Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-29T18:42:25.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is a society? Building an interdisciplinary perspective and why that's important

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2024

Mark W. Moffett Open the ORCID record for Mark W. Moffett [Opens in a new window]
Mark W. Moffett*
Affiliation:
National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA [email protected] https://naturalhistory.si.edu/staff/mark-moffett
*
Corresponding author: Mark W. Moffett; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I propose the need to establish a comparative study of societies, conceived of specificially here as bounded groups beyond a simple, immediate family that have the potential to endure for generations, whose constituent individuals recognize one another as members, and that maintain control over a physical space. This definition, with refinements and ramifications I explore, serves for cross-disciplinary research because it applies not just to nations but to diverse hunter–gatherer and tribal groups with a pedigree that likely traces back to the societies of our common ancestor with the chimpanzees. It also applies to groups among other species for which comparison to humans can be instructive. Notably, it describes societies in terms of shared group identification rather than social interactions. An expansive treatment of the topic is overdue given that the concept of a society (even the use of such synonyms as primate “troop”) has fallen out of favor among biologists, resulting in a semantic mess; whereas sociologists rarely consider societies beyond nations, and social psychologists predominantly focus on ethnicities and other component groups of societies. I examine the relevance of societies across realms of inquiry, discussing the ways member recognition is achieved; how societies compare to other organizational tiers; and their permeability, territoriality (allowing for mobile territories), relation to social networks and kinship, and impermanence. We have diverged from our ancestors in generating numerous affiliations within and between societies while straining the expectation of society memberships by assimilating diverse populations. Nevertheless, if, as I propose, societies were the first, and thereafter the primary, ingroups of prehistory, how we came to register society boundaries may be foundational to all human “groupiness.” A discipline-spanning approach to societies should further our understanding of what keeps societies together and what tears them apart.

Keywords

assimilationautonomycooperationgroup recognitionimagined communitiesminimal groupsnationsnetworkssocial groups/identitiesterritoriality
Type
Target Article
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e51
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abrutyn, S., & Turner, J. H. (2022). First institutional spheres in human societies. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Ethnic diversity and economic performance. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 762–800.Google Scholar
Allard, F. (2006). Frontiers and boundaries: The Han Empire from its southern periphery. In Stark, M. T. (Ed.), Archaeology of Asia (pp. 233–254). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Alleyne, E., & Wood, J. L. (2010). Gang involvement: Psychological and behavioral characteristics of gang members, peripheral youth, and nongang youth. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 423–436.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1982). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.Google Scholar
Apicella, C. L., Marlowe, F. W., Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2012). Social networks and cooperation in hunter–gatherers. Nature, 481, 497–501.Google Scholar
Aureli, F., Schaffner, C. M., Boesch, C., Bearder, S. K., Call, J., Chapman, C. A., … Holekamp, K. (2008). Fission–fusion dynamics: New research frameworks. Current Anthropology, 49, 627–654.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). J. O. Urmson & M. Sbisa (Eds.). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aviles, L., & Guevara, J. (2017). Sociality in spiders. In Rubenstein, D. R. & Abbot, R. (Eds.), Comparative social evolution (pp. 188–223). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barfield, T. J. (1993). The nomadic alternative. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Barker, A. J., Veviurko, G., Bennett, N. C., Hart, D. W., Mograby, L., & Lewin, G. R. (2021). Cultural transmission of vocal dialect in the naked mole-rat. Science, 371, 503–507.Google Scholar
Barrett, M. (2007). Children's knowledge, beliefs, and feelings about nations and national groups. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Barth, F. (1969). Introduction. In Barth, F. (Ed.), Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference (pp. 9–38). Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Beaune, C. (1991). Birth of an ideology: Myths and symbols of a nation. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Becker, J. C., Butz, D. A., Sibley, C. G., Barlow, F. K., Bitacola, L. M., Christ, O., … Sulz, A. (2017). What do national flags stand for? An exploration of associations across 11 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48, 335–352.Google Scholar
Berger, J., & Cunningham, C. (1987). Influence of familiarity on frequency of inbreeding in wild horses. Evolution, 41, 229–231.Google Scholar
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality – A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Bergman, T. J. (2010). Experimental evidence for limited vocal recognition in a wild primate: Implications for the social complexity hypothesis. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 3045–3053.Google Scholar
Bettinger, R. L. (1980). Explanatory/predictive models of hunter–gatherer adaptation. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 189–255.Google Scholar
Bettinger, R. L. (2015). Orderly anarchy: Sociopolitical evolution in aboriginal California. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. Sage.Google Scholar
Bird, D. W., Bird, R. B., Codding, B. F., & Zeanah, D. W. (2019). Variability in the organization and size of hunter–gatherer groups: Foragers do not live in small-scale societies. Journal of Human Evolution, 131, 96–108.Google Scholar
