Giant coronary artery aneurysms are rare but potentially fatal complications of Kawasaki disease. The lack of evidence-based recommendations on their management and treatment cause guidelines and practices to differ. We aimed to assess these variations.

An anonymous online survey regarding surveillance, imaging, pharmacological management, and interventional practices was distributed among 134 physicians attending to Kawasaki disease patients worldwide. A p-value of <0.05 was deemed significant.

The majority (60%) of respondents were general paediatric cardiologists, and 29% interventional specialists. The average years in practice was 15 ± 9.6. Physicians from Asia had the most experience with giant coronary artery aneurysms. American practitioners preferred combining anticoagulants with aspirin. Beta-blockers and statins were more likely used in teenagers versus younger children. Cardiac catheterisation was most (52%) chosen for coronary surveillance in patients with echocardiogram anomalies, followed by Coronary CT-angiography. The indications for coronary intervention were split among respondents, regardless of geographic region or experience. The preferred treatment of coronary stenosis was percutaneous intervention (69%) versus bypass surgery. For thrombosis, thrombolytics (50%) were preferred over percutaneous (39%) and surgical (11%) interventions. Most (92%) preferred intervening in young children in a paediatric facility but were split between a paediatric and adult facility for older children. Most chose combined management by adult and paediatric specialists for either age-scenarios (70, 82%).

As identified by our study, the lack of large studies and evidence-based recommendations cause uncertainty and ambivalence towards certain treatments. International collaborative efforts are needed to provide more robust evidence in the management of these patients.

The Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) is a global organisation committed to the care of children and adults with CHD and arrhythmias.

To evaluate the global needs and potential inequities as it relates to cardiac implantable electronic devices.

ARROW (Assessment of Rhythm Resources arOund the World) is an online survey about cardiac implantable electronic devices, sent electronically to physicians within the field of Cardiology, Pediatric Cardiology, Electrophysiology and Pediatric Electrophysiology.

ARROW received 42 responders from 28 countries, 50% from low-/middle-income regions. The main differences between low-/middle- and high-income regions include availability of expertise on paediatric electrophysiology (50% versus 93%, p < 00.5) and possibility to perform invasive procedures (35% versus 93%, p < 0.005). Implant of devices in low-income areas relies significantly on patient’s resources (71%). The follow-up of the devices is on the hands of paediatric cardiologist/electrophysiologist in higher resources centres (93% versus 50%, p < 0.05).

The ARROW survey represents an initial assessment of the geographical characteristics in the field of Pediatric Electrophysiology. The next step is to make this “state of the art” more extensive to other aspects of the expertise. The relevance of collecting this data before the World Congress of Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery (WCPCCS) in 2023 in Washington DC was emphasised in order to share the resulting information with the international community and set a plan of action to assist the development of arrhythmia services for children within developing regions of the world.