Adorno, T. W.Aesthetic Theory, trans. C. Lenhardt. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.Google Scholar

Allitt, Patrick. Catholic Converts: British and American Intellectuals Turn to Rome. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Anonymous. Review of Bellerophôn, by Arran and Isla Leigh. The Academy (10 September 1881), 196.

Anonymous. ‘Obituary of “Michael Field” [Edith Emma Cooper]; died 13th December at Richmond’. The Athenaeum, 20 December 1913 (4495), 729.

Anonymous. ‘Obituary of “Michael Field” [Katharine Harris Bradley]; died September 26th’. The Athenaeum, 17 October 1914 (4538), 399.

Anonymous. Review of Underneath the Bough, by Michael Field. The Athenaeum, 9 September 1893 (3437), 345–6.

Anonymous. Review of Wild Honey from Various Thyme, by Michael Field. The Athenaeum, 4 April 1908, 414.

Anonymous. Review of Wild Honey from Various Thyme, by Michael Field. The Academy, 8 February 1908, 437–8.

Armstrong, Isobel. Victorian Poetry: Poetry, Poetics and Politics. London: Routledge, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, Matthew. Complete Prose Works of Matthew Arnold, ed. Super, R. H., 6 vols. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Arnstein, Walter L.Protestant Versus Catholic in Mid-Victorian England: Mr Newdegate and the Nuns. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1982.Google Scholar

St Augustine. The Trinity, trans. Edmund Hill, ed. , John E.Rotelle, . New York: New City Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Beckson, Karl (ed.). Aesthetes and Decadents of the 1890s. Chicago: Academy Chicago, 1981, revised edition.Google Scholar

Beckson, KarlHenry Harland: His Life and Work. London: The Eighteen Nineties Society, 1978.Google Scholar

Beckson, Karl, and Lasner, Mark Samuels (eds). ‘The Yellow Book and Beyond: Selected Letters of Henry Harland to John Lane’. ELT 42 (1999).Google Scholar

Beer, Gillian. Open Fields: Science in Cultural Encounter. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Bennett, Paula. Emily Dickinson: Woman Poet. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990.Google Scholar

Berenson, Bernhard. Letter to ‘Michael’ (KB) (May 1892), BOD, MS.Eng.lett.e.33, fols. 116r–18v (NB the folio numbering in this collection mistakenly contains nos 110–19 twice over).

Berenson, Bernhard.Letter to Michael Field (22 December 1892), The Bernhard Berenson Treasury. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1962, p. 65.Google Scholar

Berenson, Bernhard.Letter to ‘Michael’ (KB) (1 February 1908), BL, Add.MSS.45855, fols. 215r–216v.

Berenson, Mary. A Self-Portrait from her Letters and Diaries, ed. Strachey, Barbara and Samuels, Jayne. New York: Norton, 1983.Google Scholar

BergerJohn, . Ways of Seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin Books, 1972.Google Scholar

Besant, Walter. ‘On Literary Collaboration’. The New Review 6 (1892), 200–9.Google Scholar

Birch, Dinah. ‘“That Ghastly Work”: Ruskin, Animals and Anatomy’. Worldviews 4 (2000), 131–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blain, Virginia. ‘“Michael Field, the Two-Headed Nightingale”: Lesbian Text as Palimpsest’. Women's History Review 5.2 (1996), 239–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blain, Virginia.‘Sexual Politics of the (Victorian) Closet; or, No Sex Please – We're Poets’, in Women's Poetry, Late Romantic to Late Victorian: Gender and Genre, 1830–1900, ed. Armstrong, Isobel and Blain, Virginia. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999, pp. 135–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blain, Virginia.Review of Victorian Sappho. Nineteenth-Century Contexts 23.2 (2001), 315–18.

Bloom, Lynn Z. ‘ “I write for Myself and Strangers”: Private Diaries as Public Documents’, in Inscribing the Daily: Critical Essays on Women's Diaries, ed. Bunkers, Suzanne L. and Huff, Cynthia A.. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1996, pp. 23–37.Google Scholar

Bornstein, George. ‘The Arrangement of Browning's Dramatic Lyrics (1842)’, in Poems in Their Place, ed. Fraistat, Neil. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1986, pp. 273–88.Google Scholar

Bossche, Chris R.Vanden, . Carlyle and the Search for Authority. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Brake, Laurel. Print in Transition, 1850–1910: Studies in Media and Book History. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar

Brand, Vanessa (ed.). The Study of the Past in the Victorian Age. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1998.Google Scholar

Bristow, Joseph. Effeminate England: Homoerotic Writing after 1885. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Bristow, Joseph.(ed.)The Fin-de-Siècle Poem. Ohio: Ohio University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Bristow, Joseph.‘Michael Field's Lyrical Aestheticism: Underneath the Bough’, published in reduced form in Michael Field and Their World, ed. Margaret D. Stetz and Cheryl A. Wilson. High Wycombe: The Rivendale Press, 2007, pp. 49–62.

Brooks, Chris. ‘Historicism and the Nineteenth Century’, in The Study of the Past in the Victorian Age, ed. Brand, Vanessa. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1998, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Brooks, Cleanth. ‘The Language of Paradox’ (1956), in Literary Theory: An Anthology, ed. Rivkin, Julie and Ryan, Michael. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1998 revised edition, pp. 58–70.Google Scholar

Brown, Sarah Annes. Devoted Sisters. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar

Brown, Susan. ‘The Victorian Poetess’, in The Cambridge Companion to Victorian Poetry, ed. Bristow, Joseph. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 180–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Browning, Robert. Letter to ‘Miss Cooper’ (28 May 1884). BL, Add.MS.46866, fol. 7r–v.

