Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T01:58:41.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - An Activity Theory Approach to Strategy as Practice

from Part II - Theoretical Resources: Social Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2025

By
Carola Wolf  and
Paula Jarzabkowski
Edited by
Damon Golsorkhi ,
Linda Rouleau ,
David Seidl  and
Eero Vaara
Damon Golsorkhi
Affiliation:
emlyon Business School
Linda Rouleau
Affiliation:
HEC Montréal
David Seidl
Affiliation:
Universität Zürich
Eero Vaara
Affiliation:
Saïd Business School, University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Carola Wolf and Paula Jarzabkowski focus on activity theory as an approach for studying strategy as practice. The origins of activity theory can be found in Lev Vygotsky’s seminal work, but it has been developed and used in a variety of ways, including foundational work in strategy as practice. Wolf and Jarzabkowski offer an overview of activity theory and propose an organizing framework for understanding how activity theory has been used in strategy as practice research: activity-in-practice, activity as part of practice, or activity-as-practice. They next explain the key theoretical elements of activity theory, which leads them to focus on how activity can be conceptualized as a product of activity systems, including the actors, the community that the actors interact with and the symbolic and material tools that mediate between actors, their community and their pursuit of activity. In this discussion, they not only highlight existing contributions but explain how future research could go much further using an activity theory approach.

Keywords

strategy as practicepractice approachactivity-theoryactivity systems
Type
Chapter
Information
Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice , pp. 130 - 146
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abdallah, C. and Langley, A. (2014), ‘The double edge of ambiguity in strategic planning’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 235–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, P. (2005), ‘The evolving object of software development’, Organization, 12/3: 401–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D., Karanasios, S. and Slavova, M. (2011), ‘Working with activity theory: context, technology, and information behavior’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62/4: 776–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, D., Brown, A., Karanasios, S. and Norman, A. (2013), ‘How should technology-mediated organizational change be explained? A comparison of the contributions of critical realism and activity theory’, MIS Quarterly, 37/3: 835–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archer, M. S. (1982), ‘Morphogenesis versus structuration: on combining structure and action’, British Journal of Sociology, 33/4: 455–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., Jarzabkowski, P. and Vaara, E. (2011), ‘Selling, resistance and reconciliation: a critical discursive approach to subsidiary role evolution in MNEs’, Journal of International Business, 42/6: 765–86.Google Scholar
Balogun, J., Jacobs, C. D., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014), ‘Placing strategy discourse in context: sociomateriality, sensemaking, and power’, Journal of Management Studies, 51/2: 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackler, F. (1993), ‘Knowledge and the theory of organizations: organizations as activity systems and the reframing of management’, Journal of Management Studies, 30/6: 863–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackler, F. (1995), ‘Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation’, Organization Studies, 16/6: 1021–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackler, F. and Regan, S. (2009), ‘Intentionality, agency, change: practice theory and management’, Management Learning, 40/2: 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackler, F., Crump, N. and McDonald, S. (1999), ‘Managing experts and competing through innovation: an activity theoretical analysis’, Organization, 6/1: 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackler, F., Crump, N. and McDonald, S. (2000), ‘Organizing processes in complex activity networks’, Organization, 7/2: 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, G. T. and Wolf, C. (2021), ‘The process affordances of strategy toolmaking when addressing wicked problems’, Journal of Management Studies, 58/2: 359–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burner, T. and Svendsen, B. (2020), ‘Activity Theory – Lev Vygotsky, Aleksei Leont’ev, Yrjö Engeström’, in Akpan, B., and Kennedy, T. J. (eds), Science Education in Theory and Practice. Springer Texts in Education: 311–22. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. W. and Appleyard, M. M. (2007), ‘Open innovation and strategy’, California Management Review, 50/1: 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawe, E. (1970), ‘The two sociologies’, British Journal of Sociology, 21/2: 207–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deken, F., Berends, H., Gemser, G. and Lauche, K. (2018), ‘Strategizing and the initiation of interorganizational collaboration through prospective resourcing’, Academy of Management Journal, 61/5: 1920–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, J. L., Lamothe, L. and Langley, A. (2001), ‘The dynamics of collective leadership and strategic change in pluralistic organizations’, Academy of Management Journal, 44/4: 809–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A. and Rouleau, L. (2007), ‘Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: rethinking theoretical frames’, Human Relations, 60/1: 179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1987), Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1990), Learning, Working and Imagining: Twelve Studies in Activity Theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1993), ‘Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: the case of primary care medical practice’, in Chaiklin, S., and Lave, J. (eds), Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context: 64–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1996), ‘Developmental work research as educational research’, Nordisk Pedagogik: Journal of Nordic Educational Research, 16/5: 131–43.