Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T08:57:24.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘The Work That Reconnects’: a groupwork methodology for enhancing adaptive responses to the climate and ecological crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2024

Rosie Jones*
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar, Bath, UK
Chris Johnstone
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar, Moray, UK
*
Corresponding author: Rosie Jones; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Abstract

The dominant economic, political and sociocultural system is leading the Earth towards climate and ecological breakdown (IPCC, 2023) as well as causing adverse mental, physical and social health consequences (Eisenberg-Guyot and Prins, 2022). To address these inter-related crises there is an urgent need for cultural evolution to life-sustaining ways of living and organising human life (Brooks et al., 2018). This requires concurrent psychological and ideological shifts and psychological contexts of support, in which people can explore their relationship with, and response to, the planetary predicament and the roles they would like to play in its transformation. The Work That Reconnects (WTR) (Macy and Brown, 2014) is a groupwork methodology developed to address this need. It consists of a set of philosophical and psychological teachings and experiential practices drawn from deep ecology, living systems thinking, Buddhism, and indigenous, spiritual and other wisdom traditions. It originated outside the field of CBT and psychotherapy, within activist movements, within which it is an increasingly well-known methodology for psychological support. The WTR has many characteristics which align with cognitive behavioural approaches with regard to processes, techniques and mechanisms of change. The WTR has, as yet, received minimal scientific research attention. The aim of this paper is to raise awareness of the methodology within the cognitive behavioural field, introducing philosophies, concepts, and techniques that may be of utility to CBT practitioners and stimulate research and evaluation of a methodology with potential to address psychological needs at this time.

Key learning aims

  1. (1) To learn about a groupwork methodology, the Work That Reconnects (WTR), for developing adaptive resilience, motivation, agency and wellbeing when facing concerns about the world.

  2. (2) To learn about the four stages of the spiral of practices of the Work That Reconnects: gratitude, honouring our pain for the world, seeing with new and ancient eyes, and going forth.

  3. (3) To understand the key concepts of the model including cultural schemas such as ‘the three stories of our time’ and application of living systems thinking to create cognitive and behavioural shifts towards adaptive action.

  4. (4) To explore the parallels with cognitive behavioural approaches, review the evidence base, highlight the need for further research, and outline areas for investigation.

  5. (5) To suggest ways in which the WTR can inform individual therapy for climate and ecological concerns.

Type
Invited Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Further reading

Active Hope (Macy and Johnstone, 2022) provides a thorough primer on the concepts of the WTR alongside exercises for self practice or use in study groups. An online self-help course (https://activehope.training) has recently been developed that can also form the basis of either a solo, paired or group process. The theory and detailed description of how to facilitate group practices of the WTR are provided in the facilitation manual Coming Back to Life (Macy and Brown, 2014) and are also available online at https://workthatreconnects.org/resources along with articles, audios and training videos.Google Scholar