Bullen, A. H. (ed.). Lyrics from the Song-Books of the Elizabethan Age. London: Lawrence & Bullen, 1891, one of multiple editions, beginning in 1887.Google Scholar

Bunkers, Suzanne L., and Huff, Cynthia A. (eds). Inscribing the Daily: Critical Essays on Women's Diaries. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas. Lectures on the History of Literature (April–July 1838), ed. Greene, J. Reay. London: Ellis and Elvey, 1892.Google Scholar

Carlyle, Thomas.The Works of Thomas Carlyle. 30 vols. London: Chapman and Hall, 1898–99, centenary edition.Google Scholar

Carrier, David. ‘Baudelaire, Pater and the Origins of Modernism’. Comparative Criticism 17 (Walter Pater and the Culture of the Fin-de-Siècle), ed. Shaffer, E. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 109–21.Google Scholar

Christ, Carol T.Victorian and Modern Poetics. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Cobbe, Frances Power. The Confessions of a Lost Dog. London: Griffith & Farran, 1867.Google Scholar

Concise Science Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

Corbett, David Peters. ‘Ekphrasis, History and Value: Charles Ricketts's Art Criticism’ Word and Image 15.2 (1999), 128–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronin, Richard, Chapman, Alison and Harrison, Antony H. (eds). A Companion to Victorian Poetry. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002.Google Scholar

Crowe, J. A., and Cavalcaselle, G. B.. A New History of Painting in Italy, 3 vols. London: John Murray, 1864.Google Scholar

Culler, A. Dwight. The Victorian Mirror of History. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Dale, Peter Allan. The Victorian Critic and the Idea of History: Carlyle, Arnold, Pater. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lauretis, Teresa. The Practice of Love: Lesbian Sexuality and Perverse Desire. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Dejean, Joan. Fictions of Sappho 1546–1937. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Delaney, J. G. P. ‘Book Design: A Nineteenth-Century Revival’. The Connoisseur (1978), 282–9.Google Scholar

Delaney, J. G. P.Charles Ricketts: A Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Delaney, J. G. P.‘Heirs of the Great Generation’: Yeats's Friendship with Charles Ricketts and Charles Shannon’. Yeats Annual 4 (1986), ed. Warwick Gould, 53–73.Google Scholar

Dellamora, R.Masculine Desire: The Sexual Politics of Victorian Aestheticism. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Dellamora, R.(ed.)Victorian Sexual Dissidence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denisoff, Dennis. Aestheticism and Sexual Parody: 1840–1940. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Deutsch, Helene. The Psychology of Women, 2 vols. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1944.Google Scholar

Dilthey, W. Meaning in History: W. Dilthey's Thoughts on History and Society, ed. , H. P. Rickman. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1961.Google Scholar

Dilthey, W.Selected Writings, ed. and trans. H. P. Rickman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Donne, John. The Complete English Poems, ed. Smith, A. J.. London: Penguin, 1986; first published 1971.Google Scholar

Donoghue, Emma. We Are Michael Field. Bath: Absolute Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Dowden, Edward. Shakespere: His Mind and Art (1909), reproduced in Nineteenth-Century Writings on Homosexuality: A Sourcebook, ed. White, Chris. London: Routledge, 1999, pp. 189–94.Google Scholar

Ehnenn, Jill. ‘Looking Strategically: Feminist and Queer Aesthetics in Michael Field's Sight and Song’. Victorian Poetry 43.1 (2005), 109–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eliot, T. S. (ed.). Literary Essays of Ezra Pound. New York: New Directions, 1968; first published 1954.Google Scholar

Ellis, Havelock. ‘The History of Marriage’, in Eonism and Other Supplementary Studies (essays and fragments left over from the main volumes), Studies in the Psychology of Sex, 2 vols. New York: Random House, 1936; first published 1928. Vol. II, part 2, pp. 492–532.

Ellis, Havelock.Letter to ‘Miss Bradley’, undated, BOD, MS.Eng.lett.e.33, fols. 69r–70v.

Ellis, Havelock.My Life. London: William Heinemann, 1940.Google Scholar

Ellis, Havelock.Studies in the Psychology of Sex: Erotic Symbolism; The Mechanism of Detumescence; The Psychic State in Pregnancy. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company, 1914, 3rd edition; first published 1906.Google Scholar

Ellis, Havelock.Studies in the Psychology of Sex: Sexual Inversion. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company, 1913, 3rd edition; first published in English 1897.Google Scholar

Ellis, Havelock.Studies in the Psychology of Sex: Sexual Selection in Man. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company, 1914, 3rd edition; first published 1905.Google Scholar

Ellmann, Richard. Yeats: The Man and the Masks. London: Faber and Faber, 1961; first published 1949.Google Scholar

Encyclopaedia Britannica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911, 11th edition.

