Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tpknm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-07T05:06:28.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-invertible planar self-affine sets

Part of: Dynamical systems with hyperbolic behavior Classical measure theory Smooth dynamical systems: general theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2024

ANTTI KÄENMÄKI  and
PETTERI NISSINEN
ANTTI KÄENMÄKI
Affiliation:
Research Unit of Mathematical Sciences, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland. e-mail: [email protected]
PETTERI NISSINEN
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Mathematics, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We compare the dimension of a non-invertible self-affine set to the dimension of the respective invertible self-affine set. In particular, for generic planar self-affine sets, we show that the dimensions coincide when they are large and differ when they are small. Our study relies on thermodynamic formalism where, for dominated and irreducible matrices, we completely characterise the behaviour of the pressures.

MSC classification

Primary: 28A80: Fractals
Secondary: 37C45: Dimension theory of dynamical systems 37D35: Thermodynamic formalism, variational principles, equilibrium states
Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 177 , Issue 1 , July 2024 , pp. 49 - 65
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baker, S., Fraser, J. M. and Máthé, A.. Inhomogeneous self-similar sets with overlaps. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 39(1) (2019) 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bárány, B., Hochman, M. and Rapaport, A.. Hausdorff dimension of planar self-affine sets and measures. Invent. Math. 216 (3) (2019), 601–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bárány, B., Käenmäki, A. and Morris, I. D.. Domination, almost additivity, and thermodynamic formalism for planar matrix cocycles. Israel J. Math. 239(1) (2020), 173–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bárány, B., Käenmäki, A. and Yu, H.. Finer geometry of planar self-affine sets. Preprint (2021), available at arXiv:2107.00983.Google Scholar
Bárány, B. and Körtvélyesi, V.. On the dimension of planar self-affine sets with non-invertible maps. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect., A. Available at arXiv:2302.13037.Google Scholar
Barnsley, M. F.. Superfractals (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnsley, M. F. and Demko, S.. Iterated function systems and the global construction of fractals. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A. 399(1817) (1985), 243–275.Google Scholar
Bochi, J. and Morris, I. D.. Continuity properties of the lower spectral radius. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 110(2) (2015), 477–509.Google Scholar
Bochi, J. and Morris, I. D.. Equilibrium states of generalised singular value potentials and applications to affine iterated function systems. Geom. Funct. Anal. 28(4) (2018), 995–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, R.. Equilibrium states and the ergodic theory of Anosov diffeomorphisms. Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 470 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, revised edition, 2008). With a preface by D. Ruelle, edited by J-R. Chazottes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrell, S. A.. On the dimension and measure of inhomogeneous attractors. Real Anal. Exchange 44(1) (2019), 199–215.Google Scholar
Burrell, S. A. and Fraser, J. M.. The dimensions of inhomogeneous self-affine sets. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 45 (1) (2020), 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgar, G. A.. Fractal dimension of self-affine sets: some examples. Measure theory (Oberwolfach, 1990) 28 (1992), 341–358.Google Scholar
Falconer, K. J.. The Hausdorff dimension of self-affine fractals. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 103(2) (1988), 339–350.Google Scholar
Feng, D. J. and Käenmäki, A.. Equilibrium states of the pressure function for products of matrices. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 30 (3) (2011), 699–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, D. J. and Shmerkin, P.. Non-conformal repellers and the continuity of pressure for matrix cocycles. Geom. Funct. Anal. 24 (4) (2014), 1101–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochman, M. and Rapaport, A.. Hausdorff dimension of planar self-affine sets and measures with overlaps. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 24 (7) (2022), 2361–2441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, J. E.. Fractals and self-similarity. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30 (5) (1981), 713–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungers, R.. The joint spectral radius. Lecture Notes in Control and Inform. Sci. vol. 385 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2009), Theory and applications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Käenmäki, A.. On natural invariant measures on generalised iterated function systems. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 29 (2) (2004), 419–458.Google Scholar
Käenmäki, A. and Lehrbäck, J.. Measures with predetermined regularity and inhomogeneous self-similar sets. Ark. Mat. 55 (1) (2017), 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Käenmäki, A. and Morris, I. D.. Structure of equilibrium states on self-affine sets and strict monotonicity of affinity dimension. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 116(4) (2018), 929–956.Google Scholar
Käenmäki, A. and Vilppolainen, M.. Dimension and measures on sub-self-affine sets. Monatsh. Math. 161 (3) (2010), 271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marstrand, J. M.. Some fundamental geometrical properties of plane sets of fractional dimensions. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 4 (1954), 257–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, P.. Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidean Spaces: Fractals and Rectifiability (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snigireva, N.. Inhomogeneous self-similar sets and measures. PhD. thesis., University of St Andrews (2008).Google Scholar
Solomyak, B.. Measure and dimension for some fractal families. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 124(3) (1998), 531–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar