Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-2z2hb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T18:48:48.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Sense of the Divine

An Affective Model of General Revelation from the Reformed Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2025

N. Gray Sutanto
Affiliation:
Reformed Theological Seminary

Summary

How should one make sense of the Christian confession that God has instilled a 'sense of divinity' in every person? While other approaches have identified the sense with a perceptual or cognitive faculty or with the empirical reports of theistic belief, this Element advances an affective model of general revelation, which draws from the writings of the neo-Calvinist branch of the Reformed tradition. The author argues that the sense of divinity refers to an implanted 'feeling of divinity', a sensus numinis, and that this model makes better sense of the Christian witness, theologically re-orients the empirical findings from the cognitive science of religion, and eludes influential objections against the doctrine of general revelation.
Get access
Type
Element
Information
Online ISBN: 9781009527910
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 22 May 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Element purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, E. (2001). Calvin’s View of Natural Knowledge of God. International Journal of Systematic Theology, 3, 280–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, R. (2013). Moral Perception. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Augustine. (1993). City of God. Translated by Marcus Dods. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
Augustine. (2012). The Trinity. Translated by E. Hill. Hyde Park: New City Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. (1968). Summa Theologiae. Translated by M. Browne. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
Aquinas, T. (1980) Commentary on the Gospel of John. Translated by J. A. Weisheipl and F. R. Larcher. Albany: Magi.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. (2004). Why Would Anyone Believe in God? Walnut Creek: Altamitra Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. (2021). Revelation and Cognitive Science: An Invitation. In Mezei, B. M., Murphy, F. A., and Oakes, K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Divine Revelation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 518–36.Google Scholar
Barth, K. (1934). No! Answer to Emil Brunner. In Bailie, J., ed. Natural Theology. Translated by P. Fraenkel. London: Centenary Press, 65128.Google Scholar
Barth, K. (1936). The Doctrine of the Word of God. Vol I of Church Dogmatics. 2nd ed. Translated by Bromiley, G. W.. Bromiley, G. W. and Torrance, T. F., eds. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Barth, K. (1957). The Doctrine of God. Vol II of Church Dogmatics. Translated by Parker, T. H. L., Johnston, W. B., Harold Knight, J. L. M. Haire, G. W. Bromiley, and Torrance, T. F., eds. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Basil. (2011). Against Eunomius. Translated by M. DelCogliana and A. R. Gallwitz. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Bavinck, H. (1892). Hoofd en Hart. Christophilus: Jaarboekje Nederlandsch Jongelings-Verbond, 7175.Google Scholar
Bavinck, H. (1897). Beginselen der Psychologie. Kampen: Bos.Google Scholar
Bavinck, H. (1909a). Magnalia Dei: Onderwijzing in de christelijke religie naar gereformeerde belijdenis. Kampen: Kok.Google Scholar
Bavinck, H. (1909b). Calvin and Common Grace. In Armstrong, W. P., ed. Calvin and the Reformation. Translated by G. Vos. New York: Fleming H. Revell, 99130.Google Scholar
Bavinck, H. (2003). Prolegomena. Vol. I of Reformed Dogmatics. Translated by J. Vriend. Bolt, J., ed. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Bavinck, H. (2004). God and Creation. Vol. 2 of Reformed Dogmatics. Translated by Vriend., J. Bolt, J., ed. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Bavinck, H. (2008). Essays on Religion, Science, and Society. Translated by Boonstra, H. and Sheeres., G. Bolt, J., ed. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Bavinck, H. (2018a). Foundations of Psychology. Translated by J. V. Born, Kloosterman, N., and Bolt, J.. The Bavinck Review, 9, 1270.Google Scholar
Bavinck, H. (2018b). Philosophy of Revelation: A New Edition. Brock, C. and Sutanto, N. G., eds. Peabody: Hendrickson.Google Scholar
Bavinck, H. (2019). Christian Worldview. Translated and edited by Sutanto, N. G., Eglinton, J., and Brock, C. C.. Wheaton: Crossway.Google Scholar
Bavinck, H. (2021). Head and Heart. Translated by G. Parker Jr. Modern Reformation. https://modernreformation.org/resource-library/articles/head-and-heart/ (accessed November 10, 2021).Google Scholar
Bavinck, H. (2022). Guidebook on the Instruction of the Christian Religion. Translated by Parker, G. Jr. and Clausing, C.. Peabody: Hendricksen.Google Scholar
Bavinck, J. (1940). Het problem der anknüpfung bij Evangelieverkondiging. Vox Theologica, 11, 105111.Google Scholar
Bavinck, J. (1941). Het problem van de pseudo-religie en de algemeene openbaring. Reunisten Organisatie.Google Scholar
Bavinck, J. (2013). The J.H. Bavinck Reader. Translated by Jong, J. A. De. Bolt, J., Bratt, J., and Visser, P. J., eds. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Bavinck, J. (2023). The Church Between Temple and Mosque: A Study of the Relationship between Chrristianity and the Other Religions. Glenside: Westminster Seminary Press.Google Scholar
Bonaventure. (1979). Disputed Questions on the Mystery of the Trinity. Translated by Hayes., Z. Marcil, G., ed. St. Bonaventure: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Bonaventure. (2002). Itinerarium Mentis in Deum. Translated by Hayes., Z. Boehner, P. and Hayes, Z, eds. St. Bonaventure: The Franciscan Institute.Google Scholar