Engelberg, Edward. The Vast Design: Patterns in W. B. Yeats's Aesthetic. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1974; first published 1964.Google Scholar

Erickson, Lee. ‘The Market’, in A Companion to Victorian Poetry, ed. Cronin, Richard, Chapman, Alison and Harrison, Antony H.. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 345–60.Google Scholar

Evans, Ifor B. (ed.). English Poetry in the Later Nineteenth Century. London: Methuen and Co, 1933.Google Scholar

Eysteinsson, Astradur. The Concept of Modernism. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Faderman, Lillian. Surpassing the Love of Men. London: Junction Books, 1981.Google Scholar

Farwell, Marilyn R. ‘Toward a Definition of the Lesbian Literary Imagination’, in Sexual Practice/Textual Theory: Lesbian Cultural Criticism, ed. Susan, J. Wolfe and Penelope, Julia. Oxford: Blackwell, 1993, pp. 66–84.Google Scholar

Felski, Rita. The Gender of Modernity. London: Harvard University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Ian (ed.). Decadence and the 1890s. London: Edward Arnold, 1979.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Ian.(ed.). Poems of John Gray. Greensboro, NC: ELT Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Robert P. ‘ “I Leave a Page Half-Writ”: Narrative Discoherence in Michael Field's Underneath the Bough’, in Women's Poetry, Late Romantic to Late Victorian: Gender and Genre, 1830–1900, ed. Armstrong, Isobel and Blain, Virginia. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999, pp. 164–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flint, Kate. ‘ “ … As a Rule, I Does Not Mean I”: Personal Identity and the Victorian Woman Poet’, in Rewriting the Self: Histories from the Renaissance to the Present, ed. Porter, Roy. London and New York: Routledge, 1997, pp. 156–66.Google Scholar

Foster, R. F.W. B.Yeats: A Life, vol. I, The Apprentice Mage 1865–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Fothergill, Robert A.Private Chronicles: A Study of English Diaries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, vol. I, An Introduction. London: Penguin Books, 1990; first published 1976.Google Scholar

Fraistat, Neil (ed.). Poems in Their Place. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Frankel, Nicholas. Oscar Wilde's Decorated Books. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, Hilary. Beauty and Belief: Aesthetics and Religion in Victorian Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, Hilary.‘The Religious Poetry of Michael Field’, in Athena's Shuttle: Myth, Religion, Ideology, from Romanticism to Modernism, ed. Marucci, Franco and Sdegno, Emma. Milan: Cisalpino, 2001, pp. 127–42.Google Scholar

Fraser, Hilary.‘A Visual Field: Michael Field and the Gaze’. Victorian Literature and Culture 34.2 (2006), 553–71.Google Scholar

Freedman, Jonathan. Professions of Taste. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works, ed. and trans. James Strachey et al. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis, 1961.Google Scholar

Gagnier, Regenia. Idylls of the Marketplace: Oscar Wilde and the Victorian Public. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Garber, Marjorie. Dog Love. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996.Google Scholar

Genette, Gérard. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, trans. Jane E. Lwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilbert, Sandra M., and Gubar, Susan. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Gilbert, Sandra M., and Gubar, Susan.No Man's Land: The Place of the Woman Writer in the Twentieth Century, 3 vols. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1988–94.Google Scholar

Gore-Booth, Eva. Poems. London: Longmans, Green and Co, 1929.Google Scholar

Gosse, Edmund. The Jacobean Poets. London: John Murray, 1894.Google Scholar

Gray, John. Letters to Michael Field. Henry W. and Albert A. Berg manuscript collection, in the New York Public Library (there are no folio numbers, so date alone must identify the letters):

Gray, John.to ‘my dear Friend’ (KB): 26 January 1907.

Gray, John.to ‘Michael’ (KB): 14 January 1908.

Gray, John.to ‘Michael’ (KB): 20 January 1908.

Gray, John.to ‘Michael’ (KB): 24 November 1908.

Gray, John.Letter to ‘Michael’ (KB), 14 January 1908, transcribed into MF diaries: vol. 23, 1908, fol. 6r (BL, Add.MS.46798).

Gray, John.The Poems of John Gray, ed. Fletcher, Ian. Greensboro, NC: ELT Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Gray, John.Review of Long Ago. The Academy, 8 June 1889, 388–9.Google Scholar

Gray, John.Silverpoints (1893), Spiritual Poems (1896), facsimile reprint by Thornton, R. K. R. and Small, Ian. Oxford: Woodstock Books, 1994.Google Scholar

Greaves, Richard. Transition, Reception and Modernism in W. B. Yeats. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.Google Scholar

Greer, Germaine. Slip-Shod Sibyls: Recognition, Rejection and the Woman Poet. London: Viking, 1995.Google Scholar

Grosz, Elizabeth A. ‘Lesbian Fetishism?’. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 3.2 (1991), 39–54.Google Scholar

Hanson, Ellis. Decadence and Catholicism. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Harvey, David. Spaces of Hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

H.D. (Hilda Doolittle) Selected Poems, ed. Martz, Louis L.. Manchester: Carcanet, 1988.Google Scholar

Hegel, G. W. F.The Phenomenology of Mind, trans. J. B. Bailey. Mineola, NY: Dover Philosophical Classics, 2004.Google Scholar

Hickok, Kathleen. ‘“Intimate Egoism”: Reading and Evaluating Noncanonical Poetry by Women’. Victorian Poetry 33 (1995), 13–30.Google Scholar

Hickok, Kathleen.Representations of Women: Nineteenth-Century British Women's Poetry. Westport, CN, and London: Greenwood Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Hill, Edmund. The Mystery of the Trinity. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1985.Google Scholar

Hilton, Tim. John Ruskin: The Later Years. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Hogan, A., and Bradstock, A. (eds). Women of Faith in Victorian Culture: Reassessing the Angel in the House. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollander, John. ‘The Poetics of Ekphrasis’. Word and Image 4.1 (January–March 1988), 209–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Homans, Margaret. Bearing the Word: Language and Female Experience in Nineteenth-Century Women's Writing. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Hope, Laurence (pseudonym of Violet Nicholson). Complete Love Lyrics. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1929.Google Scholar

Hopkins, Gerard Manley. The Poetical Works of Gerard Manley Hopkins, ed. Mackenzie, Norman H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Incorvati, Rick. ‘Introduction: Women's Friendships and Lesbian Sexuality’. Nineteenth-Century Contexts 23.2 (2001), 175–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ireland, Kenneth R. ‘Sight and Song: A Study of the Interrelations between Painting and Poetry’. Victorian Poetry 15 (1977), 9–20.Google Scholar

Irigaray, Luce. ‘When Our Lips Speak Together’, in This Sex Which Is Not One, trans. Catherine Porter with Carolyn Burke. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985, pp. 205–18.Google Scholar

Iser, Wolfgang ‘Enfoldings in Paterian Discourse: Modes of Translatability’, in Comparative Criticism 17 (Walter Pater and the Culture of the Fin-de-Siècle), ed. Shaffer, E. S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 41–60.Google Scholar

Iser, Wolfgang.Walter Pater: The Aesthetic Moment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Isherwood, Christopher. The World in the Evening. London: Methuen, 1954.Google Scholar

Jameson, Anna Brownell. Legends of the Madonna. London: Longmans, 1852.Google Scholar

Janson, H. W.History of Art. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1995, 5th edition.Google Scholar

Jenkyns, Richard. The Victorians and Ancient Greece. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980.Google Scholar

St John of the Cross. ‘The Living Flame of Love’, in Sencourt, Robert, Carmelite and Poet: St John of the Cross. London: Hollis and Carter, 1943, p. 229.Google Scholar

Johnson, Lionel. The Complete Poems of Lionel Johnson, ed. Fletcher, Ian. London: The Unicorn Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Johnson, Lionel.‘Introduction’ to selected poems by Michael Field, in The Poets and the Poetry of the Century, ed. Miles, Alfred H.. London: Hutchinson & Co, 1898, vol. VIII, pp. 395–401.Google Scholar

Jones, Ann Rosalind. The Currency of Eros: Women's Love Lyric in Europe, 1540–1620. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Judd, Catherine A. ‘Male Pseudonyms and Female Authority in Victorian England’, in Literature in the Marketplace: Nineteenth-Century British Publishing and Reading Practices, ed. Jordan, John O. and Patten, Robert L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 250–68.Google Scholar

Jullian, Philippe. Dreamers of Decadence: Symbolist Painters of the 1890s. London: Phaidon Press, 1974; 1st published 1971.Google Scholar

Koestenbaum, Wayne. Double Talk: The Erotics of Male Collaboration. New York and London: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar

Kooistra, Lorraine Janzen. The Artist as Critic: Bitextuality in Fin-de-Siècle Illustrated Books. Aldershot, Hants: Scolar Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Kooistra, Lorraine Janzen.‘Poetry and Illustration’, in A Companion to Victorian Poetry, ed. Cronin, Richard, Chapman, Alison and Harrison, Antony H.. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 392–418.Google Scholar

Krafft-Ebing, Richard. Psychopathia Sexualis. London: Staples Press, 1965, translated from the 12th German edition; first published 1886.Google Scholar

Laird, Holly. ‘The Coauthored Pseudonym: Two Women Named Michael Field’, in The Faces of Anonymity: Anonymous and Pseudonymous Publication from the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Century, ed. Griffin, Robert. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003, pp. 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laird, Holly.‘Contradictory Legacies: Michael Field and Feminist Restoration’. Victorian Poetry 33 (Spring 1995), 111–28.Google Scholar

Laird, Holly.Women Coauthors. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Cassandra, Laity. H.D. and the Victorian Fin de Siècle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Lang, Andrew. The Poetical Works of Andrew Lang, ed. Lang, Mrs, 2 vols. London: Longmans, Green and Co, 1923.Google Scholar

Lee, Vernon (Violet Paget). The Beautiful: An Introduction to Psychological Aesthetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Vernon.‘Carlyle and the Present Tense’, in ‘Studies in Literary Psychology III’. Contemporary Review 85 (1904), 386–92.Google Scholar

Leighton, Angela. ‘ “Because Men Made the Laws”: The Fallen Woman and the Woman Poet’, in Victorian Women Poets: A Critical Reader, ed. Leighton, Angela. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996, pp. 215–34.Google Scholar

Leighton, Angela.(ed.). Victorian Women Poets: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar

Leighton, Angela.Victorian Women Poets: Writing Against the Heart. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1992.Google Scholar

Leighton, Angela, and Reynolds, Margaret (eds). Victorian Women Poets: An Anthology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1995.Google Scholar

Lejeune, Philippe. On Autobiography, ed. Eakin, Paul John, trans. Katherine M. Leary. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Lemprière, John D. D.Classical Dictionary. London: 1804.Google Scholar

Lessing, G. E.Laocoön, trans. Edward Allen McCormick. Indianapolis: The Library of Liberal Arts, 1962; first published 1766.Google Scholar

Leverson, Ada. ‘Reminiscences’, in Violet Wyndham, The Sphinx and Her Circle. London: André Deutsch, 1963. pp. 103–23.Google Scholar

Linton, Eliza Lynn. ‘The Wild Women as Social Insurgents’. The Nineteenth Century 30 (October 1891), 596–605.Google Scholar

Lipking, Lawrence. Abandoned Women and Poetic Tradition. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Lipking, Lawrence.‘Aristotle's Sister: A Poetics of Abandonment’. Critical Inquiry 10.1 (1983), 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Locard, Henri. ‘Works and Days: The Journals of “Michael Field” ’. Journal of the Eighteen Nineties Society 10 (1979), 1–9.Google Scholar

