Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T03:27:05.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2025

Robert Roreitner
Robert Roreitner
Affiliation:
Charles University, Prague
Type
Chapter
Information
Aristotle on the Nature and Causes of Perception , pp. 234 - 251
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Achard, M. 2004. Epistémologie et pratique de la science chez Aristote: Les seconds analytiques et la définition de l’âme dans le De anima. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. L. 1981. Aristotle the Philosopher. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ackrill, J. L. 1997. ‘Aristotle’s Distinction between Energeia and Kinesis’, in Essays on Plato and Aristotle. Oxford University Press, pp. 142–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulos, A. 2010. ‘Change in Aristotle’s Physics 3’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 33–79.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulos, A. 2011. ‘Senses of ‘“Dunamis” and the Structure of Aristotle’s “Metaphysics” Θ’, Phronesis 56: 388–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulos, A. 2017. ‘Change, Agency and Activity in Aristotle’, Phronesis 62.2: 170–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulos, A. 2023. ‘Aristotle’s First Moves Regarding Perception: A Reading of (Most of) De Anima 2.5’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 105.1: 68–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arsenault, M. forthcoming. ‘Aristotle on the Objects of Perception’.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. 1992. ‘Peripatetic Dialectic in the De sensibus’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Gutas, D. (eds.), Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical, and Scientific Writings. New Brunswick: Routledge, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. 1996. ‘A “Dialectical” Argument in De Anima A 4: On Aristotle’s Use of Topoi in Systematic Contexts’, in Algra, K., van der Horst, P. W., and Runia, D. (eds.), Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy. Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on his Sixtieth Birthday. Leiden: Brill, pp. 333–43.Google Scholar
Baltussen, H. 2000. Theophrastus Against the Presocratics and Plato: Peripatetic Dialectic in the de Sensibus. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, A. 1981. ‘Aristotle on Perception and Ratios’, Phronesis 26.3: 248–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. 1971. ‘Aristotle’s Concept of Mind’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72: 101–14.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1980. ‘Aristotle and the Methods of Ethics’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 34.133/134: 490–511.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1993. Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baumrin, J. M. 1976. ‘Active Power and Causal Flow in Aristotle’s Theory of Vision’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 12.3: 254–9.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beekes, R. 2009. Etymological Dictionary of Greek (2 vols.). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Beere, J. 2009. Doing and Being: An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, W. 1988. Rezeptivität und Spontaneität der Wahrnehmung bei Aristoteles: Versuch einer Bestimmung der spontanen Erkenntnisleistung der Wahrnehmung bei Aristoteles in Abgrenzung gegen die rezeptive Auslegung der Sinnlichkeit bei Descartes und Kant. Baden-Baden: Koerner.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2021. ‘Thinking with Empedocles: Aristotle on Soul as Harmonia’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 59: 1–44.Google Scholar
Block, I. 1961. ‘The Order of Aristotle’s Psychological Writings’, American Journal of Philology 82: 50–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, R. 1978. ‘Aristotle’s Definitions of the Soul: De Anima II, 1–3’, Phronesis 23.3: 258–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, R. 1990. ‘The Epistemological Basis of Aristotelian Dialectic’, in Devereux, D. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Biologie, logique et métaphysique chez Aristote. Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, pp. 185–236.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 2005. ‘Perception Naturalized in Aristotle’s de Anima’, in Salles, R. (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul, and Ethics in Ancient Thought: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford University Press, pp. 209–44.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 2021. ‘Method and Doctrine in Aristotle’s Natural Psychology: De Anima II.5’, in Gregoric, P. and Fink, J. L. (eds.), Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind. New York: Routledge, pp. 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonitz, H. 1870. Index Aristotelicus. Leipzig: Reimer.Google Scholar
Bowin, J. 2011. ‘Aristotle on Various Types of Alteration in De Anima II 5’, Phronesis 56.2: 138–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowin, J. 2012a. ‘Aristotle on “First Transitions” in De Anima II 5’, Apeiron 45.3: 262–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowin, J. 2012b. ‘De anima II 5 on the Activation of the Senses’, Ancient Philosophy 32.1: 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, D. 1997. ‘Aristotle on Perception: The Dual-Logos Theory’, Apeiron 30.2: 143–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenet, J.-B. 2014. ‘Agent Sense in Averroes and Latin Averroism’, in Silva, J. F. and Yrjönsuuri, M. (eds.), Active Perception in the History of Philosophy: From Plato to Modern Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 147–66.Google Scholar
Brentano, F. 1867. Die Psychologie des Aristoteles: insbesondere seine Lehre vom Nous Poietikos. Mainz: Kirchheim.Google Scholar
Broackes, J. 1999. ‘Aristotle, Objectivity and Perception’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 57–113.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 1993. ‘Aristotle’s Perceptual Realism’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 31, supplement: 137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadie, S. 2007. ‘Nature and Craft in Aristotelian Teleology’, in Aristotle and Beyond: Essays on Metaphysics and Ethics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. 1997. ‘What Is “the Mean Relative to Us” in Aristotle’s Ethics?’, Phronesis 42.1: 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, L. 2014. ‘Why Is Aristotle’s Virtue of Character a Mean? Taking Aristotle at his Word (NE ii 6)’, in Polansky, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, G. 1986. ‘Ad Themistium Arabum’, Illinois Classical Studies 11.1/2: 223–45.Google Scholar
Buddensiek, F. 2017. ‘Aporia in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Beta’, in Karamanolis, G. and Politis, V. (eds.), The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 137–54.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1976. ‘Plato on the Grammar of Perceiving’, The Classical Quarterly 26.1: 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1984. Notes on Books Eta and Theta of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford: University of Oxford, Faculty of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1990. The Theaetetus of Plato. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1992. ‘Is an Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind Still Credible? (A Draft)’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 15–26.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1995. ‘How Much Happens When Aristotle Sees Red and Hears Middle C? Remarks on De Anima 2. 7–8’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 421–34.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2001. ‘Aquinas on “Spiritual Change” in Perception’, in Perler, D. (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality. Leiden: Brill, pp. 129–53.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2002. ‘De Anima II 5’, Phronesis 47.1: 28–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2008a. Aristotle’s Divine Intellect. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2008b. ‘Kinesis vs. Energeia: A Much-Read Passage in (but not of) Aristotle’s Metaphysics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 219–92.Google Scholar
Bynum, T. W. 1987. ‘A New Look at Aristotle’s Theory of Perception’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 4.2: 163–78.Google Scholar
Cagnoli Fiecconi, E. 2021. ‘Aristotle on Attention’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 103.4: 602–33.Google Scholar
Campeggiani, P. 2020. ‘Aristotle on Perceptual Interests’, Apeiron 53.3: 235–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbone, A. L. 2021. ‘Why Do Not Animals Grow on without End? Aristotle on Nutrition and Form’, in Korobili, G. and Lo Presti, R. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 85–100.Google Scholar
Carter, J. W. 2018. ‘Does the Soul Weave? Reconsidering De Anima 1.4, 408a29-b18’, Phronesis 63.1: 25–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. W. 2019a. Aristotle on Earlier Greek Psychology: The Science of Soul. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. W. 2019b. ‘How Aristotle Changes Anaxagoras’s Mind’, Apeiron 52.1: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cashdollar, S. 1973. ‘Aristotle’s Account of Incidental Perception’, Phronesis 18.1: 156–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 1998. ‘Aristotle and the Problem of Intentionality’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58.2: 249–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 1999. ‘Commentary on Miller’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 15.1: 214–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 2000. ‘Aristotle’s Argument for Why the Understanding Is Not Compounded with the Body’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 16.1: 135–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 2002. ‘Aristotle on Consciousness’, Mind 111.444: 751–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 2004. ‘More on Aristotle on Consciousness: Reply to Sisko’, Mind 113.451: 523–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 2005. ‘The Spirit and the Letter: Aristotle on Perception’, in Salles, R. (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul and Ethics: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford University Press, pp. 245–320.Google Scholar
Caston, V. 2012. Alexander of Aphrodisias: On the Soul: Part I: Soul as Form of the Body, Parts of the Soul, Nourishment, and Perception. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Caston, V. 2018. ‘Aristotle on the Reality of Colors and Other Perceptible Qualities’, Res Philosophica 95.1: 35–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 2019. ‘Theophrastus on Perceiving’, Rhizomata 7.2: 188–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. 2020. ‘Aristotle on the Transmission of Information: Receiving Form without the Matter’, in Bennett, D. and Toivanen, J. (eds.), Philosophical Problems in Sense Perception: Testing the Limits of Aristotelianism. Cham: Springer, pp. 15–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caston, V. forthcoming. ‘Aristotle on Perceptual Content’.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2000. Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2009. ‘Aristotle’s Psychological Theory’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 24.1: 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. 2010. ‘Metaphysics Θ.7 and 8: Some Issues Concerning Actuality and Potentiality’, in Lennox, J.G. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf. Cambridge University Press, pp. 168–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. 2015. ‘Aristotle’s Processes’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Physics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 186–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. 2020. ‘Aristotle on the Perception of Objects’, in Guyomarc’h, G., Louguet, C., and Murgier, C. (eds.), Aristote et l’âme humaine: Lectures de De anima III offertes à Michel Crubellier. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, D. 2021. The Undivided Self: Aristotle and the ‘Mind–Body’ Problem. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlton, W. 1984. Aristotle: Physics. Books I and II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Coates, C. F and Lennox, J. G. 2020. ‘Aristotle on the Unity of the Nutritive and Reproductive Functions’, Phronesis 65.4: 414–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. M. 1982. ‘St. Thomas Aquinas on the Immaterial Reception of Sensible Forms’, The Philosophical Review 91.2: 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. M. 1992. ‘Hylomorphism and Functionalism’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 57–73.Google Scholar
Coope, U. 2004. ‘Aristotle’s Account of Agency in Physics III 3’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 20.1: 201–27.Google Scholar
Coope, U. 2009. ‘Change and Its Relation to Actuality and Potentiality’, in Anagnostopoulos, G. (ed.), A Companion to Aristotle. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 277–91.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2008. Streben und Bewegen, Aristoteles’ Theorie der animalischen Ortsbewegung. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2014. ‘Activity, Passivity, and Perceptual Discrimination in Aristotle’, in Silva, J. F. and Yrjönsuuri, M. (eds.), Active Perception in the History of Philosophy: From Plato to Modern Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2015. ‘Faculties in Ancient Philosophy’, in Perler, D. (ed.), The Faculties: A History. Oxford University Press, pp. 19–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2017. Aristoteles. Über die Seele. De anima. Hamburg: Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2020. ‘De anima III 7: The Actuality Principle and the Triggering of Mental Episodes’, in Guyomarc’h, G., Louguet, C., and Murgier, C. (eds.), Aristote et l’âme humaine: Lectures de De anima III offertes à Michel Crubellier. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 185–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2021. ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Animal Agency and the Problem of Self-Motion’, in Connell, S. M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge University Press, pp. 176–94.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2022. ‘The Gate to Reality: Aristotle’s Account of Perception in De Anima II 12’, in Cohoe, C. (ed.), Aristotle’s On the Soul: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–54.