Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-5ws7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-11T17:35:57.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Prosodic Constructions

from Part IV - Multimodality and Construction Grammar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2025

By
Nigel G. Ward
Edited by
Mirjam Fried  and
Kiki Nikiforidou
Mirjam Fried
Affiliation:
Univerzita Karlova
Kiki Nikiforidou
Affiliation:
University of Athens, Greece
Get access

Summary

Spoken language exhibits not only grammatical constructions but also prosodic constructions. While the latter are also form–function mappings, there are differences: Prosodic constructions involve temporal configurations of diverse prosodic features, their functions are primarily pragmatics-related and interactional, they can be present to greater or lesser degrees, and they are frequently superimposed and aligned in complex ways with other prosodic constructions and with grammatical constructions. This chapter illustrates these properties with examples from American English.

Keywords

temporal configurationsprosodic featuresform–function mappingspragmatic functionsinteractiongradient meaningssuperposition
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Construction Grammar , pp. 337 - 353
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benus, S. (2021). Investigating Spoken English: A Practical Guide to Phonetics and Phonology Using Praat. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boas, H. C. (2022). From construction grammar(s) to pedagogical construction grammar. In Boas, H. C., ed., Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar: Learning and Teaching (with) Constructions. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brône, G. & Zima, E. (2014). Towards a dialogic Construction Grammar: Ad hoc routines and resonance activation. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 457–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cangemi, F. & Niebuhr, O. (2018). Rethinking reduction and canonical forms. In Cangemi, F., Clayards, M., Niebuhr, O., Schuppler, B., & Zellers, M., eds., Rethinking Reduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language and Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Day-O’Connell, J. (2013). Speech, song, and the minor third: An acoustic study of the stylized interjection. Music Perception, 30, 441–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64(3), 501–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, M. & Östman, J.-O. (2005). Construction Grammar and spoken language: The case of pragmatic particles. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(11), 1752–1778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilquin, G. (2022). Constructing learner speech: On the use of spoken data in applied Construction Grammar. In H. C. Boas, ed., Directions for Pedagogical Construction Grammar: Learning and Teaching (with) Constructions, 49, 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gras, P. & Elvira-Garcia, W. (2021). The role of intonation in Construction Grammar: On prosodic constructions. Journal of Pragmatics, 180, 232–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imo, W. & Lanwer, J. P. (2020). Prosodie und Konstruktionsgrammatik. In Imo, W. & Lanwer, J. P., eds., Prosodie und Konstruktionsgrammatik. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurumada, C., Brown, M., & Tannenhaus, M. K. (2012). Pragmatic interpretation of contrastive prosody: It looks like speech adaptation. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 647–652. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6jw49594.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R. (2008). Intonational Phonology, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landgraf, R. (2014). Are you serious? Irony and the perception of emphatic intensification. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages (TAL), pp. 91–94. www.isca-archive.org/tal_2014/landgraf14_tal.html.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (In press). A quantitative corpus approach to the (English) ironic tone of voice. In Schlechtweg, M., ed., Interfaces of Phonetics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marge, M., Espy-Wilson, C., Ward, N. G., Alwan, A., Artzi, Y., Bansal, M., Blankenship, G., Chai, J., III, Daumé, Dey, H., Harper, D., Howard, M., Kennington, T., Kruijff-Korbayová, C., Manocha, I., Matuszek, D., Mead, C., Mooney, R., Moore, R., Ostendorf, R. K., Pon-Barry, M., Rudnicky, H., Scheutz, A. I., Amant, M., Sun, R. S., Tellex, T., Traum, S., D., & Yu, Z. (2022). Spoken language interaction with robots: Research issues and recommendations. Computer Speech and Language, 71, 101255. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.05533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niebuhr, O. (2015). Stepped intonation contours: A new field of complexity. In Skarnitzl, R. & Niebuhr, O., eds., Tackling the Complexity of Speech. Prague: Charles University Press, pp. 39–74.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, O. (2019). Pitch accents as multiparametric configurations of prosodic features: Evidence from pitch-accent specific micro-rhythms in German. In Nyvad, A. M., ed., A Sound Approach to Language Matters: In Honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn. Aarhus: Aarhus University, pp. 321–351.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, O. & Ward, N. G. (2018). Challenges in the modeling of pragmatics-related prosody: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of the International Phonetics Association, 48, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, R. (2010). Prosodic constructions in making complaints. In Barth-Weingarten, D., Reber, E., & Selting, M., eds., Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poldvere, N. & Paradis, C. (2020). ‘What and then a little robot brings it to you?’ The reactive what-x construction in spoken dialogue. English Language and Linguistics, 24(2), 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchart, A. & Arvaniti, A. (2014). The form and use of uptalk in Southern Californian English. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, pp. 20–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shriberg, E. E. & Stolcke, A. (2004). Direct modeling of prosody: An overview of applications in automatic speech processing. In Speech Prosody, pp. 575–582. www.isca-archive.org/speechprosody_2004/shriberg04_speechprosody.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szczepek Reed, B. (2010). Analysing Conversation: An Introduction to Prosody. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Torreira, F. & Grice, M. (2018). Melodic constructions in Spanish: Metrical structure determines the association properties of intonational tones. Journal of the International Phonetics Association, 48, 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigario, M., Cruz, M., & Frota, S. (2019). Why tune or text? The role of language phonological profile in the choice of strategies for tune-text adjustment. In Proceedings of the International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, pp. 567–571. https://assta.org/proceedings/ICPhS2019Microsite/pdf/full-paper_443.pdf.Google Scholar
Ward, N. G. (2018). A corpus-based exploration of the functions of disaligned pitch peaks in American English dialog. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody, pp. 349–353. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2018-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, N. G. (2019). Prosodic Patterns in English Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, N. G. (2020). Ten prosodic patterns of turn-taking in Japanese conversation. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Speech Prosody, pp. 764–768. www.isca-archive.org/speechprosody_2020/ward20b_speechprosody.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, N. G. & Jodoin, J. A. (2019). A prosodic configuration that conveys positive assessment in American English. In International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, pp. 3368–3372. https://assta.org/proceedings/ICPhS2019/papers/ICPhS_3417.pdf.Google Scholar
Ward, N. G., Kirkland, A., Włodarczak, M., & Szekely, E. (2022). Two pragmatic functions of breathy voice in American English conversation. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Speech Prosody, pp. 82–86. https://doi.org/10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziem, A. (2017). Do we really need a Multimodal Construction Grammar? Linguistics Vanguard, 3. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2016-0095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×