We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Relationship-centred mealtimes can support care home residents, who are at high risk for loneliness. However, care home staff do not consistently promote relationship-centred mealtimes. This secondary analysis examined the impact of factors (selected based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour) upon care home staff interest in making mealtimes more relationship-centred. Data were from a cross-sectional, quantitative survey of 670 care home staff from North America. We used multivariable logistic regression to test hypotheses. The model was statistically significant, and explained 13 per cent of the variance in staff members’ interest in making mealtimes more relationship-centred. Respondents who were more satisfied with current mealtime practices, had used collaborative change strategies in the past, and who perceived organizational support for relationship-centred care were more likely to have interest in making mealtimes more relationship-centred. These are modifiable factors to target in interventions designed to promote care home staff interest in making mealtimes more relationship-centred.
This chapter considers the costs of long-term care for service users and their families, and the policies that are necessary for adequate financial protection. The main focus is on home care services due to the substantial gap in evidence regarding their affordability. Given the widespread preference for home-based care, particularly in Europe where the majority of long-term care users reside at home, understanding the financial implications of these services is crucial. While decisions about home care primarily prioritize users’ wellbeing, financial considerations also shape care arrangements. Overall, common protective mechanisms such as caps on out-of-pocket payments income-based and means tests seem unable to successfully protect long-term care users from experiencing catastrophic spending.
Population ageing coupled with a growing burden of disease and disability will cause long-term care needs to increase considerably around the world. Yet despite changing demographics, many countries do not invest adequately in long-term care systems. This chapter sets out the reasons that long-term care is often underprioritized by governments and begins to consider why countries need a re-think when it comes to the way they care for older adults.
This chapter explores how common challenges facing long-term care systems across the world have given rise to common trends in the development of long-term care service delivery - a focus on improving integration, the shift from residential care to home- and community-based care, the growing role of the private sector in care provision and the emergence of digital technologies with transformative potential. Recent developments in five countries (Germany, Japan, Sweden, Norway, and Romania) are used to exemplify and distil overarching lessons for strengthening long-term care service delivery.
This chapter examines the potential economic impact of investing in long-term care systems. Long-term care systems often indirectly burden informal caregivers, primarily women, leading to a significant loss of potential income and economic growth opportunities. Without adequately compensated, trained care professionals, it’s challenging for unpaid informal caregivers to increase their labour market participation. A comprehensive long-term care system must include support programs and policy changes that encourage both informal and formal caregivers to participate fully in the workforce, which is vital for economic growth and productivity.
This chapter reviews the strategies countries are employing to improve the quality of long-term care for older adults and assesses the impact of these approaches. Given that long-term care is a relatively new component of welfare systems, there is limited evidence on effective quality improvement measures. The scarcity of data on care quality in most countries further complicates the evaluation and comparison of these strategies. Despite these challenges, the chapter provides an overview of various quality improvement approaches, utilizing available evidence to understand their effects on the quality of long-term care.
This chapter examines the challenges in measuring long-term care needs to determine eligibility and the impact of eligibility rules on access to care and wellbeing, focusing on European countries with established long-term care systems. Eligibility rules are crucial for identifying individuals with the greatest need and ensuring equitable resource distribution, yet defining these rules is challenging due to the lack of a universal approach to measuring health and social needs. Consequently, some individuals with functional or cognitive limitations may be inadequately supported or face high out-of-pocket costs, leading to reliance on informal care or unmet needs. This can reduce their independence and increase the risk of costly hospitalizations. The chapter advocates for expanding eligibility rules to improve coverage, equity, and efficiency, highlighting their role in increasing access to care, reducing poverty due to care costs, and enhancing wellbeing.
This chapter concludes by summarizing the evidence presented in the book and considering the way forward by re-visiting the arguments in favour of investing in long-term care and the costs of inaction.
With global population ageing and shifting morbidity and disability patterns, the demand for long-term care is increasing. The chapter highlights the impact of demographic changes, particularly the rise in the older population and the growing need for dementia care, on long-term care demand. It advocates for a paradigm shift from institutionalized nursing homes to home-based care and stresses the need for policy support to enhance informal caregiving and develop a robust long-term care workforce. Additionally, it underscores the significance of recognizing long-term care as a social and human right and establishing a regulatory framework to ensure high-quality care.
The aim of this chapter is to illustrate how a robust long-term care system can positively influence the overall wellbeing of society, extending beyond the individual receiving care. Since the primary recipients of long-term care are often older or disabled individuals, it is sometimes viewed as a costly burden on society rather than an investment in the public interest or the common good. This chapter seeks to challenge such perceptions by emphasizing the positive and proactive social impact of a strong long-term care system on society as a whole. By highlighting these arguments, the chapter aims to provide further justification for countries to invest in their long-term care systems.
This chapter explores methods of financing long-term care. These include public financing, which involves government-managed programs funded through taxation and social insurance schemes, and private financing, which includes out-of-pocket payments and family contributions. The chapter also considers how resources are pooled and allocated, as well as policy decisions regarding public care coverage and financial protection. Short case studies illustrate the practical functioning of different financing models. Finally, the chapter considers the evolution of long-term care expenditure in the context of an ageing population.
This chapter explores the available evidence on how long-term care influences health systems. While the focus is primarily on high-income countries, the issues discussed are relevant to low- and middle-income countries facing rising demands for long-term care as populations age. Overall, the literature suggests a strong long-term care system has many positive consequences for the health sector and for the health and well-being of older people.
Next of kin play a vital role in the informal care of older relatives in long-term-care facilities (LTCFs). However, finding a sustainable balance between everyday commitments and caring for their loved ones can be demanding, and there is a need to explore new ways to support their caregiving efforts while prioritising their wellbeing. Digital communication technologies have shown promise in enabling meaningful social interactions between older adults and their families, yet their potential to foster connections in LTCFs remains understudied. This study explores the efficacy of a communication technology called Komp in facilitating meaningful connections between next of kin and older relatives in LTCFs. It utilises Norwegian data from all public nursing homes in Oslo municipality to assess whether Komp can facilitate social contact between nursing home residents and their next of kin, and if the use of Komp impacts the next of kin’s experience of satisfaction with this contact. Based on 238 next of kin, this study uses two data sources: (1) survey data collected from all next of kin, in three waves, and (2) a highly detailed weekly data stream from each Komp device. These sources are combined and analysed using multiple regression analysis. The results generally show a positive and significant relationship between use of Komp and increased social satisfaction, indicating that Komp can serve as a valuable tool to help next of kin maintain social bonds with older relatives in LTCFs.
The purpose of the current study was to understand the prevalence and patterns of cannabinoid use among LTC residents across Canada. We gathered data on cannabinoid prescriptions among LTC residents for one year before and after recreational cannabis legalization. Multi-level modelling was used to examine the effects of demographic and diagnostic characteristics on rates of cannabinoid prescription over time. All prescriptions were for nabilone. There was a significant increase in the proportion of residents prescribed nabilone following the legalization of recreational cannabis in Canada. Residents with relatively more severe pain (based on the Minimum Data Set pain scale), a diagnosis of depression, or a diagnosis of an anxiety disorder were more likely to have received a nabilone prescription. Our results provide valuable information regarding the increasing use of synthetic cannabinoids in LTC. The implications for clinical practice and policy decision-makers are discussed.
This position paper focuses on healthy ageing for the frailest and institutionalized older adults in the context of the recent pandemic. The paper aims to identify and discuss hindering and promoting factors for healthy ageing in this context, taking both health safety and a meaningful social life into account, in a pandemic situation and beyond.