Blainey, G. (1976). Triumph of the nomads: A history of aboriginal Australia. Overlook Press.Google Scholar
Borum, R. (2004). Psychology of terrorism. University of South Florida.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1987). The evolution of ethnic markers. Cultural Anthropology, 2, 65–79.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2022). Large-scale cooperation in small-scale foraging societies. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 31, 175–198.Google Scholar
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100, 3531–3535.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 475–482.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (2001). The many faces of social identity: Implications for political psychology. Political Psychology, 22, 115–125.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Campbell, D. T. (1976). Ethnocentrism and intergroup attitudes. Sage.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B., & Yuki, M. (2007). Culture and social identity. In Kitayama, S. & Cohen, D. (Eds.), Handbook of cultural psychology (pp. 307–322). Guilford.Google Scholar
Brindley, E. F. (2015). Ancient China and the Yue: Perceptions and identities on the southern frontier, c. 400 BCE–50 CE. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broome, R. (2010). Aboriginal Australians: A history since 1788. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Brown, J. L., & Orians, G. H. (1970). Spacing patterns in mobile animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1, 239–262.Google Scholar
Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2022). Identity theory: Revised and expanded. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Butz, D. A. (2009). National symbols as agents of psychological and social change. Political Psychology, 30, 779–804.Google Scholar
Callahan, S. P., & Ledgerwood, A. (2016). On the psychological function of flags and logos: Group identity symbols increase perceived entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 528–550.Google Scholar
Cameron, C. M. (2008). Captives in prehistory as agents of social change. In Cameron, C. M. (Ed.), Invisible citizens: Captives and their consequences (pp. 1–2). University of Utah Press.Google Scholar
Cantor, M., Shoemaker, L. G., Cabral, R. B., Flores, C. O., Varga, M., & Whitehead, H. (2015). Multilevel animal societies can emerge from cultural transmission. Nature Communications, 6, 8091.Google Scholar
Caporael, L. R. (1997). The evolution of truly social cognition: The core configurations model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 276–298.Google Scholar
Cashdan, E., Barnard, A., Bicchieri, M. C., Bishop, C. A., Blundell, V., Ehrenreich, J., … Wiessner, P. (1983). Territoriality among human foragers: Ecological models and an application to four Bushman groups. Current Anthropology, 24, 47–66.Google Scholar
Casimir, M. J. (1992). The dimensions of territoriality: An introduction. In Casimir, M. J. & Rao, A. (Eds.), Mobility and territoriality: Social and spatial boundaries among foragers, fishers, pastoralists and peripatetics (pp. 1–26). Routledge.Google Scholar
Chapais, B. (2011). The deep social structure of humankind. Science, 331, 1276–1277.Google Scholar
Charvet, C. J., & Finlay, B. L. (2012). Embracing covariation in brain evolution: Large brains, extended development, and flexible primate social systems. Progress in Brain Research, 195, 71–87.Google Scholar
Chollet, A. (2011). Switzerland as a “fractured nation”. Nations and Nationalism, 17, 738–755.Google Scholar
Christensen, C., & Radford, A. N. (2018). Dear enemies or nasty neighbors? Causes and consequences of variation in the responses of group-living species to territorial intrusions. Behavioral Ecology, 29, 1004–1013.Google Scholar
Citrin, J., & Sears, D. O. (2009). Balancing national and ethnic identities the psychology of e pluribus unum. In Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y. M., Johnston, A. I., & McDermott, R. (Eds.), Measuring identity: A guide for social scientists (pp. 145–174). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, C. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (2022). Adversarial collaboration: The next science reform. In Frisby, C. L., Redding, R. E., O'Donohue, W. T., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (Eds.), Ideological and political bias in psychology: Nature, scope, and solutions (pp. 905–927). Springer.Google Scholar
Clark, C. J., Liu, B. S., Winegard, B. M., & Ditto, P. H. (2019). Tribalism is human nature. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 587–592.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. (2016). Mammal societies. Wiley.Google Scholar
Cohen, E. (2012). The evolution of tag-based cooperation in humans: The case for accent. Current Anthropology, 53, 588–616.Google Scholar
Collins, R. (1988). Theoretical sociology. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Connor, W. (1992). The nation and its myth. In Smith, A. D. (Ed.), Ethnicity and nationalism (pp. 48–57). Brill.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., Haslam, S. A., & Balmer, J. M. (2007). Social identity, organizational identity and corporate identity: Towards an integrated understanding of processes, patternings, and products. British Journal of Management, 18, S1–S16.Google Scholar
Czechowski, W., & Godzińska, E. J. (2015). Enslaved ants: Not as helpless as they were thought to be. Insectes Sociaux, 62, 9–22.Google Scholar
Dainotto, R. M. (2015). The mafia: A cultural history. Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Davis, G. (2009). Vikings in America. Birlinn.Google Scholar
DeCasien, A. R., Williams, S. A., & Higham, J. P. (2017). Primate brain size is predicted by diet but not sociality. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1, 1–7.Google Scholar
DeFries, R. (2014). The big ratchet: How humanity thrives in the face of natural crisis. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Delabie, J. H. C., Fresneau, D., & Pezon, A. (2000). Notes on the ecology of Thaumatomyrmex spp. in southeast Bahia, Brazil. Sociobiology, 36, 571–584.Google Scholar
Denham, W. W. (2013). Beyond fictions of closure in Australian Aboriginal kinship. Mathematical Anthropology and Cultural Theory, 5, 1–90.Google Scholar
