Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-px5tt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-08T11:49:27.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lower limb exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation with adaptive nonsingular sliding mode control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2024

Daniel Centeno-Barreda
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Advanced Studies of National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
Sergio Salazar-Cruz*
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Advanced Studies of National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
Ricardo López-Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
CONACYT-CINVESTAV, Mexico City, Mexico
Yukio Rosales-Luengas
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Advanced Studies of National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
Rogelio Lozano
Affiliation:
Center for Research and Advanced Studies of National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
*
Corresponding author: Sergio Salazar-Cruz; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper introduces a lower limb exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation, which has been designed to be adjustable to a wide range of patients by incorporating an extension mechanism and series elastic actuators (SEAs). This configuration adapts better to the user’s anatomy and the natural movements of the user’s joints. However, the inclusion of SEAs increases actuator mass and size, while also introducing nonlinearities and changes in the dynamic response of the exoskeletons. To address the challenges related to the human–exoskeleton dynamic interaction, a nonsingular terminal sliding mode control that integrates an adaptive parameter adjustment strategy is proposed, offering a practical solution for trajectory tracking with uncertain exoskeleton dynamics. Simulation results demonstrate the algorithm’s ability to estimate unknown parameters. Experimental tests analyze the performance of the controller against uncertainties and external disturbances.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Høyer, E., Opheim, A. and Jørgensen, V., “Implementing the exoskeleton ekso gttm for gait rehabilitation in a stroke unit–feasibility, functional benefits and patient experiences,” Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol., 17, 473479 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calafiore, D., Negrini, F., Tottoli, N. and Ferraro, F., “Ozden Ozyemisci-Taskiran, etal, Efficacy of robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation in patients with subacute stroke: A systematic review,” Eur. J. Phys. Rehab. Med. 58, 18 (2022).Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., De Groof, S., Peyrodie, L. and Labey, L., “Mechanical Design of an Exoskeleton with Joint-Aligning Mechanism for Children with Cerebral Palsy,” In: 8th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference for Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), New York, USA ( 2020) pp. pages 106111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D., Shepherd, M. K., Mulrine, S. C., Schneider, J. D., Moore, K. F., Eggebrecht, E. M., Rogozinski, B. M., Herrin, K. R. and Young, A. J., “Reducing knee hyperextension with an exoskeleton in children and adolescents with genu recurvatum: A feasibility study,” IEEE. Trans. Bio-MED. Eng. 70, 33123320 (2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S.-Y., Seo, C.-H., Cho, Y.-S. and Joo, S.-Y., “Clinical utility of robot-assisted gait training in patients with spinal cord injury caused by electrical burns: A case report,” J. Clin. Med. 112, 7220 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkisian, S. V., Gabert, L. and Lenzi, T., “Series-elastic actuator with two degree-of-freedom pid control improves torque control in a powered knee exoskeleton,” Wearable Technol. 4, e25 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, B., Guo, K., Yu, H. and Zhang, M., “Toward gait symmetry enhancement via a cable-driven exoskeleton powered by series elastic actuators,” IEEE Robot. Auto. Letters 7,786793 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, C., Zeng, C., Huang, R., Peng, Z., Zhang, J. and Cheng, H., “Online gait learning with assist-as-needed control strategy for post-stroke rehabilitation exoskeletons,” Robotica 42, 319331 (2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosales-Luengas, Y., Espinosa-Espejel, K. I., Lopéz-Gutiérrez, R., Salazar, S. and Lozano, R., “Lower limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation with flexible joints and movement routines commanded by electromyography and baropodometry sensors,” Sensors 23, 5252 (2023).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, B., Liu, Y. W., Zhou, Z. and Xie, L., “Control of flexible knee joint exoskeleton robot based on dynamic model,” Robotica 40, 29963012 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, J., Fang, H. and Xu, J., “Online adaptive pid control for a multi-joint lower extremity exoskeleton system using improved particle swarm optimization,” Machines 10, 21 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiaiba, H., Daachi, M. E. H. and Madani, T., “Real-time adaptive super twisting algorithm based on PSO algorithm: Application for an exoskeleton robot,” Robotica 42, 126 (2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P. and Zhang, J., “Lower limb exoskeleton robots’ dynamics parameters identification based on improved beetle swarm optimization algorithm,” Robotica 40, 27162731 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P., Zhang, J. and Elsabbagh, A., “Gait multi-objectives optimization of lower limb exoskeleton robot based on bso-eollff algorithm,” Robotica 41, 174192 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, L., Bazzocchi, M. C. F. and Nejat, G., “A model-free deep reinforcement learning approach for control of exoskeleton gait patterns,” Robotica 40, 21892214 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P., Zhang, J. and Elsabbagh, A., “Fuzzy radial-based impedance controller design for lower limb exoskeleton robot,” Robotica 41, 326345 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, P. and Zhang, J., “Motion generation for walking exoskeleton robot using multiple dynamic movement primitives sequences combined with reinforcement learning,” Robotica 40, 27322747 (2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, S., Azar, A. T. and Ibraheem, I. K., “Nonlinear system controlled using novel adaptive fixed-time SMC,” AIMS Math. 9, 78957916 (2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Chang, P. H. and Jin, M., “An adaptive gain dynamics for time delay control improves accuracy and robustness to significant payload changes for robots,” IEEE. Trans. Ind. Electron. 67, 30763085 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kharb, A., Vipin Saini, Y. K. J. and Dhiman, S., “A review of gait cycle and its parameters,” IJCEM Int. J. Comp. Eng. Mgmt. 13, 7883 (2011).Google Scholar
Kelly, R., Davila, V. S.áñez and Perez, J. A. L.ía. Control of Robot Manipulators in Joint Space (Springer, 2005).Google Scholar
Salcido, E. A. A., Centeno-Barreda, D., Rosales, Y., Lopéz-Gutiérrez, R., Salazar, S. and Lozano, R., “Design of a lower limb exoskeleton: Robust control, simulation and experimental results,” Algorithms 16, 449 (2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Wang, Y., Hou, Y. and Li, H., “Fixed-time sliding mode control for uncertain robot manipulators,” IEEE Access 7, 149750149763 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riani, A., Madani, T., Benallegue, A. and Djouani, K., “Adaptive integral terminal sliding mode control for upper-limb rehabilitation exoskeleton,” Control Eng. Pract. 75, 108117 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhihong, M. and Yu, X., “Adaptive terminal sliding mode tracking control for rigid robotic manipulators with uncertain dynamics,” JSME Int. J. Series C Mech. Sys., Mach. Elements Manuf. 40, 493502 (1997).Google Scholar
Feng, Y., Yu, X. and Man, Z., “Non-singular terminal sliding mode control of rigid manipulators,” Automatica 38, 21592167 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, S., Wang, H. and Tian, Y., “Adaptive fractional high-order terminal sliding mode control for nonlinear robotic manipulator under alternating loads,” Asian J. Control. 23, 19001910 (2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar