The Qualitative Science of Vygotskian Sociocultural Psychology and L2 Development

doi:10.1017/9781108333603.004

3 - The Qualitative Science of Vygotskian Sociocultural Psychology and L2 Development

from Part I - Theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2019

Rémi A. van Compernolle

Edited by

John W. Schwieter and

Alessandro Benati

Show author details

John W. Schwieter: Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Alessandro Benati: Affiliation:
American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Since the early papers of Frawley and Lantolf (1985; Lantolf & Frawley, 1984), Vygotskian psychology, often referred to as sociocultural theory (SCT), has gained prominence as one of several “mainstream” (Swain & Deters, 2007) or “alternative” (Atkinson, 2011) second language acquisition (SLA) theories. A central concern of the general theory is how sign systems (e.g., language, literacy, numeracy) are internalized to reorganize basic, or biologically endowed, psychological functions into higher, or culturally mediated, ones, which give rise to consciousness. In particular, Vygotsky (1986) focused on the role of language in constituting higher mental functions: language does not simply facilitate cognition, but it is part and parcel of it. In this way, Vygotsky’s semiotic analysis of consciousness and word meaning connects him not only to Marxian dialectical materialism, but also to the German psycholinguistic tradition inspired by such scholars as Hegel and Herder, as Leitch (2011) has pointed out: “Human consciousness is formed through linguistic interactions, and the language which constitutes consciousness is therefore always part of it, unable to be separated” (p. 306).

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning , pp. 62 - 83

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333603.004 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adamson, H. D. (2009). Interlanguage variation in theoretical and pedagogical perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Atkinson, D. (ed.). (2011). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Backhurst, D. (2007). Vygotsky’s demons. In Cole, M., Daniels, H., & Wertsch, J. (eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 50–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blommaert, J., & Varis, P. (2013). Enough is enough: The heuristics of authenticity in superdiversity. In Duarte, J. & Gogolin, I. (eds.), Linguistic superdiversity in urban areas: Research approaches (pp. 143–160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chaiklin, S. (2002). A developmental teaching approach to schooling. In Wells, G. & Claxton, G. (eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 167–180). London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Coleman, J. A. (2013). Researching whole people and whole lives. In Kinginger, C. (ed.), Social and cultural aspects of language learning in study abroad (pp. 17–44). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Davydov, V. V. (1995). The influence of L. S. Vygotsky on education theory, research, and practice (trans. S. T. Kerr). Educational Researcher, 24(3), 12–21.CrossRef Google Scholar

Donato, R., & Davin, K. (in press). The genesis of classroom discursive practices as history-in-person processes. Language Teaching Research.Google Scholar

Fasold, R., & Preston, D. (2007). The psycholinguistic unity of inherent variability: Old Occam whips out his razor. In Bayley, R. & Lucas, C. (eds.), Sociolinguistic variation: Theory, methods, and applications (pp. 45–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fernández, J. (2016). Problematizing authentic out-of-class interactions in study abroad. In van Compernolle, R. A. & McGregor, J. (eds.), Authenticity, language, and interaction in second language contexts (pp. 131–150). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Frawley, W., & Lantolf, J. P. (1985). Second language discourse: A Vygotskian perspective. Applied Linguistics, 6, 19–44.CrossRef Google Scholar

González Rey, F. L., & Martínez, A. M. (2016). Perezhivanie: Advancing on its implications for the cultural-historical approach. International Research in Early Childhood Education, 7, 142–160.Google Scholar

Holland, D., Lachicotte, W. Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Kinginger, C. (2008). Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France. The Modern Language Journal, 92(S1), 1–124.Google Scholar

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P., & Frawley, W. (1984). Second language performance and Vygotskyan psycholinguistics: Implications for L2 instruction. In Manning, A., Martin, P., & McCalla, K. (eds.), The tenth LACUS forum 1983 (pp. 425–440). Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding learners as people. In Breen, M. (ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141–158). London: Pearson.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Leitch, D. G. (2011). Vygotsky, consciousness, and the German psycholinguistic tradition. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18, 305–318.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. (2012). The original sin of cognitive science. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 396–403.Google Scholar

Mok, N. (2015). Toward an understanding of perezhivanie for sociocultural SLA research. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 2, 139–159.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.Google Scholar

Ollman, B. (2003). Dance of the dialectic: Steps in Marx’s method. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Packer, M. (2011). The science of qualitative research. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ratner, C. (2006). Cultural psychology: A perspective on psychological functioning and social reform. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Shively, R. L. (2016). An activity theoretical approach to social interaction during study abroad. L2 Journal, 8, 51–75.Google Scholar

Smagorinsky, P. (2011). Vygotsky’s stage theory: The psychology of art and the actor under the direction of perezhivanie. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18, 319–341.Google Scholar

Swain, M., & Deters, P. (2007). “New” mainstream SLA theory: Expanded and enriched. The Modern Language Journal, 91(S1), 820–836.Google Scholar

Smedslund, J. (1979). Between the analytic and the arbitrary: A case study of psychological research. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 20, 129–140.Google Scholar

Smedslund, J. (1997). The structure of psychological common sense. Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going in interlanguage pragmatics. Language Teaching, 48, 1–5.Google Scholar

Tarone, E. (1988). Variation in interlanguage. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Tarone, E. (2007). Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition research—1997–2007. The Modern Language Journal, 91(S1), 837–848.Google Scholar

Toomela, A., & Valsiner, J. (eds.) (2010). Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? Charlotte, NC. Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J., & Sato, T. (2006). Whom to study in cultural psychology: From random to historically structured sampling. In Straub, J., Kolbl, C., Weidemann, D., & Zielke, B. (eds.), Pursuit of meaning. Theoretical and methodological advances in cultural and cross-cultural psychology. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar

Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (2014). Encountering the border: Vygotsky’s zona blizhaishego razvitia and its implications for theories of development. In Yasnitsky, A., van der Veer, R., & Ferrari, M. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 148–173). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van Compernolle, R. A. (2014). Sociocultural theory and L2 instructional pragmatics. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

van Compernolle, R. A. (2016). Sociolinguistic authenticity and classroom L2 learners: Production, perception, and metapragmatics. In van Compernolle, R. A. & McGregor, J. (eds.), Authenticity, language, and interaction in second language contexts (pp. 61–81). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

van Compernolle, R. A., Gomez-Laich, M. P., & Weber, A. (2016). Teaching L2 Spanish sociopragmatics through concepts: A classroom-based study. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 341–361.Google Scholar

van Compernolle, R. A., & Henery, A. (2014). Instructed concept appropriation and L2 pragmatic development in the classroom. Language Learning, 64, 549–578.Google Scholar

van Compernolle, R. A., & Williams, L. (2012). Reconceptualizing sociolinguistic competence as mediated action: Identity, meaning-making, agency. The Modern Language Journal, 96, 234–250.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1971). The psychology of art. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. New York: Plenum Press. Retrieved from https://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/crisis/index.htm.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1994). The problem of the environment. In van der Veer, R. and Valsiner, J. (eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 338–354). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Zinchenko, V. P. (2002). From classical to organic psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 39, 32–77.Google Scholar

Zinchenko, V. P. (2009). Consciousness as the subject matter and task of psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 47, 44–75.CrossRef Google Scholar