Hostname: page-component-669899f699-vbsjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-06T15:32:20.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ELECTRONIC AND CRYSTALLOGRAPHIC STRUCTURE OF IRON FILMS EPITAXIALLY GROWN ON Cu SINGLE CRYSTALS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

P.A. MONTANO ,
Y.C. LEE ,
J. MARCANO  and
H. MIN
P.A. MONTANO
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506
Y.C. LEE
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506
J. MARCANO
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506
H. MIN
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506
Get access

Abstract

The crystallographic and electronic structure of iron films epitaxially grown on Cu single crystals was investigated by LEED, AS, EELS and UPS. The Cu(l00), Cu(ll0) and Cu(lll)faces were used as substrates for the growth of the iron films. In our study emphasis was placed on the modification of surface properties due to the Fe/Cu interface. Significant variation with respect to α—Fe was observed in the electronic structure of fcc iron formed on the various crystal faces.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 56: Symposium H – Layered Structures and Epitaxy , 1985 , 183
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Sinfelt, J.H., Rev. Mod. Phys. 51, 569 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Freeman, A.J., Wang, D.S., and Krakauer, H., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 1997 (1982). C.Q. Ma. Ramana, M.V., and Cooper, B.R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. Al, 1095 (1983).Google Scholar
3. Tear, S.P. and Roll, K., J. Phys. C15, 5521 (1982).Google Scholar
4. Abu-Joudeh, M., Vaishnava, P.P., and Montano, P.A., J. Phys. C17, 6899 (1984).Google Scholar
5. Montano, P.A., Vaishnava, P.P., and Boling, E., Surface Sci. 130, 191 (1983)Google Scholar
6. Thompson, M.A. and Erskine, J.L., Phys. Rev. B31, 6832 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Wiartolla, W., Becker, W., Keune, W. and Pfannes, H.D., J. Phys. 45(C5), 461 (1984).Google Scholar
8.Observed by magneto-optic measurements by Naik, H.M. and Bader, S., private communication.Google Scholar
9. Binns, C. and Norris, C., Surf. Sci. 116, 338 (1982).Google Scholar
10. Brucker, C.F. and Rhodin, T.N., Surf. Sci. 57, 523 (1976).Google Scholar
11. Fernando, G.W. and Cooper, B.R., private communication.Google Scholar
12. Textor, M., Gay, I.D. and Mason, R., Proc. R. Soc. London A356, 37 (1977).Google Scholar
13. Peterson, L.G., Melander, R., Spears, D.P. and Hagotrom, S.B.M., Phys. Rev. B14, 4177 (1976).Google Scholar
14. Powell, C.J., Australian J. Phys. 13, 145 (1960).Google Scholar
15. Lee, Y.C., Min, H., and Montano, P.A., Surf. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar
16. Gradmann, U. and Tillmanns, P., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 44, 539 (1977).Google Scholar