Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 March 2025
An academic volume on Jane Campion presents the opportunity to reconcile two prevailing, competing approaches in authorship studies and film historiography, both of which revolve around ‘the auteur’. On the one hand, some feminist film scholars, beyond simply critiquing the male-dominated canon and its norms of representation, have long appropriated the framework of auteurism to advocate for female directors and to argue for their inclusion within the highest echelons of film art. In the late 1980s, after philosophical broadsides from Roland Barthes (2005) and Michel Foucault (1992), literary theorist Nancy K. Miller defended the ‘political potential’ of female authorship when she wrote the following:
The postmodernist decision that the Author is Dead and the subject along with him does not, I will argue, necessarily hold for women, and prematurely forecloses the question of agency for them. Because women have not had the same historical relation of identity to origin, institution, production that men have had.
(1988, 104)One of the most honoured women in film history, Jane Campion has, as much as anyone, seized this ‘question of agency’ for female filmmakers, earning the esteem of even the most orthodox auteurist institutions.
On the other hand, Campion's vaunted, now-canonical status presents certain perils for the film historian tracking the collaborative and institutional realities of feature film production. While auteurist criticism excels at identifying the formal and ideational qualities of a filmmaker's work, an auteur-centred analysis tends to simplify the context of creation and circulation that ultimately impacts the meanings ascribed to a given work. In other words, one can both argue that Campion has an integral oeuvre, united by idiosyncratic formal strategies and themes of womanhood and transgression, and also challenge the assumption that Campion is the sole or primary creative agent behind all of ‘her’ films. To zoom out to a wider production context does not obscure the feminist project that is inextricable from Campion's auteurism, but rather sharpens it. Campion's overlooked first feature film Two Friends (1986) offers an ideal case study for an expanded, contextual analysis of her films, as the conditions of its production and distribution were directly shaped by feminist political action and female creative talent.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.