Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T19:45:12.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Second Language Listening: Current Ideas, Current Issues

from Part III - Skill Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2019

By
John Field
Edited by
John W. Schwieter  and
Alessandro Benati
John W. Schwieter
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Alessandro Benati
Affiliation:
American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Get access

Summary

This chapter starts (12.2) by mentioning the drawbacks of the approach conventionally adopted in second language (L2) listening instruction—in particular, its focus on the products of listening rather than the processes that contribute to it. It then offers an overview of our present understanding of what those processes are, drawing upon research findings in psycholinguistics, phonetics, and applied linguistics. section 12.3 examines what constitutes proficient listening and how the performance of an L2 listener diverges from it; and section 12.4 considers the perceptual problems caused by the nature of spoken input. Subsequent sections then cover various areas of research in L2 listening. Section 12.5 provides a brief summary of topics that have been of interest to researchers over the years; and section 12.6 reviews the large body of research into listening strategies. Section 12.7 then covers a number of interesting issues that have come to the fore in recent studies: multimodality; levels of listening vocabulary; cross-language phoneme perception; the use of a variety of accents; the validity of playing a recording twice; text authenticity; and listening anxiety. A final section (12.8) identifies one or two recurring themes that have arisen and considers how listening instruction is likely to develop in the future.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning , pp. 283 - 319
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D. & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61, 364–373.Google Scholar
Aitchison, J. (2008). Words in the mind (4th edn). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its implications (5th edn). New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1989). Functionalism and the Competition Model. In MacWhinney, B. & Bates, E. (eds.), The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing (pp. 777–780). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Batty, A. O. (2015). A comparison of video- and audio-mediated listening tests with many-facet Rasch modelling and differential distractor functioning. Language Testing, 32(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekleyen, N. (2009). Helping teachers become better English students: Causes, effects, and coping strategies for foreign language listening anxiety. System, 37(4), 664–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R. (2003). The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(3), 1600–1610.Google Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W. (ed.). Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Munro, M. J. & Bohn, O.-S. (eds.) Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, A., Wayland, S. C., Rhoades, E., Blodgett, A., Linck, J., & Ross, S. (2010). What makes listening difficult: Factors affecting second language comprehension. Report: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S. (1995). Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 279–304). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106(2), 707–729.Google Scholar
Braxton, M. A. (1999). Adult ESL language learning strategies: Case studies of preferred learning styles and perceived cultural influences in academic listening tasks. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1986). Investigating listening comprehension in context. Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 284–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. (1990). Listening to spoken English (2nd edn). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1995). Speakers, listeners and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. D., & Kondo-Brown, K. (Eds.) (2006). Perspectives on teaching connected speech to second language speakers. Mãnoa, HI: University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cauldwell, R. (2013). Phonology for listening. Birmingham: Speechinaction.Google Scholar
Cervantes, R., & Gainer, G. (1992). The effects of syntactic simplification and repetition on listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 26(4), 767–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, A. C.-S. (2008). Sources of listening anxiety in learning English as a foreign language. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 106(1), 21–34.Google Scholar
Chang, A. C.-S., & Read, J. (2006). The effect of listening support on the listening performance of EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 375–397.Google Scholar
Chang, A. C.-S., & Read, J. (2008). Reducing listening test anxiety through various forms of listening support. TESL-EJ, 12(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Chung, J. M. (1999). The effects of using video texts supported with advance organizers and captions. Foreign Language Annals, 32(3), 295–307.Google Scholar
Clopper, C. G., & Pisoni, D. B. (2004). Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects. Language and Speech, 47, 207–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies of language learning and language use. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Coniam, D. (2001). The use of audio or video comprehension as an assessment instrument in the certification of English language teachers: A case study. System, 29, 1–14.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2018) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Avail-able online at https://rm.coe.int/cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-2018/1680787989.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. (1990). Exploiting prosodic possibilities. In Altmann, G. (ed.), Cognitive models of speech processing: Psycholinguistic and computational perspectives (pp. 105–121). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (1997). The comparative perspective on spoken-language processing. Speech Communication, 21, 3–15.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (2012). Native listening. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., & Clifton, C. (1999). Comprehending spoken language: A blueprint of the listener. In Brown, C. M. & Hagoort, P. (eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 123–166). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A., & Otake, T. (1994). Mora or phoneme? Further evidence for language-specific listening. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 824–844.Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, E. (2004). Language, Mind and Brain. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Scott, M. L. (1997). Communication strategies in a second language: Definitions and taxonomies. Language Learning, 47(1), 173–210.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (eds.) (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Faerch, G., & Kasper, G. (1983). Plans and strategies in foreign language communication. In Faerch, G. & Kasper, G. (eds.), Strategies in interlanguage communication. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Feltovich, P. J., Prietula, M. J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 41–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Field, J. (1998). Skills and strategies: Towards a new methodology for listening. ELT Journal, 54(2), 110–118.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2000). “Not waving but drowning”: A reply to Tony Ridgway. ELT Journal, 54(2), 186–195.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2001). Lexical segmentation in first and foreign language listening. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2004). An insight into listeners problems: Too much bottom-up or too much top-down? System, 32, 363–377.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2008a). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2008b). Revising segmentation hypotheses in first and second language listening. System, 36, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, J. (2008c). Bricks or mortar: Which parts of the input does a second language listener rely on? TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 1–22.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2012). The cognitive validity of the lecture based question in the IELTS listening paper. In Taylor, L. & Weir, C. (eds.), IELTS collected papers 2: Research in reading and listening assessment (pp. 391–453). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2013). Cognitive validity. In Geranpayeh, A. & Taylor, L. (eds.), Examining listening (pp. 77–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2014). Myth: Pronunciation teaching needs to fix in the minds of learners a set of distinct consonant and vowel sounds. In Grant, L. (ed.), Pronunciation myths (pp. 80–106). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2015). The effects of single and double play upon listening test outcomes and cognitive processing. Report: British Council ARAGS Reports. Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil.org/exam/aptis/research/publications.Google Scholar
Field, J. (2018). Rethinking the second language listening test: From theory to practice. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–276). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Floccia, C., Butler, J., Goslin, J., & Ellis, L. (2009). Regional and foreign accent processing in English: Can listeners adapt? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 38(4), 379–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floccia, C., Goslin, J., Girard, F., & Konopczynski, G. (2006). Does a regional accent perturb speech processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1276–1293.Google Scholar
Fowler, C., & Magnuson, J. S. (2012). Speech perception. In Spivey, M., McRae, K., & Joanisse, M. (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 3–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geranpayeh, A., & Taylor, L. (2008). Examining listening: Developments and issues in assessing second language listening. Cambridge ESOL Research Notes, 32, 2–5.Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M.-A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gilmore, A. (2004). A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, A. (2011). “I Prefer Not Text”: Developing Japanese learners’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Language Learning, 61(3), 786–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, C. (1998). How ESL learners with different listening abilities use comprehension strategies and tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2, 124–147.Google Scholar
Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55–75.Google Scholar
Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60(3), 222–232.Google Scholar
Goldinger, S. D. (1997). Words and voices: Perception and production in an episodic lexicon. In Johnson, K. & Mullennix, J. W. (eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 33–66). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251–279.Google Scholar
Gompel, R. P. G., & Pickering, M. (2007). Syntactic parsing. In Gaskell, G. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 289–398). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learner’s perspective. System, 34(2), 165–182.Google Scholar
Graham, S. (2011). Self efficacy and academic listening. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(2), 113–117.Google Scholar
Green, K. P. (1998). The use of auditory and visual information during phonetic processing: Implications for theories of speech perception. In Campbell, R. & Dodd, B. (eds.) Hearing by eye II: Advances in the psychology of speechreading and audiovisual speech (pp. 3–25). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Grellet, F. (1981). Developing reading skills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grosjean, F. (1985). The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets: Evidence and implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 299–310.Google Scholar
Gruba, P. (2004). Understanding digitized second language videotext. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(1), 51–82.Google Scholar
Guichon, N., & McLornan, S. (2008). The effects of multimodality on L2 learners: Implications for CALL resource design. System, 36, 85–93.Google Scholar