De Silva, S., & Wittemyer, G. (2012). A comparison of social organization in Asian elephants and African savannah elephants. International Journal of Primatology, 33, 1125–1141.Google Scholar
Devos, T., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). American = white? Journal Personality Social Psychology, 88, 447–466.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M. (1982). Chimpanzee politics: Power and sex among apes. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M., & Tyack, P. L. (2003). Preface. In de Waal, F. B. M. & Tyack, P. L. (Eds.), Animal social complexity: Intelligence, culture, and individualized societies (pp. ix–xiv). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (2011). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed (revised ed.). Penguin.Google Scholar
Dobs, K., Isik, L., Pantazis, D., & Kanwisher, N. (2019). How face perception unfolds over time. Nature Communications, 10, 1–10.Google Scholar
Dousset, L. (2019). Open and closed systems: Rebuilding the social organization of prehistoric societies. In Dousset, L., Park, S., & Guille-Escuret, G. (Eds.), Kinship, ecology, and history: Renewal of conjunctures (pp. 93–223). Wiley.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1988). Primate social systems. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681–735.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2009). The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Annals of Human Biology, 36, 562–572.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M., & Shultz, S. (2010). Bondedness and sociality. Behaviour, 147, 775–803.Google Scholar
Dunham, Y. (2018). Mere membership. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22, 780–793.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1982). The division of labor in society. Free Press (Original work was published in1893).Google Scholar
Esses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 389–412.Google Scholar
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140.Google Scholar
Feinman, G. M., & Marcus, J. (Eds.). (1998). Archaic states. School for Advance Research Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, R. B. (2001). Materialist, cultural, and biological theories on why Yanomami make war. Anthropological Theory, 1, 99–116.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (2018). Social beings: Core motives in social psychology (4th ed.). Wiley.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.Google Scholar
Foster, K. R., & Ratnieks, F. (2005). A new eusocial vertebrate? Trends in Ecology Evolution, 20, 363–364.Google Scholar
Fowles, S. (2002). From social type to social process: Placing tribe in a historical framework. In Parkinson, W. (Ed.), Archaeology of tribal societies (pp. 13–33). Berghahn.Google Scholar
Furuichi, T. (2011). Female contributions to the peaceful nature of bonobo society. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 20, 131–142.Google Scholar
Furuichi, T. (2020). Variation in intergroup relationships among species and among and within local populations of African apes. International Journal of Primatology, 41, 203–223.Google Scholar
Gamble, C. (1998). Paleolithic society and the release from proximity: A network approach to intimate relations. World Archaeology, 29, 426–449.Google Scholar
Gat, A., & Yakobson, A. (2013). Nations: The long history and deep roots of political ethnicity and nationalism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geisler, M. E. (Ed.). (2005). National symbols, fractured identities. Middlebury College Press.Google Scholar
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., … Aycan, Z. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104.Google Scholar
Gero, S., Whitehead, H., & Rendell, L. (2016). Individual, unit and vocal clan level identity cues in sperm whale codas. Royal Society Open Science, 3, 150372.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gilderhus, M. T. (2010). History and historians: A historiographical introduction. Pearson.Google Scholar
Goldman, L., Giles, H., & Hogg, M. A. (2014). Going to extremes: Social identity and communication processes associated with gang membership. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 813–832.Google Scholar
Goodall, J. (2010). Through a window: My thirty years with the chimpanzees of Gombe. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Gordon, D. M., & Heller, N. E. (2012). Seeing the forest and the trees. Behavioral Ecology, 23, 934.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. (1982). Exaptation – A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8, 4–15.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.Google Scholar
Greene, J. (2013). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. Penguin.Google Scholar
Grueter, C. C., & White, D. R. (2014). On the emergence of large-scale human social integration and its antecedents in primates. Structure & Dynamics, 7, 1–27.Google Scholar
Grueter, C. C., Qi, X., Zinner, D., Bergman, T., Li, M., Xiang, Z., … Fischer, J. (2020). Multilevel organization of animal sociality. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 35, 834–847.Google Scholar
Guibernau, M. (2013). Belonging: Solidarity and division in modern societies. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Haaland, G. (1969). Economic determinants in ethnic processes. In Barth, F. (Ed.), Ethnic groups and boundaries: The social organization of culture difference (pp. 58–73). Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Hale, H. E. (2004). Explaining ethnicity. Comparative Political Studies, 37, 458–485.Google Scholar
Hally, D. J. (1996). Platform-mound construction and the instability of Mississippian chiefdoms. In Scarry, J. F. (Ed.), Political structure and change in the prehistoric southeastern United States (pp. 92–127). University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. J., Milne, B. T., Walker, R. S., Burger, O., & Brown, J. H. (2007). The complex structure of hunter–gatherer social networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 2195–2202.Google Scholar
Hancock, I. F. (2002). We are the Romani people. University of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar
Haslam, N., Rothschild, L., & Ernst, D. (2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113–127.Google Scholar
