Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T05:44:22.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Judicial Federalism and Abortion in Mexico and the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2024

Caroline Beer Open the ORCID record for Caroline Beer [Opens in a new window]
Caroline Beer*
Affiliation:
University of Vermont, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As the US Supreme Court was preparing to overturn Roe v. Wade, the Mexican Supreme Court issued a series of sweeping rulings to liberalize abortion—part of a larger trend across Latin America (Daby and Moseley 2022; Fernandez Anderson 2017; Reuterswärd 2020; Ruibal 2014). Mexico has created a nationwide standard of access to abortion services, whereas the United States has abandoned universal legal abortion and embraced a patchwork system in which each state has different laws regulating reproductive healthcare. Why are these two neighbors on such divergent paths? This contribution to the symposium compares the ways that federalism and judicial politics have interacted in Mexico and the United States to explain the different trajectories of abortion policy. The divergent paths of the United States and Mexico can be explained by the two countries’ different experiences with democracy and political and institutional differences between the judiciaries. A different civil-society and constitutional context also has played a role.

Type
The Politics of Abortion in the Americas
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , January 2025 , pp. 52 - 55
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ayala García, Melissa S. 2019. “La Corte y el Aborto Terapéutico: Un Derecho de Todas.” Nexos, May 21. https://eljuegodelacorte.nexos.com.mx/la-corte-y-el-aborto-terapeutico-un-derecho-de-todas.Google Scholar
Beer, Caroline. 2017. “Making Abortion Laws in Mexico: Salience and Autonomy in the Policy-Making Process.” Comparative Politics 50 (1): 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, Caroline. 2024. “Abortion Policy in Mexico: A Changing Role for the Supreme Court.” Southwestern Journal of International Law 30 (2).Google Scholar
Daby, Mariela, and Moseley, Mason W.. 2022. “Feminist Mobilization and the Abortion Debate in Latin America: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender 18 (2): 359–93. DOI:10.1017/S1743923X20000197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, Hannah. 2021. “Advocating for the Right: Alliance Defending Freedom and the Rhetoric of Christian Persecution.” Feminist Legal Studies 29 (3): 375–97. DOI:10.1007/s10691-021-09468-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez Anderson, Cora. 2017. “Decriminalizing Abortion in Uruguay: Women’s Movements, Secularism, and Political Allies.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 38 (2): 221–46. DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2016.1219583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastellec, Jonathan P. 2018. “How Courts Structure State-Level Representation.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 18 (1): 27–60. DOI:10.1177/1532440017745522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
McCammon, Holly J., Sudibjo, Magdalena N., Beeson-Lynch, Cathryn, Brockman, Amanda J., and Moon, Minyoung. 2022. “Feminist Friends of the Court: Amicus Curiae, Social Movement Institutional Activism, and the US Supreme Court’s Women’s Rights Cases.” Sociological Focus 55 (1): 1–26. DOI:10.1080/00380237.2021.2009074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz-Ortega, Adriana. 2007. “Law and the Politics of Abortion.” In Decoding Gender: Law and Practice in Contemporary Mexico, ed. Baitenmann, Helga, Chenaut, Victoria, and Varley, Ann, 197–212. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Patton, Dana. 2007. “The Supreme Court and Morality Policy Adoption in the American States: The Impact of Constitutional Context.” Political Research Quarterly 60 (3): 468–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuterswärd, Camilla. 2020. “The Inter- and Intra-Party Politics of Moral Policy: Free Voting and Abortion Reform in Uruguay.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 28 (4): 1137–61. DOI:10.1093/sp/jxaa025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruibal, Alba. 2014. “Movement and Counter-Movement: A History of Abortion Law Reform and the Backlash in Colombia 2006–2014.” Reproductive Health Matters 22 (44): 42–51. DOI:10.1016/S0968-8080(14)44803-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruibal, Alba. 2021. “Using Constitutional Courts to Advance Abortion Rights in Latin America.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 23 (4): 579–99. DOI:10.1080/14616742.2021.1947148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Joshua C. 2020. “Striving to Rollback or Protect Roe: State Legislation and the Trump-Era Politics of Abortion.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 50 (3): 370–97. DOI:10.1093/publius/pjaa015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaremberg, Gisela, and de Almeida, Debora Rezende. 2022. Feminisms in Latin America: Pro-Choice Nested Networks in Mexico and Brazil, Politics and Society In Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Mary. 2020. Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. Wade to the Present. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar