Suicide remains a major risk factor for individuals suffering from schizophrenia and its prodromal state (i.e., Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis). However, less is known about the prevalence of suicidal behaviour among the adolescent and youth UHR population, a demographic vulnerable to the psychosocial and environmental risk factors of suicide. This review aims to synthesise existing literature on the prevalence of suicidal ideation and behaviour in the adolescent and youth at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis (UHR), and the associations between suicidal behaviour and its correlates.

The databases PsycINFO, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were accessed up to July 2024. A meta-analysis of prevalence was subsequently performed for lifetime suicidal ideation, lifetime non-suicidal self-injury, lifetime suicidal attempt, and current suicidal ideation. A narrative review was also carried out for the correlates of suicidal behaviour amongst adolescents and youth in the UHR population.

Studies were included in this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis revealed a high prevalence of lifetime suicidal ideation (58%), lifetime non-suicidal self-injury (37%), lifetime suicidal attempt (25%), and current (2 week) suicidal ideation (56%). The narrative review revealed that a personal transition to psychosis and a positive family history of psychosis were associated with suicidal attempts, while depression was associated with both suicidal attempts and suicidal ideation.

The prevalence of suicidal ideation and behaviour among UHR adolescents and youth is high and comparable to that of the general UHR population. Existing measures that mitigate suicide risk in the general UHR population should be adopted for the youth context.

To review and explore the eating disorder admissions to an in-patient child and adolescent mental health hospital which had restarted taking such presentations. This was done by conducting three audits using RiO (an electronic patient records system) and including all young people with eating disorders or related difficulties admitted between 1 February 2019 and 30 June 2023. As part of this, relevant practice standards were identified using the baseline assessment tool in UK national guidelines.

The audits identified 46 completed admissions, detailing demographic information, nasogastric and restraint feeding, therapeutic interventions and medication, admission and discharge routes, length of admission and more.

The review highlighted the apparent overall success of a general admission unit in treating eating disorders and related difficulties and identified key areas of importance and development in terms of clinical practice.

National policy in England recommends that young people be admitted to mental health wards that are age-appropriate. Despite this, young people continue to be admitted to adult wards.

To explore the impact of young people’s admissions to adult wards, from the perspectives of young people, parents/carers and mental health professionals working in adult services.

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 participants to explore experiences of receiving and delivering care in adult mental health wards. Participants were four young people (aged 16–17 years), four parents/carers and 21 mental health professionals from adult mental health services in England. Data were analysed using framework analysis.

Young people’s admissions to adult wards tend to occur out of hours, at a time of crisis and when no suitable adolescent bed is available. Admissions were conceptualised as a short-term safety measure rather than for any therapeutic input. Concerns were raised about safeguarding, limited treatment options and a lack of education provision for young people on adult wards. However, exceptionally, for older adolescents, an adult ward might be clinically or socially appropriate. Recommendations to reduce adult ward admissions included better integration of adolescent and adult services, having more flexible policies and increasing community provision.

Our findings emphasise the importance of young people being admitted to age-appropriate in-patient facilities. Earlier intervention and increased provision of specialist care in the community could prevent young people’s admissions to adult wards.

A youth mental health crisis is considered one of the great challenges of our time, and research and clinical services in child and adolescent psychiatry have become a priority for governments and funders. Academic leadership is needed to drive forward research. It is not clear how many senior academic leadership posts (professorships) there are in child and adolescent psychiatry, nor how this benchmarks against a similarly sized medical specialty.

This study aimed to determine the number of professorships in child and adolescent psychiatry in the UK and Ireland compared to a similarly sized specialty. A secondary aim was to identify the number of clinical trials registered for mental and behavioural disorders in children.

We identified registered specialists in child and adolescent psychiatry and a similarly sized specialty who held full professorships in medical schools. We searched the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) and ClinicalTrials.gov for trials.

As of 23 March 2023, there were 1725 doctors on the General Medical Council's (GMC) specialist register in child and adolescent psychiatry. The closest specialty in terms of number of registered specialists was neurology (N = 1724). We identified 24 professors in child and adolescent psychiatry across the UK and Ireland, compared to 124 in neurology. For every intervention trial registered for mental and behavioural disorders in children, there were approximately ten trials registered for diseases of the nervous system.

Despite equivalent numbers of medical specialists in child and adolescent psychiatry and neurology, there is a striking disparity in the number of professorship appointments. While young peoples’ mental health has, ostensibly, become a priority for policy-makers and funders, this is not reflected in medical professorship appointments. The paucity of senior academic child and adolescent psychiatrists has real-world implications for training, research, innovation and service development in mental health services.

