Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T18:00:29.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Quantifying Herbicide Mass in the Transplant Hole as it moves from the Surface of the Plasticulture Mulch

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2025

Kayla M. Eason
Affiliation:
Current Research Agronomist (Former Graduate Research Assistant), in the Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793
Timothy L. Grey*
Affiliation:
Professor, in the Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793
A. Stanley Culpepper
Affiliation:
Professor, in the Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793
Timothy Coolong
Affiliation:
Professor in the Department of Horticulture, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
Nicholas T. Basinger
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor in the Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602
*
Author for correspondence: Timothy L. Grey; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Vegetable production on plastic mulch in Georgia often combines fumigation, drip tape, raised beds, and plastic mulch, where 3 to 5 high-value crops are produced over two years. With the elimination of methyl bromide as a soil fumigant, herbicides applied over plastic mulch prior to transplanting a crop have become essential to maintain weed control. However, proper care must be taken to avoid crop damage from any herbicide residue. Experiments using simulated vegetable beds, covered with totally impermeable film (TIF) were conducted to quantify the concentration of halosulfuron-methyl, glufosinate, glyphosate, S-metolachlor, and acetochlor remaining on the mulch, and quantify the amount of each that moved into the crop transplant hole when irrigation water was applied. When irrigating with 0.63-cm of water, <2% of halosulfuron-methyl, glufosinate, and glyphosate remained on the surface of the TIF. In contrast, 91 and 15% of acetochlor remained on the TIF after irrigating with 0.63 and 1.27-cm of water, respectively. For S-metolachlor, 17 and 3% remained after the aforementioned irrigation volumes, respectively. The order of concentration detected in the transplant hole was equivalent to ranking the herbicides by water-solubility: glyphosate > glufosinate > halosulfuron-methyl > S-metolachlor > acetochlor. All herbicide concentrations were below 1.0 mg ai or ae in the transplant hole regardless of irrigation volume. For halosulfuron, glyphosate, and glufosinate these concentrations were equal to a 1.3 to 8.9 times the field use rate washing into the transplant hole. Acetochlor and S-metolachlor concentrations in the transplant hole were equivalent to 0.1 to 0.7x of field use rates, respectively. With further evaluations, the quantified herbicide concentrations in the transplant hole can be used to make changes to recommended rates and potentially create new options for growers to utilize.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America