Between 500 and 1500, the economy of Europe changed considerably. The papal court saw an equally radical change in the nature of their income, their expenditure, their administration, and their financial expectations. The papal court became the jurisdictional apex of the medieval Church and a major power in European secular politics. Consequently, the income of the Roman Curia increased radically, as did their expenditure. The papacy was a religious power first and foremost. Therefore, the accounting, income, and expenditure of the popes had to correspond to a model medieval Christianity thought good; the pope should look after his flock and spend appropriately on their welfare. There were times, however, when it was not clear to the Christian world that the pope was acting in an acceptable manner, as regards finance and wealth. Bitter satires followed, and the papacy gained a reputation for extravagance. It has never fully thrown off that reputation.

This chapter describes the institutional, political, and legal changes that the Roman episcopacy underwent during the first millennium. It sketches the historical developments that led to the emergence of the papacy as an institution, and it describes the first official papal decretals and the early collections of papal decisions. The chapter also examines the evolving ideas of Petrine and Pauline succession and of papal supremacy. Inseparably linked to those ideas was the relationship between the bishops of Rome and the ever-changing but enduring Byzantine Roman Empire. In the period under study, the papacy had to deal with many external and internal challenges, which shaped the Roman episcopacy during the first millennium and thereafter. The chapter should be read in connection with the chapters on two popes: Leo the Great (440–461) and Gregory the Great (590–604).

Christian leaders and scholars during the first millennium in the West were preoccupied with written norms and corrective practices. Law (lex) during this era needs to be understood in a broader normative context. This introductory chapter provides historical and historiographical background to the specialized chapters that follow, explores the notions of lex, ius, norma, regula, and canon, and proposes an overarching schema of four normative fields, as understood by authors of the period: laws, canons, penitential prescriptions, and monastic rules, with their corresponding normative practices and textual compilations. The legal status of conciliar canons and papal decretals during this era is problematic. Although scholars today usually construe these as constituting a body of law, Isidore of Seville did not, and authors of the era usually treated laws (leges) and canons as distinct but complementary categories. The final section of the chapter examines this problem, proposing several fields of inquiry that would shed light on it, and suggesting that canonical collections, as a genre, were practical but not attached to any particular application.