Hansen, C., & Jensen, C. (1994). Evaluating lecture comprehension. In Flowerdew, J. (ed.) Academic listening: Research perspectives (pp. 241–268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, L. (2011). The use of speakers with L2 accents in academic English learning listening assessment: A validation study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Harding, L., Alderson, J. C., & Brunfaut, T. (2015). Diagnostic assessment of reading and listening in a second or foreign language: Elaborating on diagnostic principles. Language Testing, 32(3), 317–336.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S. (1999a). Auditory capacities and phonological development: Animal, baby and foreign listeners. In Pickett, J. M. (ed.) The acoustics of speech communication: Fundamentals, speech perception theory, and technology (pp. 183–197). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S. (1999b). Re-evaluating assumptions about speech perception: Interactive and integrative theories. In Pickett, J. M. (ed.) The acoustics of speech communication: Fundamentals, speech perception theory, and technology (pp. 232–288). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Henning, G. (1990). A study of the effects of variation of short term memory load, reading response length and processing hierarchy on TOEFL listening comprehension item performance. Princeton, NJ: ETS Report, 33.Google Scholar
Herron, C., & Seay, I. (1991). The effect of authentic oral texts on student listening comprehension in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 24(6), 487–495.Google Scholar
Herron, C., Cole, P., York, H., & Linden, P. (1998). A comparison study of student retention of foreign language video: Declarative versus interrogative advance organizer. The Modern Language Journal, 82(2), 237–247.Google Scholar
Horwitz, E. K. (2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112–126.Google Scholar
Hulstijn, J. (2003). Connectionist models of language processing and the training of listening skills with the aid of multimedia software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(5), 413–425.Google Scholar
Imai, S., Walley, A. C., & Flege, J. E. (2005) Lexical frequency and neighborhood density effects on the recognition of native and Spanish-accented words by native English and Spanish listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 896–906.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 83–103.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (2005). The “general” study of expertise. In Johnson, K. (ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 11–33). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (2008). Speaker normalisation in speech perception. In Pisoni, D. B. & Remez, R. E. (eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 363–389), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kim, S. Y. (2000). Foreign language listening anxiety: A study of Korean students learning English. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Klatt, D. H. (1979). Speech perception: A model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 279–312.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1994). Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1993). The architecture of normal spoken language use. In Blanken, G., Dittman, J., Grimm, H., Marshall, J., & Wallesch, C.-W. (eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies (pp. 1–15). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. (2006). Academic listening: Marrying top and bottom. In Martinez-Flor, A. & Uso-Juan, E. (eds.), Current trends in learning and teaching the four skills within a communicative framework (pp. 91–110). Amsterdam: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. (2009). Teaching second language listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macaro, E., Graham, S., & Vanderplank, R. (2007). A review of listening strategies: Focus on sources of knowledge and on success. In Cohen, A. D. & Macaro, E. (eds.), Language learner strategies (pp. 165–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Major, R. C., Fitzmaurice, S. F., Bunta, F., & Balasubramian, C. (2002). The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 173–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, R. C., Fitzmaurice, S. F., Bunta, F., & Balasubramian, C. (2005). Testing the effects of regional, ethnic and international dialects of English on listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55(1), 37–69.Google Scholar
Mattys, S. L., & Melhorn, J.F. (2005). How do syllables contribute to the perception of spoken English? Insight from the migration paradigm. Language and Speech, 48, 223–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1997). Written and spoken vocabulary. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 20–39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McGurk, H., & McDonald, J. (1976). Hearing lips and seeing voices. Nature, 264, 746–748.Google Scholar
McQueen, J. M. (1998). Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 21–46.Google Scholar
McQueen, J. M. (2007). Eight questions about spoken word recognition. In Gaskell, G. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 37–54). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mendelsohn, D. J. (1994). Learning to listen: A strategy-based approach for the second-language learner. San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.Google Scholar
Miller, J. L. (1990). Speech perception. In Oscherson, D. N. & Lasnik, H. (eds.), An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 1, pp. 119–157). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Milton, J., & Hopkins, N. (2006). Comparing phonological and orthographic vocabulary size. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 127–147.Google Scholar
Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 50, 323–331.Google Scholar
Morley, J. (2001). Aural comprehension instruction: Principles and practice. In Celce-Murcia, M. (ed.). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd edn., pp. 81–106). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Morton, S. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of foreign accents. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 111–131.Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching reading skills in a foreign language. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Nygaard, L. C. (2008). Linguistic and nonlinguistic properties of speech. In Pisoni, D. B. & Remez, R. E. (eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 390–413), Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Nygaard, L. C., & Pisoni, D. B. (1995). Speech perception: New directions in research and theory. In Miller, J. L. & Eimas, P. D. (eds.), Speech, language and communication (pp. 63–96). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ockey, G., & French, R. (2016). From one to multiple accents on a test of L2 listening comprehension. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 693–715.Google Scholar