Hassin, R. R., Ferguson, M. J., Shidlovski, D., & Gross, L. (2007). Subliminal exposure to national flags affects political thought and behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 19757–19761.Google Scholar
Heinz, H.-J. (1972). Territoriality among the Bushmen in general and the !Ko in particular. Anthropos, 67, 405–416.Google Scholar
Heinz, H.-J. (1994). Social organization of the !Kõ Bushmen. Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Heller, N. E., Ingram, K. K., & Gordon, D. M. (2008). Nest connectivity and colony structure in unicolonial Argentine ants. Insectes Sociaux, 55, 397–403.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Derex, M., Kline, M. A., Mesoudi, A., Muthukrishna, M., … Thomas, M. G. (2016). Understanding cumulative cultural evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, E6724–E6725.Google Scholar
Henrickson, E. F. (1985). The early development of pastoralism in the Central Zagros Highlands (Luristan). Iranica Antiqua, 20, 1–42.Google Scholar
Hersh, T. A., Gero, S., Rendell, L., Cantor, M., Weilgart, L., Amano, M., … Payne, R. (2022). Evidence from sperm whale clans of symbolic marking in non-human cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119, e2201692119.Google Scholar
Hewlett, B. S., van de Koppel, J. M. H., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1986). Exploration and mating range of aka Pygmies of the Central African Republic. In Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (Ed.), African Pygmies (pp. 65–79). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hill, K. R., & Hurtado, A. M. (2017). Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. Routledge.Google Scholar
Hill, R. A., Bentley, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Network scaling reveals consistent fractal pattern in hierarchical mammalian societies. Biology Letters, 4, 748–751.Google Scholar
Hill, K. R., Walker, R. S., Božičević, M., Eder, J., Headland, T., Hewlett, B., … Wood, B. (2011). Coresidence patterns in hunter–gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science, 331, 1286–1289.Google Scholar
Hill, K. R., Wood, B. M., Baggio, J., Hurtado, A. M., & Boyd, R. T. (2014). Hunter–gatherer inter-band interaction rates: Implications for cumulative culture. PLoS ONE, 9, e102806.Google Scholar
Hong, Y., & Ratner, K. G. (2021). Minimal but not meaningless: Seemingly arbitrary category labels can imply more than group membership. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120, 576–600.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (1999). On the social relations of the hunter–gatherer band. In Lee, R. B. & Daly, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of hunters and gatherers (pp. 399–410). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, G. R. (1997). The evolutionary roots of patriotism. In Bar-Tal, D. & Staub, E. (Eds.), Patriotism in the lives of individuals and nations (pp. 45–90). Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. W., & Earle, T. K. (2000). The evolution of human societies: From foraging group to agrarian state. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Joniak-Lüthi, A. (2015). The Han: China's diverse majority. University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Kahlenberg, S. M., Thompson, M. E., Muller, M. N., & Wrangham, R. W. (2008). Immigration costs for female chimpanzees and male protection as an immigrant counterstrategy to intrasexual aggression. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1497–1509.Google Scholar
Kappeler, P. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (2002). Evolution of primate social systems. International Journal of Primatology, 23, 707–740.Google Scholar
Kasper, C., & Voelkl, B. (2009). A social network analysis of primate groups. Primates, 50, 343–356.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, J. H. (1983). On the definitions and functions of dominance and territoriality. Biological Reviews, 58, 1–20.Google Scholar
Kelly, R. L. (2013). The lifeways of hunter–gatherers: The foraging spectrum. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kemmelmeier, M., & Winter, D. G. (2008). Sowing patriotism, but reaping nationalism? Consequences of exposure to the American flag. Political Psychology, 29, 859–879.Google Scholar
Kerth, G., & van Schaik, J. (2012). Causes and consequences of living in closed societies: Lessons from a long-term socio-genetic study on Bechstein's bats. Molecular Ecology, 21, 633–646.Google Scholar
Knack, M. C. (2001). Boundaries between: The Southern Paiutes, 1775–1995. University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Knight, N. (2008). Imagining globalization in China. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Kowalewski, S. (2006). Coalescent societies. In Pluckhahn, T. J. & Ethridge, R. (Eds.), Light on the path: The anthropology and history of the southeastern Indians (pp. 94–122). University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Krause, J., & Ruxton, G. D. (2002). Living in groups. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kruuk, H. (1989). The social badger: Ecology and behaviour of a group-living carnivore (Meies meles). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Layton, R., O'Hara, S., & Bilsborough, A. (2012). Antiquity and social functions of multilevel social organization among human hunter–gatherers. International Journal of Primatology, 33, 1215–1245.Google Scholar
Lea, A. J., Blumstein, D. T., Wey, T. W., & Martin, J. G. (2010). Heritable victimization and the benefits of agonistic relationships. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 21587–21592.Google Scholar
Leach, C. W., Van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., … Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–155.Google Scholar
Lenski, G. (2015). Ecological-evolutionary theory: Principles and applications. Routledge.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1956). The family. In Shapiro, H. L. (Ed.), Man, culture, and society (pp. 261–285). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (1988). Constitutional faith. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Leyens, J.-P., Cortes, B., Demoulin, S., Dovidio, J., Fiske, S., Gaunt, R., … Vaes, J. (2003). Emotional prejudice, essentialism, and nationalism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 703–717.Google Scholar
Liao, X., Rong, S., & Queller, D. C. (2015). Relatedness, conflict, and the evolution of eusociality. PLoS Biology, 13, e1002098.Google Scholar
Lizot, J. (1984). Histoire, organization et evolution du peuplement Yanomami. L'Homme, 2, 5–40.Google Scholar
Lurz, R., Krachun, C., Hopkins, W. D., & Taglialatela, J. (2022). Evidence of psychological essentialism in a symbol-trained bonobo (Pan paniscus). International Journal of Primatology, 43, 235–252.Google Scholar
MacDonald, D. W., & Newman, C. (2022). The badgers of Wytham Woods: A model for behavior, ecology, and evolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacLin, O. H., & MacLin, M. K. (2011). The role of racial markers in race perception and racial categorization. In Adams, R. B. Jr., Ambady, N., Nakayama, K., & Shimojo, S. E. (Eds.), The science of social vision (pp. 321–346). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maher, C. R., & Lott, D. F. (1995). Definitions of territoriality used in the study of variation in vertebrate spacing systems. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1581–1597.Google Scholar
Maher, C. R., & Lott, D. F. (2000). A review of ecological determinants of territoriality within vertebrate species. American Midland Naturalist, 143, 1–29.Google Scholar
Malpass, M. A. (2009). Daily life in the Incan empire (2nd ed.). Greenwood.Google Scholar
Markham, A. C., Guttal, V., Alberts, S. C., & Altmann, J. (2013). When good neighbors don't need fences: Temporal landscape partitioning among baboon social groups. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 67, 875–884.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. (2005). Hunter–gatherers and human evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 14, 54–67.Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. (2010). The Hadza hunter–gatherers of Tanzania. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, A. A., Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). Nonverbal “accents”: Cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. Psychological Science, 14, 373–376.Google Scholar
Marsh, A. A., Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2007). Separated by a common language: Nonverbal accents and cultural stereotypes about Americans and Australians. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 284–301.Google Scholar
Marzluff, J. M., & Balda, R. P. (1992). The pinyon jay: Behavioral ecology of a colonial and cooperate corvid. T & AD Poyser.Google Scholar
McNeill, W. (1986). Polyethnicity and national unity in world history. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Melewar, T. C., & Karaosmanoglu, E. (2006). Seven dimensions of corporate identity: A categorization from the practitioners’ perspectives. European Journal of Marketing, 40, 846–869.Google Scholar
Mersch, D. P., Crespi, A., & Keller, L. (2013). Tracking individuals shows spatial fidelity is a key regulator of ant social organization. Science, 340, 1090–1093.Google Scholar
Messier, F. (1985). Solitary living and extraterritorial movements of wolves in relation to social status and prey abundance. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 63, 239–245.Google Scholar
Milton, K. (1991). Comparative aspects of diet in Amazonian forest-dwellers. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 334, 253–263.Google Scholar
Moffett, M. W. (2000). What's “up?” A critical look at the basic terms of canopy biology. Biotropica, 32, 569–596.Google Scholar
Moffett, M. W. (2012a). Supercolonies of billions in an invasive ant: What is a society? Behavioural Ecology, 29, 925–933.Google Scholar
Moffett, M. W. (2012b). Supercolonies, nests, and societies: Distinguishing the forests from the trees. Behavioural Ecology, 29, 938–939.Google Scholar
Moffett, M. W. (2013). Human identity and the evolution of societies. Human Nature, 24, 219–267.Google Scholar
Moffett, M. W. (2019). The human swarm: How our societies arise, thrive and fall. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Moffett, M. W. (2020a). Apples and oranges, ants and humans: The misunderstood art of making comparisons. Skeptic, 25, 8–9.Google Scholar
Moffett, M. W. (2020b). Societies, identity, and belonging. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 164, 1–9.Google Scholar
Moffett, M. W. (2022a). Symbols and how we came to be human. In Mishler, B. & Swartz, B. (Eds.), Speciesism in biology and culture: How human exceptionalism has led to the most pressing challenges in history (pp. 111–123). Springer.Google Scholar
Moffett, M. W. (2022b). Societies and other kinds of social groups. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, 37–38.Google Scholar
Moffett, M. W., Garnier, S., Eisenhardt, K., Furr, N. R., Warglien, M., Sartoris, C., … Offenberg, J. (2021). Ant colonies: Building complex organizations with minuscule brains and no leaders. Journal of Organization Design, 10, 55–74.Google Scholar
Morris-Drake, A., Kennedy, P., Braga Goncalves, I., & Radford, A. N. (2022). Variation between species, populations, groups and individuals in the fitness consequences of outgroup conflict. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 377, 20210148.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, D. J. (1976). The chain of connection: The material evidence. In Peterson, N. (Ed.), Tribes and boundaries in Australia (pp. 72–94). Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Mulvaney, D. J., & White, J. P. (1987). Australians to 1788. Fairfax, Syme & Weldon.Google Scholar
Murphy, R. F., & Murphy, Y. (1960). Shoshone-Bannock subsistence and society. Anthropological Records, 16, 293–338.Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 8577–8582.Google Scholar
Noble, G. K. (1939). The role of dominance in the life of birds. Auk, 56, 263–273.Google Scholar
Nolan, P., & Lenski, G. (2004). Human societies: An introduction to macrosociology. Paradigm.Google Scholar
Offer, S. (2021). Negative social ties: Prevalence and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 47, 177–196.Google Scholar
Olson, L. E., & Blumstein, S. T. (2010). Applying the coalitionary-traits metric: Sociality without cooperation in male yellow-bellied marmots. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 957–965.Google Scholar
O'Reilly, C. (1989). Corporations, culture, and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Review, 31, 9–25.Google Scholar
Orgad, L. (2011). Creating new Americans: The essence of Americanism under the citizenship test. Houston Law Review, 47, 1–46.Google Scholar
Packer, C. (2023). The lion: Behavior, ecology, and conservation of an iconic species. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pappano, D. J., Snyder-Mackler, N., Bergman, T. J., & Beehner, J. C. (2012). Social “predators” within a multilevel primate society. Animal Behaviour, 84, 653–658.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1966). Societies: Evolutionary and comparative perspectives. Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Penn, D. J., & Frommen, J. G. (2010). Kin recognition: An overview of conceptual issues. In Kappeler, P. (Ed.), Animal behaviour: Evolution and mechanisms (pp. 55–85). Springer.Google Scholar
Peterson, N. (Ed.). (1976). Tribes and boundaries in Australia. Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Pietraszewski, D. (2022). Toward a computational theory of social groups. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, 1–64.Google Scholar
Pisor, A. C., & Surbeck, M. (2019). The evolution of intergroup tolerance in nonhuman primates and humans. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 28, 210–223.Google Scholar
Pollard, K. A., & Blumstein, D. T. (2011). Social group size predicts the evolution of individuality. Current Biology, 21, 413–417.Google Scholar
Poole, R. (1999). Nation and identity. Routledge.Google Scholar
Powell, R. A. (2000). Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. In Boitani, L. & Fuller, T. K. (Eds.), Research techniques in animal ecology: Controversies and consequences (pp. 65–110). Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be? Central questions in organizational identification. In Whetten, D. A. & Godfrey, P. (Eds.), Identity in organizations (pp. 171–207). Sage.Google Scholar
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2007). Psychological essentialism of human categories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 202–206.Google Scholar
Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484–493.Google Scholar
Pyrooz, D. C., Sweeten, G., & Piquero, A. R. (2013). Continuity and change in gang membership and gang embeddedness. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50, 239–271.Google Scholar
Ransom, J. I., & Kaczensky, P. (Eds.). (2016). Wild equids: Ecology, management, and conservation. John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rawlings, C. M., & Friedkin, N. E. (2017). The structural balance theory of sentiment networks: Elaboration and test. American Journal of Sociology, 123, 510–548.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. (1997). Kingdoms and communities in western Europe, 900–1300. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2008). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Riley, A. (2021). Toward a biosocial science. Routledge.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. B. G. (2010). Constraints on social networks. In Dunbar, R. I. M., Gamble, C., & Gowlett, J. A. J. (Eds.), Social brain, distributed mind (pp. 117–138). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rodda, G. H. (1992). The mating behavior of Iguana iguana. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 534, 1–40.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, A. M., Barker, J. L., & Robinson, E. J. (2023). The evolution of intergroup cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378, 20220074.Google Scholar
Rodseth, L., Wrangham, R. W., Harrigan, A. M., Smuts, B. B., Dare, R., Fox, R., … Otterbein, K. F. (1991). The human community as a primate society. Current Anthropology, 32, 221–254.Google Scholar
Roscoe, P. B. (2009). Social signaling and the organization of small-scale society: The case of contact-era New Guinea. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 16, 69–116.Google Scholar
Rossano, J. (2015). The evolutionary emergence of costly rituals. PaleoAnthropology, 2015, 78–100.Google Scholar
Roux, A., & Bergman, T. J. (2012). Indirect rival assessment in a social primate, Theropithecus gelada. Animal Behaviour, 83, 249–255.Google Scholar
Samuni, L., & Surbeck, M. H. (2023). Cooperation across social borders in bonobos. Science, 382, 805–809.Google Scholar
Samuni, L., Langergraber, K. E., & Surbeck, M. H. (2022). Characterization of Pan social systems reveals in-group/out-group distinction and out-group tolerance in bonobos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119, e2201122119.Google Scholar
Sani, F. (2009). Why groups fall apart: A social psychological model of the schismatic process. In Butera, F. & Levine, J. M. (Eds.), Coping with minority status (pp. 243–266). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sani, F., Bowe, M., Herrera, M., Manna, C., Cossa, T., Miao, X., & Zhou, Y. (2007). Perceived collective continuity: Seeing groups as entities that move through time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1118–1134.Google Scholar
Sanmartín-Villar, I., da Silva, E. C., Chiara, V., Cordero-Rivera, A., & Lorenzo-Carballa, M. O. (2022). Genetic divergence and aggressiveness within a supercolony of the invasive ant Linepithema humile. NeoBiota, 77, 125–153.Google Scholar
Schaller, G. B. (1972). The Serengeti lion: A study in predator–prey relations. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schaller, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (2012). Danger, disease, and the nature of prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1–54.Google Scholar
Schapera, I. (1930). The Khoisan peoples of South Africa. Routledge.Google Scholar
Schoener, T. W. (1968). Sizes of feeding territories among birds. Ecology, 49, 123–141.Google Scholar
Schradin, C., & Lamprecht, J. (2000). Female-biased immigration and male peacekeeping in groups of the shell-dwelling cichlid fish. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48, 236–242.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (2017). Precursors to language: Social cognition and pragmatic inference in primates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 79–84.Google Scholar
