Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Raising a mucosal flap vs. tympanomeatal flap to repair subtotal perforations

  • Yajian Shen, Zhengcai Lou
  • Journal:
    The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , First View
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    21 October 2024, pp. 1-6
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation
  • Objectives

    This study aimed to compare the graft success rate, hearing outcomes, operation time and complications between myringoplasty with raising of a mucosal flap (RMF) and raising of a tympanomeatal flap (RTF) for the repair of subtotal perforations.

    Methods

    Subtotal perforations were recruited and randomly allocated to either the RMF group or the RTF group. The graft success rate, hearing outcomes and complications were evaluated at 6 months post-operatively.

    Results

    The mean operation time was 31.4 ± 2.8 minutes (range: 26–47) in the RMF group and 57.6 ± 0.9 minutes in the RTF group (p < 0.01). The graft success rate was 96.0 per cent in the RMF group and 88.9 per cent in the RTF group (p = 0.659).

    Conclusion

    Endoscopic myringoplasty with the RMF achieved similar graft success and hearing gain compared to the tympanomeatal flap technique for repairing subtotal perforations, but with significantly shorter operation time and minimal temporary hypogeusia.