Background:
The recent COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the vulnerability of frail older adults residing in long-term care institutions. This is a segment of the older population that does not seem to align well with the recent policy trend of healthy and active ageing. The need for healthy ageing in this population has been voiced by professionals and interest organizations alike, alluding to inadequate support systems during the pandemic, conditioned by both previous and newly emerging contextual factors. Supporting healthy ageing in older adults in nursing homes and other residential care settings calls for attending to meaningful social life as well as to disease control.
Methods:
Findings and early conclusions leading up to the position paper were presented with peer discussions involving healthcare professionals and researchers at two joint EFPC PRIMORE workshops 2021 and 2022, as well as other international research seminars on long-term care. The following aspects of long-term care and COVID-19 were systematically discussed in those events, with reference to relevant research literature: 1. Long-term care policies, 2. pre-COVID state of long-term care facilities and vulnerability to the pandemic, 3. factors influencing the extent of spread of infection in long-term care facilities, and 4. the challenge of balancing between strict measures for infection control and maintaining a meaningful social life for residents and their significant others.
Findings:
A policy shift towards ageing at home and supporting the healthiest of older adults seems to have had unwarranted effects both for frail older adults, their significant others, and professional care staff attending to their needs. Resulting insufficient investment in primary health care staff and in the built environment for frail older adults in nursing homes were detrimental both for the older adults living in nursing homes, their significant others, and staff. More investment in staff and in physical surroundings might improve the quality of care and the social life of older adults in nursing homes in a non-pandemic situation and be a resource for primary health care staff ensuring both protection from health hazards and a meaningful social life for frail older adults in a pandemic or epidemic situation. As for investing in the physical surroundings, smaller nursing homes are advantageous, with singular resident rooms and for developing out-and indoor spaces for socializing and for meeting with families and other visitors. Regarding investment in staff, there is a documented need for educated staff in full-time positions. Use of part-time or temporary staff should be limited.
Delusional disorder is a mental illness characterized by the presence of one or more delusions for a period of at least one month. Delusional beliefs are based on the misinterpretation of external reality and are not made better with education or persuasion. The prevalence of delusional disorder in older adults is thought to be double that seen in younger adults. The occurence of delusional disorder is more common in later life when compared to other psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. Seven subtypes of delusional disorder are recognized in the DSM-5. These include persecutory type, somatic type, jealous type, grandiose type, erotomanic type, mixed type, and unspecified type. Response to treatment of delusional disorder with antipsychotics is fair.
Chronic alcohol use disorder is an important cause of major neurocognitive disorder. There are several suggested mechanisms for how alcohol use disorder leads to major neurocognitive disorder. Medical treatment of alcohol use disorder can help limit the late effects of alcohol use. Alcohol-induced major neurocognitive disorder can be partially reversible with abstinence but this depends on the severity of the pathology.
Sundowner syndrome is a common neuropsychiatry syndrome seen in residents of long-term care. Several theories are proposed to explain the pathophysiology and contributing factors. Treatment options are also discussed.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is more common in older adults than any other age group. It is the most common fall-related injury in adults over the age of 65. The pathogenesis of TBI involves multiple mechanisms. Medications generally do not alter the course of the disease process but can treat the neuropsychiatric symptoms. Mood and anxiety disorders are commonly comorbid with TBI.
The potential of substance use disorders in older adults is often overlooked in a general health assessment. Substance use disorders have a high comorbidity with other psychiatric disorders. Physiologic changes in older adults make them more susceptible to the negative effects of alcohol use. With the proper support and resources older adults with alcohol use disorder can live a healthier, happier life free from alcohol. Cannabis use is increasing in all age groups including older adults. Be aware that older adults may be using cannabis to self medicate psychiatric conditions such as anxiety and depression or to treat chronic pain despite limited evidence for long term improvement. Older adults may be at risk of opiate use disorder due to chronic pain issues, multiple medical comorbidities, and psychiatric comorbidities. Treatment options for opioid use disorder such as medications, outpatient treatment programs, and psychosocial supports are often as effective in older adults as in younger patients.