Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×

Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.

  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 5 - One Means Not One

  • from Part II - How Many “One Gods” Are There?
  • David Michael Grossberg, Cornell University, New York
  • Book:
    The Evolution of Jewish Monotheism
    Published online:
    20 February 2025
    Print publication:
    27 February 2025, pp 159-195

  • Summary

    In the Bible, “YHWH is one” meant to praise YHWH, not to deny that other gods exist. In Jewish Platonism, “God is one” meant not that there are no other divine beings but that these are at best secondary to God. To some Christian trinitarians, “God is one,” meant that there is one Godhead that is, even so, internally diverse. To the rabbis, “God is one” meant that there is an unbridgeable gap between God and all other beings. Medieval Islamic and Jewish philosophers constructed yet another conceptualization: “God is one” means that God is somehow ontologically one. This in turn led to “negative theology”: that God could not be described through positive attributes that suggest diversity, but only though negative predicates. This innovation led to troubling questions. If “God is one” means that God’s unity is entirely unlike the diversity of everything else, how is knowledge of God possible?