Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-4ks9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T09:26:54.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Re-Evaluation of the Reliability of AMS Dates on Pottery Food Residues from the Late Prehistoric Central Plains of North America: Comment on Roper (2013)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2016

John P Hart  and
William A Lovis
John P Hart
Affiliation:
Research and Collections Division, New York State Museum, 3140 Cultural Education Center, Albany, New York 12230, USA. Email: [email protected]
William A Lovis
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and MSU Museum, 355 Baker Hall, 655 Auditorium Road, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ancient carbon reservoirs in freshwater bodies have the potential to introduce ancient carbon into charred cooking residues adhering to pottery wall interiors when aquatic organisms are parts of cooked resource mixes. This ancient carbon results in old apparent ages when these cooking residues are subjected to accelerator mass spectrometry dating, the so-called freshwater reservoir effect (FRE). Roper's (2013) assessment of the FRE on 14C ages from cooking residue in the Central Plains is only the second such peer-reviewed regional assessment in eastern North America. Roper suggests that 13 of 23 14C ages on residue are too old as a result of ancient carbon from fish or leached from shell temper or old carbon introduced via maize nixtamalization. Herein, we re-assess Roper's data set of 14C ages on cooking residues and annual plants and argue that she is mistaken in her assessment of the accuracies of 14C ages from residues. This outcome is placed in the context of the larger FRE literature.

Type
Comments and Replies
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , 2014 , pp. 341 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Beck, M. 1998. Ceramics and community structure: a reanalysis of material from the Minneapolis Site (14OT5). Plains Anthropologist 43(165):287–310.Google Scholar
Boudin, M, Van Strydonck, M, Crombé, P. 2010. Fish reservoir effect on charred food residue 14C dates: Are stable isotope analyses the solution? Radiocarbon 52(2):697–705.Google Scholar
Boyd, M, Surette, C. 2010. Northernmost precontact maize in North America. American Antiquity 75(1):117–33.Google Scholar
Broecker, WS, Walton, A. 1959. The geochemistry of C14 in fresh-water systems. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 16(1):15–38.Google Scholar
Culleton, BJ. 2006. Implications of a freshwater reservoir correction for the timing of late Holocene settlement of the Elk Hills, Kern County, California. Journal of Archaeological Science 33(9):1331–9.Google Scholar
Deevey, ES Jr, Gross, MS, Hutchinson, GE, Kraybill, HL. 1954. The natural C14 contents of materials from hard-water lakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 40(5):285–88.Google Scholar
Ellwood, EC, Scot, MP, Lipe, WD, Matson, RG, Jones, JG. 2012. Stone-boiling maize with limestone: experimental results and implications for nutrition among SE Utah Preceramic groups. Journal of Archaeological Science 40(1):35–44.Google Scholar
Fischer, A, Heinemeier, J. 2003. Freshwater reservoir effect in 14C dates of food residue on pottery. Radiocarbon 45(3):449–66.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R, Fink, D, Petchey, F, Jacobsen, G. 2009. Murray-Darling basin freshwater shells: riverine reservoir effect. Archaeologica Oceania 44(2):107–11.Google Scholar
Godwin, H. 1951. Comments on radiocarbon dating for samples from the British Isles. American Journal of Science 249(4):301–7.Google Scholar
Hart, JP, Lovis, WA. 2007a. The freshwater reservoir and radiocarbon dates on cooking residues: old apparent ages or a single outlier? Comments on Fischer and Heinemeier (2003). Radiocarbon 49(3):1403–10.Google Scholar
Hart, JP, Lovis, WA. 2007b. A multi-regional analysis of AMS and radiometric dates from carbonized food residues. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 32:201–61.Google Scholar
Hart, JP, Lovis, WA, Schulenberg, JK, Urquhart, GR. 2007a. Paleodietary implications from stable carbon isotope analysis of experimental cooking residues. Journal of Archaeological Science 34(5):804–13.Google Scholar
Hart, JP, Brumbach, HJ, Lusteck, R. 2007b. Extending the phytolith evidence for early maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) and squash (Cucurbita sp.) in central New York. American Antiquity 72(3):563–83.Google Scholar
Hart, JP, Urquhart, GR, Feranec, RS, Lovis, WA. 2009. Nonlinear relationship between bulk δ13C and percent maize in carbonized cooking residues and the potential of false negatives in detecting maize. Journal of Archaeological Science 36(10):2206–12.Google Scholar
Hart, JP, Lovis, WA, Urquhart, GR, Reber, EA. 2013. Modeling freshwater reservoir offsets on radiocarbon-dated charred cooking residues. American Antiquity 78(3):536–52.Google Scholar
Herbert, JM. 2008. The history and practice of shell tempering in the Middle Atlantic: a useful balance. Southeastern Archaeology 27(2):265–85.Google Scholar
Hohman-Caine, CA, Syms, EL. 2012. The Age of Brainerd Ceramics. Report prepared for Minnesota Historical Society Contract No. 4107232. Prepared by Soils Consulting, Hackensack, Minnesota, USA.Google Scholar
Ishikawa, NF, Hyodo, F, Tayasu, I. 2013. Use of carbon-13 and carbon-14 natural abundances for stream food web studies. Ecological Research 28(5):759–69.Google Scholar
Katz, SH, Hediger, ML, Valleroy, LA. 1974. Traditional maize processing techniques in the new world. Science 184(4138):765–73.Google Scholar
