Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T08:33:24.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Kinematic analysis and advanced control of a vectored thruster based on 3RRUR parallel manipulator for micro-size AUVs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2024

Tao Liu*
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University & Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, China
Jintao Zhao
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University & Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, China
Junhao Huang
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Engineering and Technology, Sun Yat-sen University & Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, China
*
Corresponding author: Tao Liu; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) have played a pivotal role in advancing ocean exploration and exploitation. However, traditional AUVs face limitations when executing missions at minimal or near-zero forward velocities due to the ineffectiveness of their control surfaces, considerably constraining their potential applications. To address this challenge, this paper introduces an innovative vectored thruster system based on a 3RRUR parallel manipulator tailored for micro-sized AUVs. The incorporation of a vectored thruster enhances the performance of micro-sized AUVs when operating at minimal and low forward speeds. A comprehensive exploration of the kinematics of the thrust-vectoring mechanism has been undertaken through theoretical analysis and experimental validation. The findings from theoretical analysis and experimental confirmation unequivocally affirm the feasibility of the devised thrust-vectoring mechanism. The precise control of the vector device is studied using Physics-informed Neural Network and Model Predictive Control (PINN-MPC). Through the adoption of this pioneering thrust-vectoring mechanism rooted in the 3RRUR parallel manipulator, AUVs can efficiently and effectively generate the requisite motion for thrust-vectoring propulsion, overcoming the limitations of traditional AUVs and expanding their potential applications across various domains.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Sunagawa, S., Acinas, S. G., Bork, P., Bowler, C., Eveillard, D., Gorsky, G., Guidi, L., Iudicone, D., Karsenti, E., Lombard, F., Ogata, H., Pesant, S., Sullivan, M. B., Wincker, P. and de Vargas, C., “Tara oceans: Towards global ocean ecosystems biology,” Nat Rev Microbiol 18(8), 428445 (2020).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, T., Hu, Y., Xu, H., Wang, Q. and Du, W., “A novel vectored thruster based on 3-RPS parallel manipulator for autonomous underwater vehicles,” Mech Mach Theory 133, 646672 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huvenne, V. A., Robert, K., Marsh, L., Iacono, C. L., Bas, T. L. and Wynn, R. B., “Rovs and Auvs,” In: Submarine Geomorphology (Springer, 2018) pp. 93108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahn, J., Yasukawa, S., Sonoda, T., Ura, T. and Ishii, K., “Enhancement of deep-sea floor images obtained by an underwater vehicle and its evaluation by crab recognition,” J Marine Sci Technol 22(4), 758770 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, H., Zhou, H., Fu, J., Zhang, X., Yao, B. and Lian, L., “Consensus protocol based attitudes coordination control for underwater glider formation,” Ocean Eng 262, 112307 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kadiyam, J. and Mohan, S., “Conceptual design of a hybrid propulsion underwater robotic vehicle with different propulsion systems for ocean observations,” Ocean Eng 182, 112125 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, G., Shen, Y., Qu, N., Wang, D. and He, B., “Control architecture of autonomous underwater vehicle for coverage mission in irregular region,” Ocean Eng 236, 109407 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, P., Cruz, N., Matos, A., Neves, M. V. and Pereira, F. L., “Monitoring an Ocean Outfall using an AUV,” In: MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001. An Ocean Odyssey. Conference Proceedings, (IEEE, 2001) pp. 20092014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolek, J. M. M., Dzikowicz, B. R. and Houston, B. H., “The orbiting dubins traveling salesman problem: Planning inspection tours for a minehunting AUV,” Auton Robot 45(1), 3149 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohntopp, D., Lehmann, B., Kraus, D. and Birk, A., “Seafloor Classification for Mine Countermeasures Operations Using Synthetic Aperture Sonar Images,” In: OCEANS 2017-Aberdeen, (IEEE, 2017) pp. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagala, F. and Bambang, R. T., Development of Sea Glider Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Platform for Marine Exploration and Monitoring (NISCAIR-CSIR, India, 2011).Google Scholar
Rumson, G., “The application of fully unmanned robotic systems for inspection of subsea pipelines,” Ocean Eng 235, 109214 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allibert, G., Hua, M.-D., Krupiski, S. and Hamel, T., “Pipeline following by visual servoing for autonomous underwater vehicles,” Control Eng Pract 82, 151160 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aras, M. S. M., Mazlan, K., Ahmad, A., Ali, N. M., Karis, M. S., Khamis, A., Zambri, M. K. M., Kasno, M. A. and Azmi, M. W. N., “Analysis Performances of Laser Range Finder and Blue LED for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV),” In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Underwater System Technology: Theory and Applications (USYS), (IEEE, 2016) pp. 171176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjelmervik, K. T. and Berg, H., “Automatic Target Classification for Low-Frequency Anti-Submarine Warfare Sonars,” In: 2013 MTS/IEEE OCEANS-Bergen, (IEEE, 2013) pp. 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, K. M., Liddy, T., Anvar, A. and Lu, T., “The Advancement of an Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) Technology,” In: 2008 3rd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications, (IEEE, 2008) pp. 336341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhail, S., Templeton, R., Pebody, M., Roper, D. and Morrison, R., “Autosub Long Range AUV Missions under the Filchner and Ronne Ice Shelves in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica-an Engineering Perspective,” In: OCEANS 2019-Marseille, (IEEE, 2019) pp. 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPhail, S., “Autosub6000: A deep diving long range AUV,” J Bionic Eng 6(1), 5562 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffre, F., Littlefield, R., Grund, M. and Purcell, M., “Development of a New Version of the remus 6000 Autonomous Underwater Vehicle,” In: OCEANS 2019-Marseille, (IEEE, 2019) pp. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRaven, C., Pelletier, L.-P., Ware, J., Gardner, A., Farr, N., Collins, J. and Purcell, M., “Wireless Retrieval of High-Rate Ocean Bottom Seismograph Data and Time Synchronization Using the WHOI Optical Modem and REMUS AUV,” In: OCEANS 2019-Marseille, (IEEE, 2019) pp. 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, R., Zhang, L., Liu, L., Wu, D., Pan, G., Huang, Q., Zhu, Y., Liu, Y. and Zhu, Z., “Multi-AUV cooperative navigation algorithm based on temporal difference method,” J Marine Sci Eng 10, 955 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panish, R., Dynamic control capabilities and developments of the bluefin robotics AUV fleet, (2009).Google Scholar
Brown, H. C., Lawrence, M. S., Sloat, J. V. and Fajans, J. S., “Toward Longitudinal Reef Health Monitoring in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary using Iver AUVs,” In: OCEANS 2019 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE, (IEEE, 2019) pp. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, J., “Low Cost Solid State Attitude Sensor for Marine and General Applications,” In: OCEANS 2006, (IEEE, 2006) pp. 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwen, R., Thomas, H., Weber, D. and Psota, F., “Performance of an AUV navigation system at Arctic latitudes,” IEEE J Oceanic Eng 30, 443454 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jun, B.-H., Park, J.-Y., Lee, F.-Y., Lee, P.-M., Lee, C.-M., Kim, K., Lim, Y.-K. and Oh, J.-H., “Development of the AUV ISiMI and a free running test in an ocean engineering basin,” Ocean Eng 36(1), 214 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanakitkorn, K., Wilson, P. A., Turnock, S. R. and Phillips, A. B., “Depth control for an over-actuated, hover-capable autonomous underwater vehicle with experimental verification,” Mechatronics 41, 6781 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xia, H., Wang, P., Jin, Z., An, X. and Ding, Y., “Maneuverability analysis of thrust vectoring ducted propeller with deflector,” Ocean Eng 213, 107614 (2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenson, L. V., Phillips, A. B., Rogers, E., Furlong, M. E. and Turnock, S. R., Control of an AUV from thruster actuated hover to control surface actuated flight, (2011).Google Scholar
Vu, M. T., Le, T.-H., Thanh, H. L. N. N., Huynh, T.-T., Van, M., Hoang, Q.-D. and Do, T. D., “Robust position control of an over-actuated underwater vehicle under model uncertainties and ocean current effects using dynamic sliding mode surface and optimal allocation control,” Sensors 21(3), 747 (2021).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xin, B., Luo, X., Shi, Z. and Zhu, Y., “A vectored water jet propulsion method for autonomous underwater vehicles,” Ocean Eng 74, 133140 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, T., Hu, Y., Xu, H., Zhang, Z. and Li, H., “Investigation of the vectored thruster AUVs based on 3SPS-S parallel manipulator,” Appl Ocean Res 85, 151161 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, E., Michelini, R. C. and Filaretov, V. F., “Conceptual design of an AUV equipped with a three degrees of freedom vectored thruster,” J Intell Robot Syst 39(4), 365391 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallo, E. and Michelini, R., “A Robotic Equipment for the Guidance of a Vectored Thrustor AUV,” In: 35th International Symposium on Robotics ISR, (Citeseer, 2004) pp. 16.Google Scholar
Panish, R., Dynamic control capabilities and developments of the bluefin robotics AUV fleet, (2009).Google Scholar
Caress, D. W., Thomas, H., Kirkwood, W. J., McEwen, R., Henthorn, R., Clague, D. A., Paull, C. K., Paduan, J. and Maier, K. L., “High-Resolution Multibeam, Sidescan, and Subbottom Surveys Using the MBARI AUV D. Allan B,” In: Marine Habitat Mapping Technology for Alaska (Reynolds, J. R. and Greene, H. G., eds.) (Alaska Sea Grant College Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks, USA, 2008) pp. 4769.Google Scholar
Khalil, W. and Ibrahim, O., “General solution for the dynamic modeling of parallel robots,” J Intell Robot Syst 49(1), 1937 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parikh, P. J. and Lam, S. S., “Solving the forward kinematics problem in parallel manipulators using an iterative artificial neural network strategy,” Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40(5), 595606 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, D.,Song, Y. and Sun, T., “Nonlinear dynamic modeling and performance analysis of a redundantly actuated parallel manipulator with multiple actuation modes based on FMD theory,” Nonlinear Dyn 89, 391428 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Wang, L. and Guan, L., “A study on the effect of structure parameters on the dynamic characteristics of a PRRRP parallel manipulator,” Nonlinear Dyn 74(1),227235 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Wang, L. and You, Z., “A new method for optimum design of parallel manipulator based on kinematics and dynamics,” Nonlinear Dyn 61(4), 717727 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Ye, H., Yu, G. and Huang, T., “A novel dynamic evaluation method and its application to a 4-DOF parallel manipulator,” Mech Mach Theory 168, 104627 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Yu, G., Gao, Y. and Wang, L., “Mechatronics modeling and vibration analysis of a 2-DOF parallel manipulator in a 5-DOF hybrid machine tool,” Mech Mach Theory 121, 430445 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simoni, R., Carboni, A. P. and Martins, D., “Enumeration of parallel manipulators,” Robotica 27(4), 589597 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erastova, K., “Effective workspaces of parallel robots,” Robotica 40(12), 43084325 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, H., Han, H., Li, D., Xu, Z. and Wu, Q., “Inverse dynamics analysis of a 6-RR-RP-RR parallel manipulator with offset universal joints,” Robotica 42(5), 119 (2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Qin, Y. and Yang, Y., “Structure design and kinematic performance of the deployable translational parallel tape-spring manipulator,” Robotica 42(5), 126 (2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar