Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Raimond Gaita's moral philosophy is distinguished by, among other things, its attention to the role of embodied, enacted witness in disclosing certain moral values, and its understanding of the emotions as forms of thought. In this paper, I consider how Gaita's insights on these matters may be applied to certain questions in the philosophy of religion, paying particular attention to the nature of religious experience and ‘the problem of evil’. I suggest that Gaita's discussion of how we come to recognise moral values or ‘meanings’ can be extended to the question of how we might recognise religious meanings. On this view, religious experience may take the form of an appreciation of the meaning borne by a material context (rather than, for example, some supra-sensory encounter with a supernatural agent), and our sense of the goodness or otherwise of the world may be answerable to the authoritative example of particular lives.
1 Gaita, Raimond, A Common Humanity. Thinking About Love & Truth & Justice (Melbourne: Text Publishing, 1999), pp. 17–19Google Scholar.
2 Gaita, A Common Humanity, pp. 21–2, Gaita's emphasis.
3 Gaita, A Common Humanity, p. 26.
4 Gaita, A Common Humanity, pp. 250–1.
5 He notes for instance the connection between her demeanour and her use of the language of divine parental love in her prayers: A Common Humanity, p. 22.
6 Swinburne, Richard, The Existence of God (Oxford: Clarendon, 2nd edition 2004), p. 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Swinburne, The Existence of God, p. 299.
8 Thomas Barrie, , Sacred Place: Myth, Ritual, and Meaning in Architecture (Boston MA: Shambhala, 1996), p. 59Google Scholar.
9 Tugwell, Simon, Ways of Imperfection: An Exploration of Christian Spirituality (London: Darton, Longman and Todd, 1985), p. 130Google Scholar, Tugwell's emphasis.