We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This study aimed to refine the content of a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure via cognitive interviewing techniques to assess the unique presentation of depressive symptoms in older adults with cancer (OACs).
Methods
OACs (≥ 70years) with a history of a depressive disorder were administered a draft measure of the Older Adults with Cancer – Depression (OAC-D) Scale, then participated in a semi-structured cognitive interview to provide feedback on the appropriateness, comprehensibility, and overall acceptability of measure. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, and qualitative methods guided revision of scale content and structure.
Results
OACs (N = 10) with a range of cancer diagnoses completed cognitive interviews. Participants felt that the draft measure took a reasonable amount of time to answer and was easily understandable. They favored having item prompts and response anchors repeated with each item for ease of completion, and they helped identify phrasing and wording of key terms consistent with the authors’ intended constructs. From this feedback, a revised version of the OAC-D was created.
Significance of results
The OAC-D Scale is the first PRO developed specifically for use with OACs. The use of expert and patient input and rigorous cognitive interviewing methods provides a conceptually accurate means of assessing the unique symptom experience of OACs with depression.
There has been an increasing number of applications from unaccompanied asylum-seeking children (UASC) in the United Kingdom in recent years. It is well-known that this population is at high-risk of developing mental health disorders, which require early detection and intervention to facilitate successful integration. This paper describes the introduction of mental health screening for unaccompanied asylum-seeking children in a National Health Service (NHS) outpatient clinic in central London. This follows the results of a two-year retrospective analysis of the health needs of the population in our clinic, which identified a high incidence of disturbance to mood and sleep. We describe the selection process for a culturally appropriate and validated screening tool, piloting the Refugee Health Screener (RHS) tool with 20 UASC in clinic, and using preliminary findings to inform a more targeted referral to community Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS). We conclude that implementation of the RHS-13 is feasible for widespread mental health screening for UASC in an NHS setting, and provide suggestions for future research directions within this field.
Screening for breast cancer using mammography is one of the most common medical tests for women aged 50 and older. In the United States, many protocols initiate mammography at ages 40 or 45. Although cancer screening tests are widely advocated, some systematic reviews find little evidence supporting the most common screening tests. Cancer screening clearly identifies lesions at an earlier stage. Yet, when evaluated against cancer-specific or all-cause mortality, screening is less likely to be associated with longer life of higher quality of life. This chapter reviews a series of biases, including lead time bias and length bias, that may explain the discrepancy between enthusiasm for cancer screening and clinical trials that have consistently failed to show benefit. We also review potential harms of screening, such as false positive results, unnecessary biopsies, and anxiety. We conclude that more studies are needed, particularly investigations that include a heterogeneous mix of studies participants.
Congenital heart Disease (CHD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Pulse-oximetry is a good non-invasive simple tool for critical CHD screening. Implications of this tool may be possible in certain areas and non-practical in others. We aim to report on the preliminary results of a recent ongoing protocol concerning the use of pulse-oximetry in detecting critical CHD in newborn in Egypt.
Patients & Methods:
All neonates born in or transferred to 10 university hospitals during the period between February and November 2023 and fulfilled the criteria of inclusion were screened for critical CHD by pulse-oximetry using Granelli protocol in the first 24–72 hours after birth.
Results:
During a 10-month pilot period, a total of 2392 neonates were screened. A total of 549 neonates (23%) tested positive (failed) screening. Among the positive cases, 213 neonates (42%) died during their hospital stay, while the remaining were discharged or scheduled for intervention. The positive cases underwent echocardiography that revealed CHD in the majority of cases (80.3%). Only 40 cases of those cases had cardiac defects that are classified as critical CHD with a prevalence of 16.7 per 1000 live births, while the rest of the cases have either simple (non-critical CHD) or persistent pulmonary hypertension. About 19.7% of positive cases have completely free echocardiograms without cardiac defects.
Conclusion:
The prevalence of critical CHD in Egypt is higher than the mean worldwide prevalence. The introduction of pulse-oximetry as a mass screening tool for critical CHD is possible and effective in low-income countries.
Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a potentially irreversible movement disorder induced by dopamine receptor-blocking agents, including antipsychotics. Despite progress in antipsychotic medications, TD remains widely prevalent even in the era of second-generation antipsychotics. Early detection is critical for preventing irreversible damage and minimizing the disorder’s impact on patients’ daily lives. Risk factors for TD include advanced age, female sex, medical comorbidities, and prolonged use of dopamine receptor-blocking agents (DRBAs). Effective screening for TD should incorporate evidence-based screening techniques such as the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) and informal methods to capture a comprehensive view of TD’s severity and impact. Combining these approaches allows for a thorough assessment of both healthcare practitioner-perceived severity and patient-reported effects on daily life. Modern treatment options, including vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) inhibitors like valbenazine and deutetrabenazine, have demonstrated significant efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Approved by the FDA in 2017, these medications enable continued psychiatric care while managing TD symptoms. Long-term studies support their sustained efficacy and safety, underscoring the importance of individualized, evidence-based treatment plans to improve patient outcomes.
In low- and middle-income countries, fewer than 1 in 10 people with mental health conditions are estimated to be accurately diagnosed in primary care. This is despite more than 90 countries providing mental health training for primary healthcare workers in the past two decades. The lack of accurate diagnoses is a major bottleneck to reducing the global mental health treatment gap. In this commentary, we argue that current research practices are insufficient to generate the evidence needed to improve diagnostic accuracy. Research studies commonly determine accurate diagnosis by relying on self-report tools such as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. This is problematic because self-report tools often overestimate prevalence, primarily due to their high rates of false positives. Moreover, nearly all studies on detection focus solely on depression, not taking into account the spectrum of conditions on which primary healthcare workers are being trained. Single condition self-report tools fail to discriminate among different types of mental health conditions, leading to a heterogeneous group of conditions masked under a single scale. As an alternative path forward, we propose improving research on diagnostic accuracy to better evaluate the reach of mental health service delivery in primary care. We recommend evaluating multiple conditions, statistically adjusting prevalence estimates generated from self-report tools, and consistently using structured clinical interviews as a gold standard. We propose clinically meaningful detection as ‘good-enough’ diagnoses incorporating multiple conditions accounting for context, health system and types of interventions available. Clinically meaningful identification can be operationalized differently across settings based on what level of diagnostic specificity is needed to select from available treatments. Rethinking research strategies to evaluate accuracy of diagnosis is vital to improve training, supervision and delivery of mental health services around the world.
Inference is considered for the marginal distribution of X, when (X, Y) has a truncated bivariate normal distribution. The Y variable is truncated, but only the X values are observed. The relationship of this distribution to Azzalini's “skew-normal” distribution is obtained. Method of moments and maximum likelihood estimation are compared for the three-parameter Azzalini distribution. Samples that are uniformative about the skewness of this distribution may occur, even for large n. Profile likelihood methods are employed to describe the uncertainty involved in parameter estimation. A sample of 87 Otis test scores is shown to be well-described by this model.
Studies show that people with severe mental illness (SMI) have a greater risk of dying from colorectal cancer (CRC). These studies mostly predate the introduction of national bowel cancer screening programmes (NBCSPs) and it is unknown if these have reduced disparity in CRC-related mortality for people with SMI.
Methods
We compared mortality rates following CRC diagnosis at colonoscopy between a nationally representative sample of people with and without SMI who participated in Australia’s NBCSP. Participation was defined as the return of a valid immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT). We also compared mortality rates between people with SMI who did and did not participate in the NBCSP. SMI was defined as receiving two or more Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme prescriptions for second-generation antipsychotics or lithium.
Results
Amongst NBCSP participants, the incidence of CRC in the SMI cohort was lower than in the controls (hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61–0.98). In spite of this, their all-cause mortality rate was 1.84 times higher (95% CI 1.12–3.03), although there was only weak evidence of a difference in CRC-specific mortality (HR 1.82; 95% CI 0.93–3.57). People with SMI who participated in the NBCSP had better all-cause survival than those who were invited to participate but did not return a valid iFOBT (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50–0.88). The benefit of participation was strongest for males with SMI and included improved all-cause and CRC-specific survival.
Conclusions
Participation in the NBCSP may be associated with improved survival following a CRC diagnosis for people with SMI, especially males, although they still experienced greater mortality than the general population. Approaches to improving CRC outcomes in people with SMI should include targeted screening, and increased awareness about the benefits or participation.
Trial registration
Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12620000781943).
We evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of frailty screening using handgrip strength with gait speed measures within four primary care-based memory clinics in Ontario. This mixed methods quality improvement initiative examined the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of frailty screening from the perspective of patients (N = 216), care partners (N = 142), and healthcare providers (N = 9). Frailty screening was well-received by patients and care partners and perceived as quick and easy to administer and integrate into assessment processes by healthcare providers at all four memory clinics. The ease of integrating frailty screening into clinic processes was a key factor facilitating implementation; few challenges or suggestions for improvement were identified. All four clinics plan to continue frailty screening, three using the methods adopted in this study. Integrating frailty screening into memory assessments is feasible and acceptable and, given the interactional relationship between frailty and dementia, provides a significant opportunity to improve health outcomes for older adults.
In the previous chapter we alluded to what is sometimes called ‘secondary’ prevention, where instead of trying to prevent disease from occurring, we try to detect it earlier, in the hope that this will enable more effective treatment and thus improved health outcomes. This is an aspect of public health that has great intuitive appeal, especially for serious conditions such as cancer, where the options for primary prevention can be very limited. However, screening programs are usually very costly exercises and they do not always deliver the expected benefits in terms of improved health outcomes. In this chapter we introduce you to the requirements for implementing a successful screening program and to some of the problems that we encounter when trying to determine whether such a program is actually beneficial in practice.
The avoidance of asthma triggers, like tobacco smoke, facilitates asthma management. Reliance upon caregiver report of their child’s environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure may result in information bias and impaired asthma management. This analysis aimed to characterize the chronicity of ETS exposure, assess the validity of caregiver report of ETS exposure, and investigate the relationship between ETS exposure and asthma attack.
Methods:
A secondary data analysis was performed on data from a longitudinal study of 162 children aged 7–12 years with asthma living in federally subsidized housing in three US cities (Boston, Cincinnati, and New Orleans). Data were collected at three time points over 1 year.
Results:
Over 90% of children were exposed to ETS (≥0.25 ng/ml of urine cotinine (UC)). Exposure was consistent over 1 year. Questionnaire data had a sensitivity of 28–34% using UC ≥0.25 ng/ml as the gold standard. High ETS exposure (UC ≥ 30 ng/ml) was significantly associated with asthma attack (aOR 2.97, 0.93–9.52, p = 0.07). Lower levels (UC 0.25–30 ng/ml) were not statistically significant (aOR 1.76, 0.71– 4.38, p = 0.22). No association was found using caregiver-reported ETS exposure.
Conclusion:
Relying on questionnaire data to assess children’s exposure to tobacco smoke may lead to substantial information bias. For children with asthma, incorrect characterization may substantially impact asthma morbidity.
Guidelines recommend screening for psychiatric co-morbidities in patients with congenital heart defects alongside cardiac outpatient follow-ups. These recommendations are not implemented in Denmark. This study aimed to investigate the psychiatric co-morbidities in children and adolescents with Fontan circulation in Denmark and to evaluate the feasibility of an online screening measure for psychiatric disorders.
Methods:
Children, adolescents, and their families answered the Development and Well-Being Assessment questionnaire and a questionnaire about received help online. Development and Well-Being Assessment ratings present psychiatric diagnoses in accordance with ICD-10 and DSM-5. Parent-reported received psychiatric help is also presented. Feasibility data are reported as participation rate (completed Development and Well-Being Assessments) and parental/adolescent acceptability from the feasibility questionnaire.
Results:
The participation rate was 27%. Of the participating children and adolescents, 53% (ICD-10)/59% (DSM-5) met full diagnostic criteria for at least one psychiatric diagnosis. Of these, 50% had not received any psychiatric or psychological help. Only 12% of participants had an a priori psychiatric diagnosis.
Conclusions:
We found that a large proportion of children and adolescents with Fontan circulation are underdiagnosed and undertreated for psychiatric disorders. The results from our study emphasise the need for psychiatric screening in this patient group. Development and Well-Being Assessment may be too comprehensive for online electronic screening in children and adolescents with CHD.
Edited by
Laurie J. Mckenzie, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston,Denise R. Nebgen, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
More women are surviving gynecological cancer with advancements in screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Survivorship care of gynecological cancer includes surveillance for recurrence of disease, monitoring for late effects of treatment, reducing the risk and early detection of other cancer, and assessment of psychosocial function. Even if the surveillance of gynecological cancer survivors has some common features, non-invasive and invasive breast, cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer will require an individualized therapeutic approach. Many survivors of gynecologic cancer will have long lasting effects on bone and sexual heath, so these areas should be addressed on a regular basis. In addition, it is important to use every encounter as an opportunity to assess the risk of other cancer and provide appropriate early detection. Survivorship care will also incorporate strategies to decrease the risk of other cancer through lifestyle modifications. Many female cancer survivors will have lifelong issues related to distress, body image, finance, and social support. Assessment of psychosocial issues and referral to appropriate services should be performed at every patient encounter.