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2023. ‘The Undivided Self: Aristotle and the “Mind–Body Problem”, by David Charles’, Mind 132.525: 303–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2024a. ‘Aristotle’s Account of the Human Capacity for Thinking’, in Corcilius, K., Falcon, A. and Roreitner, R., Aristotle on the Essence of Human Thought. Oxford University Press, pp. 49–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2024b. ‘An. III 8: Concluding Theorems about Human Nous’, in Corcilius, K., Falcon, A. and Roreitner, R., Aristotle on the Essence of Human Thought. Oxford University Press, pp. 191–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius, K. 2025. ‘The Soul Itself in Aristotle’s Science of Living Things’, in Lefebvre, D. (ed.), The Science of Life in Aristotle and Early Peripatos. Leiden: Brill, pp. 23–50.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. and Falcon, A. 2022. ‘Aristotle on Remembering and Memory: Toward an Interpretation of Mem. 1’, Medicina nei secoli 34.1: 11–30.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K., Falcon, A., and Roreitner, R., 2024. Aristotle on the Essence of Human Thought. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcilius, K. and Gregoric, P. 2010. ‘Separability vs. Difference: Parts and Capacities of the Soul in Aristotle’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 39: 81–120.Google Scholar
Corcilius, K. and Gregoric, P. 2013. ‘Aristotle’s Model of Animal Motion’, Phronesis 58.1: 52–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coren, D. 2019. ‘Aristotle on Self-Change in Plants’, Rhizomata 7.1: 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornford, F. M. 1935. Plato’s Theory of Knowledge: The Theaetetus and the Sophist of Plato Translated with a Running Commentary. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Coughlin, S. 2024. ‘Art and Nature in Aristotle’s Physics: Some Antecedents in Early Greek Medicine’, in Bartoš, H. and Linka, V. (eds.), Aristotle Reads Hippocrates. Leiden: Brill, pp. 126–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creese, D. 2010. The Monochord in Ancient Greek Harmonic Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crubellier, M. 2020. ‘L’âme comme la main: traduction et commentaire du chapitre III 8’, in Guyomarc’h, G., Louguet, C., and Murgier, C. (eds.), Aristote et l’âme humaine: Lectures de De anima III offertes à Michel Crubellier. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 221–53.Google Scholar
Crubellier, M. forthcoming. ‘Aristotle on Human Thinking and Divine Thinking’, in C. Bobonich, I. Ramelli, R. Roreitner, and T. Slabon (eds.), Human and Divine Nous from Ancient to Renaissance Philosophy and Religion: Key Themes, Intersections, and Developments. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Crubellier, M. and Laks, A. 2009. ‘Introduction’, in Crubellier, M. and Laks, A. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Beta: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford University Press, pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, E. 2015. Mortal Imitations of Divine Life: The Nature of the Soul in Aristotle’s De anima. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducharme, A. 2014. ‘Aristotle’s Mark of Sentience’, Apeiron 47.3: 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebert, T. 1983. ‘Aristotle on What Is Done in Perceiving’, Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 37.2: 181–98.Google Scholar
Esfeld, M. 2000. ‘Aristotle’s Direct Realism in De Anima’, Review of Metaphysics 54.2: 321–36.Google Scholar
Everson, S. 1997. Aristotle on Perception. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2015. ‘Aristotle and the Study of Animals and Plants’, in Holmes, B. and Fischer, K.-D. (eds.), The Frontiers of Ancient Science: Essays in Honor of Heinrich von Staden. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcon, A. 2018. ‘The Place of the De Anima in Aristotle’s Explanatory Project’, Epekeina: International Journal of Ontology, History and Critics 9: 1–15.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2019. ‘Definition, Explanation, and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s De Somno’, Manuscrito 42: 516–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcon, A. 2020. ‘Aristotle’s Study of Animals in Context: The Peripatetic Study of Life Reconsidered’, in König, P. and Lindén, J.-I. (eds.), Aristoteles – Antike Kontexte, gegenwärtige Perspektiven. Akten der Tagung ‚Die aristotelische Philosophie im antiken Kontext’ in Heidelberg, 7.–9. Januar 2016. Heidelberg: Winter Verlag, pp. 185–202.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. 2021. ‘La longévité comparée des plantes et des animaux selon Aristote’, Archives de Philosophie 84.2: 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falcon, A. 2024. The Architecture of Science of Living Beings: Aristotle and Theophrastus on Animals and Plants. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, M. 1999. ‘Perception and Dialectic in Aristotle’s De Anima’, in Sim, M. (ed.), From Puzzles to Principles? Essays on Aristotle’s Dialectic. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 151–61.Google Scholar
Fernandez, P. A. and Mittelmann, J. 2017. ‘ἡ κίνησις τῆς τέχνης: Crafts and Souls as Principles of Change’, Phronesis 62.2: 136–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, P. A. and Mittelmann, J. 2020. ‘When Life Imitates Art: Vital Locomotion and Aristotle’s Craft Analogy’, in King, C. G. and Bartoš, H. (eds.), Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Science. Cambridge University Press, pp. 260–87.Google Scholar
Ferro, A. 2022. Aristotle on Self-Motion: The Criticism of Plato in De Anima and Physics VIII. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.Google Scholar
Fine, G. 1994. ‘Protagorean Relativisms’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 10.1: 211–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K. 1999. ‘Things and their Parts’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 23.1: 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, K. 2008. ‘Coincidence and Form’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 82.1: 101–18.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. J. 2018. ‘A Plausible Doctrine of the Mean’, The Review of Metaphysics 72.1: 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Förster, A. 1912. Aristotelis De Anima libri tres. Budapest: Academiae Litterarum Hungaricae.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, H. G. 1977. ‘Identification and Externality’, in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), The Identities of Persons. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 239–52.Google Scholar
Frede, D. 2012. ‘The Endoxon Mystique: What Endoxa Are and What They Are Not’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43: 184–215.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1992. ‘On Aristotle’s Conception of Soul’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 93–107.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1994. ‘Aristotle’s Notion of Potentiality in Metaphysics Θ’, in Scaltsas, T., Charles, D., and Gill, M. L. (eds.), Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford University Press, pp. 173–94.Google Scholar
Freeland, C. 1992. ‘Aristotle on the Sense of Touch’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 227–48.Google Scholar
Freeland, C. 2021. ‘The Science of Perception in Aristotle’, in Connell, S. M. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Biology. Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–75.Google Scholar
Fritz, K. von. 1946. ‘ΝΟΥΣ, Noein, and Their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras): Part II. The Post-Parmenidean Period’, Classical Philology 41.1: 12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryde, E. B. 1994. ‘The “Paraphrase” by Themistios of Aristotle’s De Anima, and St Thomas Aquinas’, The English Historical Review 109.433: 952–9.Google Scholar
Ganson, T. S. 1997. ‘What’s Wrong with the Aristotelian Theory of Sensible Qualities?’, Phronesis 42.3: 263–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganson, T. S. 2020. ‘Aristotle on Perception as Representation’, in Bennett, D. and Toivanen, J. (eds.), Philosophical Problems in Sense Perception: Testing the Limits of Aristotelianism. Cham: Springer, pp. 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasser-Wingate, M. 2021. Aristotle’s Empiricism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauthier, R. A. (ed.). 1984. Thomas Aquinas: Sentencia libri De anima. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gelber, J. 2017. ‘Uses of Aporiai in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals’, in Karamanolis, G. and Politis, V. (eds.), The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–71.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. 1989. Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. 2021. ‘Method and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle’s De Anima II,4’, in Korobili, G. and Lo Presti, R. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 21–42.Google Scholar
Glidden, D. 1984. ‘Aristotelian Perception and the Hellenistic Problem of Representation’, Ancient Philosophy 4.2: 119–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, F. 2019. ‘Being as Activity: A Defence of the Importance of Metaphysics 1048B18–35 for Aristotle’s Ontology’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 56: 123–92.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, P. 1993. ‘Aristotle Versus Protagoras on Relatives and the Objects of Perception’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 11: 101–19.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. 1980. ‘States and Performances: Aristotle’s Test’, The Philosophical Quarterly 30.119: 117–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasso, R. 2013. ‘De Anima’, Philosophical Inquiry 37.1/2: 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grasso, R. 2020. ‘Blind-Spots in Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Perceptual Mean’, Apeiron 53.3, 257–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregoric, P. 2007. Aristotle on the Common Sense. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregoric, P. 2021. ‘Perceiving That We Are Not Seeing and Hearing’, in Gregoric, P. and Fink, J. L. (eds.), Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind. New York: Routledge, pp. 119–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregoric, P. forthcoming. ‘From Simultaneous Perception to Perception of Objects: De sensu 7, De anima III.2 and 7’, in K. Corcilius (ed.), Text and Idea of Aristotle’s De Sensu. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
de Haas, F. A. J. 2005. ‘The Discriminating Capacity of the Soul in Aristotle’s Theory of Learning’, in Salles, R. (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul and Ethics: Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji. Oxford University Press, pp. 321–44.Google Scholar
Hamlyn, D. W. 1993. Aristotle, De Anima: Books II and III. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2019. ‘Can There Be a Science of Psychology? Aristotle’s de Anima and the Structure and Construction of Science’, Manuscrito 42.4: 469–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, W. F. R. 1964. ‘Aristotle’s Treatment of the Relation Between the Soul and the Body’, Philosophical Quarterly 14.54: 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, W. F. R. 1965. ‘Aristotle’s Doctrine That Virtue Is a “Mean”’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 65.1: 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, R. and Madden, E. H. 1975. Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heinaman, R. 1985. ‘Aristotle on Housebuilding’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 2.2: 145–62.Google Scholar
Heinaman, R. 1990. ‘Aristotle and the Mind–Body Problem’, Phronesis 35.1: 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinaman, R. 2007. ‘Actuality, Potentiality and “De Anima II.5”’, Phronesis 52.2: 139–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzberg, S. 2007. ‘De Anima II 5 und Aristoteles’ Wahrnehmungstheorie’, Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 61.1: 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzberg, S. 2010. Wahrnehmung und Wissen bei Aristoteles. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, R. D. 1907. Aristotle, De Anima. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hursthouse, R. 2006. ‘The Central Doctrine of the Mean’, in Kraut, R. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, E. 1983. Aristotle’s Physics Books III and IV. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1989. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, S. 1997. Passion and Action: The Emotions in Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jannone, A. and Barbotin, E. 1966. Aristote: De l’âme. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Jaulin, A. 2020. ‘DA III 4, 429a10–430a9’, in Guyomarc’h, G., Louguet, C., and Murgier, C. (eds.), Aristote et l’âme humaine: Lectures de De anima III offertes à Michel Crubellier. Leuven: Peeters, pp. 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, W. 2011. Philosophy of Mind: A Comprehensive Introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jaworski, W. 2014. ‘Hylomorphism and the Metaphysics of Structure’, Res Philosophica 91.2: 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, W. 2016. Structure and the Metaphysics of Mind: How Hylomorphism Solves the Mind–Body Problem. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joachim, H. H. 1922. Aristotle: On Coming-to-be and Passing-away. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 1997. Aristotle on the Sense-Organs. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2002. ‘Imprinted on the Mind: Active and Passive in Aristotle’s Theory of Sense Perception’, in Saunders, B. and van Brakel, J. (eds.), Theories, Technologies, Instrumentalities of Color: Anthropological and Historiographic Perspectives. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 169–88.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2006. ‘What’s New in the De Sensu? The Place of the De Sensu in Aristotle’s Psychology’, in King, R. A. H. (ed.), Common to Body and Soul. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 140–64.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2012a. ‘Capacity and Potentiality: Aristotle’s Metaphysics Θ.6–7 from the Perspective of the De Anima’, Topoi 31.2: 209–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2012b. The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2014. ‘Parts in Aristotle’s Definition of Soul: De Anima Books I and II’, in Perler, D. and Corcilius, K. (eds.), Partitioning the Soul: Debates from Plato to Leibniz. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2019. ‘The Principle that “Like Perceives Like” in Theophrastus’ De sensibus’, Rhizomata 7.2: 226–48.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. 2006. ‘Hylomorphism’, Journal of Philosophy 103.12: 652–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, M. A. 2012. ‘Aristotle on Odour and Smell’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43: 143–83.Google Scholar