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2000), ‘Activity theory and the social construction of knowledge: a story of four umpires’, Organization, 7/2: 301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2001), ‘Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization’, Journal of Education and Work, 14/1: 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (2009), ‘The future of activity theory: a rough draft’, in Sannino, A., Daniels, H., and Gutiérrez, K. D. (eds), Learning and Expanding with Activity Theory: 303–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. and Blackler, F. (2005), ‘On the life of the object’, Organization, 12/3: 307–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. and Sannino, A. (2011), ‘Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: a methodological framework’, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24/3: 368–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. and Sannino, A. (2021), ‘From mediated actions to heterogenous coalitions: four generations of activity-theoretical studies of work and learning’, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 28/1: 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y., Kerosuo, H. and Kajamaa, A. (2007), ‘Beyond discontinuity: expansive organizational learning remembered’, Management Learning, 38/3: 319–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, K. A. (2002), ‘Pursuing an evolving object: a case study in object formation and identification’, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9/2: 56–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frawley, W. (1997), Vygotsky and Cognitive Science: Language and the Unification of the Social and Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherardi, S. (2008), ‘Situated knowledge and situated action: what do practice-based studies promise?’, in Barry, D., and Hansen, H. (eds), SAGE Handbook of the New and Emerging in Management and Organization: 516–27. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2001) ‘The sociological foundation of organizational learning’, in Dierkes, M., Berthoin Antal, A., Child, J., and Nonaka, I. (eds), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge: 35–60. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gond, J.-P., Cabantous, L. and Krikorian, F. (2018), ‘How do things become strategic? “Strategifying” corporate social responsibility’, Strategic Organization, 16/3: 241–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haefliger, S., Monteiro, E., Foray, D. and von Krogh, G. (2011), ‘Social software and strategy’, Long Range Planning, 44/5: 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hautz, J., Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2017), ‘Open strategy: dimensions, dilemmas, dynamics’, Long Range Planning, 50/3: 298–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkinson, G., Whittington, R., Johnson, G. and Schwarz, M. (2006), ‘The role of strategy workshops in strategy development processes: formality, communication, coordination and inclusion’, Long Range Planning, 39/5: 479–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, D. (2000), ‘A dialogical approach to skill and skilled activity’, Human Relations, 53/7: 957–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995), Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977), Dialectical Logic: Essays on Its History and Theory. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Ilyenkov, E. V. (1982), The Dialectics of the Abstract and the Concrete in Marx’s Capital. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2003) ‘Strategic practices: an activity theory perspective on continuity and change’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. (2005), Strategy as Practice: An Activity-Based View. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Balogun, J. (2009), ‘The practice and process of delivering integration through strategic planning’, Journal of Management Studies, 46/8: 1255–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Bednarek, R. (2018), ‘Toward a social practice theory of relational competing’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 794–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Fenton, E. (2006), ‘Strategizing and organizing in pluralistic contexts’, Long Range Planning, 39/6: 631–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. and Spee, A. P. (2009), ‘Strategy-as-practice: a review and future directions for the field’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11/1: 69–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Kavas, M. and Krull, E. (2021), ‘It’s practice. But is it strategy? Reinvigorating strategy-as-practice by rethinking consequentiality’, Organization Theory, 2/3: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Lê, J. and van de Ven, A. H. (2013), ‘Responding to competing strategic demands: how organizing, belonging and performing paradoxes co-evolve’, Strategic Organization, 11/3: 245–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Seidl, D. and Balogun, J. (2022), ‘From germination to propagation: two decades of Strategy-as-Practice research and potential future directions’, Human Relations, 75/8: 1533–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, G., Melin, L. and Whittington, R. (2003), ‘Guest editors’ introduction: Micro strategy and strategizing: towards an activity-based view’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. (2011), ‘Strategy and PowerPoint: an inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making’, Organization Science, 22/2: 320–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaptelinin, V. and Nardi, B. (2006), Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kerosuo, H. (2011), ‘Caught between a rock and a hard place: from individually experienced double binds to collaborative change in surgery’, Journal of Change Management, 24/3: 388–99.Google Scholar
Knight, E., Paroutis, S. and Heracleous, L. (2018), ‘The power of PowerPoint: a visual perspective on meaning making in strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 894–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozulin, A. (1999), Vygotsky’s Psychology: A Biography of Ideas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leontiev, A. N. (1978), Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lockwood, D. (1964), ‘Social integration and system integration’, in Zollschan, G. K., and Hirsch, H. W. (eds), Explorations in Social Change: 244–57. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Loscher, G., Splitter, V. and Seidl, D. (2018), ‘Theodore Schatzki’s theory and its implications for Organization Studies’, in Clegg, S., and Pinae Cunha, M. (eds), Management, Organizations and Contemporary Social Theory: 115–34. 1st edn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Malopinsky, L. (2008), ‘Facilitating organizational change: the use of activity theory as a framework for social construction of strategy knowledge’, unpublished PhD thesis. Indianapolis: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2008), ‘On the problem of participation in strategy: a critical discursive perspective’, Organization Science, 19/2: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantere, S. and Whittington, R. (2021), ‘Becoming a strategist: the roles of strategy discourse and ontological security in managerial identity work’, Strategic Organization, 19/4; 553–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miettinen, R. and Virkkunen, J. (2005), ‘Epistemic objects, artifacts and organizational change’, Organization, 12/3: 437–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miettinen, R., Samra-Fredericks, D. and Yanow, D. (2009), ‘Re-turn to practice: an introductory essay’, Organization Studies, 30/12: 1309–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. and Waters, J. A. (1985), ‘Of strategies, deliberate and emergent’, Strategic Management Journal, 6/3: 257–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirabeau, L. and Maguire, S. (2014), ‘From autonomous strategic behavior to emergent strategy’, Strategic Management Journal, 35/8: 1202–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardi, B. A. (ed.) (1996a), Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human–Computer Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nardi, B. A. (1996b), ‘Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition’, in Nardi, B. A. (ed.), Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human–Computer Interaction: 69–102. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nardi, B. A. (2005), ‘Objects of desire: power and passion in collaborative activity’, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12/1: 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolini, D. (2009), ‘Zooming in and out: studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections’, Organization, 30/12: 1391–418.Google Scholar
Nicolini, D. (2012), Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Omicini, A. and Ossowski, S. (2004), ‘Coordination and collaboration activities in cooperative information systems’, International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 13/1: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2002), ‘Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing’, Organization Science, 13/3: 249–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlikowski, W. J. (2015), ‘Practice in research: phenomenon, perspective and philosophy’, in Gosorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., and Vaara, E. (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice: 23–33. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Paroutis, S. and Heracleous, L. (2013), ‘Discourse revisited: dimensions and employment of first-order strategy discourse during institutional adoption’, Strategic Management Journal, 34/8: 935–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettit, K. L. and Crossan, M. M. (2020), ‘Strategic renewal: beyond the functional resource role of occupational members’, Strategic Management Journal, 41/6: 1112–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabardel, P. and Beguin, P. (2005), ‘Instrument mediated activity: from subject development to anthropocentric design’, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 6/5: 429–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reckwitz, A. (2002), ‘Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5/2: 243–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouleau, L. and Cloutier, C. (2022), ‘It’s strategy. But is it practice? Desperately seeking social practice in strategy-as-practice research’, Strategic Organization, 20/4: 722–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvato, C. (2003), ‘The role of micro-strategies in the engineering of firm evolution’, Journal of Management Studies, 40/1: 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sannino, A. (2020), ‘Enacting the utopia of eradicating homelessness: Toward a new generation of activity-theoretical studies of learning’, Studies in Continuing Education, 42/2: 163–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2001), ‘Practice mind-ed orders’, in Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K., and von Savigny, E. (eds), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory: 42–55. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2002), The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, T. R. (2012), ‘A primer on practices: theory and research’, in Higgs, J., Barnett, R., Billett, S., Hutchings, M., and Trede, F. (eds), Practice, Education, Work and Society, vol. 6, Practice-Based Education: Perspectives and Strategies: 13–26. Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Schatzki, T. R., Knorr Cetina, K. and von Savigny, E. (eds) (2001), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seidl, D. and Werle, F. (2018), ‘Inter-organizational sensemaking in the face of strategic meta-problems: requisite variety and dynamics of participation’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 830–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, D. and Whittington, R. (2014), ‘Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: towards taller and flatter ontologies’, Organization Studies, 35/10: 1407–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillince, J., Jarzabkowski, P. and Shaw, D. (2012), ‘Shaping strategic action through the rhetorical construction and exploitation of ambiguity’, Organization Science, 23/3: 630–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smets, M., Jarzabkowski, P., Burke, G. T. and Spee, A. P. (2015), ‘Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: balancing conflicting-yet-complementary logics in practice’, Academy of Management Journal, 58/3: 932–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. K. (2014), ‘Dynamic decision making: a model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes’, Academy of Management Journal, 57/6: 1592–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, A. P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2009), ‘Strategy tools as boundary objects’, Strategic Organization, 7/2: 223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spee, A. P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2017), ‘Agreeing on what? Creating joint accounts of strategic change’, Organization Science, 28/1: 152–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spender, J.-C. (1995), ‘Organizations are activity systems, not merely systems of thought’, in Shrivastava, P., and Stubbart, C. (eds), Advances in Strategic Management: Challenges within the Mainstream, vol. B: 153–74. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Splitter, V., Jarzabkowski, P. and Seidl, D. (2021), ‘Middle managers’ struggle over their subject position in open strategy processes’, Journal of Management Studies, published online 30 September 2021, doi:10.1111/joms.12776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Splitter, V., Dobusch, L., von Krogh, G., Whittington, R. and Walgenbach, P. (2023), ‘Openness as organizing principle: Introduction to the Special Issue’, Organization Studies, 44/1: 7–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stetsenko, A. (2005), ‘Activity as object-related: resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity’, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12/1: 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, L. (1987), Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, S. (1994), The Social Theory of Practices. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Vaara, E. and Whittington, R. (2012), ‘Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously’, Academy of Management Annals, 6/1: 285–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., Kleymann, B. and Seristö, H. (2004), ‘Strategies as discursive constructions: the case of airline alliances’, Journal of Management Studies, 41/1: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaara, E., Sorsa, V. and Pälli, P. (2010), ‘On the force potential of strategy texts: a critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization’, Organization, 17/6: 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1978), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, K. (2004), ‘Activity systems and conflict resolution in an online professional communication course’, Business Communication Quarterly, 67/2: 182–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiser, A., Jarzabkowski, P. and Laamanen, T. (2020), ‘Completing the adaptive turn: an integrative view of strategy implementation’, Academy of Management Annals, 14/2: 969–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G. (2002), ‘The role of dialogue in activity theory’, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9/1: 43–66,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, G. (2007), ‘The mediating role of discoursing in activity’, Mind, Culture, and Activity, 14/3: 160–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenzel, M. and Koch, J. (2018), ‘Strategy as staged performance: a critical discursive perspective on keynote speeches as a genre of strategic communication’, Strategic Management Journal, 39/3: 639–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. (1985), Vygotsky and the Social Formation of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, R. (2006), ‘Completing the practice turn in strategy research’, Organization Studies, 27/5: 613–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×