Previous studies investigating behavioural health screening processes have focused on selected diagnoses within paediatric cardiology and focused on a smaller number of potential concerns. We developed and administered a brief survey in our paediatric heart centre to assess the presence of a wider variety of behavioural health concerns and to connect patients with resources. A cohort of 305 patients aged 2–29 years (M = 11.97 years; SD = 6.00 years; 50.49% female), representing a variety of indications for a cardiology clinic visit, or a parent, completed a survey of 14 common behavioural health concerns. Behavioural health concerns were included based on practice patterns within paediatric psychology. Respondents indicated if they were currently receiving behavioural health services and if they were interested in behavioural health follow-up. Surveys were administered during check in and collected by clinic staff. A behavioural health provider attempted to reach all those who indicated interest by phone. Approximately 45% of the sample endorsed one or more behavioural health concerns and 30.16% of the sample endorsed at least one concern but were not already connected to services. Only 27.17% of this group requested follow-up. Most commonly endorsed concerns were anxiety, sleep problems, depressed/irritable mood, and somatic complaints. Survey results converge with existing literature to indicate that behavioural health concerns are common among youth seen in a paediatric cardiology clinic but most patients are not connected to appropriate services. Screening programmes can help meet this need but challenges remain. Clinical implications and future directions are discussed.
We aimed to compare and link the total scores of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), two common global cognitive screeners.
Methods:
2,325 memory clinic patients (63.2 ± 8.6 years; 43% female) with a variety of diagnoses, including subjective cognitive decline, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia due to various etiologies completed the MMSE and MoCA concurrently. We described both screeners, including at the item level. Then, using linear regressions, we investigated how age, sex, education, and diagnosis affected total scores on both instruments. Next, in linear mixed models, we treated the two screeners as repeated measures and analyzed the influence of these characteristics on the relationship between the instruments’ total scores. Finally, we linked total scores using equipercentile equating, accounting for relevant patient characteristics.
Results:
MMSE scores (mean ± standard deviation: 25.0 ± 4.6) were higher than MoCA scores (21.2 ± 5.4), and MMSE items generally showed less variation than MoCA items. Both instruments’ scores were individually influenced by age, sex, education, and diagnosis. The relationship between the screeners was moderated by age (estimate = −0.01, 95% confidence interval = [−0.03, −0.00]), education (0.14 [0.10, 0.18]), and diagnosis. These were accounted for when producing crosswalk tables based on equipercentile equating.
Conclusions:
Accounting for the influence of patient characteristics, we created crosswalk tables to convert MMSE scores to MoCA scores, and vice versa. These tables may facilitate collaboration between clinicians and researchers and could allow larger, pooled analyses of global cognitive functioning in older adults.
To quantify the proportion of referrals sent to Crumlin Cardiology Department for cardiac screening prior to commencement or modifying attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medication and assess the number detected with a clinically significant abnormality.
Methods:
A prospective audit was performed over a 6-month period, from November 2021 to April 2022 inclusive. Referrals sent via outpatient department triage letters, electrocardiogram dept. email, and walk-in electrocardiogram service were screened for those pertaining to commencing or modifying medication for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Each referral was coded against National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines to determine the degree of clinical details given. Reported abnormalities, recommended management, and correspondence were recorded.
Results:
Ninety-one referrals were received during the 6-month audit period. More than half lacked a clinical indication for referral (53/91, 58.2%), with fewer than one third (26/91, 28.5%) meeting National Institute for Health and Care Excellence criteria for referral for cardiology. Eighty (80/91) referrals had clinical outcomes available for review (missing outpatient department information and age outside of service range accounted for eleven referrals with unavailable clinical outcomes). Of the eighty clinically reviewed referrals, seventy-two (72/80, 90%) were reported as normal with no cardiology follow up required. Eight referrals (8/80, 10%) were reviewed in the Cardiology Outpatient Department prior to commencement or modifying attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medication. Of these, only one (1/80 1%) had a clinically significant abnormality which was a potential contraindication to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medication use, and this referral was appropriate as per National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines.