Johnstone, M. A. 2013. ‘Aristotle on Sounds’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21.4: 631–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, M. A. 2015. ‘Aristotle and Alexander on Perceptual Error’, Phronesis 60.3: 310–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, M. A. 2022. ‘Aristotle on the Objects of Perception’, in Cohoe, C. (ed.), Aristotle’s On the Soul: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press, pp. 155–73.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 2003. The Verb ‘Be’ in Ancient Greek. 2nd ed. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kalderon, M. E. 2015. Form without Matter: Empedocles and Aristotle on Color Perception. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalderon, M. E. 2017. Sympathy in Perception. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalderon, M. E. 2020. ‘Reply to Ganson’, in Bennett, D. and Toivanen, J. (eds.), Philosophical Problems in Sense Perception: Testing the Limits of Aristotelianism. Cham: Springer, pp. 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamtekar, R. 2009. ‘Knowing by Likeness in Empedocles’, Phronesis 54.3: 215–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsafanas, P. 2011. ‘Activity and Passivity in Reflective Agency’, Oxford Studies in Metaethics 6: 219–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsey, S. 2018. ‘An Aporia About Aisthêsis’, in Radice, R. and Zanata, M. (eds.), Aristotele e le sfide del suo tempo. Milan: Unicopli, pp. 161–71.Google Scholar
Kelsey, S. 2022. Mind and World in Aristotle’s De Anima. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1963. Action, Emotion and Will. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kent Sprague, R. 1996. ‘A Missing Middle Term: De Anima II,2’, Phronesis 41.1: 104–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1989. ‘The Myth of Nonreductive Materialism’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 63.3: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 1992. ‘The Nonreductivist’s Troubles with Mental Causation’, in Heil, J. and Mele, A. R. (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford University Press, pp. 189–210.Google Scholar
Kim, J. 1998. Mind in a Physical World: An Essay on the Mind-Body Problem and Mental Causation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. 2005. Physicalism, or Something Near Enough. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
King, C. G. 2021. ‘Δόξαι and the Tools of Dialectic in De Anima I.1–3’, in Gregoric, P. and Fink, J. L. (eds.), Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind. New York: Routledge, pp. 15–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. A. H. 2001. Aristotle on Life and Death. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
King, R. A. H. 2021. ‘Nutrition and Hylomorphism in Aristotle’, in Korobili, G. and Lo Presti, R. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. 2009. ‘The Activity of Reason’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 83.2: 23–43.Google Scholar
Koslicki, K. 2006. ‘Aristotle’s Mereology and the Status of Form’, Journal of Philosophy 103.12: 715–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koslicki, K. 2008. The Structure of Objects. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosman, A. 1969. ‘Aristotle’s Definition of Motion’, Phronesis 14.1: 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosman, A. 1975. ‘Perceiving That We Perceive: On the Soul III, 2’, The Philosophical Review 84.4: 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosman, A. 1984. ‘Substance, Being, and Energeia: The Argument of Metaphysics Theta’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 121–49.Google Scholar
Kosman, A. 1994. ‘The Activity of Being in Aristotle’s Metaphysics’, in Scaltsas, T., Charles, D., and Gill, M. L. (eds.), Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Oxford University Press, pp. 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosman, A. 2013. The Activity of Being: An Essay on Aristotle’s Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, R. 2006. ‘How to Justify Ethical Propositions: Aristotle’s Method’, in Kraut, R. (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 76–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulvicki, J. 2008. ‘The Nature of Noise’, Philosopher’s Imprint 8: 1–16.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 1993. ‘Mind’s Crisis. On Anaxagoras’ νοῦς’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 31 Supplement: 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laks, A. 2002a. ‘Les fonctions de l’intellect’, Methodos 2: 7–31.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2002b. ‘La physique de la sensation aristotélicienne selon Théophraste (Physique, livre 5)’, in Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Le style de la pensée: recueil de textes en hommage à Jacques Brunschwig. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, pp. 353–74.Google Scholar
Laks, A. 2009. ‘Aporia Zero (Metaphysics B 1, 995a24–995b4)’, in Crubellier, M. and Laks, A. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Beta: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford University Press, pp. 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laks, A. 2019. ‘The Lever, or How to Act at a Distance: A Backdrop to Theophrastus’, De sensibus’, Rhizomata 7.2: 168–87.Google Scholar
Le Blond, J. M. 1945. Aristote, philosophe de la vie. Le livre premier du Traité sur les parties des animaux. Paris: Aubier.Google Scholar
Lear, J. 1988. Aristotle: The Desire to Understand. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M.-K. 2005. Epistemology after Protagoras: Responses to Relativism in Plato, Aristotle, and Democritus. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M.-K. 2011. ‘The Distinction between Primary and Secondary Qualities in Ancient Greek Philosophy’, in Nolan, L. (ed.), Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate. Oxford University Press, pp. 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, D. 2021. ‘Looking for the Formative Power in Aristotle’s Nutritive Soul’, in Korobili, G. and Lo Presti, R. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 101–26.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, C. 1972. Sur l’évolution d’Aristote en psychologie. Louvain: Éditions de l’Institut supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. 2021a. Aristotle on Inquiry. Erotetic Frameworks and Domain-Specific Norms. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennox, J. 2021b. ‘“Most Natural Among the Functions of Living Things”: Puzzles about Reproduction as a Nutritive Function’, in Korobili, G. and Lo Presti, R. (eds.), Nutrition and Nutritive Soul in Aristotle and Aristotelianism. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. 1992. ‘Aspects of the Relationship Between Aristotle’s Psychology and his Zoology’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 147–67.