Lonsdale, Roger (ed.). Eighteenth-Century Women Poets. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Lottes, Wolfgang. ‘Appropriating Botticelli: English Approaches 1860–1890’, in Icons, Texts, Iconotexts: Essays on Ekphrasis and Intermediality, ed. Wagner, Peter. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1996, pp. 236–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lysack, Krista. ‘Aesthetic Consumption and the Cultural Production of Michael Field'sSight and Song’. SEL 45.4 (Autumn 2005), 935–60.Google Scholar

McCormack, Jerusha Hull. John Gray: Poet, Dandy, and Priest. Hanover, NH: Brandeis University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

McCormack, Jerusha Hull.The Man Who Was Dorian Gray. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2000.Google Scholar

McDonagh, Josephine. Child Murder and British Culture, 1720–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

McDonald, Jan. ‘“Disillusioned Bards and Despised Bohemians”: Michael Field's A Question of Memory at the Independent Theatre Society’. Theatre Notebook 31.2 (1977), 18–29.Google Scholar

McLeod, Hugh. Religion and Society in England, 1850–1914. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Madden, Norman Edward Jr. ‘Lyrical Transvestism: Gender and Voice in Modernist Literature’. Ph.D. thesis at the University of Texas at Austin, 1994.Google Scholar

Maeterlinck, Maurice. The Life of the Bee, trans. Alfred Sutro. London: George Allen, 1901.Google Scholar

Malet, Lucas. The History of Sir Richard Calmady, ed. Schaffer, Talia. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Maltz, Diana. British Aestheticism and the Urban Working Classes, 1870–1900: Beauty for the People. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maltz, Diana.‘Engaging “Delicate Brains”: From Working-Class Enculturation to Upper-Class Lesbian Liberation in Vernon Lee and Kit Anstruther-Thomson's Psychological Aesthetics’, in Women and British Aestheticism, ed. Schaffer, Talia and Psomiades, Kathy Alexis. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1999, pp. 211–29.Google Scholar

Mandeville, Bernard. The Fable of the Bees, ed. Harth, Phillip. London: Penguin, 1970; first published 1714.Google Scholar

Marcus, Laura. Auto/biographical Discourses: Criticism, Theory, Practice. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Maynard, John. Victorian Discourses on Sexuality and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Melnyk, Julie. ‘“Mighty Victims”: Women Writers and the Feminization of Christ’. Victorian Literature and Culture 31.1 (2003), 131–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mermin, Dorothy. ‘The Damsel, the Knight, and the Victorian Woman Poet’, Critical Inquiry 13 (1986). 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mermin, Dorothy.‘“The Fruitful Feud of Hers and His”: Sameness, Difference, and Gender in Victorian Poetry’. Victorian Poetry 33 (1995), 149–68.Google Scholar

Meyers, Terry L.The Sexual Tensions of William Sharp: A Study of the Birth of Fiona MacLeod. New York: Peter Lang, 1996.Google Scholar

Meynell, Alice. ‘Introduction’, in Poems by Cowper, William. Glasgow and London: Blackie and Sons, 1904.Google Scholar

Meynell, Alice.The Wares of Autolycus. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Miles, Alfred H. (ed.). The Poets and the Poetry of the Century, 10 vols. London: Hutchinson & Co, 1898.Google Scholar

Mill, J. S. ‘What is Poetry?’ in The Broadview Anthology of Victorian Poetry and Poetic Theory, ed. Collins, Thomas J. and Rundle, Vivienne J.. Ontario: Broadview Press, 1999 (first published 1833), pp. 1212–20.Google Scholar

Miller, Nicholas Andrew. Modernism, Ireland and the Erotics of Memory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miner, Earl. ‘Some Issues for Study of Integrated Collections’, in Poems in Their Place, ed. Fraistat, Neil. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press, 1986, pp. 18–43.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T. ‘Ekphrasis and the Other’, in Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994, pp. 151–81.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T.Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Montefiore, Jan. Feminism and Poetry: Language, Experience, Identity in Women's Writing. London: Pandora, 1994.Google Scholar

Moore, T. Sturge (ed.). A Selection from the Poems of Michael Field. London: The Poetry Bookshop, 1923.Google Scholar

Moore, T. Sturge, and Sturge, D. C. (eds). Works and Days. London: John Murray, 1933.Google Scholar

Moran, Maureen F. ‘“Lovely Manly Mould”: Hopkins and the Christian Body’. Journal of Victorian Culture 6 (2001), 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moriarty, David J. ‘ “Michael Field” (Edith Cooper and Katherine Bradley) and Their Male Critics’, in Nineteenth-Century Women Writers of the English-Speaking World, ed. , Rhoda B. Nathan. New York: Greenwood Press, 1986, pp. 121–42.Google Scholar

Morley, Rachel. ‘Constructing the Self, Composing the Other: Auto/Fixation and the Case of Michael Field’. Colloquy: Text Theory Critique 8 (2004), no pagination: electronic publication.Google Scholar

Morshead, E. D. A. Review of Attila, My Attila! The Academy 25 (January 1896), 71.

