Hostname: page-component-669899f699-cf6xr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T03:48:08.361Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epitaxy and Atomic Structure Determination of Au/TiO2 Interfaces by Combined EBSD and HRTEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

F. Cosandey  and
P. Stadelmann
F. Cosandey
Affiliation:
Department of Ceramic and Materials Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8065, [email protected]
P. Stadelmann
Affiliation:
Centre Interdepartemental de Microscopie Electronique, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

We have studied the effects of deposition conditions on the epitaxial orientation of Au or TiO2 (110) and on the atomic structure of Au/TiO2 interfaces by combined EBSD and HRTEM. Two experimental conditions were explored consisting of deposition of a 12 nim Au film at 300K followed by annealing at 770K and direct deposition of a 12 nm Au film at 770K. Deposition at 300K followed by annealing at 770K give rise to a (111)Au//(110)TiO2 epitaxial orientation relationship, while direct deposition at 700K temperature give rise to an epitaxial orientation relationship given by (112)Au//(110)TiO2. For both orientations, two epitaxial variants are observed which are twin related. The (112)Au//(110)TiO2 orientation has been found to minimize the interfacial lattice misfit while maximizing the number of Au-Ti bonds across the interface.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 589 , 1999 , 235
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1.Haruta, M. et al. , J. of Catalysis, 144, 175 (1993)Google Scholar
2.Kobayashi, T., Haruta, M., Tsubota, S. and Sano, H., Sens. and Actuators, B 1, 222 (1990)Google Scholar
3.Zhang, L., Cosandey, F., Persaud, R. and Madey, T.E., Surface Science, 439, 73 (1999)Google Scholar
4.Valden, M., Lai, X. and Goodman, D.W., Science, 281, 1647 (1998)Google Scholar
5.Cosandey, F.. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 3(2), 559 (1997)Google Scholar
6.Pashley, D.W. and Stowell, M.J., Phil. Mag., 8, 1605 (1963)Google Scholar
7.Dahmen, U., in Boundaries and Interfaces in Materials: The David A. Smith Symposium, Pond, R.C. et al. , Editors. TMS Publ., 225 (1998).Google Scholar
8.Bourgeois, S. et al. , Thin Solid Films, 304, 267 (1997)Google Scholar