Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T06:21:35.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Fragility of Nb-Ni Based and Zr55-x Tix(CuNi)18.25+yBe26.25-y Bulk Metallic Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Ludi A. Shadowspeaker  and
Ralf Busch
Ludi A. Shadowspeaker
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis Oregon 97331
Ralf Busch
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis Oregon 97331
Get access

Abstract

The heating rate dependencies of the glass transition temperature of the Ni65Nb35, Ni60Nb35Sn5, Ni59.35Nb34.45Sn6.2, Ni60(Nb40Ta60)34Sn6, and Ni57Fe3Nb35Sn5 metallic glass forming alloys were investigated with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). The relaxation time for each DSC experiment was plotted versus inverse temperature and a Vogel-Fulcher-Tamman (VFT) type relation was fitted to the data. The fragilities of the alloys were characterized with the fragility parameter, D*, and the VFT temperature, T0, which are the fit parameters from the VFT relation. It was found that for the binary alloy D* = 6.2, for the ternary alloys D* = 11.0, and that for the quaternary alloys D* was between 16.4 and 19.0. The D* increases monotonically as the number of components in the alloy is increased. This trend is also seen in Zr based alloys.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 806: Symposium MM – Amorphous and Nanocrystalline Metals , 2003 , MM5.3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1] Inoue, A., Zhang, T., and Masumoto, T., Mater. Trans., JIM 31, 425 (1991).Google Scholar
[2] Lin, X. H. and Johnson, W. L., J. Appl. Phys., 78 6514 (1995).Google Scholar
[3] Peker, A. and Johnson, W. L., Appl. Phys. Lett., 63, 2342 (1993).Google Scholar
[4] Zhang, T., Inoue, A., and Masumoto, T., Mater. Trans., JIM 32, 1005 (1991).Google Scholar
[5] Angell, C. A., Science 267, 1924 (1995).Google Scholar
[6] Waniuk, T. A., Busch, R., Mashur, A., and Johnson, W. L., Acta Mater. 46, 5229, (1998).Google Scholar
[7] Busch, R., Bakke, E., and Johnson, W. L., Acta Metal., 46, 4725 (1998).Google Scholar
[8] Busch, R., Liu, W., and Johnson, W.L., J. Appl. Phys., 83, 4134 (1998).Google Scholar
[9] Choi-Yim, H., Xu, D.H., and Johnson, W. L., Appl. Phys. Lett., 82, 1030 (2003).Google Scholar
[10] Nemilov, S. V., Glass Phys. Chem. 21, 91, (1995).Google Scholar
[11] Tang, X. P., Geyer, U., Busch, R., Johnson, W. L., and Wu, Y., Nature 402, 160 (1999)Google Scholar