We say that a Kripke model is a GL-model (Gödel and Löb model) if the accessibility relation
$\prec $ is transitive and converse well-founded. We say that a Kripke model is a D-model if it is obtained by attaching infinitely many worlds
$t_1, t_2, \ldots $, and
$t_\omega $ to a world
$t_0$ of a GL-model so that
$t_0 \succ t_1 \succ t_2 \succ \cdots \succ t_\omega $. A non-normal modal logic
$\mathbf {D}$, which was studied by Beklemishev [3], is characterized as follows. A formula
$\varphi $ is a theorem of
$\mathbf {D}$ if and only if
$\varphi $ is true at
$t_\omega $ in any D-model.
$\mathbf {D}$ is an intermediate logic between the provability logics
$\mathbf {GL}$ and
$\mathbf {S}$. A Hilbert-style proof system for
$\mathbf {D}$ is known, but there has been no sequent calculus. In this paper, we establish two sequent calculi for
$\mathbf {D}$, and show the cut-elimination theorem. We also introduce new Hilbert-style systems for
$\mathbf {D}$ by interpreting the sequent calculi. Moreover, we show that D-models can be defined using an arbitrary limit ordinal as well as
$\omega $. Finally, we show a general result as follows. Let X and
$X^+$ be arbitrary modal logics. If the relationship between semantics of X and semantics of
$X^+$ is equal to that of
$\mathbf {GL}$ and
$\mathbf {D}$, then
$X^+$ can be axiomatized based on X in the same way as the new axiomatization of
$\mathbf {D}$ based on
$\mathbf {GL}$.