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1966. ‘Thinking and Sense-Perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism?’, The Classical Quarterly 16.2: 256–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, H. 2007. ‘The Assimilation of Sense to Sense-Object in Aristotle’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33: 179–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, M. F. 1983. ‘Aristotle on Kinds of Thinking’, Phronesis 28.1: 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, M. C. (ed.). 1973. An Arabic Translation of Themistius’ Commentary on Aristoteles, De anima. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacClintock, S. 1956. Perversity and Error: Studies on the ‘Averroist’ John of Jandun. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Madigan, A. 1999. Aristotle: Metaphysics, Book B and Book K 1–2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Magee, J. M. 2000. ‘Sense Organs and the Activity of Sensation in Aristotle’, Phronesis 45.4: 306–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, J. M. 2003. Unmixing the Intellect: Aristotle on Cognitive Powers and Bodily Organs. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Makin, S. 2006. Aristotle: Metaphysics, Book Theta. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1996. ‘Aristote et la structure du De sensibus de Théophraste’, Phronesis 41.2: 158–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansion, S. 1961. ‘Le role de l’exposé et de la criticism des philosophies antérieures chez Aristote’, in Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problèmes de méthode. Louvain: Publications Universitaires, pp. 35–56.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. 2007. ‘The Union of Cause and Effect in Aristotle: Physics III 3’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32: 205–32.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A. 2013. ‘Aristotle’s Hylomorphism without Reconditioning’, Philosophical Inquiry 37.1–2: 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmodoro, A. 2014. Aristotle on Perceiving Objects. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. 2022. ‘The Gaze of the Mind: Cognitive Activity, Attention, and Causal Explanation in 13th–14th Century Latin Medieval Psychology’. Unpublished PhD thesis, McGill University.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 2011. Understanding Human Agency. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAninch, A. 2017. ‘Activity, Passivity, and Normative Avowal’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98.1: 2–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConkie, G. and Loschky, L. 2003. ‘Change Blindness, Psychology of’, in Nadel, L. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
McCready-Flora, I. C. 2015. ‘Protagoras and Plato in Aristotle: Rereading the Measure Doctrine’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49: 71–127.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 1994. ‘The Origins of Aristotle’s Concept of ᾿Ενέργεια: ᾿Ενέργεια and Δύναμις’, Ancient Philosophy 14.1: 73–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, S. 2002. ‘Aristotle’s Definition of Soul and the Programme of the De Anima’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 83–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, S. forthcoming a. The Aim and the Argument of Aristotle’s Metaphysics. https://www.philosophie.hu-berlin.de/de/lehrbereiche/antike/mitarbeiter/menn/contents.Google Scholar
Menn, S. forthcoming b. ‘The Origins of Aristotle’s Concept of ᾿Ενέργεια: ᾿Ενέργεια and Κίνησις’.Google Scholar
Miller, F. D. 1999a. ‘Aristotle’s Philosophy of Perception’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 15.1: 177–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, F. D. 1999b. ‘Aristotle’s Philosophy of Soul’, The Review of Metaphysics 53.2: 309–37.Google Scholar
Miller, F. D. 2018. Aristotle: On the Soul and Other Psychological Works. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mingucci, G. 2021. ‘In Search of the Essence of the Soul: Aristotle’s Scientific Method and Practice in De Anima II.1–2’, in Gregoric, P. and Fink, J. L. (eds.), Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind. New York: Routledge, pp. 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modrak, D. K. W. 1987. Aristotle: The Power of Perception. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. 1978. ‘Events, Processes, and States’, Linguistics and Philosophy 2.3: 415–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, D. 2005. ‘Aristotle on Why Plants Cannot Perceive’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 295–339.Google Scholar
Narcy, M. 1996. ‘ΚΡΙΣΙΣ et ΑΙΣΘΗΣΙΣ (De anima, III, 2)’, in Dherbey, G. R. (ed.), Corps et âme: Sur le de Anima d’Aristote. Paris: Vrin, pp. 239–56.Google Scholar
Natali, C. 2013. ‘A Note on Metaphysics Θ.6, 1048b18–36’, Rhizomata 1.1: 104–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nudds, M. 2010. ‘What Sounds Are’, Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 5: 279–302.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. 1978. Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium: Text with Translation, Commentary, and Interpretive Essays. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M.C. 1982. ‘Saving Aristotle’s Appearances’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen. Cambridge University Press, pp. 267–94.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. and Putnam, H. 1992. ‘Changing Aristotle’s Mind’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 27–55.Google Scholar
Nuyens, F. 1948. L’évolution de la psychologie d’Aristote. Louvain: Éditions de l’Institut supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
Oates, W. J. 1936. ‘The Doctrine of the Mean’, The Philosophical Review 45.4: 382–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Callaghan, C. 2007. Sounds: A Philosophical Theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Callaghan, C. 2020. ‘Auditory Perception’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2020 Edition. https://plato.stanford.ed/archives/sum2020/entries/perception-auditory/.Google Scholar
Oderberg, D. S. 2008. Real Essentialism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Regan, J. K. 2003. ‘Change Blindness’, in Nadel, L. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 486–90.Google Scholar
O’Regan, J. K. and Noë, A. 2001. ‘A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24.5: 939–73 (discussion 973–1031).Google ScholarPubMed
Owen, G. E. L. 1961. ‘Tithenai ta Phainomena’, in Mansion, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problèmes de méthode. Louvain: Publications Universitaires, pp. 83–103.Google Scholar
Pattin, A. 1988. Pour l’histoire du sens agent. La controverse entre Barthélemy de Bruges et Jean de Jandun, ses antécédents et son évolution. Étude et textes inédits. Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Penner, T. 1970. ‘Verbs and the Identity of Actions: A Philosophical Exercise in the Interpretation of Aristotle’, in Wood, O. P. and Pitcher, G. (eds.), Ryle: A Collection of Critical Essays. London: Macmillan, pp. 393–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perälä, M. 2018. ‘Aristotle on Perceptual Discrimination’, Phronesis 63.3: 257–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perälä, M. 2022. ‘Aristotle on Incidental Perception’, in Toivanen, J. (ed.), Forms of Representation in the Aristotelian Tradition, vol. 1: Sense Perception. Leiden: Brill, pp. 66–98.Google Scholar
Pickering, R. F. 1977. ‘Aristotle on Walking’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 59.1: 37–43.Google Scholar
Pippin, R. B. 1987. ‘Kant on the Spontaneity of Mind’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17.2: 449–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polansky, R. 2000. ‘Analogy and Disanalogy of the Soul’s Faculties in Aristotle’s De Anima’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 15: 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polansky, R. 2007. Aristotle’s De anima: A Critical Commentary. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polansky, R. and Fritz, J. 2018. ‘Aristotle on Accidental Perception’, in Sfendoni-Mentzou, D. (eds.), Aristotle: Contemporary Perspectives on his Thought: On the 2400th Anniversary of Aristotle’s Birth. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 125–50.Google Scholar
Price, A. W. 1996. ‘Aristotelian Perceptions’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 12.1: 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2010. ‘Dialektik und Gespräch bei Aristoteles’, in Hempfer, K. and Traninger, A. (eds.), Der Dialog im Diskursfeld seiner Zeit. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, pp. 47–73.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975. ‘Philosophy and Our Mental Life’, in Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers. Cambridge University Press, pp. 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinoff, E. 2015. ‘Aristotle on the Intelligibility of Perception’, Review of Metaphysics 68.4: 719–40.Google Scholar
Rabinoff, E. 2018. Perception in Aristotle’s Ethics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, C. 2006. ‘What Use Is Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean?’, in Reis, B. (ed.), The Virtuous Life in Greek Ethics. Cambridge University Press, pp. 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, C. 2017a. ‘Aporia and Dialectical Method in Aristotle’, in Karamanolis, G. and Politis, V. (eds.), The Aporetic Tradition in Ancient Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, pp. 112–36.Google Scholar
Rapp, C. 2017b. ‘Aristoteles’ hylemorphischer Seelenbegriff’, in Kiesel, D. and Ferrari, C. (eds.), Seele: Orient und Okzident. Berlin: Klostermann, pp. 45–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rashed, M. 2020. ‘Les petites catégories’, in Rashed, M. and Chiaradonna, R. (eds.), Boéthos de Sidon Exégète d’Aristote et philosophe. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 213–53.Google Scholar
Raz, J. and Ruben, D.-H. 1997. ‘The Active and the Passive’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 71: 211–46.Google Scholar
Rea, M. C. 2011. ‘Hylomorphism Reconditioned’, Philosophical Perspectives 25.1: 341–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 2017. Aristotle: De Anima. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. 1916. Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie. Bonn: Verlag von Friedrich Cohen.Google Scholar
Robinson, H. 1978. ‘Mind and Body in Aristotle’, The Classical Quarterly 28.1: 105–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, H. 1983. ‘Aristotelian Dualism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1: 123–44.Google Scholar
Robinson, H. 2014. ‘Modern Hylomorphism and the Reality and Causal Power of Structure: A Skeptical Investigation’, Res Philosophica 91.2: 203–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, H. 2021. ‘Aristotelian Dualism, Good; Aristotelian Hylomorphism, Bad’, in Gregoric, P. and Fink, J. L. (eds.), Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind. New York: Routledge, pp. 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodier, G. 1900. Aristote: Traité de L’âme. Tome II. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Roreitner, R. 2020. ‘Blood, πνεῦμα, or Something More Solid? Aristotle on the Material Structure of Perceptual Apparatus’, in Bartoš, H. and King, C. (eds.), Heat, Pneuma, and Soul in Ancient Philosophy and Science. Cambridge University Press, pp. 288–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roreitner, R. 2023. ‘The Perceptive Soul’s Impassivity in Late Ancient Reception of Aristotle’s De Anima’, Ancient Philosophy 43.1: 219–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roreitner, R. 2024a. ‘The Principles of Propositional Thought: The Unity and the Function of An. III 6’, in Corcilius, K., Falcon, A., and Roreitner, R., Aristotle on the Essence of Human Thought. Oxford University Press, pp. 112–55.Google Scholar
Roreitner, R. 2024b. ‘Nous and Nature’, in Corcilius, K., Falcon, A., and Roreitner, R., Aristotle on the Essence of Human Thought. Oxford University Press, pp. 223–47.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle’s Metaphysics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1956. Aristoteles, De anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1961. Aristoteles, De anima. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, G. 2017. ‘Going through aporiai: The Critical Use of Aristotle’s Dialectic’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 52: 209–56.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1954. Dilemmas: The Tanner Lectures, 1953. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Salmieri, G. 2009. ‘Aristotle’s Non-“Dialectical” Methodology in the Nicomachean Ethics’, Ancient Philosophy 29.2: 311–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scaltsas, T. 1996. ‘Biological Matter and Perceptual Powers in Aristotle’s de Anima’, Topoi 15.1: 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiter, K. M. 2012. ‘Images, Appearances, and Phantasia in Aristotle’, Phronesis 57.3: 251–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruton, R. 2009. ‘Sounds as Secondary Objects and Pure Events’, in Nudds, M. and O’Callaghan, C. (eds.), Sounds and Perception: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press, pp. 50–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 1992. ‘Peripatetic Dialectic in the De sensibus’, in Fortenbaugh, W. W. and Gutas, D. (eds.), Theophrastus: His Psychological, Doxographical, and Scientific Writings. New Brunswick: Routledge, pp. 20–31.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 2004. The Midwife of Platonism: Text and Subtext in Plato’s Theaetetus. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 2008. Creationism and its Critics in Antiquity. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. 2010. ‘Teleology, Aristotelian and Platonic’, in Lennox, J. G. and Bolton, R. (eds.), Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle: Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf. Cambridge University Press, pp. 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. 1988. ‘Soul as Subject in Aristotle’s De Anima’, The Classical Quarterly 38.1: 140–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. 1991. ‘The First Functionalist’, in Smith, J.-C. (ed.), Historical Foundations of Cognitive Science. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. 1997. ‘Intentionality and Isomorphism in Aristotle’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 11: 307–30.Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2007. ‘The Peculiar Motion of Aristotelian Souls’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81: 139–61.Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2009. ‘The Priority of Soul in Aristotle’s De Anima: Mistaking Categories?’, in Frede, D. and Reis, B. (eds.), Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 267–90.Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2013. ‘The Phainomenological Method in Aristotle’s Metaphysics’, in Feser, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. London: Palgrave, pp. 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, C. 2016. Aristotle: De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2019. ‘Hylomorphic Offices’, Dialogoi: Ancient Philosophy Today 1.2: 215–36.Google Scholar
