We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Validate a public health model identifying patients at high risk for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) on admission and evaluate performance across a healthcare network.
Design:
Retrospective case-control studies
Participants:
Adults hospitalized with a clinical CRE culture within 3 days of admission (cases) and those hospitalized without a CRE culture (controls).
Methods:
Using public health data from Atlanta, GA (1/1/2016–9/1/2019), we validated a CRE prediction model created in Chicago. We then closely replicated this model using clinical data from a healthcare network in Atlanta (1/1/2015–12/31/2021) (“Public Health Model”) and optimized performance by adding variables from the healthcare system (“Healthcare System Model”). We frequency-matched cases and controls based on year and facility. We evaluated model performance in validation datasets using area under the curve (AUC).
Results:
Using public health data, we matched 181 cases to 764,408 controls, and the Chicago model performed well (AUC 0.85). Using clinical data, we matched 91 cases to 384,013 controls. The Public Health Model included age, prior infection diagnosis, number of and mean length of stays in acute care hospitalizations (ACH) in the prior year. The final Healthcare System Model added Elixhauser score, antibiotic days of therapy in prior year, diabetes, admission to the intensive care unit in prior year and removed prior number of ACH. The AUC increased from 0.68 to 0.73.
Conclusions:
A CRE risk prediction model using prior healthcare exposures performed well in a geographically distinct area and in an academic healthcare network. Adding variables from healthcare networks improved model performance.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.