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmeri, T. J., Goldinger, S. D., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 309–328.Google Scholar
Pashler, H., & Johnston, J.C. (1998). Attentional limitations in dual task performance. In Pashler, H. (ed.), Attention (pp. 155–189). Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pemberton, R. (2003). Spoken Word Recognition in a Second Language. Hong Kong: HK University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (eds.), Frequency effects and emergent grammar (pp. 137–158). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Piske, T. (2007). Implications of James E. Flege’s research for the foreign language classroom. In Munro, M. J. & Bohn, O.-S. (eds.), Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production (pp. 301–314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. B. (1997). Some thoughts on “normalization” in speech perception. In Johnson, K. & Mullennix, J. W. (eds.), Talker variability in speech processing (pp. 33–66). San Diego, CA: Academic Press,Google Scholar
Pisoni, D. B., & Luce, P. A. (1987). Acoustic-phonetic representation in word recognition. In Frauenfelder, U. H. & Tyler, L. K. (eds.), Spoken word recognition (pp. 21–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Richards, J. (1983). Listening comprehension: Approach, design, procedure. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 219–239.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. (1966). Listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 50(4), 196–204.Google Scholar
Rost, M. (1992). Listening in language learning. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Rost, M., & Ross, S. (1991). Learner use of strategies in interaction: Typology and teachabilty. Language Learning, 41, 235–273.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199–211.Google Scholar
Ruhm, R., Leitner-Jones, C., Kulmhofer, A., Kiefer, T., Mlakar, H., & Itzlinger-Bruneforth, U. (2016). Playing the recording once or twice: Effects on listening test performances, International Journal of Listening, 30(1–2), 67–83.Google Scholar
Salisbury, K. (2005). The edge of expertise: Towards an understanding of listening test item writing as professional practice. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Kings College London.Google Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Cross language speech perception. In Pisoni, D. B. & Remez, R. E. (eds.), The handbook of speech perception (pp. 546–566). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (2016). Automaticity. In Robinson, P. (ed.), The Routledge encyclopaedia of second language acquisition (pp. 53–57). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sherman, J. (1997). The effect of question preview in listening comprehension tests. Language Testing, 14, 185–213.Google Scholar
Shockey, L. (2003). Sound patterns of spoken English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Staehr, L. S. (2009). Vocabulary knowledge and advanced listening comprehension in English as foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 577–607.Google Scholar
Strange, W. (1999). Perception of vowels. In Pickett, J. M. (ed.), The acoustics of speech communication (pp. 153–165). Needham Heights, MA: Alleyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Strange, W., & Shafer, V. L. (2008). Speech perception in second language learners: The re-education of selective perception. In Hansen Edwards, J. G. & Zampini, M. L. (eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 153–191). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sueyoshi, A., & Hardison, D. M. (2005). The role of gesture and facial cues in second language listening comprehension. Language Learning, 55, 661–699.Google Scholar
Suvorov, R. (2009). Context visuals in L2 listening tests: The effects of photographs and video vs. audio-only format. In Chapelle, C. A., Jun, H. G., & Katz, I. (eds.), Developing and evaluating language learning materials. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Suvorov, R. (2015). Interacting with visuals in L2 listening tests: An eye-tracking study. Report: British Council ARAGS Reports, London. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/interacting_with_visuals_in_l2_listening_tests_suvorov.pdf.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (1995). Sentence comprehension. In Miller, J. L. & Eimas, P. D. (eds.), Speech language and communication (pp. 217–262). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. (2006). The changing landscape of English: Implications for language assessment. ELT Journal, 60(1), 51–60.Google Scholar
Teichert, H. U. (1996). A comparative study using illustrations, brainstorming and questions as advance organizers. Modern Language Review, 80(4), 509–517.Google Scholar
Tsui, A., & Fullilove, J. (1998). Bottom-up or top-down processing as a discriminator of L2 listening performance. Applied Linguistics, 19, 432–451.Google Scholar
Ur, P. (1984). Teaching listening comprehension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 457–479.Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3–25.Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency? The Modern Language Journal, 90, 6–18.Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 6–18.Google Scholar
Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching learners how to listen does make a difference. Language Learning, 65, 470–497.Google Scholar
Vogely, A. (1995). Perceived strategy use during performance on three authentic listening comprehension tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 41–56.Google Scholar
Vogely, A. (1999). Addressing listening comprehension anxiety. In Young, D. J. (ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language learning (pp. 106–123). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wagner, E., & Toth, P. A. (2014). Teaching and testing L2 Spanish listening using scripted vs unscripted texts. Foreign Language Annals, 47(3), 404–422.Google Scholar
Wesche, M. B., & Paribakht, T. S. (2010). Lexical inferencing in a first and second language. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wu, W. M., & Stansfield, C. W. (2001). Towards authenticity of task in test development. Language Testing, 18(2), 187–206.Google Scholar
Zhang, X. (2013). Foreign language listening anxiety and listening performance: Conceptualizations and causal relationships. System, 41(1), 164–177.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×