Shields, C. 2021. ‘Hylomorphic Mental Causation’, in Gregoric, P. and Fink, J. L. (eds.), Encounters with Aristotelian Philosophy of Mind. New York: Routledge, pp. 307–24.Google Scholar
Silva, J. F. 2019. ‘The Chameleonic Mind: The Activity versus the Actuality of Perception’, in Băltuță, E. (ed.), Medieval Perceptual Puzzles: Theories of Sense Perception in the 13th and 14th Centuries. Leiden: Brill, pp. 38–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, J. F. 2020. ‘From Agent to Active Sense: Was There an Augustinianism-Averroisant?’, in Decaix, V. and Mora-Márquez, A. M. (eds.), Active Cognition: Challenges to an Aristotelian Tradition. Cham: Springer, pp. 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, A. 1989. ‘Color and Color-Perception in Aristotle’s De anima’, Ancient Philosophy 9.2: 271–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisko, J. E. 1996. ‘Material Alteration and Cognitive Activity in Aristotle’s De Anima’, Phronesis 41.2: 138–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisko, J. E. 1998. ‘Alteration and Quasi-Alteration: A Critical Notice of Stephen Everson, Aristotle on Perception’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 16: 331–52.Google Scholar
Sisko, J. E. 2004. ‘Reflexive Awareness Does Belong to the Main Function of Perception: Reply to Victor Caston’, Mind 113.451: 513–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skrzypek, J. 2017. ‘Three Concerns for Structural Hylomorphism’, Analytic Philosophy 58.4: 360–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slakey, T. J. 1961. ‘Aristotle on Sense Perception’, The Philosophical Review 70.4: 470–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. A. 1931. The Works of Aristotle: De Anima. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1972. ‘Aristotle, Mathematics, and Colour’, The Classical Quarterly 22.2: 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1974. ‘Body and Soul in Aristotle’, Philosophy 49.187: 63–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sorabji, R. 1992. ‘Intentionality and Physiological Processes: Aristotle’s Theory of Sense-Perception’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 195–225.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1993. Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 2001. ‘Aristotle on Sensory Processes and Intentionality: A Reply to Burnyeat’, in Perler, D. (ed.), Ancient and Medieval Theories of Intentionality. Leiden: Brill, pp. 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, N. 2010. ‘After Literalism and Spiritualism: The Plasticity of Aristotelian Perception’, in Riel, G. van V. and Destrée, P. (eds.), Ancient Perspectives on Aristotle’s De Anima. Leuven University Press, pp. 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton, G. M. 1917. Theophrastus and the Greek Physiological Psychology before Aristotle. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 1990. ‘Aristotle’s Epistemology’, in Everson, S. (ed.), Epistemology: Companions to Ancient Thought, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, pp. 116–42.Google Scholar
Terzis, G. N. 1995. ‘Homeostasis and the Mean in Aristotle’s Ethics’, Apeiron 28.4: 175–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torstrik, A. 1862. Aristotelis De anima libri III. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Tracy, T. 1969. Physiological Theory and the Doctrine of the Mean in Plato and Aristotle. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracy, T. 1974. ‘Heart and Soul in Aristotle’, The Society for Ancient Greek Philosophy Newsletter 90: 1–18.Google Scholar
Tweedale, M. 1990. ‘Aristotle’s Motionless Soul’, Dialogue 29.1: 123–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweedale, M. 1992. ‘Origins of the Medieval Theory that Sensation Is an Immaterial Reception of a Form’, Philosophical Topics 20.2: 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeke, G. (ed.). 1957. Themistius: Commentaire sur le traité de l’âme d’Aristote. Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke. Louvain: Publications universitaires.Google Scholar
Vogiatzi, M. 2020. ‘Aristotle on the Soul as Harmony’, Elenchos 41.2: 245–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, E. 1882. Aristotle’s Psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, J. K. 1988. ‘Perception and λόγος in de Anima II 12’, Ancient Philosophy 8.2: 217–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waterlow, S. 1982. Nature, Change, and Agency in Aristotle’s Physics: A Philosophical Study. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. 1980. ‘Aristotle’s Concept of Θεωρία and the Ἐνέργια-Κίνησις Distinction’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 18.3: 253–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildberg, C. 2004. ‘On Generation and Corruption I.7: Aristotle on poiein and paschein’, in de Haas, F. A. J. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle’s On Generation and Corruption I. Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford University Press, pp. 219–42.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 1992. ‘Dialectic, Motion, and Perception: De Anima Book I’, in Nussbaum, M. C. and Rorty, A. O. (eds.), Essays on Aristotle’s De Anima. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 169–83.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 1996. ‘Commentary on Price’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 12.1: 310–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, C. 2015. ‘In Defense of the Craft Analogy: Artifacts and Natural Teleology’, in Leunissen, M. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press, pp. 107–20.Google Scholar
Wolt, D. 2023. ‘Energeia in the Magna Moralia’, Mnemosyne 76: 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, C. M. 1996. ‘The Doctrine of the Mean’, Topoi 15.1: 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabarella, J. 1605. In Tres Aristotelis Libros de Anima Commentarii. Venice: Franciscum Bolzettam.Google Scholar
Zabarella, J. 1619. Commentarii: In III Aristot. Libros de Anima. Frankfurt: Zetznerus.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Robert Roreitner, Charles University, Prague
  • Book: Aristotle on the Nature and Causes of Perception
  • Online publication: 01 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009533829.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Robert Roreitner, Charles University, Prague
  • Book: Aristotle on the Nature and Causes of Perception
  • Online publication: 01 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009533829.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Robert Roreitner, Charles University, Prague
  • Book: Aristotle on the Nature and Causes of Perception
  • Online publication: 01 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009533829.012
Available formats
×