Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T21:50:15.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Patient–oncologist working alliance and its relation to locus of control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 October 2022

Sivan Levi ,
Henny Amir ,
Gil Goldzweig Open the ORCID record for Gil Goldzweig [Opens in a new window] ,
Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon Open the ORCID record for Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon [Opens in a new window]  and
Michal Braun Open the ORCID record for Michal Braun [Opens in a new window]
Sivan Levi
Affiliation:
School of Behavioral Sciences, The Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Henny Amir
Affiliation:
School of Behavioral Sciences, The Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
Gil Goldzweig
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
Michal Braun*
Affiliation:
School of Behavioral Sciences, The Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel Breast Oncology Unit, Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
*
Author for correspondence: Michal Braun, School of Behavioral Sciences, The Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Tel Aviv-Yaffo 61083, Israel; Breast Oncology Unit, Sharett Institute of Oncology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

In this study, we assessed the patient–oncologist relationship, conceptualized as the working alliance from a dyadic perspective, and its relation to locus of control.

Methods

One hundred and three oncologist–patient dyads were recruited. Measures included a sociodemographic and medical questionnaire; the “internal, powerful others, and chance” locus of control scale; and the working alliance inventory.

Results

Application of the actor–partner interdependence model yielded 2 actor effects: a positive association between oncologist “internal” locus of control and oncologist working alliance, and a negative association between oncologist “chance” locus of control and oncologist working alliance. It also yielded one partner effect: a positive association between oncologist “internal” locus of control and patient working alliance.

Significance of results

The actor–partner effect suggests that oncologists’ locus of control has a role in the establishment of the patient–oncologist working alliance; oncologists’ internal locus of control is a dominant factor affecting not only their own perceived alliance but patients’ perceived alliance as well.

