Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T01:04:14.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase Stability in the Nanocrystalline Tio2 System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Hengzhong Zhang  and
Jillian F. Banfield
Hengzhong Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1215 W. Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706, [email protected]
Jillian F. Banfield
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1215 W. Dayton St., Madison, WI 53706, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Initial thermodynamic analysis predicts surface tension of fine solid particles decreases with decrease in particle size. Free energy of fine solid particles increases with decrease in particle size. In the nanocrystalline TiO2 system, the surface tensions and the surface energies of both anatase and rutile were estimated by modeling available thermochemical data and kinetic data. The particle size versus temperature phase diagram of the nanocrystalline TiO2 system was calculated, which reveals 1–8 nm anatase is more stable than rutile of the same size at certain temperatures.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 481: Symposium P – Science and Technology of Semiconductor Surface Preparation , 1997 , 619
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Gribb, A.A. and Banfield, J. F., Am. Min. 82, 717 (1997).Google Scholar
2. Terwilliger, C.D. and Chiang, Y.M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78, 2045(1995).Google Scholar
3. Terwilliger, C.D. and Chiang, Y.M. in Nanophase and Nanocomposite Materials, edited by S., Komarneni, J.C., Parker and Thomas, G.J. (MRS, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993) pp. 15–20.Google Scholar
4. Cordfunke, E.H.P. and Konings, R.J.M., J. Phase Equ. 14, 457 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Zubov, V.I., Nanostructured Mater. 3, 189 (1993).Google Scholar
6. Lindan, P.J.D., Harrison, N.M., Holender, J.M., Gillan, M.J. and Payne, M.C., Surface Science 364, 431 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Ramamoorthy, M., Vanderbilt, D. and King-Smith, R.D., Physical Review B 49, 16721 (1994).Google Scholar
8. Mackenzie, K.J.D. and Melling, P. J., Trans. J. British Ceram. Soc. 73, 23 (1974).Google Scholar
9. Joesten, R.L. in Contact Metamorphism, edited by Kerrick, D.M. (Mineralogical Society of America, Washington, DC, 1991) pp.50 7–582 Google Scholar
10. Lee, I.G. and Chen, I.W. in Sintering'87 (Vol.1), edited by S., Somiya, M., Shimada, M., Yoshimura and Watanabe, R. (Elsevier Applied Science, London, 1988) pp. 340–345.Google Scholar
11. Weast, R.C., Astle, M.J. and Beyer, W. H., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 66th ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, 1985) pp. B–210, F.Google Scholar