Nead, Lynda. The Female Nude: Art, Obscenity and Sexuality. London: Routledge, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, James G.The Early Nineties: A View from the Bodley Head. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, James G.Elkin Mathews: Publisher to Yeats, Joyce, Pound. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Norman, E. R. (ed.). Anti-Catholicism in Victorian England. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1968.Google Scholar

Olney, James. Metaphors of Self: The Meaning of Autobiography. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter. Greek Studies. London: Macmillan, 1895.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter.Marius the Epicurean, 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1885, 2nd edition.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter.Uncollected Essays. London: Thomas B. Mosher, 1903.Google Scholar

Pater, Walter.Walter Pater: Three Major Texts (The Renaissance; Appreciations and Imaginary Portraits), ed. Buckler, William E.. New York: New York University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Patten, Robert L.George Cruikshank's Life, Times, and Art, vol. II, 1835–1878. Cambridge: The Lutterworth Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Perry, Seamus. ‘Elegy’, in A Companion to Victorian Poetry, ed. Cronin, Richard, Chapman, Alison and Harrison, Antony H.. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 115–33.Google Scholar

Peterson, Linda H.Victorian Autobiography: The Tradition of Self-Interpretation. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Pionke, Katharine. ‘Michael Field: Got God? ’ MA thesis, Truman State University, 2003.Google Scholar

Pound, Ezra. Literary Essays of Ezra Pound, ed. Eliot, T. S.. New York: New Directions, 1968; first published 1954.Google Scholar

Prins, Yopie. ‘Greek Maenads, Victorian Spinsters’, in Victorian Sexual Dissidence, ed. Dellamora, Richard. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1999, pp. 43–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prins, Yopie.‘A Metaphorical Field: Katherine [sic] Bradley and Edith Cooper’. Victorian Poetry 33.1 (1995), 129–48.Google Scholar

Prins, Yopie.‘Sappho Doubled: Michael Field’. Yale Journal of Criticism 8 (1995), 165–86.Google Scholar

Prins, Yopie.Victorian Sappho. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Probyn, May. A Ballad of the Road, and Other Poems. London: W. Satchell and Co, 1883.Google Scholar

Psomiades, Kathy Alexis. Beauty's Body: Femininity and Representation in British Aestheticism. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Psomiades, Kathy Alexis.‘Subtly of Herself Contemplative: Women, Poets, and British Aestheticism’, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, 1990.Google Scholar

Radford, Ernest. Measured Steps. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1884.Google Scholar

Raffalovich, Marc-André. Letter to ‘Michael Field Esq.’ (16 November 1884). BL, Add.MSS.45851, fols. 72r–73v.

Raffalovich, Marc-André.Uranisme et unisexualité. Paris: Masson, 1896.Google Scholar

Reynolds, Margaret. ‘ “I lived for art, I lived for love”: The Woman Poet Sings Sappho's Last Song’, in Victorian Women Poets: A Critical Reader, ed. Leighton, Angela. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996, pp. 277–306.Google Scholar

Reynolds, Margaret.The Sappho History. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2003.Google Scholar

Rich, Adrienne. ‘Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence’, in Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality, ed. Snitow, Ann, Stansell, Christine and Thompson, Sharon. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1983, pp. 177–205.Google Scholar

Ricketts, Charles. A Bibliography of the Books Issued by Hacon and Ricketts. London: Vale Press, 1904.Google Scholar

Ricketts, Charles.Letter to ‘My Dear Poet’ (KB), September/October 1907. BL (Ricketts and Shannon papers vol. 5), Add.MS.58089, fol. 71r.

Ricketts, Charles.Letters from Charles Ricketts to ‘Michael Field’ (1903–1913), ed. Delaney, J. G. Paul. Edinburgh: The Tragara Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Ricketts, Charles.Michael Field, ed. Delaney, Paul. Edinburgh: The Tragara Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Ricketts, CharlesPages on Art. London: Constable and Co, 1913.Google Scholar

Ricketts, Charles.The Prado and its Masterpieces. Westminster: Archibald Constable and Co, 1903.Google Scholar

Ricketts, Charles.Some Letters from Charles Ricketts and Charles Shannon to ‘Michael Field’ (1894–1902), ed. Delaney, J. G. Paul. Edinburgh: The Tragara Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Ricketts, Charles.Titian. London: Methuen, 1910.Google Scholar

Ricketts, Charles.‘The Unwritten Book’. The Dial 2 (1892), 25–8.Google Scholar

Rivière, Joan. ‘Womanliness as a Masquerade’, in Formations of Fantasy, ed. Burgin, Victor, Donald, James and Kaplan, Cora. London: Methuen, 1986, first published 1929, pp. 35–44.Google Scholar

Robertson, Eric S.English Poetesses: A Series of Critical Biographies, with Illustrative Extracts. London: Cassell and Company, 1883.Google Scholar

Robinson, A.Mary, F. (Darmesteter/Duclaux). The Collected Poems, Lyrical and Narrative. London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1902.Google Scholar

Robinson, A. Mary F.Letter to ‘Michael Field’. BOD, MS.Eng.lett.e.32, fols. 95–98r.

Robinson, A. Mary F.Review of Callirrhoë and Fair Rosamund. The Academy (7 June 1884), 395–6.

Roden, Frederick S.Same-Sex Desire in Victorian Religious Culture. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ronsley, Joseph. Yeats's Autobiography: Life as Symbolic Pattern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.

Roof, Judith. A Lure of Knowledge: Lesbian Sexuality and Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Rossetti, Christina. The Complete Poems, ed. Crump, R. W.. London: Penguin, 2001.Google Scholar

Rossetti, Dante Gabriel. Ballads and Sonnets. London: Ellis and White, 1881.Google Scholar

Rothenstein, William. ‘Introduction’, to Michael Field, Works and Days, ed. Moore, T. Sturge and Moore, D. C. Sturge. London: John Murray, 1933.Google Scholar

Rowell, George (ed.). Victorian Dramatic Criticism. London: Methuen, 1971.Google Scholar

Rowlinson, Matthew. ‘Lyric’, in A Companion to Victorian Poetry, ed. Cronin, Richard, Chapman, Alison and Harrison, Antony H.. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 59–79.Google Scholar

Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám, trans. and versified by Edward FitzGerald. London: Bernard Quaritch, 1859 (the volume went through many editions; the same publisher produced the rather different second edition in 1868).

Ruskin, John. Letter to ‘Katharine’ (KB) (25 December 1877). MF correspondence: BL, Add.MS.46867, fol. 137r.

Ruskin, John.Letter to ‘Katharine’ (KB) (28 December 1877). MF correspondence: BL, Add.MS.46867, fols. 139r–140v.

Ruskin, John.The Works of John Ruskin, ed. Cook, E. T. and Wedderburn, Alexander, 39 vols. London: George Allen, 1903–12.Google Scholar

Russell, Richard Rankin. ‘W. B. Yeats and Eavan Boland: Postcolonial Poets’, in W. B. Yeats and Postcolonialism, ed. Fleming, Deborah. West Cornwall, CT: Locust Hill Press, 2001, pp. 101–32.Google Scholar

Samuels, Ernest. Bernard Berenson: The Making of a Connoisseur. Cambridge, MA, and London: The Belknap Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Saville, Julia F. ‘The Poetic Imaging of Michael Field’, in The Fin-de-Siècle Poem, ed. Bristow, Joseph. Ohio: Ohio University Press, 2005, pp. 178–206.Google Scholar

Schaffer, Talia. ‘Connoisseurship and Concealment in Sir Richard Calmady: Lucas Malet's Strategic Aestheticism’, in Women and British Aestheticism, ed. Schaffer, Talia and Psomiades, Kathy Alexis. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1999. pp. 44–61.Google Scholar

Schaffer, Talia.The Forgotten Female Aesthetes: Literary Culture in Late-Victorian England. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 2000.Google Scholar

Schaffer, Talia, and Psomiades, Kathy Alexis (eds). Women and British Aestheticism. Charlottesville and London: University Press of Virginia, 1999.Google Scholar

Schor, Naomi. ‘Female Fetishism: The Case of George Sand’, in The Female Body in Western Culture: Contemporary Perspectives, ed. Suleiman, Susan Rubin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986, pp. 363–72.Google Scholar

Schreiner, Olive. Dreams, ed. Jay, Elisabeth. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Scott, Bonnie Kime (ed.). The Gender of Modernism: A Critical Anthology. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1990.

Scott, Bonnie Kime(ed.). Refiguring Modernism, 2 vols. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Seeley, Tracy. ‘“The Fair Light Mystery of Images”: Alice Meynell's Metaphysical Turn’. Victorian Literature and Culture 34.2 (2006), 663–84.Google Scholar

Seeley, Tracy.‘“The Sun Shines on a World Re-Arisen to Pleasure”: The Fin-de-Siècle Metaphysical Revival’. Literature Compass 3.2 (2006), 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seigel, Jules Paul (ed.). Thomas Carlyle: the Critical Heritage. New York: Barnes & Noble, 1873.Google Scholar

Sencourt, Robert. Carmelite and Poet: St John of the Cross. London: Hollis and Carter, 1943.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, William. The Complete Oxford Shakespeare, ed. Stanley Wells and Gary Taylor. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shaw, W. David. Victorians and Mystery: Crises of Representation. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists From Brontë to Lessing. London: Virago, 1982; first published 1977.Google Scholar

Showalter, Elaine.Sexual Anarchy: Gender and Culture at theFin de Siècle. New York: Viking, 1990.Google Scholar

Slinn, E. Warwick. ‘Dramatic Monologue’, in A Companion to Victorian Poetry, ed. Cronin, Richard, Chapman, Alison and Harrison, Antony H.. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002, pp. 80–98.Google Scholar

Smith, Logan Pearsall. Reperusals and Re-Collections. London: Constable, 1936.Google Scholar

Snitow, Ann, Stansell, Christine and Thompson, Sharon (eds). Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Sontag, Susan. ‘Notes on “Camp” ’, in Camp: Queer Aesthetics and the Performing Subject, ed. Cleto, FabioEdinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999, (first published 1964), pp. 53–65.Google Scholar

Sprigge, Sylvia. Berenson: A Biography. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1960.Google Scholar

Staten, Henry. Eros in Mourning: Homer to Lacan. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Stockton, Kathryn Bond. God Between Their Lips: Desire Between Women in Irigaray, Brontë, and Eliot. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Sturgeon, Mary. Studies of Contemporary Poets. London: Harrap, 1920, revised edition.Google Scholar

Sturgeon, Mary.Michael Field. London: George G. Harrap, 1921.Google Scholar

Swinburne, Algernon Charles. ‘Notes on Designs of the Old Masters at Florence’, in Swinburne's Essays and Studies. London: Chatto and Windus, 1875 (first published July 1868, in the Fortnightly Review), pp. 314–57.Google Scholar

Swinburne, Algernon Charles.Selected Poems, (ed.). Findlay, L. M.. Manchester: Fyfield Books, 1982.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington (ed.). A Problem in Greek Ethics. Ten copies printed privately for author's use, 1883.Google Scholar

Symonds, John Addington.Renaissance in Italy, vol. III, The Fine Arts. London: Smith, Elder, 1877.Google Scholar

Symons, A. J. A. (ed.) and (intro). An Anthology of ‘Nineties’ Verse. London: Elkin Mathews & Marrot, 1928.Google Scholar

Symons, Arthur.Figures of Several Centuries. London: Constable and Company, 1916.Google Scholar

Symons, Arthur.‘Michael Field’. The Forum 69 (1923), 1584–92.Google Scholar

Symons, Arthur.Selected Letters, 1880–1935, ed. Beckson, Karl and Munro, John M.. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taft, Vickie L. ‘The Tragic Mary: A Case Study in Michael Field's Understanding of Sexual Politics’. Nineteenth-Century Contexts 23 (2001), 265–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Temple, Ruth Z. ‘The Other Choice: The Worlds of John Gray, Poet and Priest’. Bulletin of Research in the Humanities 84 (1981), 16–64.Google Scholar

