The role of consequences, comparison and counterfactuals in constructivist ethical thought

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511755897.004

3 - The role of consequences, comparison and counterfactuals in constructivist ethical thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 May 2010

Kathryn Sikkink

Edited by

Richard M. Price

Show author details

Richard M. Price: Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Book contents

Get access

Summary

First let me plead guilty to one of the charges that Price aims at constructivists. Although I believe that some of my work has demonstrated the possibilities of moral change in world politics, I have not explicitly articulated a normative or prescriptive position of particular changes as good. And this is the case despite the fact that my students and my colleagues get irritated when I (not infrequently) bristle with moral indignation. The story of why I and other constructivists have not engaged in normative theory is complicated. I don't claim to fully understand it and I don't want to dwell on it here, but just mention a few possible explanations. When I started working on human rights in the late 1980s, the choice of topic alone was a sufficiently normative signal that I felt obliged to spend the rest of my time demonstrating that I was being rigorous in my theory and method. Perhaps I believed that my normative argument was implicit and the discerning reader would know where I stood. Maybe Frost is correct and even constructivists have concealed our ethical stances under a disguise of (our own kind of) scientific objectivity? After over twenty years of doing serious empirical research to document key trends in world politics, I'm still annoyed at being categorised in a recent article by Jack Snyder and Leslie Vinjamuri among those ‘idealists’ who don't understand the ‘political realities’ of world politics.

Type: Chapter
Information: Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics , pp. 83 - 111

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755897.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Frost, Mervyn, ‘A Turn Not Taken: Ethics in IR at the Millennium’, Review of International Studies 24 (1998), 119CrossRef Google Scholar

Snyder, Jack and Vinjamuri, Leslie, ‘Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice’, International Security 28:3 (2003/04), 5–44CrossRef Google Scholar

Linklater, Andrew, The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundation of the Post-Westphalian Era (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Beitz, Charles, Political Theory and International Relations (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1979)Google Scholar

Shue, Henry, Basic Rights (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, second edition 1996)Google Scholar

Gibney, Matthew, The Ethics and Politics of Asylum: Liberal Democracy and the Response to Refugees (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004)CrossRef Google Scholar

Barnett, Michael, Eyewitness to Genocide: The United Nations and Rwanda (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002)Google Scholar

Nye, Joseph, Nuclear Ethics (New York, NY: Free Press, 1986)Google Scholar

Holzgrefe, J. L. and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003CrossRef

Hawaii, Honolulu; Sikkink, Kathryn and Walling, Carrie Booth, ‘The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America’, Journal of Peace Research 44:4 (2007), 427–445Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya, ‘Rights and Agency’. In Scheffler, Samuel (ed.), Consequentialism and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), 187–223.Google Scholar

Shaw, William H., Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1999), 185Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha C., Woman and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000)CrossRef Google Scholar

Sen, Amartya, ‘Freedoms and Needs’, The New Republic January 10/17, 1994, 31–38Google Scholar

Morsink, Johannes, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: Origins, Drafting and Intent (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999)CrossRef Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann, A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (New York, NY: Random House, 2001)Google Scholar

Lauren, Paul Gordon, The Evolution of Human Rights: Visions Seen (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann, ‘The Forgotten Crucible: The Latin American Influence on the Universal Human Rights Idea’, Harvard Human Rights Journal 16 (2003), 27–39Google Scholar

Donnelly, Jack, Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, second edition, 2003), 40Google Scholar

Keck, Margaret and Sikkink, Kathryn, Activists beyond Borders (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998)Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization 52:4 (1998), 887–917CrossRef Google Scholar

Hooker, Brad, Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-consequentialist Theory of Morality (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000)Google Scholar

Lutz, Ellen and Sikkink, Kathryn, ‘The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America’, Chicago Journal of International Law 2:1 (2001), 1–34Google Scholar

Krasner, Stephen, ‘After Wartime Atrocities Politics Can Do More Than the Courts’, International Herald Tribune January 16, 2001Google Scholar

Mendez, Juan, ‘In Defense of Transitional Justice’. In McAdams, A. James (ed.), Transitional Justice and Rule of Law in New Democracies (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1997), 5Google Scholar

Poe, Stephen, Tate, C. Neal and Keith, Linda Camp, ‘Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity Revisited: A Global Cross-National Study Covering the Years 1976–1993’, International Studies Quarterly 43:2 (1999), 291–313.CrossRef Google Scholar

Weber, Steve, ‘Counterfactuals: Past and Future’. In Tetlock, Philip and Belkin, Aaron (eds.), Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996), 268–288Google Scholar

O'Neill, Onora, ‘Lifeboat Earth’. In Beitz, Charleset al. (eds.), International Ethics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985), 265.Google Scholar

Levinson, Sanford, Torture: A Collection (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Lagouranis, Anthony, ‘Tortured Logic’, New York Times February 28, 2006.Google Scholar

Lelyveld, Joseph, ‘Interrogating Ourselves’, New York Times Magazine June 12, 2005, 36.Google Scholar

Bass, Gary, Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Pogge, Thomas W., ‘“Assisting” the Global Poor’. In Chatterjee, Deen K. (ed.), The Ethics of Assistance: Morality and the Distant Needy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 273–277Google Scholar

Doty, Roxanne, Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North– South Relations (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Guilhot, Nicolas, The Democracy Makers: Human Rights and International Order (New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2005), 222–224.CrossRef Google Scholar

Singer, Peter, ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’. In Beitz, et al., International Ethics, 247–261.