Shannon, T. J. (2008). Iroquois diplomacy on the early American frontier. Penguin.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M. J., & Nachman, M. W. (2014). Morphological and population genomic evidence that human faces have evolved to signal individual identity. Nature Communications, 5, 4800.Google Scholar
Silberbauer, G. B. (1981). Hunter and habitat in the central Kalahari Desert. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1908). Soziologie. Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Singer, M. T. (2003). Cults in our midst: The continuing fight against their hidden menace. Wiley.Google Scholar
Slobodchikoff, C. N., Perla, B. S., & Verdolin, J. L. (2009). Prairie dogs: Communication and community in an animal society. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smaldino, P. (2019). Social identity and cooperation in cultural evolution. Behavioural Processes, 161, 108–116.Google Scholar
Smaldino, P. (2022). Models of identity signaling. Current Directions of Psychological Science, 31, 231–237.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D. (2000). The nation in history: Historiographical debates about ethnicity and nationalism. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M.-A. (2013). The archaeology of Australia's deserts. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, K. B., Oxley, D. R., Hibbing, M. V., Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2011). Linking genetics and political attitudes: Reconceptualizing political ideology. Political Psychology, 32, 369–397.Google Scholar
Smoak, G. E. (2006). Ghost dances and identity: Prophetic religion and American Indian ethnogenesis in the nineteenth century. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Smoak, G. E. (2007). The Newe (“the people”) and the Utah superintendency. In Morgan, L. D. (Ed.), Shoshonean peoples and the overland trail: Frontiers of the Utah superintendency of Indian affairs, 1849–1869 (pp. 33–55). University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Snow, D. (2001). Collective identity and expressive forms. In Smelser, N. & Baltes, P. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 2212–2219). Elsevier.Google Scholar
Snyder-Mackler, N., Beehner, J. C., & Bergman, T. J. (2012). Defining higher levels in the multilevel societies of geladas (Theropithecus gelada). International Journal of Primatology, 33, 1054–1068.Google Scholar
Soleimani, K., & Mohammadpour, A. (2019). Can non-Persians speak? The sovereign's narration of “Iranian identity”. Ethnicities, 19, 925–947.Google Scholar
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 16–325.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1893). The principles of sociology (Vol. 2). Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Stanner, W. E. H. (1965). Aboriginal territorial organization. Oceania, 36, 1–26.Google Scholar
Steward, J. H. (1938). Basin-plateau aboriginal sociopolitical groups. Bureau of American Ethnography Bulletin.Google Scholar
Steward, J. H. (1955). Theory of culture change. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Stolley, K. S. (2005). The basics of sociology. Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Sueur, C., Jacob, S. A., Amblard, F., Petit, O., & King, A. J. (2011). How can social network analysis improve the study of primate behavior? American Journal of Primatology, 73, 703–719.Google Scholar
Tezcür, G. M., & Asadzade, P. (2019). Ethnic nationalism versus religious loyalty: The case of Kurds in Iran. Nations and Nationalism, 25, 652–672.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, E. A., & Dale, J. (2007). Individual recognition: It is good to be different. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 529–537.Google Scholar
Tibbetts, E. A., Pardo-Sanchez, J., Ramirez-Matias, J., & Avarguès-Weber, A. (2021). Individual recognition is associated with holistic face processing in Polistes paper wasps in a species-specific way. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 288, 20203010.Google Scholar
Tokuyama, N., Sakamaki, T., & Furuichi, T. (2019). Inter-group aggressive interaction patterns indicate male mate defense and female cooperation across bonobo groups at Wamba, Democratic Republic of the Congo. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 170, 535–550.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2014). A natural history of human thinking. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tonkinson, R. (1987). Mardujarra kinship. In Mulvaney, D. J. & White, J. P. (Eds.), Australia to 1788 (pp. 197–220). Fairfax, Syme, & Weldon.Google Scholar
Tönnies, F. (1887). Gemeinschaft und gesellschaft: Abhandlung communismus und des socialismus als empirischer culturformen. Fues.Google Scholar
Toosi, N. R., & Ambady, N. (2011). Ratings of essentialism for eight religious identities. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21, 17–29.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Routledge.Google Scholar
Tsutsui, N. D. (2004). Scents of self: The expression component of self/non-self recognition systems. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 41, 713–727.Google Scholar
Turchin, P., & Gavrilets, S. (2009). Evolution of complex hierarchical societies. Social Evolution and History, 8, 167–198.Google Scholar
Turchin, P., Currie, T., Whitehouse, H., François, P., Feeney, K., Mullins, D., … Mendel-Gleason, G. (2017). Quantitative historical analysis uncovers a single dimension of complexity that structures global variation in social organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, E144–E151.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1984). Social identification and psychological group formation. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), The social dimension: European developments in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 518–538). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uz, I. (2015). The index of cultural tightness and looseness among 68 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 319–335.Google Scholar
Van de Waal, E., & Canteloup, C. (2023). Social learning and culture in monkeys. In Tehrani, J. J., Kendal, J., & Kendal, R. (Eds.), Cultural evolution handbook. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198869252.013.24Google Scholar
