Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T17:57:27.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Rivers and Wetland Systems

from Part IV - Managing Connectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2025

By
Kirstie Fryirs ,
Gary Brierley ,
Tim Ralph  and
Ian Fuller
Edited by
Ronald Pöppl ,
Anthony Parsons  and
Saskia Keesstra
Ronald Pöppl
Affiliation:
BOKU University Vienna
Anthony Parsons
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Saskia Keesstra
Affiliation:
Wageningen Universiteit, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

River and wetland case studies from contrasting landscape settings with differing sediment cascades and (dis)connectivity relationships in Australia and New Zealand present contrasting sediment ‘problems’. Here we use the concept of switches that regulate the operation of buffers, barriers and blankets as a basis to develop catchment-scale sediment management plans. We present plans for managing sediment (dis)connectivity for each case study. We conclude with five key factors that practitioners need to consider when embarking on managing sediment (dis)connectivity of rivers and wetlands in practice.

Keywords

sediment managementriverswetlandscase studies
Type
Chapter
Information
Connectivity in Geomorphology , pp. 314 - 354
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beechie, T.J., Sear, D.A., Olden, J.D., Pess, G.R., Buffington, J.M., Moir, H., Roni, P. & Pollock, M.M. (2010). Process-based principles for restoring river ecosystems. BioScience, 60(3), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilderback, E. L., Pettinga, J. R., Litchfield, N. J., Quigley, M., Marden, M., Roering, J. J., & Palmer, A. S. (2015). Hillslope response to climate-modulated river incision in the Waipaoa catchment, East Coast North Island, New Zealand. Bulletin, 127(1–2), 131–148.Google Scholar
Boardman, J., Vandaele, K., Evans, R. & Foster, I. D. (2019). Off‐site impacts of soil erosion and runoff: Why connectivity is more important than erosion rates. Soil Use and Management, 35(2), 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulton, A. J. (2007). Hyporheic rehabilitation in rivers: restoring vertical connectivity. Freshwater Biology, 52(4), 632–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracken, L.J., Turnbull, L., Wainwright, J. & Bogaart, P. (2015). Sediment connectivity: a framework for understanding sediment transfer at multiple scales. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 40, 177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, A.P. & Brierley, G.J. (1997). Geomorphic responses of lower Bega River to catchment disturbance, 1851–1926. Geomorphology, 18(3–4), 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, A. & Brierley, G. (2000). The role of European disturbance in the metamorphosis of the lower Bega River. In Brizga, S. & Finlayson, B. (eds.), River management: The Australasian experience, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 221–246.Google Scholar
Brierley, G.J. & Fryirs, K. (2000). River Styles in Bega Catchment, NSW, Australia: Implications for river rehabilitation. Environmental Management, 25 (6), 661–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brierley, G.J. & Fryirs, K.A. (2005). Geomorphology and River Management: Applications of the River Styles Framework, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publications. 398 pp.Google Scholar
Brierley, G. & Fryirs, K. (2009). Don’t fight the site: Three geomorphic considerations in catchment-scale river rehabilitation planning. Environmental Management, 43 (6), 1201–1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brierley, G.J. & Fryirs, K.A. (2016). The use of evolutionary trajectories to guide ‘moving targets’ in the management of river futures. River Research and Applications, 32 (5), 823–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brierley, G., Fryirs, K. & Jain, V. (2006). Landscape connectivity: The geographic basis of geomorphic applications. Area, 38 (2), 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brierley, G.J., Cohen, T., Fryirs, K. & Brooks, A. (1999). Post‐European changes to the fluvial geomorphology of Bega catchment, Australia: Implications for river ecology. Freshwater Biology, 41 (4), 839–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brierley, G., Tunnicliffe, J., Bizzi, S., Lee, F., Perry, G., Pöppl, R. & Fryirs, K. (2021). Quantifying sediment (dis)connectivity in the modelling of river systems. In Treatise on Geomorphology. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Brierley, G.J., Hikuroa, D.C.H., Friedrich, H., Fuller, I.C., Brasington, B., Hoyle, J., Tunnicliffe, J., Allen, K. & Measures, R. (2021). Why we should release New Zealand’s strangled rivers to lessen the impact of future floods. The Conversation. March 1st, 2021. https://theconversation.com/ – 153077.Google Scholar
