Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-xlmdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-12T09:55:39.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meta-analysis of trials comparing antidepressants with active placebos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Joanna Moncrieff ,
Simon Wessely  and
Rebecca Hardy
Joanna Moncrieff*
Affiliation:
Sector of Epidemiology and General Practice, Institute of Psychiatry, London
Simon Wessely
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, Kings Cortege School of Medicine and Dentistry, London
Rebecca Hardy
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, London
*
Joanna Moncrieff. Section of Epidemiology and General Practice. Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Parle. London SES 8AF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Unblinding effects may-introduce bias into clinical trials. The use of active placebos to mimic side-effects of medication may therefore produce more rigorous evidence on the efficacy of antidepressants.

Method

Trials comparing antidepressants with active placebos were located. A standard measure of effect was calculated for each trial and weighted pooled estimates obtained. Heterogeneity was examined and sensitivity analyses performed. A subgroup analysis of in-patient and out-patient trials was conducted.

Results

Only two of the nine studies examined produced effect sizes which showed a consistent significant difference in favour of the active drug. Combining all studies produced pooled effect size estimates of between 0.41 (0.27–0.56) and 0.46 (0.31–0.60) with high heterogeneity due to one strongly positive trial. Sensitivity analyses excluding this and one other trial reduced the pooled effect to between 0.21 (0.03–0.38) and 0.27 (0.10–0.45).

Conclusions

Meta-analysis is very sensitive to decisions about exclusions. Previous general meta-analyses have found combined effect sizes in the range 0.4–0.8. The more conservative estimates produced here suggest that unblinding effects may inflate the efficacy of antidepressants in trials using inert placebos.

Type
Papers
Information
The British Journal of Psychiatry , Volume 172 , Issue 3 , March 1998 , pp. 227 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

See Commentary, pp. 232–234 this issue.

References

Abrarmon, J. H. (1991) Meta-analysis a review of pros and cons. Public Health Reviews. 18, 1–47 Google Scholar
Daneman, E. A. (1961) Imipramine in office management of depressive reactions Diseases of the Nervous System, 22, 213–217.Google Scholar
Engelhardt, D. M., Mergolis, R. A., Rudorfer, L., et al (1969) Physician bias and the double-blind Archives of General Psychiatry, 20, 315–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, A. S. (1975) Interaction of drug therapy with marital therapy in depressive patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 619–637 Google Scholar
Friedman, A. S., Granick, S., Cohen, H. W., et al (1966) Imipramine (tofranil) vs placebo in hospitalised psychotic depressives. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 4, 13–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillin, J. C. Laurellio, J., Kelsoe, J. R., et al (1995) No antidepressant effect of biperiden compared with placebo in depression: A double-blind 6-week clinical trial. Psychiatric Research, 58, 99–105 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grnenberg, R, P., Bornstein, R. F., Greenberg, M. D., et al (1992) A meta-analysis of antidepressant outcome under “blinder” conditions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 664–669 Google Scholar
Grnenberg, R. P., & Fisher, S. (1994) Suspended judgement. Seeing through the double-masked design: a commentary. Controlled Clinical Trials, 15, 244–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, L. V. & Olkin, I. (1985) Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press Google Scholar
Hollitter, L. E., Overall, J. E., Johnson, M., et al (1963) Evaluation of desipramine in depressive states. Journal of New Drugs, 3, 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollitter, L. E., Overall, J. E., Johnson, M., et al (1964) Controlled comparison of imipramine, amitriptyline and placebo in hospitalised depressed patients. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 139, 370–375 Google Scholar
Hussain, Z. (1970) Drugs in depressive illness. British Medical Journal, 1, 482.Google Scholar
Kasper, S., Moises, H-W & Beckmann, H. (1981) The anticholinergic biperiden in depressive disorders Phormocopsychiatry, 14, 195–198 Google Scholar
Medical Research Council (1965) Clinical trial of the treatment of depressive illness British Medical Journal, 1, 881–886.Google Scholar
Murphy, G. E., Simons, A. D., Wetzel, R. D., et al (1984) Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 41, 33–41 Google Scholar
Quality Assurance Project (1983) A treatment outline for depressive disorders. Autralion and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 17, 129–146 Google Scholar
Rush, A. J., Beck, A. T., Kovacs, M., et al (1977) Comparative effects of cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy in the treatment of depressed outpatients Cognitive Research and Therapy, 1, 17–37.Google Scholar
Smith, M. C., Glass, G. V. & Miller, T. I. (1980) Reviews of research on the effects of drug therapy on psychological disorders. In The Benefits of Psychotherapy (eds Smith, M C., Glass, G. V. & Miller, T. I.), pp. 127–261 Baltimore. MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Steinbrueck, S. M., Maxwell, S. E. & Howard, G. S. (1983) A meta-analysis of psychotherapy and drug therapy in the treatment of unipolar depression with adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 856–863.Google Scholar
Toneatto, T. & Sellers, E. M. (1992) Perception of whether drug or placebo has been administered is a determinant of drinking reduction. In Novel Pharmacological Interventions for Alcoholism (eds Sellers, E. M. & Naranjo, C. A.). Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Uhlenthuth, E. H. & Park, L. C. (1963) The influence of medication (Imipramine) and doctor m relieving depressed psychoneurotic outpatients. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 2, 101–122 Google Scholar
Weintreub, W. & Aronson, H. (1963) Clinical judgement in psychopharmacological research Journal of Neuropsychiatry, 5, 65–70 Google Scholar
White, K., Kendo, J., Park, T., et al (1992) Side effects and the “blindability” of clinical drug trials America Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 1730–1761.Google Scholar
Wilson, I. C., Vernon, J. T., Guin, T., et al (1963) A controlled study of treatments of depression. Journal of Neuropsychiatry, 4, 331–337 Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.