Tennyson, Alfred Lord. The Poems of Tennyson, ed. Ricks, Christopher. London: Longman, 1969.Google Scholar

Tennyson, Hallam. Alfred Lord Tennyson: A Memoir, 2 vols. London: Macmillan, 1897.Google Scholar

Thain, Marion. ‘ “Damnable Aestheticism” and the Turn to Rome: John Gray, Michael Field, and a Poetics of Conversion’, in The Fin-de-Siècle Poem, ed. Bristow, Joseph. Ohio: Ohio University Press, 2005, pp. 311–36.Google Scholar

Thain, Marion.Michael Field and Poetic Identity. London: The Eighteen Nineties Society, 2000.Google Scholar

Thornton, R. K. R. ‘ “Decadence” in Later Nineteenth-Century England’, in Decadence and the 1890s, ed. Fletcher, Ian. London: Edward Arnold, 1979, pp. 15–30.Google Scholar

Thornton, R. K. R.The Decadent Dilemma. London: Edward Arnold, 1983.Google Scholar

Treby, Ivor C.The Michael Field Catalogue. De Blackland Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Treby, Ivor C.(ed.). Music and Silence. De Blackland Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Treby, Ivor C.(ed.). A Shorter Shīrazād. De Blackland Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Treby, Ivor C.(ed.). Uncertain Rain. De Blackland Press, 2002.Google Scholar

T. W. H. (T. W. Higginson). ‘Women and Men: Women Laureates’. Harper's Bazar (New York, Saturday 17 June 1893). See BOD, MS.Eng.lett.e.33, fols. 119–11 (NB the page numbering is wrong in this volume and nos 110–19 appear twice in succession).

Vadillo, AnaParejo, I.. ‘Sight and Song : Transparent Translations and a Manifesto for the Observer’. Victorian Poetry 38 (2000), 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vadillo, AnaParejo, I..‘Women Poets and the Aesthetics of Space and Transport at the Fin de Siècle’. Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 2000.Google Scholar

Vadillo, AnaParejo, I..Women Poets and Urban Aestheticism. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vanita, Ruth. Sappho and the Virgin Mary: Same-Sex Love and the English Literary Imagination. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Vicinus, Martha. ‘The Adolescent Boy: Fin de Siècle Femme Fatale?’. Journal of the History of Sexuality 5 (1994), 90–114.Google Scholar

Vicinus, Martha.‘“The Gift of Love”: Nineteenth-Century Religion and Lesbian Passion’. Nineteenth-Century Contexts 23.2 (2001), 241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vicinus, Martha.Intimate Friends: Women Who Loved Women, 1778–1928. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Ward, A. W., and Waller, A. R. (eds.). Cambridge History of English Literature, vol. XIII, The Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1916.Google Scholar

Warner, Marina. Alone of All Her Sex: The Myth and the Cult of the Virgin Mary. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1976.Google Scholar

Webb, Ruth. ‘Ekphrasis Ancient and Modern: The Invention of a Genre’. Word and Image 15.1 (1999), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weeks, Jeffrey. Coming Out: Homosexual Politics in Britain, from the Nineteenth Century to the Present. London: Quartet Books, 1977.Google Scholar

Weir, David. Decadence and the Making of Modernism. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Wharton, H. T.Sappho. London: John Lane, 1895.Google Scholar

White, Chris. ‘Flesh and Roses: Michael Field's Metaphors of Pleasure and Desire’, Women's Writing 3.1 (1996), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Chris.(ed.). Nineteenth-Century Writings on Homosexuality: A Sourcebook. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

White, Chris.‘“Poets and Lovers Evermore”: Interpreting Female Love in the Poetry and Journals of Michael Field’. Textual Practice 4.2 (1990), 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Chris.‘The Tiresian Poet: Michael Field’, in Victorian Women Poets: A Critical Reader, ed. Leighton, Angela. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996, pp. 148–61.Google Scholar

White, Gleeson (ed.). Ballades and Rondeaus. London: The Walter Scott Publishing Co, 1887.Google Scholar

Wilde, Oscar. The Works of Oscar Wilde, ed. Maine, G. F.. London: Collins, 1992.Google Scholar

Williams, Carolyn. Transfigured World: Walter Pater's Aesthetic Historicism. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Wilson, Bee. The Hive. London: John Murray, 2004.Google Scholar

Wollheim, Richard. On Art and the Mind: Essays and Lectures. London: Allen Lane, 1973.Google Scholar

Wyndham, Violet. The Sphinx and Her Circle. London: André Deutsch, 1963.Google Scholar

Yaeger, Patricia. Honey-Mad Women: Emancipatory Strategies in Women's Writing. New York: Columbia University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Yeats, W. B. The Letters of W. B. Yeats, ed. Wade, Allan. London: Rupert Hart-Davis, 1954.Google Scholar

Yeats, W. B..(ed.) and (intro). The Oxford Book of Modern Verse, 1892–1935. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936.Google Scholar

Yeats, W. B.Selected Poetry, ed. Webb, Timothy. London: Penguin, 1991.Google Scholar

Yeats, W. B.A Vision. London: Macmillan, 1937, 2nd edition; first published privately 1925.Google Scholar

Zonana, Joyce. ‘The Embodied Muse: Elizabeth Barrett Browning's Aurora Leigh and Feminist Poetics’, in Victorian Women Poets: A Critical Reader, ed. Leighton, AngelaOxford: Blackwell, 1996, pp. 53–74.Google Scholar