Brinson, M.M. (1993). A hydrogeomorphic classification for Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Wetlands. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report WRP-DE-4. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Chessman, B.C., Fryirs, K. A. & Brierley, G.J. (2006). Linking geomorphic character, behaviour and condition to fluvial biodiversity: Implications for river management. Aquatic Conservation: Maine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 16(3), 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, B.R., Ausseil, A.E. & Gerbeaux, P. (2013). Wetland ecosystem services. In Dymond, J.R. (ed.), Ecosystem Services in New Zealand – Conditions and Trends. Lincoln, New Zealand: Manaaki Whenua Press.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R. Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., et al. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., & Van Den Belt, M. (1998). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 25(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, R.C. & Basher, L. R. (2011). Measurement of river bank and cliff erosion from sequential LIDAR and historical aerial photography. Geomorphology, 126, 132–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeRose, R.C., Prosser, I.P., Weisse, M. & Hughes, A.O. (2003). Patterns of Erosion and Sediment and Nutrient Transport in the Murray-Darling Basin. Technical Report 32/03, Canberra: CSIRO Land and Water.Google Scholar
Downs, P.W. & Piégay, H. (2019). Catchment-scale cumulative impact of human activities on river channels in the late Anthropocene: implications, limitations, prospect. Geomorphology, 338, 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engineers, Washington DC (2010). Wetlands research program technical report WRP-DE-4. In Burt, T. & Allison, R. (eds.), Sediment Cascades: An Integrated Approach. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 471 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everard, M. (2016). Biodiversity in wetlands. In Finlayson, C. et al. (eds.), The Wetland Book. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Evrard, O., Navratil, O., Ayrault, S., Ahmadi, M., Némery, J., Legout, C., Lefévre, I., Poirel, A., Bonté, P. & Esteves, M. (2011). Combining suspended sediment monitoring and fingerprinting to determine the spatial origin of fine sediment in a mountainous river catchment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 36 (8), 1072–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fausch, K. D., Torgersen, C. E., Baxter, C. V. & Li, H.W. (2002). Landscapes to riverscapes: Bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes: a continuous view of the river is needed to understand how processes interacting among scales set the context for stream fishes and their habitat. BioScience, 52 (6), 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florsheim, J.L., Mount, J.F. & Chin, A. (2008). Bank erosion as a desirable attribute of rivers. BioScience, 58, 519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florsheim, J.L., Mount, J.F. & Constantine, C.R. (2006). A geomorphic monitoring and adaptive assessment framework to assess the effect of lowland floodplain river restoration on channel–floodplain sediment continuity. River Research and Applications, 22(3), 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryirs, K. (2013). (Dis)connectivity in catchment sediment cascades: A fresh look at the sediment delivery problem. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 38 (1), 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryirs, K.A. (2015). Developing and using geomorphic condition assessments for river rehabilitation planning, implementation and monitoring. WiresWater, 2(6), 649–667.Google Scholar
Fryirs, K. & Brierley, G. (1998). The character and age structure of valley fills in upper Wolumla Creek catchment, south coast, New South Wales, Australia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23(3), 271–287.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryirs, K. & Brierley, G.J. (1999). Slope–channel decoupling in Wolumla catchment, New South Wales, Australia: The changing nature of sediment sources following European settlement. Catena, 35(1), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryirs, K. & Brierley, G.J. (2001). Variability in sediment delivery and storage along river courses in Bega catchment, NSW, Australia: implications for geomorphic river recovery. Geomorphology, 38(3–4), 237–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryirs, K. & Brierley, G. (2005). Practical application of the River Styles Framework as a tool for catchment-wide river management: a case study from Bega catchment, New South Wales. Macquarie University, 227 pp.Google Scholar
