Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-02T00:20:51.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 42 - Feminist Perspectives on Doing Strategy-as-Practice Research

from Part V - Substantive Topic Areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2025

By
Pikka-Maaria Laine ,
Susan Meriläinen ,
Johanna Moisander  and
Janne Tienari
Edited by
Damon Golsorkhi ,
Linda Rouleau ,
David Seidl  and
Eero Vaara
Damon Golsorkhi
Affiliation:
emlyon Business School
Linda Rouleau
Affiliation:
HEC Montréal
David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Eero Vaara
Affiliation:
Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Pikka-Maaria Laine, Susan Meriläinen, Johanna Moisander and Janne Tienari focus on a very important but largely neglected topic in strategy as practice research. They argue that strategy as practice research would benefit from a theoretically advanced feminist understanding of what gender is and how it plays into strategy work. They offer an overview of different feminist approaches for developing strategy as practice scholarship. They then concentrate on feminist phenomenology and feminist new materialisms and offer an empirical illustration of what it means to draw from these approaches in strategy as practice research. They conclude with a discussion of future research that could tap into these insights or follow also some of the other feminist perspectives.

Keywords

strategy as practicepractice approachfeminist perspectivesfeminism
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 755 - 772
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acker, J. (2016), ‘Gendering organizational theory’, in Shafritz, J. M., Ott, J. S., and Jang, Y. S. (eds), Classics in Organization Theory: 422–8. 8th edn. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ahmed, S. (2017), Living a Feminist Life, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Alaimo, S. and Hekman, S. (2008), Material Feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Alamgir, F. and Alakavuklar, O. N. (2020), ‘Compliance codes and women workers’ (mis)representation and (non)recognition in the apparel industry of Bangladesh’, Journal of Business Ethics, 165/2: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alamgir, F., Bapuji, H. and Mir, R. (2022), ‘Challenges and insights from South Asia for imagining ethical organizations: introduction to the special issue’, Journal of Business Ethics, 177/12: 717–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (1993a), ‘Introduction: when feminisms intersect epistemology’, in Alcoff, L., and Potter, E. (eds), Feminist Epistemologies: 1–14. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (eds) (1993b), Feminist Epistemologies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Allen-Collinson, J. (2011), ‘Feminist phenomenology and the woman in the running body’, Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 5/3: 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcraft, K. L. (2017), ‘“Submission” to the rule of excellence: ordinary affect and precarious resistance in the labor of organization and management studies’, Organization, 24/1: 36–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, S. B and Arjaliès, D-L. (2021), ‘Celebrating the end of enlightenment: organization theory in the Age of the Anthropocene and Gaia (and why neither is the solution to our ecological crisis)’, Organization Theory, 1: 1–24.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S. B., Jermier, J. M., Peredo, A. M, Perey, R. and Reichel, A. (2021), ‘Theoretical perspectives on organizations and organizing in a post-growth era’, Organization, 28/3: 337–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bansal, P. and DesJardine, M. R. (2014), ‘Business sustainability: it is about time’, Strategic Organization, 1: 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, K. (2008), ‘Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter’ in Alaimo, S., and Hekman, S. (eds), Material Feminism: 120–54. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bargetz, B. (2019), ‘Longing for agency: new materialisms’ wrestling with despair’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 26/2: 181–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, E., Meriläinen, S., Taylor, S. and Tienari, J. (2020), ‘Dangerous knowledge: the political, personal, and epistemological promise of feminist research in management and organization studies’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 22/2: 177–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010), Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Benschop, Y. (2021), ‘Grand challenges, feminist answers’, Organization Theory, 2: 9–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benschop, Y. and Verloo, M. (2016), ‘Feminist organization theories: islands of treasure’, in Mir, R., Wilmott, H., and Greenwood., M (eds), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy in Organization Studies: 100–12. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, S.. (1956), The Second Sex. Translated and edited by Parshley, H. M.. London: Love and Prydone. Originally published in France by Librairie Gallimard in 1949 under the title Le Deuxiéme Sexe (2 vols).Google Scholar
Bhambra, G. K. (2014), ‘Postcolonial and decolonial dialogues’, Postcolonial Studies, 17/2: 115–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidotti, R. (2015), ‘Posthumanist feminist theory’, in Disch, L., and Hawkesworth, M. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory: 673–98. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990), Gender Trouble – Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1993), Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1997), The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (2004), Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, J. (2006), ‘Sexual difference as a question of ethics: alterities of the flesh in Irigaray and Merleau-Ponty’, in Olkowski, D., and Weiss, G. (eds), Feminist Interpretations of Maurice Merleau-Ponty: 107–25. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Calás, M. and Smircich, L. (1991), ‘Voicing seduction to silence leadership’, Organization Studies, 12/4: 567–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calás, M. and Smircich, L. (2006), ‘From the “woman’s point of view” ten years later: towards a feminist organization studies’, in Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., and Lawrence, T. B. (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies: 284–346. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calás, M. and Smircich, L. (2023), A Research Agenda for Organization Studies, Feminisms and New Materialisms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calás, M. B., Ergene, S. and Smircich, L. (2018), ‘Becoming possible in the Anthropocene? Becoming social entrepreneurship as more-than-capitalist practice’, in Dey, P., and Steyaert, C. (eds), Social Entrepreneurship. An Affirmative Critique: 264–93. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Cheney, G., Santa Cruz, I., Peredo, A. M. et al. (2014), ‘Worker cooperatives as an organizational alternative: challenges, achievements and promise in business governance and ownership’, Organization, 21/5: 591–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2006), ‘Strategy as practical coping: a Heideggerian perspective’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, R. and Holt, R. (2009), Strategy without Design: The Efficacy of Indirect Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chia, R. and MacKay, B. (2007), ‘Post-processual challenges for the emerging strategy-as-practice perspective: discovering strategy in the logic of practice’, Human Relations, 60/1: 217–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, D. (2008), ‘Climbing like a girl: an exemplary adventure in feminist phenomenology’, Hypatia: The Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 23/1: 9–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Code, L. (2006), Ecological Thinking: The Politics of Epistemic Location. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, P. H. and Bilge, S. (2016), Intersectionality. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Connell, R. W. (1995), Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (2013), ‘Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics’, in Maschke, K. (ed.), Feminist Legal Theories: 23–51. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dameron, S. and Torset, C. (2014), ‘The discursive construction of strategists’ subjectivities: towards a paradox lens on strategy’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delphy, C. (1984), Close to Home: A Materialist Analysis of Women’s Oppression. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Dotson, K. (2014), ‘Conceptualizing epistemic oppression’, Social Epistemology, 28: 115–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussel, E. and Ibarra‐Colado, E. (2006), ‘Globalization, organization and the ethics of liberation’, Organization, 13/4: 489–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrström-Fuentes, M. (2022), ‘Organising in defence of life: the emergence and dynamics of a territorial movement in Southern Chile’, Organization, 29/1: 155–77.Google Scholar
Ellis, C. and Bochner, A. P. (2000), ‘Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: researcher as subject’, in Denzin, N., and Lincoln, Y. (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research: 733–68. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ergene, S., Banerjee, S. B. and Hoffman, A. J. (2021), ‘(Un)Sustainability and organization studies: towards a radical engagement’, Organization Studies, 42/8: 1319–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ergene, S., Calás, M. B. and Smircich, L. (2018), ‘Ecologies of sustainable concerns: organization theorizing for the Anthropocene’, Gender, Work & Organization, 25/3: 222–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewenstein, B. and Whyte, J. (2007), ‘Beyond words: aesthetic knowledge and knowing in organizations’, Organization Studies, 28/5: 689–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. (2010), ‘Strategy and strategizing: a poststructuralist perspective’, in Baum, J. A. C., and Lampel, J. (eds), Advances in Strategic Management, vol. XXVII, The Globalization of Strategy Research: 75–109. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fotaki, M. (2013), ‘No woman is like a man (in academia): the masculine symbolic order and the unwanted female body’, Organization Studies, 34/9: 1251–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherardi, S. and Strati, A. (2012), Learning and Knowing in Practice-Based Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K. and Dombroski, K. (2020), ‘Introduction to The Handbook of Diverse Economies: inventory as ethical intervention’, in Gibson, J., and Dombriski, K. (eds), The Handbook of Diverse Economies: 1–24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, E. (2005), Time Travels: Feminism, Nature, Power. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hahn, T. and Tampe, M. (2021), ‘Strategies for regenerative business’, Strategic Organization, 19/3: 456–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, T., Figge, F., Aragón-Correa, J. A. and Sharma, S. (2017), ‘Advancing research on corporate sustainability: off to pastures new or back to the roots?’, Business and Society, 56/2: 155–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. (1988), ‘Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism as a site of discourse on the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14/3: 575–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, D. (2006), ‘When we have never been human, what is to be done?’, Theory, Culture and Society, 23/7–8: 135–58.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (1991), Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, S. (ed.) (2004), The Feminist Standpoint Reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hardy, C. and Thomas, R. (2014), ‘Strategy, discourse and practice: the intensification of power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 320–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsock, N. (1983), ‘The feminist standpoint: developing the ground for a specifically feminist historical materialism’, in Harding, S., and Hintikka, M. B. (eds), Discovering Reality: 283–310. Dordrecht D. Reidel Publishing.Google Scholar
Howard-Grenville, J. and Lahneman, B. (2021), ‘Bringing the biophysical to the fore: re-envisioning organizational adaptation in the era of planetary shifts’, Strategic Organization, 19/3: 478–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Balogun, J. and Seidl, D. (2007), ‘Strategizing: the challenges of a practice perspective’, Human Relations, 60/1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. and Spee, P. (2015), ‘Constructing spaces for strategizing work: a multimodal perspective’, British Journal of Management, 26/S1: 26–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Dowell, G. W. and Berchicci, L. (2021), ‘Strategy and organization scholarship through a radical sustainability lens: a call for 5.0’, Strategic Organization, 19/3: 449–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Kavas, M. and Krull, E. (2021), ‘It’s practice. But is it strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality’, Organization Theory, 2: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Spee, P. and Smets, M. (2013), ‘Material artifacts: practices for doing strategy with “stuff”’, European Management Journal, 31/1: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2008), ‘Framing contests: strategy making under uncertainty’, Organization Science, 19: 729–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, K. and Bell, E. (2011), ‘Representing the successful managerial body’, in Jeanes, E., Knights, D., and Yancey Martin, P. (eds), Handbook of Gender, Work and Organization: 163–76. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Kløcker Larsen, R., Boström, M., Muonio Reindeer Herding District, Vilhelmina Sodra Reindeer Herding District, Voernese Reindeer Herding District and Wik-Karlsson, J. (2022), ‘The impacts of mining on Sámi lands: a knowledge synthesis from three reindeer herding districts’, The Extractive Industries and Society, 9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2022.101051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, E., Paroutis, S. and Heracleous, L. (2018), ‘The power of PowerPoint: a visual perspective on meaning making in strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 894–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knights, D. and Morgan, G. (1991), ‘Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: a critique’, Organization Studies, 12/2: 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohtamäki, M., Whittington, R., Vaara, E. and Rabetino, R. (2022), ‘Making connections: harnessing the diversity of strategy-as-practice research’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 24/2: 210–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, M. and Clegg, S. (2011), ‘Strategy as performative practice: the case of Sydney 2030’, Strategic Organization, 9/2: 136–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laamanen, T., Maula, M., Kajanto, M. and Kunnas, P. (2017), ‘The role of cognitive load in effective strategic issue management’, Long Range Planning, 51: 625–39.Google Scholar
Laine, P.-M., Meriläinen, S., Tienari, J. and Vaara, E. (2016), ‘Mastery, submission, and subversion: on the performative construction of strategist identity’, Organization, 23/4: 505–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lather, P. (1991), Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugones, M. (2010), ‘Towards a decolonial feminism’, Hypatia: The Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 25/4: 742–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäkinen, J. and Kasanen, E. (2016), ‘Boundaries between business and politics: a study on the division of moral labor’, Journal of Business Ethics, 134/1: 103–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCabe, D. (2010), ‘Strategy-as-power: ambiguity, contradiction and the exercise of power in a UK building society’, Organization, 17/2: 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meriläinen, S., Tienari, J. and Valtonen, A. (2015), ‘Headhunters and the “ideal” executive body’, Organization, 22/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, B. and Woodhams, C. (2012), ‘Introduction: new directions in gender, diversity and organization theorizing – re-imagining feminist post-colonialism, transnationalism and geographies of power’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 14: 123–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mies, M. and Shiva, V. (1993), Ecofeminism. Halifax, N.S./London/Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Fernwood Publications/Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanty, C. T. (2003), ‘Under Western eyes’ revisited: feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles’, Signs, 28: 499–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G. and Knights, D. (1991), ‘Gendering jobs: corporate strategy, managerial control and the dynamics of job segregation’, Work, Employment and Society, 5/2: 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocasio, W., Laamanen, T. and Vaara, E. (2018), ‘Communication and attention dynamics: an attention-based view on strategic change’, Strategic Management Journal, 39: 155–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilcher, J. and Whelehan, I. (2017), Key Concepts in Gender Studies. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullen, A. and Rhodes, C. (2014), ‘Corporeal ethics and the politics of resistance in organizations’, Organization, 21/6: 782–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravenscroft, A. (2018), ‘Strange weather: indigenous materialisms, new materialism, and colonialism’, Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry, 5/3: 353–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Revelles-Benavente, B. (2018), ‘Material knowledges: intra-acting van der Tuin’s new materialism with Barad’s agential realism’, Enrahonar. An International Journal of Theoretical and Practical Reason, 60: 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2014), ‘Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: towards taller and flatter ontologies’, Organization Studies, 35/10: 1407–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schües, C. (2018), ‘Phenomenology and Politics: Injustice and Prejudices’, in Cohen Shabot, S., and Landry, C. (eds), Rethinking Feminist Phenomenology: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives: 103–20, London: Rowman & Littlefield International Ltd.Google Scholar
Sikka, T. (2021), ‘Feminist materialism and Covid-19: the agential activation of everyday objects’, NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 29/1: 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, A. (2019), ‘Five movements in an embodied feminism: a memoir’, Human Relations, 72/1: 144–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slawinski, N., Pinkse, J., Busch, T. and Banerjee, B. S. (2017), ‘The role of short-termism and uncertainty avoidance in organizational inaction on climate change: a multi-level framework’, Business and Society, 56: 253–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparkes, A. C. (2000), ‘Autoethnography and narratives of self: reflection on criteria in action’, Sociology of Sport Journal, 17: 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, G. (1988), ‘Can the subaltern speak?’, in Nelson, C., and Grossberg, L. (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture: 271–313. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Stawarska, B. (2018), ‘Subject and structure in feminist phenomenology: re-reading Beauvoir with Butler’, in Cohen Shabot, S., and Landry, C. (eds), Rethinking Feminist Phenomenology: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives: 13–32. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
Sultana, F. (2022), ‘The unbearable heaviness of climate coloniality’, Political Geography, 99: 102638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. and Hardy, C. (2011), ‘Reframing resistance to organizational change’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27: 322–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, The Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., Rantakari, A. and Holstein, J. (2016), ‘Participation research and open strategy’, in Seidl, D., von Krogh, G., and Whittington, R. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Open Strategy: 27–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaara, E., Tienari, J. and Laurila, J. (2006), ‘Pulp and paper fiction: on the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring’, Organization Studies, 27/6: 789–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valkonen, S., Aikio, A., Alakorva, S. and Magga, S-M. (eds) (2022), The Sámi World. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitry, C., Sage, D. and Dainty, A. (2020), ‘Affective atmospheres of sensemaking and learning: workplace meetings as aesthetic and anaesthetic’, Management Learning, 51/3: 274–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuori, N., Vuori, T. O. and Huy, Q. N. (2018), ‘Emotional practices: how masking negative emotions impacts the post-acquisition integration process’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 859–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, K. and Koch, J. (2018), ‘Strategy as staged performance: a critical discursive perspective on keynote speeches as a genre of strategic communication’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 639–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2007), ‘Strategy practice and strategy process: family differences and the sociological eye’, Organization Studies, 28/10: 1575–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, R. (2019), Opening Strategy: Professional Strategists and Practice Change, 1960 to Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, A. and Whiteman, G. (2021), ‘A call for deep engagement for impact: addressing the planetary emergency’, Strategic Organization, 19/3: 526–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M. (2005), On Female Body Experience: ‘Throwing Like a Girl’ and Other Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×