Keywords

Working allianceCancerOncologyPatient–oncologist relationshipLocus of control
Type
Original Article
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , February 2024 , pp. 41 - 48
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, EB (2002) Patient-centeredness: A new approach. Nephrology News & Issues 16(12), 80–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, SA, Wampold, BE and Imel, ZE (2007) Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: Exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 75(6), 842. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.6.842CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bar-Sela, G, Mitnik, I and Lulav-Grinwald, D (2016) Perceptions of the working alliance among medical staff and cancer patients. Palliative & Supportive Care 14(3), 199–203. doi:10.1017/S1478951515000759CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, RS, Daughtridge, R and Sloane, PD (2002) Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: A systematic review. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice 15(1), 25–38.Google ScholarPubMed
Benassi, VA, Sweeney, PD and Dufour, CL (1988) Is there a relation between locus of control orientation and depression? Journal of Abnormal Psychology 97(3), 357. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.97.3.357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, JK, Fuertes, JN, Keitel, M, et al. (2011) The role of patient attachment and working alliance on patient adherence, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life in lupus treatment. Patient Education and Counseling 85(1), 53–59. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.08.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanchard-Fields, F (2007) Everyday problem solving and emotion: An adult developmental perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16(1), 26–31. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00469.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordin, ES (1979) The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice 16(3), 252. doi:10.1037/h0085885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brosschot, JF, Gebhardt, WA and Godaert, GL (1994) Internal, powerful others and chance locus of control: Relationships with personality, coping, stress and health. Personality and Individual Differences 16(6), 839–852. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90228-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, AJ, Thaker, PH, Sun, CC, et al. (2017) Nothing left to chance? The impact of locus of control on physical and mental quality of life in terminal cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer 25(6), 1985–1991. doi:10.1007/s00520-017-3605-zCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, A, Hewlett, S, Hughes, R, et al. (2003) Rheumatology outcomes: The patient’s perspective. The Journal of Rheumatology 30(4), 880–883.Google ScholarPubMed
Charles, ST and Carstensen, LL (2008) Unpleasant situations elicit different emotional responses in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging 23(3), 495. doi:10.1037/a0013284CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, AJ and Johnson, JA (2002) Patient adherence with medical treatment regimens: An interactive approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11(3), 94–97. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colquitt, JA, LePine, JA and Noe, RA (2000) Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology 85(5), 678. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, WL and Kenny, DA (2005) The actor–partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development 29(2), 101–109. doi:10.1080/0165025044400405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crandall, VC and Crandall, BW (2013) Maternal and childhood behaviors as antecedents of internal-external control perceptions in young adulthood. In Lefcourt, HM (ed.), Research with the Locus of Control Construct: Developments and Social Problems. New York: Academic Press, 53–103.Google Scholar
DiMatteo, MR and Lepper, HS (1998) Promoting adherence to courses of treatment: Mutual collaboration in the physician-patient relationship. In Jackson, LD and Durn, BK (eds.), Health Communication Research: A Guide to Developments and Directions. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 75–86.Google Scholar
Engel, GL (1977) The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 196(4286), 129–136. doi:10.1126/science.847460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, RM and Street, RL Jr. (2007). Patient-centered communication in cancer care: Promoting healing and reducing suffering. National Cancer Institute.Google Scholar
Fuertes, JN, Boylan, LS and Fontanella, JA (2009) Behavioral indices in medical care outcome: The working alliance, adherence, and related factors. Journal of General Internal Medicine 24(1), 80–85. doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0841-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gale, CR, Hatch, SL, Batty, GD, et al. (2009) Intelligence in childhood and risk of psychological distress in adulthood: The 1958 National Child Development Survey and the 1970 British Cohort Study. Intelligence 37(6), 592–599. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2008.09.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galvin, BM, Randel, AE, Collins, BJ, et al. (2018) Changing the focus of locus (of control): A targeted review of the locus of control literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior 39(7), 820–833. doi:10.1002/job.2275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldzweig, G, Hasson-Ohayon, I, Elinger, G, et al. (2016) Adaptation of Meaning Centered Group Psychotherapy (MCGP) in the Israeli Context: The process of importing an intervention and preliminary results. In Breitbart, WS (ed.), Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy in the Cancer Setting: Finding Meaning and Hope in the Face of Suffering. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 145–156.Google Scholar
Ha, JF and Longnecker, N (2010) Doctor-patient communication: A review. Ochsner Journal 10(1), 38–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Han, SJ, Guo, QQ, Wang, T, et al. (2013) Prognostic significance of interactions between ER alpha and ER beta and lymph node status in breast cancer cases. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 14(10), 6081–6084. doi:10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.10.6081CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hatcher, RL and Barends, AW (2006) How a return to theory could help alliance research. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 43(3), 292. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.43.3.292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holman, H and Lorig, K (2000) Patients as partners in managing chronic disease: Partnership is a prerequisite for effective and efficient health care. BMJ 320(7234), 526–527.10.1136/bmj.320.7234.526CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horvath, AO and Greenberg, LS (1989) Development and validation of the Working Alliance Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology 36(2), 223–233. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kashy, DA and Kenny, DA (2000) The analysis of data from dyads and groups.Google Scholar