Fryirs, K.A. & Brierley, G.J. (2016). Assessing the geomorphic recovery potential of rivers: forecasting future trajectories of adjustment for use in management. WiresWater, 3(5), 727–748.Google Scholar
Fryirs, K.A., Brierley, G.J., Hancock, F., Cohen, T.J., Brooks, A.P., Reinfelds, I., Cook, N. & Raine, A. (2018). Tracking geomorphic recovery in process‐based river management. Land Degradation and Development, 29(9), 3221–3244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryirs, K.A., Brierley, G.J., Preston, N.J. & Kasai, M. (2007). Buffers, barriers and blankets: The (dis)connectivity of catchment-scale sediment cascades. Catena, 70, 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryirs, K.A., Farebrother, W. & Hose, G.C. (2019). Understanding the spatial distribution and physical attributes of upland swamps in the Sydney Basin as a template for their conservation and management. Australian Geographer, 50, 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryirs, K., Spink, A. & Brierley, G. (2009). Post‐European settlement response gradients of river sensitivity and recovery across the upper Hunter catchment, Australia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34(7), 897–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryirs, K., Hancock, F., Healey, M., Mould, S., Dobbs, L., Riches, M., Raine, A. & Brierley, G. (2021). Things we can do now that we could not do before: Developing and using a cross-scalar, state-wide database to support geomorphologically-informed river management. PloS One, 16(1), e0244719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, I.C. & Death, R.G. (2018). The science of connected ecosystems: What is the role of catchment‐scale connectivity for healthy river ecology? Land Degradation & Development, 29(5), 1413–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, I. C. & Marden, M. (2011). Slope–channel coupling in steepland terrain: A field-based conceptual model from the Tarndale gully and fan, Waipaoa catchment, New Zealand. Geomorphology, 128, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, I. C., Strohmaier, F., McColl, S. T., Tunnicliffe, J. & Marden, M. (2020). Badass gully morphodynamics and sediment generation in Waipaoa Catchment, New Zealand. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 45, 3917–3930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GDC (2020). Te mahinga arai waipuke o Waipaoa Waipaoa flood control. Available at: www.gdc.govt.nz/council/major-projects/waipaoa-river-flood-control-schemeGoogle Scholar
Gomez, B., Banbury, K., Marden, M., Trustrum, N. A., Peacock, D. H., & Hoskin, P. J. (2003). Gully erosion and sediment production: Te Weraroa Stream, New Zealand. Water Resources Research, 39(7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, B., Coleman, S., Sy, V., Peacock, D. & Kent, M. (2007). Channel change, bankfull and effective discharges on a vertically accreting, meandering, gravel‐bed river. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 32, 770–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, B., Cui, Y., Kettner, A., Peacock, D. & Syvitski, J. (2009). Simulating changes to the sediment transport regime of the Waipaoa River, New Zealand, driven by climate change in the twenty-first century. Global and Planetary Change, 67, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, B., Eden, D. N., Peacock, D. H. & Pinkney, E. J. (1998). Floodplain construction by recent, rapid vertical accretion: Waipaoa River, New Zealand. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23, 405–413.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, B. & Livingston, D. M. (2012). The river it goes right on: Post-glacial landscape evolution in the upper Waipaoa River basin, eastern North Island, New Zealand. Geomorphology, 159, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, B., Rosser, B. J., Peacock, D. H., Hicks, D. M. & Palmer, J. A. (2001). Downstream fining in a rapidly aggrading gravel bed river. Water Resources Research, 37, 1813–1823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, D., Brierley, G., Pickard, J. & Jansen, J. (2000). Anatomy of a floodout in semi-arid eastern Australia. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie, 122, 113–139.Google Scholar
Graves, B.P., Ralph, T.J., Hesse, P.P., Westaway, K.E., Kobayashi, T., Gadd, P.S. & Mazumder, D. (2019). Macro-charcoal accumulation in floodplain wetlands: problems and prospects for reconstruction of fire regimes and environmental conditions. PLoS ONE, 14, e0224011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurnell, A. (2014). Plants as river system engineers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 39(1):4–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, D. & Kelman, E. (1952). Soil Conservation Survey of the Waipaoa River Catchment, Poverty Bay-New Zealand. Soil Conservation, Ministry of Works.Google Scholar
Harvey, A.M. (2001). Coupling between hillslopes and channels in upland fluvial systems: Implications for landscape sensitivity illustrated from the Howgill Fells, northwest England. Catena, 42, 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, A.M. (2002). Effective timescales of coupling within fluvial systems. Geomorphology, 44, 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, P.P., Williams, R., Ralph, T.J., Larkin, Z.T., Fryirs, K.A., Westaway, K.E. & Yonge, D. (2018). Dramatic reduction in size of the lowland Macquarie River in response to Late Quaternary climate-driven hydrologic change. Quaternary Research, 90, 360–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, M., Brierley, G. & Fryirs, K. (2008). Social and biophysical connectivity of river systems. In Brierley, G.J., & Fryirs, K.A. (eds.), River Futures: An Integrative Scientific Approach to River Repair. Washington, DC: Island Press, 125–142.Google Scholar
Hicks, D. M., Gomez, B. & Trustrum, N. A. (2000). Erosion thresholds and suspended sediment yields, Waipaoa River Basin, New Zealand. Water Resources Research, 36, 1129–1142. www.doi.org/10.1029/1999WR900340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, D. M., Shankar, U., McKerchar, A. I., Basher, L., Lynn, I., Page, M. & Jessen, M. (2011). Suspended sediment yields from New Zealand rivers. Journal of Hydrology (New Zealand), 81–142.Google Scholar
Hooke, J.M. (2003). Coarse sediment connectivity in river channel systems: A conceptual framework and methodology. Geomorphology, 56, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, V. & Tandon, S.K. (2010). Conceptual assessment of (dis) connectivity and its application to the Ganga River dispersal system. Geomorphology, 118(3–4), 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, L.A. (2010). Secular sediment waves, channel bed waves, and legacy sediment. Geography Compass, 4(6), 576–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, L.A. (2013). Legacy sediment: definitions and processes of episodically produced anthropogenic sediment. Anthropocene, 2, 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, K. E. & Preston, N. J. (2012). Spatial and temporal patterns of off-slope sediment delivery for small catchments subject to shallow landslides within the Waipaoa catchment, New Zealand. Geomorphology, 141, 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasai, M., Brierley, G.J., Page, M.J., Marutani, T. & Trustrum, N.A. (2005). Impacts of land use change on patterns of sediment flux in Weraamaia catchment, New Zealand. Catena, 64(1), 27–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keesstra, S., Nunes, J., Saco, P., Parsons, A., Pöppl, R., Pereira, P., Novara, A., Comino, J.R., Masselink, R. & Cerda, A. (2018). The way forward: can connectivity be useful to design better measuring and modelling schemes for water and sediment dynamics? Science of the Total Environment, 644, 1557–1572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kingsford, R.T. (2000). Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetlands in Australia. Austral Ecology, 25, 109–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondolf, G.M. (2011). Setting goals in river restoration: when and where can the river “heal itself”. Stream restoration in dynamic fluvial systems: scientific approaches, analyses, and tools. Geophysical Monograph Series, 194, 29–43.Google Scholar
Kondolf, G.M. & Micheli, E.R. (1995). Evaluating stream restoration projects. Environmental Management, 19(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondolf, G.M., Boulton, A.J., O’Daniel, S., Poole, G.C., Rahel, F.J., Stanley, E.H., Wohl, E., Bång, A., Carlstrom, J., Cristoni, C. & Huber, H. (2006). Process-based ecological river restoration: visualizing three-dimensional connectivity and dynamic vectors to recover lost linkages. Ecology and Society, 11(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondolf, G.M., Smeltzer, M.W. & Railsback, S.F. (2001). Design and performance of a channel reconstruction project in a coastal California gravel-bed stream. Environmental Management, 28(6), 761–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T., Ryder, D.S., Ralph, T.J., Mazumder, D., Saintilan, N., Iles, J., Knowles, L., Thomas, R., & Hunter, S. (2011). Longitudinal spatial variation in ecological conditions in an in-channel floodplain river system during flow pulses. River Research and Applications, 27, 461–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kobayashi, T., Ralph, T.J., Ryder, D.S., Hunter, S.J., Shiel, R.J., & Segers, H. (2015). Spatial dissimilarities in plankton structure and function during flood pulses in a semi-arid floodplain wetland system. Hydrobiologia, 747, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehl, S. A., Alexander, C. R., Blair, N. E., Harris, C. K., Marsaglia, K. M., Ogston, A. S., Orpin, A. R., Roering, J. J., Bever, A. J. & Bilderback, E. L. (2016). A source-to-sink perspective of the Waipaoa River margin. Earth-Science Reviews, 153, 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkin, Z.T., Ralph, T.J., Tooth, S., Fryirs, K.A. & Carthey, J.R. (2020). Identifying threshold responses of Australian dryland rivers to future hydroclimatic change. Scientific Reports, 10, 6653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larkin, Z.T., Ralph, T.J., Tooth, S. & McCarthy, T.S. (2017). The interplay between extrinsic and intrinsic controls in determining floodplain wetland characteristics in the South African drylands. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42, 1092–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leenman, A. & Tunnicliffe, J. (2020). Tributary‐junction fans as buffers in the sediment cascade: A multi‐decadal study. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 45(2), 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leenman, A. & Tunnicliffe, J. (2018). Genesis of a major gully mass-wasting complex, and implications for valley filling, East Cape, New Zealand. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 130(7–8), 1121–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisenby, P.E., Fryirs, K.A. & Thompson, C.J. (2020). River sensitivity and sediment connectivity as tools for assessing future geomorphic channel behavior. International Journal of River Basin Management, 18(3), 279–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisenby, P.E., Tooth, S. & Ralph, T.J. (2019). Product vs. process? The role of geomorphology in wetland characterization. Science of the Total Environment, 663, 980–991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mach, K.J. & Siders, A.R. (2021). Reframing strategic, managed retreat for transformative climate adaptation. Science, 372(6548), 1294–1299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marden, M. (2011). Sedimentation History of Waipaoa Catchment. Landcare Research.Google Scholar
Marden, M. (2012). Effectiveness of reforestation in erosion mitigation and implications for future sediment yields, East Coast catchments, New Zealand: A review. New Zealand Geographer, 68, 24–35. www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7939.2012.01218.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marden, M., Arnold, G., Gomez, B. & Rowan, D. (2005). Pre‐and post‐reforestation gully development in Mangatu Forest, East Coast, North Island, New Zealand. River Research and Applications, 21, 757–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marden, M., Fuller, I. C., Herzig, A. & Betts, H. D. (2018). Badass gullies: Fluvio-mass-movement gully complexes in New Zealand’s East Coast region, and potential for remediation. Geomorphology, 307, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marden, M., Herzig, A. & Basher, L. (2014). Erosion process contribution to sediment yield before and after the establishment of exotic forest: Waipaoa catchment, New Zealand. Geomorphology, 226, 162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitsch, W.J. & Gosselink, J.G. (2015). Wetlands (5th ed). New York: Wiley, 744 pp.Google Scholar
Olley, J.M. & Wasson, R.J. (2003). Changes in the flux of sediment in the Upper Murrumbidgee catchment, Southeastern Australia, since European settlement. Hydrological Processes, 17, 3307–3320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyston, S.M., Ralph, T.J. & Hesse, P.P. (2014). Cutting down, back and out: assessment of channel erosion in a sensitive floodplain wetland. In Vietz, G., Rutherfurd, I.D. & Hughes, R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Australian Stream Managament Conference, 27–30 July 2014. Townsville, QLD: River Basin Management Society, pp. 143–149.Google Scholar
Page, M., Trustrum, N., Brackley, H. & Baisden, T. (2004). Erosion-related soil carbon fluxes in a pastoral steepland catchment, New Zealand. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 103, 561–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piegay, H., Darby, S.E., Mosselman, E., & Surian, N. (2005). A review of techniques available for delimiting the erodible river corridor: a sustainable approach to managing bank erosion. River Research and Applications, 21, 773–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöppl, R.E., Keesstra, S.D. & Hein, T. (2015). The geomorphic legacy of small dams – An Austrian study. Anthropocene, 10, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöppl, R.E., Keesstra, S.D. & Maroulis, J.