We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.
To save this undefined to your undefined account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your undefined account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This paper considers tests for the rank of a matrix
for which a root-T consistent estimator is available.
However, in contrast to tests associated with the minimum
chi-square and asymptotic least squares principles, the
estimator's asymptotic variance matrix is not required
to be either full or of known rank. Test statistics based
on certain estimated characteristic roots are proposed
whose limiting distributions are a weighted sum of independent
chi-squared variables. These weights may be simply estimated,
yielding convenient estimators for the limiting distributions
of the proposed statistics. A sequential testing procedure
is presented that yields a consistent estimator for the
rank of a matrix. A simulation experiment is conducted
comparing the characteristic root statistics advocated
in this paper with statistics based on the Wald and asymptotic
least squares principles.
This paper is concerned with tests in multivariate
time series models made up of random walk (with drift)
and stationary components. When the stationary component
is white noise, a Lagrange multiplier test of the hypothesis
that the covariance matrix of the disturbances driving
the multivariate random walk is null is shown to be locally
best invariant, something that does not automatically follow
in the multivariate case. The asymptotic distribution of
the test statistic is derived for the general model. The
test is then extended to deal with a serially correlated
stationary component. The main contribution of the paper
is to propose a test of the validity of a specified value
for the rank of the covariance matrix of the disturbances
driving the multivariate random walk. This rank is equal
to the number of common trends, or levels, in the series.
The test is very simple insofar as it does not require
any models to be estimated, even if serial correlation
is present. Its use with real data is illustrated in the
context of a stochastic volatility model, and the relationship
with tests in the cointegration literature is discussed.
Seasonal autoregressive models with an intercept or
linear trend are discussed. The main focus of this paper
is on the models in which the intercept or trend parameters
do not depend on the season. One of the most important
results from this study is the asymptotic distribution
for the ordinary least squares estimator of the autoregressive
parameter obtained under nearly integrated condition, and
another is the approximation to the limiting distribution
of the t-statistic under the null for testing
the unit root hypothesis.
The autoregressive fractionally integrated moving
average (ARFIMA) model has become a popular approach for
analyzing time series that exhibit long-range dependence.
For the Gaussian case, there have been substantial advances
in the area of likelihood-based inference, including development
of the asymptotic properties of the maximum likelihood
estimates and formulation of procedures for their computation.
Small-sample inference, however, has not to date been studied.
Here we investigate the small-sample behavior of the conventional
and Bartlett-corrected likelihood ratio tests (LRT) for
the fractional difference parameter. We derive an expression
for the Bartlett correction factor. We investigate the
asymptotic order of approximation of the Bartlett-corrected
test. In addition, we present a small simulation study
of the conventional and Bartlett-corrected LRT's.
We find that for simple ARFIMA models both tests perform
fairly well with a sample size of 40 but the Bartlett-corrected
test generally provides an improvement over the conventional
test with a sample size of 20.
The paper considers different versions of the Lagrange
multiplier (LM) tests for autocorrelation and/or for conditional
heteroskedasticity. These versions differ in terms of the
residuals, and of the functions of the residuals, used
to build the tests. In particular, we compare ordinary
least squares versus least absolute deviation (LAD) residuals,
and we compare squared residuals versus their absolute
value. We show that the LM tests based on LAD residuals
are asymptotically distributed as a χ2
and that these tests are robust to nonnormality. The Monte
Carlo study provides evidence in favor of the LAD residuals,
and of the absolute value of the LAD residuals, to build
the LM tests here discussed.
A strong consistency result for heteroskedasticity
and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix estimators
is proven in this paper. In addition, an error in a weak
consistency proof for such estimators in the econometrics
literature and a correction of that result is provided.
This paper compares the performance of several
single and system estimators of a two equation simultaneous
model with unbalanced panel data. The Monte Carlo design
varies the degree of unbalancedness in the data and the
variance components ratio due to the individual effects.
One useful result for applied researchers is that the feasible
error components 2SLS and 3SLS procedures based on simple
ANOVA type estimators of the variance components perform
well with incomplete panels and are recommended in practice.
Karanasos (1998) presented a new method for computing
the theoretical autocovariance function (acf) of the following
univariate autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model:
The inaugural meeting of the NZESG was held in February 1997
and comprised 14 papers, a software demonstration, and a roundtable
panel discussion. Around 15 participants attended throughout, with
stronger attendance on the first day.