Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-26T00:28:00.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A multidisciplinary approach to resolve the taxonomy of the historically extinct sea mink (Neogale macrodon) (Maine, USA)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2025

Paula Work*
Affiliation:
Maine State Museum, Augusta, ME 04333-0083, USA
Robert Lewis
Affiliation:
Maine State Museum, Augusta, ME 04333-0083, USA
Beverly Johnson
Affiliation:
Bates College, Lewison, ME 04240, USA
Bruce Bourque
Affiliation:
Maine State Museum, Augusta, ME 04333-0083, USA Bates College, Lewison, ME 04240, USA
*
Corresponding author: Paula Work; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper addresses the taxonomic status of the extinct large-bodied sea mink Neogale macrodon. Since the early twentieth century, bones of this mink have been found commingled with those of the extant mink, Neogale vison, in Maine’s prehistoric archaeological sites. These two size classes of mink have been described as separate species and as sexually dimorphic size variants of N. vison. A century later, researchers revisited this dispute using data from North American modern and archaeological mink skulls, along with limited postcranial bones, and decided in favor of two species. However, this conclusion was challenged.

We return to the discussion by focusing on postcranial bones, which have advantages over skulls for metric analyses. We considered historical evidence for mink morphology and behavior and determined that, although the two forms shared the same habitat, our large number of identified specimens (NISP) of mink (NISP > 1200) contained no detectable evidence for interbreeding. We conclude that the sea mink was an emerging marine fissiped, transitioning from an undetermined N. vison ancestor in a manner analogous to the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) and the sea otter (Enhydra lutris). Lastly, we suggest N. macrodon became extinct during the nineteenth century under heavy pressure from market hunting.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Quaternary Research Center.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Allen, G., 1942. Extinct and Vanishing Mammals of the Western Hemisphere, with the Marine Species of all Oceans. American Committee for International Wild Life Protection. Special Publication No. 11, The Intelligencer Printing Co., Lancaster, PA, 620 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonzi, E., Pacheco-Forés, S.I., Gordon, G.W., Kuijt, I., Knudson, K.J., 2020. New understandings of the sea spray effect and its impact on bioavailable radiogenic strontium isotope ratios in coastal environments. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 33, 102462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102462Google Scholar
Birney, E.C., Fleharty, E.D., 1968. Comparative success in the application of aging techniques to a population of winter-trapped mink. The Southwestern Naturalist 13, 275282. https://doi.org/10.2307/3669221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, D.W., Reading, J.E., Savage, H.G., 1998. Archaeological records of the extinct sea mink, Mustela macrodon Carnivora: Mustelidae), from Canada. (The Canadian Field-Naturalist 112, 4549. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.358350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourque, B.J., 1995. Diversity and Complexity in Prehistoric Maritime Societies: A Gulf of Maine Perspective. Plenum, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourque, B.J., Krueger, H.W., 1994. Dietary reconstruction from human bone isotopes for five coastal New England populations. In: Sobolik, K.D. (Ed.), Paleonutrition: The Diet and Health of Prehistoric Americans. Southern Illinois University Center for Archaeological Investigations Occasional Paper No. 22, pp. 195209.Google Scholar
Burton, R.K., Snodgrass, J.J., Gifford-Gonzalez, D., Guilderson, T., Brown, T., Koch, P.L., 2001. Holocene changes in the ecology of northern fur seals: insights from stable isotopes and archaeofauna. Oecologia 128, 107115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100631CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craik, J.C.A., 1998. Recent mink-related declines of gulls and terns in West Scotland and the beneficial effects of mink control. Argyll Bird Report 14, 98110.Google Scholar
Craik, J.C.A., 2008. Sex ratio in catches of American mink – how to catch the females. Journal for Nature Conservation 16, 5660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2008.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, K.L., 1973. Experimental zoogeography: introductions of mice to small islands. The American Naturalist 107, 535558. https://doi.org/10.1086/282857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraaf, R.M., Yamasaki, M., 2001. New England Wildlife: Habitat, Natural History, and Distribution. University Press Of New England, Lebanon, New Hampshire.Google Scholar
Denys, N., 1908. The Description and Natural History of the Coasts of North America (Acadia). Praeger, Westport, Connecticut. https://archive.org/details/publicationofcha0000unse/page/n9/mode/2up.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunston, N., 1993. The Mink. Poyser, London.Google Scholar
Elder, W.H., 1951. The baculum as an age criterion in mink. Journal of Mammalogy 32, 4350. https://doi.org/10.2307/1375411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enders, R.K., 1952. Reproduction in the mink (Mustela vison). Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96, 691755.Google Scholar
Gilpin, J.B., 1867. On the Mammalia of Nova Scotia, No. III. Proceedings and Transactions of the Nova Scotian Institute of Natural Science 2, 816. http://hdl.handle.net/10222/10152Google Scholar
Graham, R.W., 2001. Comment on “Skeleton of Extinct North American Sea Mink (Mustela macrodon)” by Mead et al. Quaternary Research 56, 419421. https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.2001.2266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, K.R., 1957. Some osteological characters of known-age ranch minks. Journal of Mammalogy 38, 319330. https://doi.org/10.2307/1376231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, M., 1903. The extinct mink from the Maine shell heaps. Forest and Stream 61, 125.Google Scholar
Hollister, N., 1913. A synopsis of the American minks. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 44, 471480. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.44-1965.471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, S.R., Setzer, H.W., 1989. Geographic variation and taxonomic revision of mink (Mustela vison) in Florida. Journal of Mammalogy 70, 241252. https://doi.org/10.2307/1381505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, C.T., 1837. First Report on the Geology of the State of Maine. Smith Robinson, Printers to the State, Augusta, Maine, 128 pp., + Atlas of 24 Plates.Google Scholar
Krueger, H.W., 1985. Sr isotopes and Sr/Ca in bone. Poster Paper presented at Biomineralization Conference, Airlie House, Warrenton, VA April 14–17 , 1985.Google Scholar
Kruuk, H., Balharry, D., 1990. Effects of sea water on thermal insulation of the otter, Lutra lutra. Journal of Zoology 220, 405415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1990.tb04315.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtén, B., 1973. Trans Beringian relationships of Ursus arctos Linné (brown and grizzly bears). Commentationes Biologicae Societas Scientiarum Fennica 65, 110.Google Scholar
Lechleitner, R.R., 1954. Age criteria in mink, Mustela vison. Journal of Mammalogy 35, 496503. https://doi.org/10.2307/1375572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, A., 1936. Threatened species. American Forests 42, 116119.Google Scholar
Life Magazine Staff Writers, 1938. The “extinct” sea otter swims back to life. Life Magazine 4, June 20 .Google Scholar
Loomis, F.B., 1911. A new mink from the shell heaps of Maine. American Journal of Science 4-31, 227229. https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.s4-31.183.227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, R.L., 1994. Vertebrate Taphonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, R.L., 2007. Prehistoric mink (Mustela vison) trapping on the Northwest Coast. Journal of Field Archaeology 32, 9195. https://doi.org/10.1179/009346907791071683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansueti, R., 1954. Mystery mink. Nature Magazine 47, 185186.Google Scholar
Manville, R.H., 1966. The extinct sea mink, with taxonomic notes. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 122, 112. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.122-3584.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, W.H., 1936. A study of the winter activities of the mink. Journal of Mammalogy 17, 382392. https://doi.org/10.2307/1374404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mavor, R.A., Parsons, M., Heubeck, M., Schmitt, S., 2006. Seabird Numbers and Breeding Success in Britain and Ireland, 2005. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough (UK Nature Conservation, No. 31).Google Scholar
McAlpine, D.F., Huynh, H.M., Pavey, S.A., 2024. The extinct sea mink, Neogale macrodon: a putative specimen in the New Brunswick Museum, Canada, confirmed as American mink, Neogale vison. Archives of Natural History 51, 171174. https://doi.org/10.3366/anh.2024.0904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNab, B.K., 1971. On the ecological significance of Bergman’s rule. Ecology 52, 845854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, J.I., Spiess, A.E., 2001. Reply to Russell Graham about Mustela macrodon. Quaternary Research 56, 422423. https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.2001.2268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, J.I., Spiess, A.E., Sobolik, K.D., 2000. Skeleton of extinct North American sea mink (Mustela macrodon). Quaternary Research 53, 247262. https://doi.org/10.1006/qres.1999.2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorehead, W.K., 1922. A Report on the Archæology of Maine. The Andover Press, Andover, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Mucha, A., Zatoń-Dobrowolska, M., Moska, M., Wierzbicki, H., Dziech, A., Bukaciński, D., Bukacińska, M., 2021. How selective breeding has changed the morphology of the American mink (Neovison vison)—a comparative analysis of farm and feral animals. Animals 11, 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11010106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2019. Evaluating the Taxonomic Status of the Mexican Gray Wolf and the Red Wolf. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/25351Google Scholar
Norton, A., 1930. The mammals of Portland, Maine, and vicinity. Proceedings of the Portland Society of Natural History 4, 1151.Google Scholar