Conclusion:
Routine screening prior to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medication prescription in the absence of clinical indications (as per National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) contributed to delays in medication initiation among young people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Unnecessary referrals have resource implications for cardiology clinical team. Improved adherence to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines would provide benefits for patients and clinicians.
E-mental health tools are a promising solution to reducing the high prevalence of perinatal mood and anxiety disorders and addressing barriers faced by women seeking professional help. This article summarises the main e-health tools used in perinatal mental healthcare, including examples of evidence-based tools for assessment, prevention and treatment of such disorders. We also highlight the main characteristics of the development process of e-mental health tools, which are based on cognitive–behavioural therapy, as well as the ethical concerns to be considered with their use and integration in healthcare systems.
Social determinants of health (SDOH) can contribute to disparities that negatively impact health outcomes and healthcare utilization. Comprehensive screening is frequently overlooked during inpatient clinical care. This pilot aimed to evaluate the capturability of a multi-domain SDOH screening tool during hospitalization, as well as correlation of SDOH needs to readmissions.
Methods:
The Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients’ Assets, Risks and Experiences (PRAPARE) screening tool was implemented on admission with adult inpatients at an academic tertiary medical center in central Pennsylvania. A total of 80 patients were screened over an 8-week period using the PRAPARE tool.
Results:
43.7% of participants were identified as having at least one SDOH need and 21.2% were identified as having two or more needs. Of the participants identified as having at least one SDOH need through PRAPARE screening, 42.5% experienced a readmission within 30 days, compared to 15% readmissions among participants with no identified SDOH needs. For each additional SDOH need a patient had, the odds they experienced a readmission increased by 2.2 times.
Conclusions:
The study findings suggest that utilization of the PRAPARE screening tool has the ability to capture significant SDOH needs among hospitalized patients. This study also suggests that higher SDOH needs correlate to increased odds of experiencing a hospital readmission.
Edited by
Allan Young, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London,Marsal Sanches, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas,Jair C. Soares, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas,Mario Juruena, King's College London
Accurate diagnoses are crucial in choosing the most appropriate evidence-based treatment for mood disorders. Structured clinical interviews are the gold standard to assess unipolar (UD) and bipolar disorders (BD); however, they require time, financial, and training resources that are often unavailable. As this is especially true outside of specialty clinics or tertiary care settings, self-ratings can be used for screening to facilitate the diagnostic process. Such tools have both strengths and weaknesses, but it is essential that a detailed clinical assessment still follows before providing a valid diagnosis for mood disorders. In this chapter, we review several screening tools for UD and BD that have substantial empirical support and/or are widely used. We list measures that have been used for other types of screening, for example, to assess severity of symptoms or focus on specific populations. Gaps, recent developments, such as digital approaches, and final conclusions for clinical practice are also discussed.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with worse outcomes in stroke, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD), but diagnosis is challenging in these groups. We aimed to compare the prevalence of high risk of OSA based on commonly used questionnaires and self-reported OSA diagnosis: 1. within groups with stroke, AD, PD and the general population (GP); 2. Between neurological groups and GP.
Methods:
Individuals with stroke, PD and AD were identified in the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging (CLSA) by survey. STOP, STOP-BAG, STOP-B28 and GOAL screening tools and OSA self-report were compared by the Chi-squared test. Logistic regression was used to compare high risk/self-report of OSA, in neurological conditions vs. GP, adjusted for confounders.
Results:
We studied 30,097 participants with mean age of 62.3 years (SD 10.3) (stroke n = 1791; PD n = 175; AD n = 125). In all groups, a positive GOAL was the most prevalent, while positive STOP was least prevalent among questionnaires. Significant variations in high-risk OSA were observed between different questionnaires across all groups. Under 1.5% of individuals self-reported OSA. While all questionnaires suggested a higher prevalence of OSA in stroke than the GP, for PD and AD, there was heterogeneity depending on questionnaire.
Conclusions:
The wide range of prevalences of high risk of OSA resulting from commonly used screening tools underscores the importance of validating them in older adults with neurological disorders. OSA was self-reported in disproportionately small numbers across groups, suggesting that OSA is underdiagnosed in older adults or underreported by patients, which is concerning given its increasingly recognized impact on brain health.