References

Atkins, P., Wilson, D. & Hayes, S. (2019). Prosocial: Using Evolutionary Science to Build Productive, Equitable and Collaborative Groups. Context Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, M. Y., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Gratitude and prosocial behavior: helping when it costs you. Psychological Science, 17, 319325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01705.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bragg, E. A. (1996). Towards an ecological self: deep ecology meets constructionist self-theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 93108. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, J. S., Waring, T. M., Borgerhoff Mulder, M. & Richerson, P. J. (2018). Applying cultural evolution to sustainability challenges: an introduction to the special issue. Sustainability Science, 13, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0516-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughlan, A., Ross, E., Nikles, D., De Cesare, E., Tran, C. & Pensini, P. (2022). Nature guided imagery: an intervention to increase connectedness to nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 80, article 101759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunha, L. F., Pellanda, L. C., & Reppold, C. T. (2019). Positive psychology and gratitude interventions: a randomized clinical trial. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, article 584. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00584 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunsolo, A., Harper, S. L., Minor, K., Hayes, K., Williams, K. G. & Howard, C. (2020). Ecological grief and anxiety: the start of a healthy response to climate change? The Lancet Planetary Health, 4, e261e263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30144-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg-Guyot, J. & Prins, S. J. (2022). The impact of capitalism on mental health: an epidemiological perspective. In Bhugra, D., Moussaoui, D., & Craig, T.J. (eds), Oxford Textbook of Social Psychiatry. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198861478.003.0022 Google Scholar
Furness, E. (2021). Understanding the lived experience of connection to nature. Conservation Science and Practice, 3(7), e440. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.440 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajek, A., & König, H. H. (2022). Climate anxiety, loneliness and perceived social isolation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, article 14991. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214991 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, J. (2022). Alchemizing sorrow into deep determination. Emotional reflexivity and climate change engagement. Frontiers in Climate, 4, article 786631. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2022.786631 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, M. D. (2017). Activating hope in the midst of crisis: emotions, transformative learning and the Work That Reconnects. Journal of Transformative Education, 15(4), 296314. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344616680350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, S. C., & Lillis, J. (2012). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlund-de Witt, A., de Boer, J. & Boersema, J. J. (2014). Exploring inner and outer worlds: a quantitative study of worldviews, environmental attitudes, and sustainable lifestyles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 37, 4054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, S. V., Pollitt, A., Barnett, M. A., Curran, M. A. & Craig, Z. R. (2018). Differentiating environmental concern in the context of psychological adaption to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 48, 158167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickman, C., Marks, E., Pihkala, P., Clayton, S., Lewandowski, R. & Mayall, E. (2021). Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: a global survey. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5, e863e873. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, J. & Sparks, P. (2008). Engaging with the natural environment: the role of affective connection and identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 109120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis-Walker, L. (2012). Change processes in emotion-focused therapy and the Work That Reconnects. Ecopsychology, 4, 2536. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2011.0047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (2023). AR6 Synthesis Report Climate Change 2023. Summary for policymakers. Retrieved from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf Google Scholar
Ives, C. D., Freeth, R. & Fischer, J. (2020). Inside-out sustainability: the neglect of inner worlds. Ambio, 49, 208217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01187-w CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackowska, M., Brown, J., Ronaldson, A., & Steptoe, A. (2016). The impact of a brief gratitude intervention on subjective well-being, biology and sleep. Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 22072217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315572455 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnstone, C. (2002). ‘Reconnecting With Our World’, in Chesner, A. & Hahn, H. (eds), Creative Advances in Groupwork. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Johnstone, C. (2019). Gaian psychology in practice: an outcome study of groupwork to address our concerns about the world. Journal of Holistic Healthcare, 16. Retrieved from: https://bhma.org/gaian-psychology-in-practice-an-outcome-study-of-groupwork-to-address-concerns-about-the-world/ Google Scholar
Johnstone, C. (2023). ‘Building change-making capacity: active hope training’, in Aspey, L., Jackson, C., & Parker, D. (eds), Holding the Hope, pp. 101110. PCCS Books Google Scholar
Lee, H. C., Chugani, S. & Namkoong, J. (2020). The role of entitlement and perceived resources in gratitude’s effect on materialism: evidence from two longitudinal experiments. SSRN. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3650833 Google Scholar
Macy, J. (1983). Despair and Personal Power in the Nuclear Age. New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Macy, J. (2007). World as Lover, World as Self: Courage for Global Justice and Ecological Renewal. Parallax Press.Google Scholar
Macy, J. & Brown, M. (2014). Coming Back to Life. The Updated Guide to The Work That Reconnects. New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Macy, J., & Johnstone, C. (2022). Active Hope: How to Face the Mess we’re in with Unexpected Resilience and Creative Power (2nd edn). New World Library.Google Scholar
Mah, A. Y. J., Chapman, D. A., Markowitz, E. M. & Lickel, B. (2020). Coping with climate change: three insights for research, intervention, and communication to promote adaptive coping to climate change. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 75, article 102282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102282 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, F. S. & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. G. (1978). Living Systems. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change (3rd edn). Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Naess, A., & Haukeland, P. I. (2002). Life’s Philosophy: Reason & Feeling in a Deeper World. Translated by Huntford, Roland. University of Georgia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naess, A., & Sessions, G. (1984). The basic principles of deep ecology. Ecophilosophy, 6. Retrieved from: https://iseethics.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/sessions-george-ecophilosophy-newsletter-6-may-1984.pdf Google Scholar
O’Connor, M.-F. (2022). The Grieving Brain: The Surprising Science of How we Learn from Love and Loss. HarperOne.Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics (2021). Three-quarters of adults in Great Britain worry about climate change: those who are worried about climate change are also more likely to make lifestyle changes in response. Retrieved from: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/articles/threequartersofadultsingreatbritainworryaboutclimatechange/2021-11-05 Google Scholar
Rachman, S. (1980). Emotional processing. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 18, 5160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(80)90069-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sessions, G. (1995). Deep Ecology for the 21st Century. Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
Sirois, F. M., & Wood, A. M. (2017). Gratitude uniquely predicts lower depression in chronic illness populations: a longitudinal study of inflammatory bowel disease and arthritis. Health Psychology, 36, 122132. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strumse, E. (2007). The ecological self: a psychological perspective on anthropogenic environmental change. European Journal of Science and Theology, 3, 1118. Retrieved from: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/23274116/the-ecological-self-a-psychological-perspective-on-anthropogenic- Google Scholar
Sun, J., Ma, B., & Wei, S. (2023). Same gratitude, different pro-environmental behaviors? Effect of the dual-path influence mechanism of gratitude on pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 415, article 137779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137779 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, A. M., Maltby, J., Gillett, R., Linley, P. A. & Joseph, S. (2008). The role of gratitude in the development of social support, stress, and depression: two longitudinal studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 854871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaremba, D., Kulesza, M., Herman, A. M., Marczak, M., Kossowski, B., Budziszewska, M., Michałowski, J. M., Klöckner, C. A., Marchewka, A. & Wierzba, M. (2022). A wise person plants a tree a day before the end of the world: coping with the emotional experience of climate change in Poland. Current Psychology, 14, 119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03807-3 Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.