The school–vacation cycle may have impacts on the psychological states of adolescents. However, little evidence illustrates how transition from school to vacation impacts students’ psychological states (e.g. depression and anxiety).

To explore the changing patterns of depression and anxiety symptoms among adolescent students within a school–vacation transition and to provide insights for prevention or intervention targets.

Social demographic data and depression and anxiety symptoms were measured from 1380 adolescent students during the school year (age: 13.8 ± 0.88) and 1100 students during the summer vacation (age: 14.2 ± 0.93) in China. Multilevel mixed-effect models were used to examine the changes in depression and anxiety levels and the associated influencing factors. Network analysis was used to explore the symptom network structures of depression and anxiety during school and vacation.

Depression and anxiety symptoms significantly decreased during the vacation compared to the school period. Being female, higher age and with lower mother's educational level were identified as longitudinal risk factors. Interaction effects were found between group (school versus vacation) and the father's educational level as well as grade. Network analyses demonstrated that the anxiety symptoms, including ‘Nervous’, ‘Control worry’ and ‘Relax’ were the most central symptoms at both times. Psychomotor disturbance, including ‘Restless’, ‘Nervous’ and ‘Motor’, bridged depression and anxiety symptoms. The central and bridge symptoms showed variation across the school vacation.

The school–vacation transition had an impact on students’ depression and anxiety symptoms. Prevention and intervention strategies for adolescents’ depression and anxiety during school and vacation periods should be differentially developed.

Intergenerational transmission of mental disorders has been well established, but it is unclear whether exposure to a child's mental disorder increases parents' subsequent risk of mental disorders.

We examined the association of mental disorders in children with their parents' subsequent mental disorders.

In this population-based cohort study, we included all individuals with children born in Finland or Denmark in 1990–2010. Information about mental disorders was acquired from national registers. The follow-up period began when the parent's eldest child was 5 years old (for ICD-10 codes F10–F60) or 1 year old (for codes F70–F98) and ended on 31 December 2019 or when the parent received a mental disorder diagnosis, died, or emigrated from Finland or Denmark. The associations of mental disorders in children with their parents' subsequent mental disorders were examined using Cox proportional hazards models.

The study cohort included 1 651 723 parents. In total, 248 328 women and 250 763 men had at least one child who had been diagnosed with a mental disorder. The risk of a parent receiving a mental disorder diagnosis was higher among those who had a child with a mental disorder compared with those who did not. For both parents, the hazard ratios were greatest in the first 6 months after the child's diagnosis (hazard ratio 2.04–2.54), followed by a subtle decline in the risk (after 2 years, the hazard ratio was 1.33–1.77).

Mental disorders in children are associated with a greater risk of subsequent mental disorders among their parents. Additional support is needed for parents whose children have been recently diagnosed with a mental disorder.

An improved understanding of the factors associated with self-harm in young people who die by suicide can inform suicide prevention measures.

To describe sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and service utilisation related to self-harm in a national sample of young people who died by suicide.

We carried out a descriptive study of self-harm in a national consecutive case series (N = 544) of 10- to 19-year-olds who died by suicide over 3 years (2014–2016) in the UK as identified from national mortality data. Information was collected from coroner inquest hearings, child death investigations, criminal justice system and National Health Service serious incident reports.

Almost half (49%) of these young people had harmed themselves at some point in their lives, a quarter (26%) in the 3 months before death. Girls were twice as likely as boys to have recent self-harm (40 v. 20%; P < 0.001). Compared to the no self-harm group, young people with recent self-harm were more likely to have a mental illness diagnosis (63 v. 23%; P < 0.001); misused alcohol (19 v. 9%; P = 0.07); experienced physical, sexual or emotional abuse (17 v. 3%; P < 0.01); and recent life adversity (95 v. 75%; P < 0.001). Furthermore, they were more likely to be in contact with mental health services (60 v. 10%), or emergency departments or general physicians for a mental health condition (52 v. 10%) in the 3 months before death.

Presentation to services in young people who self-harm is an important opportunity to intervene through comprehensive psychosocial assessment and treatment of underlying conditions.

Discipline is a crucial aspect of parenting, shaping child development and behaviour. Time-out, a widely used disciplinary strategy with a strong evidence-base, has recently come under scrutiny with concerns about potential adverse effects on children's emotional development and attachment, particularly for those with a history of adversity.

To contribute critical empirical insights to the current controversy surrounding time-out by exploring the associations among time-out implementation, parent–child attachment and child mental health, and whether adversity exposure moderated these associations.

This cross-sectional study utilised a nationally representative sample of 474 primary caregivers in Australia, with children aged 6–8 years, who completed an online survey. Measures included the Implementation of Time-out Scale, Adverse Life Experiences Scale, Primary Attachment Style Questionnaire, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and Spence Child Anxiety Scale.

Appropriately implemented time-out was associated with enhanced mental health and attachment, while inappropriate time-out correlated with adverse child outcomes. Exposure to adversity moderated the relationship between time-out implementation and child well-being, such that children exposed to adversity were most likely to experience attachment enhancement from appropriately implemented time-out.

Despite recent concerns of harm caused by time-out, particularly for children with a history of adversity, findings support the beneficial impact of time-out on child well-being and attachment when implemented in accordance with evidence-based parameters. Combatting misinformation and disseminating evidence-based time-out guidelines is crucial for promoting child well-being and attachment, especially for children who have experienced adversity.

Various studies have highlighted the increased incidence and symptoms of depression and anxiety in paediatric cancer survivors (PCS). Yet no meta-analysis has focused on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) in PCS and their family nucleus.

To evaluate the overall risk of PTSD and severity of PTSS in PCS and their family nucleus. Secondary objectives include identifying potential risk factors of PTSD and high PTSS.

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO for studies comparing the risk of PTSD and PTSS severity among PCS, their family nucleus and non-cancer controls. PRISMA reporting guidelines were followed. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were conducted.

From 1089 records, we included 21 studies. PCS have an increased risk of PTSD (risk ratio 2.36, 95% CI 1.37–4.06) and decreased PTSS severity (standardised mean difference −0.29, 95% CI −0.50 to −0.08). Subgroup analyses of other categorical study-level characteristics revealed that female PCS who were older at diagnosis and data collection had a significantly higher risk of PTSD. Meta-regression were insignificant. Family nucleus did not show a significantly increased risk of PTSD (risk ratio 1.13, 95% CI 0.59–5.00) and PTSS severity (standardised mean difference 0.53, 95% CI −0.00 to 1.06). Systematically reviewing studies on the family nucleus found that the majority reported a significantly increased risk of psychological trauma compared with the comparator. Lower education, income and social status were also risk factors.

Timely identification and interventions are imperative for policy makers and healthcare providers to prevent trauma from worsening in this population group.

Young people from racialised backgrounds are overrepresented in justice services. This study explored differences in community support offered to young people from racialised groups referred to a forensic child and adolescent mental health service.

We compared support offered to 427 young people, according to five ethnic groups.

Over 20% of young people referred were Black (compared with 14% of the local population) and 15.8% were Dual White and Black Heritage (compared with 4% of the local population). Odds ratios showed that Black and Dual Heritage groups were more frequently involved with youth offending services (Black: 2.59, Dual Heritage: 2.88), gangs services (Black: 4.31, Dual Heritage: 7.13) and have a national referral mechanism (Black: 3.61, Dual Heritage: 4.01) than their White peers, but were less often in mainstream education compared with their Asian peers (Black: 0.26, Dual Heritage: 0.29). Black (odds ratio 0.35) and Dual Heritage (odds ratio 0.40) young people were less frequently diagnosed with a neurodevelopmental disorder than their White peers.

Those from Black and Dual Heritage backgrounds were disproportionately disadvantaged.

There are now hundreds of systematic reviews on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) of variable quality. To help navigate this literature, we have reviewed systematic reviews on any topic on ADHD.

We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science and performed quality assessment according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. A total of 231 systematic reviews and meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria.

The prevalence of ADHD was 7.2% for children and adolescents and 2.5% for adults, though with major uncertainty due to methodological variation in the existing literature. There is evidence for both biological and social risk factors for ADHD, but this evidence is mostly correlational rather than causal due to confounding and reverse causality. There is strong evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological treatment on symptom reduction in the short-term, particularly for stimulants. However, there is limited evidence for the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in mitigating adverse life trajectories such as educational attainment, employment, substance abuse, injuries, suicides, crime, and comorbid mental and somatic conditions. Pharmacotherapy is linked with side effects like disturbed sleep, reduced appetite, and increased blood pressure, but less is known about potential adverse effects after long-term use. Evidence of the efficacy of nonpharmacological treatments is mixed.

Despite hundreds of systematic reviews on ADHD, key questions are still unanswered. Evidence gaps remain as to a more accurate prevalence of ADHD, whether documented risk factors are causal, the efficacy of nonpharmacological treatments on any outcomes, and pharmacotherapy in mitigating the adverse outcomes associated with ADHD.