Bratt, J. D. (2013). Abraham Kuyper: Modern Calvinist, Christian Democrat. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Brock, C. (2020). Orthodox yet Modern: Herman Bavinck’s Use of Schleiermacher. Bellingham: Lexham Press.Google Scholar
Calvin, J. (1961). Institutes of the Christian Religion. Translated by Battles, F. L.. McNeill, J., ed. Library of Christian Classics. London: SCM.Google Scholar
Case, B. (2021). Bonaventure’s Critique of Thomas Aquinas. churchlifejournal.nd.edu/articles/bonaventures-critique-of-thomas-aquinas/.Google Scholar
Clark, K. J. (2019). God and the Brain: The Rationality of Religious Belief. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Clark, K. J., and Barrett, J. (2011). Reidian Religious Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 79, 639675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copleston, F. (1950). Medieval Philosophy. Vol. 2 of A History of Western Philosophy. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Cullen, C. (2006). Bonaventure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. (2006). Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Diller, K. (2015). Theology’s Epistemological Dilemma: How Karl Barth and Alvin Plantinga Offer a Unified Response. Downers Grove: IVP Academic.Google Scholar
Dowey, E. (1994). The Knowledge of God in Calvin’s Theology. 3rd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (1991). Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (2014). Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers Can Benefit from the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise. In Wrathall, M., ed., Skillful Coping: Essays on the Phenomenology of Everyday Perception and Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 104124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duby, S. (2019). God in Himself: Scripture, Metaphysics, and the Task of Christian Theology. Downers Grove: IVP Academic.Google Scholar
Eglinton, J. (2012). Trinity and Organism: Toward a New Reading of Herman Bavinck’s Organic Motif. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Fergusson, D. (2016). Karl Barth’s Doctrine of Creation: Church-bells Beyond the Stars. International Journal of Systematic Theology, 18, 414431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, J. P. (2021). Revelation in Heidegger. In Mezei, B. M., Murphy, F. A., and Oakes, K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Divine Revelation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 309321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, G. (2013). Barth as Theorist of Religion. In Brooke, J. H., Manning, R. R., and Watts, F., eds., Karl Barth On Religion. Translated by G. Green. London: Bloomsbury, 135.Google Scholar
Hector, K. (2015). The Theological Project of Modernism: Faith and the Conditions of Mineness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hector, K. (2023). Christianity as a Way of Life: A Systematic Theology. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Translated by Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holder, R. D. (2013). Natural Theology in the Twentieth-Century. In Brooke, J. H., Manning, R. R., and Watts, F., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 118135.Google Scholar
Hunsinger, G. (2015). The “Yes” in Barth’s “No” to Brunner: The First Commandment as a Theological Axiom. In Evangelical, Reformed, and Catholic: Doctrinal Essays on Barth and Related Themes. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 85105.Google Scholar
Inkpin, A. (2016). Disclosing the World: On the Phenomenology of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K. (2010). Karl Barth and the Analogia Entis. London: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Jong, J., Kavanaugh, C., & Visala, A. (2015). Born Idolators: The Limits of the Philosophical Implications of the Cognitive Science of Religion. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie, 57, 244266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junius, F. (2014). A Treatise on True Theology. Translated by Noe, D.. Grand Rapids: Reformation Heritage.Google Scholar
Kuyper, A. (1898). Encyclopaedia of Sacred Theology. Translated by H. de Vries. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Kuyper, A. (2015). The Natural Knowledge of God. Translated by H. van Dyke. The Bavinck Review, 6, 73112.Google Scholar
Launonen, L., and Mullins, R. T. (2021). Why Open Theism is Natural and Classical Theism is Not. Religions, 12, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, S. (2017). Augustine. In Abraham, W. and Aquino, F., eds., The Oxford Handbook of the Epistemology of Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 354368.Google Scholar
Manning, R. R. (2013). Protestant Perspective on Natural Theology. In Brooke, J. H., Manning, R. R., and Watts, F., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 197212.Google Scholar
Marrone, S. (2001). The Light of Thy Countenance: Science and the Knowledge of God in the Thirteenth Century. Vol 1 of A Doctrine of Divine Illumination. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
McAllister, B., and Dougherty, T. (2019). Reforming Reformed Epistemology: A New Take on the Sensus Divinitatis. Religious Studies, 55, 537–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormack, B. (1995). Karl Barth’s Critically Realistic Dialectical Theology: It’s Genesis and Development, 1909–1936. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McFarland, I. (2014). From Nothing: A Theology of Creation. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
McFarland, I. (2016). “God, the Father Almighty”: A Theological Excursus. International Journal of Systematic Theology, 18, 259–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, I. (2022). Rethinking Nature and Grace: The Logic of Creation’s Consummation. International Journal of Systematic Theology, 24, 5679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, I. (2024). From Nothing: A Theology of Creation. Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
McNabb, T. (2018). Religious Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, R. (2000). The Unaccommodated Calvin: Studies in the Foundation of a Theological Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, R. (2003). Post-Reformation Reformed Dogmatics. Four Volumes. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, A. (2015). Knowledge and Christian Belief. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. (1999). Thomas Aquinas and Karl Barth: Sacred Doctrine and the Natural Knowledge of God. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Schaefer, D. O. (2015). Religious Affects: Animality, Evolution, and Power. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Schilder, K. (2022). The Klaas Schilder Reader. Harinck, G., Mouw, R., and Jong, M. De, eds. Bellingham: Lexham Press.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, F. (2016). Christian Faith: A New Translation and Critical Edition. Translated by Kelsey, C. L., Lawler, E., Tice, T. N., Kelsey, C. L., Tice, T. N., eds., Louisville: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Schumacher, L. (2011). Divine Illumination: The History and Future of Augustine’s Theory of Knowledge. Oxford: Wiley & Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonderegger, K. (2021). The Doctrine of God. In Allen, M. and Swain, S. R., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Reformed Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 389403.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, D. (1995). Calvin in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Streetman, R. (1986). Romanticism and the Sensus Numinis in Schleiermacher. In Jasper, D., ed., The Interpretation of Belief: Coleridge, Schleiermacher and Romanticism. London: Palgrave McMillan, 104125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sudduth, M. (2009). The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sutanto, N. G. (2018). Herman Bavinck and Thomas Reid on Perception and Knowing God. Harvard Theological Review, 111, 115134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutanto, N. G. (2020). God and Knowledge: Herman Bavinck’s Theological Epistemology. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutanto, N. G. (2024) God and Humanity: Herman Bavinck and Theological Anthropology. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thysius, A., Polyander, J., Rivetus, A., & Walaeus, A. (2014). Disputations 1–23. Vol. I of Synopsis Purioris Theologiae: Latin Text and English Translation. Translated by te Velde, D. and Faber, R. A.. Velde, D. te Veldete, ed. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Torrance, T. F. (1990). Natural Theology in the Thought of Karl Barth. In Karl Barth, Biblical and Evangelical Theologian. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 136159.Google Scholar
Turretin, F. (1992). First through Tenth Topics. Vol. 1 of Institutes of Elenctic Theology. Translated by Giger, G. M.. Dennison, J. T. Jr., ed. Phillipsburg: P&R.Google Scholar
Van den Brink, G. (2020). Reformed Theology and Evolutionary Theory. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Van der Kooi, C. (2005). As in a Mirror: John Calvin and Karl Barth on Knowing God. Translated by Mader, D.. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Eyghen, H., Peels, R., and Brink, G. V. D. (2018). The Cognitive Science of Religion, Philosophy, and Theology: A Survey of the Issues. In van Eyghen, H., Peels, R., and van den Brink, G., eds., New Developments in the Cognitive Science of Religion: The Rationality of Religious Beliefs. Cham: Springer. 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Mastricht, P. (2019). Faith in the Triune God. Vol. II of Theoretical-Practical Theology. Translated by Rester, T. M.. Beeke, J. R., ed. Grand Rapids: Reformation Heritage Books.Google Scholar
Vater, C. A. (2022). God’s Knowledge of the World: Medieval Theories of Divine Ideas from Bonaventure to Ockham. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visala, A. (2018). Human Cognition and the Image of God. In Crisp, O. D. and Sanders, F., eds. The Christian Doctrine of Humanity: Explorations in Constructive Dogmatics. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Academic. 91109.Google Scholar
Ward, G. (2016). How the Light Gets In: Ethical Life I. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, J. (2012). The Domain of the Word: Scripture and Theological Reason. London: T&T Clark.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, J. (2013). Heidegger’s Eschatology: Theological Horizon’s in Martin Heidegger’s Early Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahl, S. (2015). On the Affective Salience of Doctrine. Modern Theology, 31, 428444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zahl, S. (2021). The Holy Spirit and Christian Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A Sense of the Divine
  • N. Gray Sutanto, Reformed Theological Seminary
  • Online ISBN: 9781009527910
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

A Sense of the Divine
  • N. Gray Sutanto, Reformed Theological Seminary
  • Online ISBN: 9781009527910
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

A Sense of the Divine
  • N. Gray Sutanto, Reformed Theological Seminary
  • Online ISBN: 9781009527910
Available formats
×