Van Stekelenburg, J. (2013). Collective identity. In Snow, D., Della Porta, D., Klandermans, B., & McAdam, D. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements (pp. 219–225). Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Verdu, P., Leblois, R., Froment, A., Théry, S., Bahuchet, S., Rousset, F., … Vitalis, R. (2010). Limited dispersal in mobile hunter–gatherer Baka Pygmies. Biology Letters, 6, 858–861.Google Scholar
Vonholdt, B. M., Stahler, D. R., Smith, D. W., Earl, D. A., Pollinger, J. P., & Wayne, R. K. (2008). The genealogy and genetic viability of reintroduced Yellowstone grey wolves. Molecular Ecology, 17, 252–274.Google Scholar
Walker, R. S., Hill, K. R., Flinn, M. V., & Ellsworth, R. M. (2011). Evolutionary history of hunter–gatherer marriage practices. PLoS ONE, 6, 2–7.Google Scholar
Wallensteen, P. (2012). Future directions in the scientific study of peace and war. In Vasquez, J. A. (Ed.), What do we know about war? (2nd ed., pp. 257–270). Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Watson-Jones, R. E., & Legare, C. H. (2016). The social functions of group rituals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 42–46.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1919). Politik als beruf: Wissenschaft als beruf. Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Weber, E. (1976). Peasants into Frenchmen: The modernization of rural France 1870–1914. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978). Max Weber: Selections in translation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, R., & Scott, M. (2018). Tursiops truncatus, common bottlenose dolphin. In Würsig, B., Thewissen, J. G. M., & Kovacs, K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of marine mammals (pp. 118–125). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Werbner, P. (2010). Religious identity. In Wetherell, M. & Mohanty, C. T. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of identities (pp. 233–257). Sage.Google Scholar
While, G. M., Chapple, D. G., Gardner, M. G., Uller, T., & Whiting, M. J. (2015). Egernia lizards. Current Biology, 25, R593–R595.Google Scholar
Whitehead, H., & Dufault, S. (1999). Techniques for analyzing vertebrate social structure using identified individuals. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 28, 33–74.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, M. E. A., & Jaffe, K. (1996). Ant wars: Combat strategies, territory, and nest defense in the leaf-cutting ant Atta laevigata. Animal Behaviour, 51, 1207–1217.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H., & Lanman, J. A. (2014). The ties that bind us: Ritual, fusion, and identification. Current Anthropology, 55, 674–695.Google Scholar
Whiten, A. (2011). The scope of culture in chimpanzees, humans and ancestral apes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 997–1007.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. W. (1982). Risk, reciprocity and social influences on !Kung San economics. In Leacock, E. & Lee, R. (Eds.), Politics and history in band societies (pp. 61–84). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. W. (1983). Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity, 48, 253–276.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. W. (2014). Members of society: Firelight talk among the Ju/’hoansi Bushmen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111, 14027–14035.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. W. (2016). The rift between science and humanism: What's data got to do with it? Current Anthropology, 57, S154–S166.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P. W., & Tumu, A. (1998). Historical vines: Enga networks of exchange, ritual, and warfare in Papua New Guinea. Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Wiley, R. H. (2013). Specificity and multiplicity in the recognition of individuals: Implications for the evolution of social behaviour. Biological Reviews, 88, 179–195.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G. S., Carter, G. G., Bohn, K. M., & Adams, D. M. (2016). Non-kin cooperation in bats. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Series B, Biological Sciences, 371(1687), 20150095.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O., & Hölldobler, B. (2005). Eusociality: Origin and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 13367–13371.Google Scholar
Wimmer, A. (2008). The making and unmaking of ethnic boundaries: A multilevel process theory. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 970–1022.Google Scholar
Winner, E. (2019). How art works: A psychological exploration. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittemyer, G., Okello, J. B., Rasmussen, H. B., Arctander, P., Nyakaana, S., Douglas-Hamilton, I., & Siegismund, H. R. (2009). Where sociality and relatedness diverge: The genetic basis for hierarchical social organization in African elephants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 3513–3521.Google Scholar
Wobst, H. (1974). Boundary conditions for Paleolithic social systems. America Antiquity, 39, 147–178.Google Scholar
Wobst, H. (1977). Stylistic behavior and information exchange. In Cleland, C. E. (Ed.), Research essays in honor of James B. Griffin (pp. 317–342). Museum of Anthropology.Google Scholar
Woolfenden, G. E., & Fitzpatrick, J. W. (1984). The Florida scrub jay: Demography of a cooperative-breeding bird. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R. W., Lundy, R., Crofoot, M., & Gilby, I. (2007). Use of overlap zones among group-living primates: A test of the risk hypothesis. Behaviour, 144, 1599–1619.Google Scholar
Yogeeswaran, K., & Dasgupta, N. (2010). Will the “real” American please stand up? The effect of implicit national prototypes on discriminatory behavior and judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1332–1345.Google Scholar
Young, D. M., Sanchez, D. T., & Wilton, L. S. (2017). Biracial perception in black and white: How Black and White perceivers respond to phenotype and racial identity cues. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 23, 154–164.Google Scholar
Zhou, W.-X., Sornette, D., Hill, R. A., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2005). Discrete hierarchical organization of social group sizes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 439–444.Google Scholar
Ziller, R. C. (1965). Toward a theory of open and closed groups. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 164–182.Google Scholar