Kelley, HH (1973) The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist 28(2), 107. doi:10.1037/h0034225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, DA (1996) Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 13(2), 279–294. doi:10.1177/0265407596132007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, DA, Kashy, DA, and Cook, WL (2006) Dyadic Data Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kent, GG, Matthews, RM and White, FH (1984) Locus of control and oral health. The Journal of the American Dental Association 109(1), 67–69. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1984.0291CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinicki, AJ and Vecchio, RP (1994) Influences on the quality of supervisor–subordinate relations: The role of time‐pressure, organizational commitment, and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior 15(1), 75–82. doi:10.1002/job.4030150108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjeken, I, Dagfinrud, H, Mowinckel, P, et al. (2006) Rheumatology care: Involvement in medical decisions, received information, satisfaction with care, and unmet health care needs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Care & Research 55(3), 394–401. doi:10.1002/art.21985CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laine, C and Davidoff, F (1996) Patient-centered medicine: A professional evolution. JAMA 275(2), 152–156. doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03530260066035CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langer, EJ (1975) The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(2), 311. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.32.2.311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefcourt, HM (1981) Differentiating among internality, powerful others, and chance. Research with the Locus of Control Construct 1, 15–59.Google Scholar
Levenson, H (1974) Activism and powerful others: Distinctions within the concept of internal-external control. Journal of Personality Assessment 38(4), 377–383. doi:10.1080/00223891.1974.10119988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, P, Everitt, H, Williamson, I, et al. (2001) Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ 323(7318), 908–911. doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7318.908CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mack, JW, Block, SD, Nilsson, M, et al. (2009) Measuring therapeutic alliance between oncologists and patients with advanced cancer: The Human Connection Scale. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society 115(14), 3302–3311. doi:10.1002/cncr.24360CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahomed, NN, Liang, MH, Cook, EF, et al. (2002) The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. The Journal of Rheumatology 29(6), 1273–1279.Google ScholarPubMed
Maltby, J, Day, L and Macaskill, A (2007) Personality, Individual Differences and Intelligence. Harlow: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Martin, DJ, Garske, JP and Davis, MK (2000) Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 68(3), 438. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.68.3.438CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, R, Thomas, G, Charles, K, et al. (2005) The role of leader‐member exchanges in mediating the relationship between locus of control and work reactions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 78(1), 141–147. doi:10.1348/096317904X23763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLane, CG, Zyzanski, SJ and Flocke, SA (1995) Factors associated with medication noncompliance in rural elderly hypertensive patients. American Journal of Hypertension 8(2), 206–209. doi:10.1016/0895-7061(94)00194-GCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mead, N and Bower, P (2002) Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: A review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling 48(1), 51–61. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00099-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, PC, Lefcourt, HM, Holmes, JG, et al. (1986) Marital locus of control and marital problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(1), 161. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, TW, Sorensen, KL and Eby, LT (2006) Locus of control at work: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior 27(8), 1057–1087. doi:10.1002/job.416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noe, RA (1988) An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology 41(3), 457–479. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00638.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, LE and Price, RH (1994) Empowered managers and empowered workers: The effects of managerial support and managerial perceived control on workers’ sense of control over decision making. Human Relations 47(8), 911–928. doi:10.1177/001872679404700803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, SM, and Lipkin, M (1995) The patient-centered interview: Research support. In The Medical Interview. New York: Springer, 530–538.10.1007/978-1-4612-2488-4_47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotman, I (1999) Attachment Styles in Adulthood and the Development of the Working Alliance, Doctoral dissertation, Masters thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa.Google Scholar
Rotter, JB (1966) Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 80(1), 1. doi:10.1037/h0092976CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, EA (1996) A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(3), 549. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spector, PE (1982) Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychological Bulletin 91(3), 482. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.3.482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tambling, RB, Johnson, SK and Johnson, LN (2011) Analyzing dyadic data from small samples: A pooled regression actor–partner interdependence model approach. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation 2(2), 101–114. doi:10.1177/2150137811422901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, A, Zimmermann, C and Rodin, G (2005) Interpersonal processes in palliative care: An attachment perspective on the patient-clinician relationship. Palliative Medicine 19(2), 143–150. doi:10.1191/0269216305pm994oaCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, SE (1989) Positive Illusions: Creative Self-Deception and the Healthy Mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Thompson, D and Ciechanowski, PS (2003) Attaching a new understanding to the patient-physician relationship in family practice. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 16(3), 219–226. doi:10.3122/jabfm.16.3.219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevino, KM, Fasciano, K and Prigerson, HG (2013) Patient-oncologist alliance, psychosocial well-being, and treatment adherence among young adults with advanced cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 31(13), 1683. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.46.7993CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turban, DB and Dougherty, TW (1994) Role of protégé personality in receipt of mentoring and career success. Academy of Management Journal 37(3), 688–702.10.2307/256706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, EH, Glasgow, RE, Davis, C, et al. (2001) Quality improvement in chronic illness care: A collaborative approach. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement 27(2), 63–80. doi:10.1016/S1070-3241(01)27007-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S, Tomlinson, EC and Noe, RA (2010) The role of mentor trust and protégé internal locus of control in formal mentoring relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology 95(2), 358. doi:10.1037/a0017663CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed