We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Vaccine hesitancy among health care workers poses significant challenges to public health, particularly during times of crisis. This study investigates the factors influencing vaccine hesitancy among health care workers at Montefiore Medical Center, NY, with the aim of providing valuable insights to help shape and enhance future public health vaccination campaigns.
Methods
Utilizing Montefiore’s HER (Epic system) data from 2021–2023, linear logistic and multiple regression analyses were performed to assess correlations between demographic variables—such as age, race/ethnicity, job category, and county of residence—and vaccine uptake for both influenza and COVID-19 vaccines. Data were sourced from EPIC and Cority employee datasets. Missing demographic data were imputed where possible. The study population comprises a diverse workforce of 21 331 health care workers, encompassing a wide range of clinical and non-clinical roles.
Results
Key predictors of vaccine hesitancy included prior influenza vaccination status, age, race/ethnicity, job title, and county of residence. Workers vaccinated against influenza were 6.2% more likely to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Younger health care workers and racial groups like Black and biracial employees demonstrated higher levels of hesitancy, while Asian workers exhibited higher rates of vaccine acceptance.
Conclusions
Tailored communication strategies and educational programs are critical for addressing vaccine hesitancy, particularly among younger health care workers and specific racial groups. Building trust and improving transparency will be essential to increasing vaccine uptake and achieving broader public health objectives.
In the years following FDA approval of direct-to-consumer, genetic-health-risk/DTCGHR testing, millions of people in the US have sent their DNA to companies to receive personal genome health risk information without physician or other learned medical professional involvement. In Personal Genome Medicine, Michael J. Malinowski examines the ethical, legal, and social implications of this development. Drawing from the past and present of medicine in the US, Malinowski applies law, policy, public and private sector practices, and governing norms to analyze the commercial personal genome sequencing and testing sectors and to assess their impact on the future of US medicine. Written in relatable and accessible language, the book also proposes regulatory reforms for government and medical professionals that will enable technological advancements while maintaining personal and public health standards.
In the years following FDA approval of direct-to-consumer, genetic-health-risk/DTCGHR testing, millions of people in the US have sent their DNA to companies to receive personal genome health risk information without physician or other learned medical professional involvement. In Personal Genome Medicine, Michael J. Malinowski examines the ethical, legal, and social implications of this development. Drawing from the past and present of medicine in the US, Malinowski applies law, policy, public and private sector practices, and governing norms to analyze the commercial personal genome sequencing and testing sectors and to assess their impact on the future of US medicine. Written in relatable and accessible language, the book also proposes regulatory reforms for government and medical professionals that will enable technological advancements while maintaining personal and public health standards.
In the years following FDA approval of direct-to-consumer, genetic-health-risk/DTCGHR testing, millions of people in the US have sent their DNA to companies to receive personal genome health risk information without physician or other learned medical professional involvement. In Personal Genome Medicine, Michael J. Malinowski examines the ethical, legal, and social implications of this development. Drawing from the past and present of medicine in the US, Malinowski applies law, policy, public and private sector practices, and governing norms to analyze the commercial personal genome sequencing and testing sectors and to assess their impact on the future of US medicine. Written in relatable and accessible language, the book also proposes regulatory reforms for government and medical professionals that will enable technological advancements while maintaining personal and public health standards.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.