Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×

Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. Business Ethics Quarterly
  4. Volume 4
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 4 - October 1994

Contents

Page 3 of 3

Review Article

Other

Replies

Articles

  • Harmony, Hobbes and Rational Negotiation: A Reply to Dees and Cramton’s “Promoting Honesty in Negotiation”

  • Kevin Gibson
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    23 January 2015, pp. 373-381

  • Dees and Cramton have argued that we should take a deontological stand to make negotiations more ethical (“Promoting Honesty in Negotiation: An Exercise in Practical Ethics” BEQ, Vol. 3, #3). I suggest that their analysis is overdetermined, and that one can, in fact, reach the same conclusions through a Hobbesian approach to negotiation. I suggest that an equally valid way to develop ethical negotiation is through the consequentialist “Harmony Thesis” which posits that moral behavior is coextensive with beneficial results.

    Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves; be ye therefore as wily as serpents and harmless as doves

Other

Review Article

Front Matter

Other

Back Matter

Front Matter

Page 3 of 3