(2017). A conceptual connectivity framework for understanding geomorphic change in human-impacted fluvial systems. Geomorphology, 277, 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöppl, R.E., Coulthard, T., Keesstra, S.D. & Keiler, M., J. (2019). Modeling the impact of dam removal on channel evolution and sediment delivery in a multiple dam setting. International Journal of Sediment Research, 34(6), 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pöppl, R.E., Fryirs, K.A., Tunnicliffe, J. & Brierley, G.J. (2020). Managing sediment (dis)connectivity in fluvial systems. Science of the Total Environment, 736, 139627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prosser, I.P., Rutherfurd, I.D., Olley, J.M., Young, W.J., Wallbrink, P.J., & Moran, C.J. (2001). Large-scale patterns of erosion and sediment transport in river networks, with examples from Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 52, 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, T.J., & Hesse, P.P. (2010). Downstream hydrogeomorphic changes along the Macquarie River, southeastern Australia, leading to channel breakdown and floodplain wetlands. Geomorphology, 118, 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, T.J., Hesse, P.P., & Kobayashi, T. (2016). Wandering wetlands: Spatial patterns of historical channel and floodplain change in the Ramsar-listed Macquarie Marshes, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 67, 782–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, T.J., Kobayashi, T., García, A., Hesse, P.P., Yonge, D., Bleakley, N., & Ingleton, T. (2011). Paleoecological responses to avulsion and floodplain evolution in a semiarid Australian freshwater wetland. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 58, 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, T.J., Larkin, Z., Farebrother, W., Ocock, J., Hosking, T., Kobayashi, Y., Hughes, M., Hesse, P. & Fryirs, K. (2021) Exploring the relationship between channel bed control structures and stream power in low-gradient floodplain wetlands. In Proceedings of the 10th Australian Stream Management Conference, 2–4 August 2021, Kingscliff, NSW, 74316, River Basin Management Society, Melbourne, VIC.Google Scholar
Ralph, T.J. & Rogers, K. (2011). Floodplain wetlands of the Murray-Darling Basin and their freshwater biota. In Rogers, K. & Ralph, T. J. (eds.) Floodplain Wetland Biota in the Murray-Darling Basin: Water and Habitat Requirements, Collingwood, VIC: CSIRO Publishing, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Rayburg, S. & Thoms, M. (2009). A coupled hydraulic–hydrologic modelling approach to deriving a water balance model for a complex floodplain wetland system. Hydrology Research, 40, 364–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, L. & Page, M. (2003). Magnitude and frequency of landsliding in a large New Zealand catchment. Geomorphology, 49, 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittenhouse, T.A. & Peterman, W.E. (2018). Connectivity of wetlands. In Finlayson, C. et al. (eds.), The Wetland Book. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Rogers, K. & Ralph, T.J. (eds.), (2011). Floodplain Wetland Biota in the Murray-Darling Basin: Water and Habitat Requirements. Collingwood, VIC: CSIRO Publishing, 348 pp.Google Scholar
Schmidt, J.C., Webb, R.H., Valdez, R.A., Marzolf, G.R. & Stevens, L.E. (1998). Science and values in river restoration in the Grand Canyon: there is no restoration or rehabilitation strategy that will improve the status of every riverine resource. BioScience, 48(9), 735–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scorpio, V., Aucelli, P. P., Giano, S. I., Pisano, L., Robustelli, G., Rosskopf, C.M. & Schiattarella, M. (2015). River channel adjustments in Southern Italy over the past 150 years and implications for channel recovery. Geomorphology, 251, 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sear, D.A., Newson, M.D. & Brookes, A. (1995). Sediment‐related river maintenance: the role of fluvial geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 20(7), 629–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semeniuk, C. & Semeniuk, V. (1995). A geomorphic approach to global classification for inland wetlands. Vegetatio, 118, 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, A., Doyle, M., Kondolf, M., ShieldsJr, F.D., Rhoads, B. & McPhillips, M. (2007). Critical evaluation of how the Rosgen classification and associated “natural channel design” methods fail to integrate and quantify fluvial processes and channel response. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(5), 1117–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M., Sinha, R. & Tandon, S.K. (2021). Geomorphic connectivity and its application for understanding landscape complexities: a focus on the hydro‐geomorphic systems of India. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 46(1), 110–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spink, A., Fryirs, K. & Brierley, G. (2009). The relationship between geomorphic river adjustment and management actions over the last 50 years in the upper Hunter catchment, NSW, Australia. River Research and Applications, 25(7), 904–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R. J., Massey, C., Fuller, I. C., Marden, M., Archibald, G. & Ries, W. (2018). Quantifying sediment connectivity in an actively eroding gully complex, Waipaoa catchment, New Zealand. Geomorphology, 307, 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C., Fryirs, K. & Croke, J. (2016). The disconnected sediment conveyor belt: Patterns of longitudinal and lateral erosion and deposition during a catastrophic flood in the Lockyer Valley, southeast Queensland, Australia. River Research and Applications, 32, 540–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooth, S., Ellery, W., Grenfell, M., Thomas, A., Kotze, D. & Ralph, T. (2015). 10 reasons Why the Geomorphology of Wetlands Is Important. Wetlands in Drylands Research Network.Google Scholar
Tubridy, D., Scott, M. & Lennon, M. (2021). Managed retreat in response to flooding: lessons from the past for contemporary climate change adaptation. Planning Perspectives, 1–20.Google Scholar
Tunnicliffe, J., Brierley, G., Fuller, I. C., Leenman, A., Marden, M. & Peacock, D. (2018). Reaction and relaxation in a coarse-grained fluvial system following catchment-wide disturbance. Geomorphology, 307, 50–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turley, M., Hassan, M. A. & Slaymaker, O. (2021). Quantifying Sediment Connectivity: Moving Towards a Holistic Assessment Through a Mixed Methods Approach. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, J., Turnbull, L., Ibrahim, T.G., Lexartza-Artza, I., Thornton, S.F. & Brazier, R.E. (2011). Linking environmental regimes, space and time: Interpretations of structural and functional connectivity. Geomorphology, 126(3–4), 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walling, D.E. (1983). The sediment delivery problem. Journal of Hydrology, 65, 209–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, R.C. & Merritts, D.J. (2008). Natural streams and the legacy of water-powered mills. Science, 319(5861), 299–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warrick, J.A., Bountry, J.A., East, A.E., Magirl, C.S., Randle, T.J., Gelfenbaum, G., Ritchie, A.C., Pess, G.R., Leung, V. & Duda, J.J. (2015). Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Source-to-sink sediment budget and synthesis. Geomorphology, 246, 729–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wethered, A.S., Ralph, T.J., Smith, H.G., Fryirs, K.A. & Heijnis, H. (2015). Quantifying fluvial (dis)connectivity in an agricultural catchment using a geomorphic approach and sediment source tracing. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 15, 2052–2066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheaton, J.M., Bennett, S., Bouwes, N., Maestas, J.D. & Shahverdian, S.M. (eds.), (2019). Low-Tech Process-Based Restoration of Riverscapes: Design Manual. Version 1.0. Logan, UT: Utah State University Restoration Consortium. Available at: http://lowtechpbr.restoration.usu.edu/manualGoogle Scholar
Williams, R.T. & Fryirs, K.A. (2020). The morphology and geomorphic evolution of a large chain-of-ponds river system. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 45, 1732–1748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohl, E, (2015). Legacy effects on sediments in river corridors. Earth Science Reviews, 147, 30–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohl, E. (2018). Geomorphic context in rivers. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 42(6), 841–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohl, E. & Beckman, N.D. (2014). Leaky rivers: Implications of the loss of longitudinal fluvial disconnectivity in headwater streams. Geomorphology, 205, 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohl, E., Bledsoe, B.P., Jacobson, R.B., Poff, N. L., Rathburn, S.L., Walters, D.M. & Wilcox, A.C. (2015). The natural sediment regime in rivers: broadening the foundation for ecosystem management. BioScience, 65(4), 358–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wohl, E., Brierley, G., Cadol, D., Coulthard, T., Covino, T., Fryirs, K., Grant, G., Pöpplet al. (2019). Connectivity as an emergent property of geomorphic systems. Earth Surface Processes Landforms, 44, 4–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, X., Chen, M., Yang, G., Jiang, B. & Zhang, J. (2020). Wetland ecosystem services research: a critical review. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, e01027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziliani, L. & Surian, N. (2012). Evolutionary trajectory of channel morphology and controlling factors in a large gravel-bed river. Geomorphology, 173, 104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziliani, L. & Surian, N. (2016). Reconstructing temporal changes and prediction of channel evolution in a large Alpine river: The Tagliamento River, Italy. Aquatic Sciences, 78(1), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×