trail-blazing programs that treat a wide range of stress-related illnesses (heart disease, depression, diabetes, functional neurological disorders, bodily distress disorders, and comorbid depression and diabetes or heart disease), this chapter distills the features common across these treatment approaches. They provide a guide for what we can expect if we want to slow or stop the course of a stress-related illness.
Edited by
David Kingdon, University of Southampton,Paul Rowlands, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS foundation Trust,George Stein, Emeritus of the Princess Royal University Hospital
Patients with bodily distress, hypochondriasis and chronic pain experience symptoms that impair their functioning and cause them significant degrees of discomfort. They also represent a significant public health challenge. Problems in classification/nosology continue to bedevil this area, and these difficulties – along with the use of the language of psychiatric classification, which most patients find unacceptable – continue to led to the DSM/ICD terms being little used in day-to-day clinical practice, including liaison psychiatry. Biological, psychological and social factors are relevant to both the aetiology and the maintenance of these syndromes, as well as to their treatment. In recent years, a variety of effective biological and psychosocial approaches to treatment have been developed, and these patients can now be considered as a group for whom medical and psychological approaches should be offered.
Edited by
David Kingdon, University of Southampton,Paul Rowlands, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS foundation Trust,George Stein, Emeritus of the Princess Royal University Hospital
This chapter gives an overview and update on functional neurological disorder (FND), also known as dissociative neurological symptom disorder and previously known as conversion disorder. FND is the presence of neurological symptoms that are not explained or explainable by a neurological disorder. FND has been assumed to be a purely stress-related psychiatric disorder, but over the recent decades, this simplistic conception has been supplanted by more nuanced models of symptom generation. FND is no longer a diagnosis of exclusion. Instead, wherever possible, it is ruled-in by distinct features of history and examination, the latter known as positive clinical signs. There have been concurrent advances in the biological understanding of FND, exemplified by functional neuroimaging studies that have indicated that FND can be distinguished from, for example, feigned symptoms mimicking the disorder. FND encompasses multiple subtypes, from seizures to motor disorders to sensory abnormalities. Symptoms often co-occur, sometimes in a striking fashion.
Current treatment options for FND are limited, and many patients have severe long-term symptoms despite best-available treatment including psychological therapies and medication. Nevertheless, there are simple, and sometimes effective, steps that clinicians can take to manage and treat patients.
Edited by
David Kingdon, University of Southampton,Paul Rowlands, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS foundation Trust,George Stein, Emeritus of the Princess Royal University Hospital
Anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders are common in community settings and primary and secondary medical care. Anxiety symptoms are often mild and only transient, but many people are troubled by severe symptoms that cause both considerable personal distress and a marked impairment in social and occupational function. The principal anxiety disorders are currently considered to comprise panic disorder, generalised anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, agoraphobia, specific phobias, separation anxiety disorder and selective mutism. Additional conditions (not considered further here) include substance/medication-induced anxiety disorder, anxiety disorder due to another medical condition, other specified anxiety disorder and unspecified anxiety disorder. Together, anxiety disorders constitute the most frequent mental disorders, with an estimated 12-month prevalence of approximately 10–14 per cent.
Although the societal impact of anxiety disorders is substantial, many of those who could benefit from psychological or pharmacological treatment are neither recognised nor treated. Recognition relies on maintaining a keen awareness of the psychological and physical symptoms of anxiety disorders, and accurate diagnosis rests on identifying the pathognomonic features of specific conditions.
Edited by
David Kingdon, University of Southampton,Paul Rowlands, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS foundation Trust,George Stein, Emeritus of the Princess Royal University Hospital
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic and debilitating illness. It has a specific natural history and treatment response that merits separate attention. This chapter provides a comprehensive update on the origins, aetiology and treatment of OCD. We also touch upon advances in the understanding of a group of less-well-researched disorders related to and currently classified together with OCD, termed as the obsessive-compulsive and related disorders (OCRDs). However, the main focus of this chapter will be on OCD.
Edited by
David Kingdon, University of Southampton,Paul Rowlands, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS foundation Trust,George Stein, Emeritus of the Princess Royal University Hospital
The psychiatry of primary care, and the work that GPs do, has expanded as a field of interest for psychiatrists beyond its early roots in epidemiological research and studies into the detection of mental disorders by general practitioners. An understanding of the key role of the primary care team in managing often-complex mental health problems in the wider community as well as how to work effectively at the interface in partnership and joint work with GPs is essential not only for general adult psychiatrists but other specialists too – as policy makers, both local to the UK and internationally, continue to recognise its importance. The Pathways to Care model provides a useful framework for understanding how the prevalence of mental illness in the community (particularly for common mental disorders such as anxiety and depression) is distributed and how this changes according to the way that health care systems are organised. Ways of working include collaborative care, social prescribing, brief psychological therapy – including CBT-guided self-help – and antidepressants (although controversies surround their usage), with suicide prevention, shared care with CMHTs and training and education of both groups being prominent issues.
Edited by
David Kingdon, University of Southampton,Paul Rowlands, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS foundation Trust,George Stein, Emeritus of the Princess Royal University Hospital
Evidence-based interventions include psychological and social treatments and modes of service delivery such as early intervention for psychosis teams. Family work and individual cognitive behaviour therapy are the psychological approaches that have been best researched but remain limited in availability: assessment, engagement, case conceptualisation and specific work with hallucinations, delusions and negative symptoms have been adapted for clinical practice. The goal is self-determined recovery that will take into account key physical and mental health and social concerns (e.g. accommodation, employment and relationships).