Pasitschniak-Arts, M., 1993. Ursus arctos. Mammalian Species.439, 110. https://doi.org/10.2307/3504138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, J.E., Axtell, R.W., Kohn, L.A.P., 2010. Morphometric evaluation of the two mink subspecies in Illinois. Journal of Mammalogy 91, 14591466. https://doi.org/10.1644/09-mamm-a-251.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrides, G.A., 1950. The determination of sex and age ratios in fur animals. American Midland Naturalist 43, 355382. https://doi.org/10.2307/2421905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popowics, T.E., 2003. Postcanine dental form in the Mustelidae and Viverridae (Carnivora: Mammalia). Journal of Morphology 256, 322341. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10091CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prentiss, D.W., 1903. Description of an extinct mink from the shell-heaps of the Maine coast. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 26, 887888. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.26-1336.887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoeninger, M.J., DeNiro, M.J., 1984. Nitrogen and carbon isotopic composition of bone collagen from marine and terrestrial animals. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 48, 625639. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(84)90091-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoeninger, M.J., DeNiro, M.J., Tauber, H., 1983. Stable nitrogen isotope ratios of bone collagen reflect marine and terrestrial components of prehistoric human diet. Science 220, 13811383. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6344217CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreber, J.C.D., 1777. Die Säugthiere in Abbildungen nach der Natur mit Beschreibungen.(eds.), W. Walther, Erlangen, vol. 3, 425440.Google Scholar
Sealfon, R.A., 2007. Dental divergence supports species status of the extinct sea mink (Carnivora: Mustelidae: Neovison macrodon). Journal of Mammalogy 8, 371383. https://doi.org/10.1644/06-mmm-a-227r1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seton, E.T., 1929. Lives of Game Animals: An Account of Those Land Animals in America, North of the Mexican Border, which are Considered “Game”, Either Because They Have Held the Attention of Sportsmen, or Received the Protection of Law, Vol. 2, Pt. 2. Doubleday, Doran Company Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Shackelford, R.M., 1949. Origin of the American ranch-bred mink. American Fur Breeder 22, 1214.Google Scholar
Spiess, A.E., Lewis, R.A., 2001. The Turner Farm Fauna: 5000 Years of Hunting and Fishing in Penobscot Bay, Maine, Maine State Museum and Maine State Historic Preservation Commission Occasional Publication in Maine Archaeology No. 11.Google Scholar
Stevens, R.T., Kennedy, M.L., 2006. Geographic variation in body size of American mink (Mustela vison). Mammalia 70, 145152. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2006.018Google Scholar
von den Driesch, A., 1976. A Guide to the Measurement of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites, Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology Bulletin 1, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Waters, J.H., Ray, C.E., 1961. Former range of the sea mink. Journal of Mammalogy 42, 380383. https://doi.org/10.2307/1377035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, J.O., Jr, Hamilton, W. J., Jr, 1998. Mammals of the Eastern United States. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Zalewski, A., Bartoszewicz, M., 2012. Phenotypic variation of an alien species in a new environment: the body size and diet of American mink over time and at local and continental scales. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 105, 681693. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01811.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Work et al. supplementary material 1

Work et al. supplementary material
Download Work et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 36.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Work et al. supplementary material 2

Work et al. supplementary material
Download Work et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 35.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Work et al. supplementary material 3

Work et al. supplementary material
Download Work et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 42.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Work et al. supplementary material 4

Work et al. supplementary material
Download Work et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 34.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Work et al. supplementary material 5

Work et al. supplementary material
Download Work et al. supplementary material 5(File)
File 32.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Work et al. supplementary material 6

Work et al. supplementary material
Download Work et al. supplementary material 6(File)
File 33.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Work et al. supplementary material 7

Work et al. supplementary material
Download Work et al. supplementary material 7(File)
File 28.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Work et al. supplementary material 8

Work et al. supplementary material
Download Work et al. supplementary material 8(File)
File 43.5 KB