Keaveney, EM, Reimer, PJ. 2012. Understanding the variability in freshwater radiocarbon reservoir offsets: a cautionary tale. Journal of Archaeological Science 39(5):1306–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinietz, WV. 1940. The Indians of the Western Great Lakes 1615–1760. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Logan, B, editor. 1998. Prehistoric Settlement of the Lower Missouri Uplands. The View from DB Ridge, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas. Museum of Anthropology, Project Report Series No. 98. Lawrence: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Lovis, WA, Urquhart, GR, Raviele, ME, Hart, JP. 2011. Hardwood ash nixtamalization may lead to false negatives for the presence of maize by depleting bulk δ13C in carbonized residues. Journal of Archaeological Science 38(10):2726–30.Google Scholar
Lovis, WA, Arbogast, AF, Monaghan, GW. 2012. The Geoarchaeology of Lake Michigan Coastal Dunes. Environmental Research Series, Volume 2. Michigan Department of Transportation. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar
Messner, TC. 2011. Acorns and Bitter Roots: Starch Grains in the Prehistoric Eastern Woodlands. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Messner, TC, Dickau, R, Harbison, J. 2008. Starch grain analysis: methodology and applications in the Northeast. In: Hart, JP, editor, Current Northeast Paleoethnobotany II. New York State Museum Bulletin 512. Albany: University of the State of New York. p 111–28.Google Scholar
Michels, JW. 1973. Dating Methods in Archaeology. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Miyata, Y, Minami, M, Onbe, S, Sakamoto, M, Matsuzaki, H, Nakamura, T, Imamura, M. 2011. Difference in radiocarbon ages of carbonized material from the inner and outer surfaces of pottery from a wetland archaeological site. Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and Biological Sciences 87(8):518–28.Google Scholar
Mullins, HT, Patterson, WP, Teece, MA, Burnett, AW. 2011. Holocene climate and environmental change in central New York (USA). Journal of Paleolimnology 45(2):243–56.Google Scholar
Parker, AC. 1910. Iroquois Uses of Maize and Other Food Plants. New York State Museum Bulletin 144. Albany: University of the State of New York.Google Scholar
Philippsen, B. 2008. Old water or high ages? 14C food crust analysis on Mesolithic pottery from northern Germany [Diploma thesis in physics]. Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Philippsen, B, Kjeldsen, H, Hartz, S, Paulsen, H, Clausen, I, Heinemeier, J. 2010. The hardwater effect in AMS 14C dating of food crusts on pottery. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7):995–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigati, JS, Rech, JA, Nekola, JC. 2010. Radiocarbon dating of small terrestrial gastropod shells in North America. Quaternary Geochronology 5(5):519–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rakovan, MT, Rech, JA, Pigati, JS, Nekola, JC, Wiles, GC. 2013. An evaluation of Mesodon and other larger terrestrial gastropod shells for dating late Holocene and historic alluvium in the Midwestern USA. Geomorphology 193:47–56.Google Scholar
Raviele, ME. 2010. Assessing carbonized archaeological cooking residues: evaluation of maize phytolith taphonomy and density through experimental residue analysis [PhD dissertation]. Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar
Reber, EA, Hart, JP. 2008. Pine resins and pottery sealing: analysis of absorbed and visible pottery residues from central New York State. Archaeometry 50(6):999–1117.Google Scholar
Roper, DC. 2005. Ceramic period components at the Claussen site, 14WB322, Waubunsee County, Kansas. The Kansas Anthropologist 26:65–119.Google Scholar
Roper, DC. 2012. New AMS radiocarbon dating results for Central Plains Tradition sites in Kansas and Nebraska. Plains Anthropologist 57(221):39–52.Google Scholar
Roper, DC. 2013. Evaluating the reliability of AMS dates on food residue on pottery from the late prehistoric Central Plains of North America. Radiocarbon 55(1):151–62.Google Scholar
Roper, DC, Adair, MJ. 2011. Interpreting AMS radiocarbon age determinations from selected Central Plains Tradition sites. Plains Anthropologist 56(217):3–22.Google Scholar
Roper, DC, Adair, MJ. 2012. Additional AMS radiocarbon age determinations for the Central Plains Tradition. Plains Anthropologist 57(221):31–8.Google Scholar
Rosentrater, KA. 2006. A review of corn masa processing residues: generation, properties, and potential utilization. Waste Management 26(3):284–92.Google Scholar
Schiffer, MB, Skibo, JM, Boekle, TC, Neuport, MA, Aronson, M. 1994. New perspectives on experimental archaeology: surface treatments and thermal response of the clay cooking pot. American Antiquity 59(2):197–217.Google Scholar
Scott, EM. 2003. The Fourth International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (FIRI). Radiocarbon 45(2):135–290.Google Scholar
Shott, MJ. 1992. Radiocarbon dating as a probabilistic technique: the Childers site and Late Woodland occupation in the Ohio Valley. American Antiquity 57(2):202–30.Google Scholar
Siddique, R. 2008. Waste Materials and By-Products in Concrete. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Ward, GK, Wilson, SR. 1978. Procedures for comparing and combining radiocarbon age determinations: a critique. Archaeometry 20(1):19–31.Google Scholar
Will, GF, Hyde, GE. 1917. Corn among the Indians of the Upper Missouri. St. Louis: W.H. Miner Co.Google Scholar
Wilson, GL. 1917. Agriculture of the Hidatsa Indians: An Indian Interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Yu, SY, Shen, J, Colman, SM. 2007. Modeling the radiocarbon reservoir effect in lacustrine systems. Radiocarbon 49(3):1241–54.Google Scholar
Zigah, PK, Minor, EC, Werne, JP. 2012. Radiocarbon and stable-isotope geochemistry of organic and inorganic carbon in Lake Superior. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 26(1):GB1023, doi:10.1029/2011GB004132.Google Scholar