Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T18:23:09.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The race between offshoring and automation in explaining wage polarization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2023

Mafalda Pinho ,
Oscar Afonso Open the ORCID record for Oscar Afonso [Opens in a new window]  and
Tiago Sequeira Open the ORCID record for Tiago Sequeira [Opens in a new window]
Mafalda Pinho
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics and Cef.up, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Oscar Afonso*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics and Cef.up, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal Faculty of Economics and CeBER, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Tiago Sequeira
Affiliation:
Faculty of Economics and CeBER, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
*
Corresponding author: Oscar Afonso; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Offshoring and automation are sources of wage polarization. We reassess these two determinants of wage polarization in a single directed technical change setup that encompasses routine and nonroutine production. We empirically establish the conditional positive relationship between automation and relocations on one side and wage polarization on the other. Theoretically, we show that wage polarization increases with automation and offshoring. In particular, wage polarization in favor of domestic (nonroutine) high(low)-skilled workers is positively affected by an increase in domestic (nonroutine) high(low)-skilled labor quantity and/or absolute productivity. Additionally, it is also positively influenced by a rise in foreign (routine) medium-skilled labor quantity and/or absolute productivity while negatively impacted by an increase in domestic (routine) medium-skilled labor quantity and/or absolute productivity. We show that the effect of offshoring on wage polarization diminishes with the degree of substitutability between routine and nonroutine sectors in the economy, with the share of machines in the production of intermediate goods, and with the scale effect. We quantitatively assess the impact through a thorough data-based calibration exercise, where the numerical results confirmed the theoretical findings.

Keywords

Directed technical changeautomationoffshoringinternational tradewage polarization
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 28 , Issue 6 , September 2024 , pp. 1278 - 1312
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

†

Cef.UP is funded by Portuguese public funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., in the framework of the project with references UIDB/04105/2020 and UIDP/04105. CeBER’s research is funded by national funds through FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., Project UIDB/05037/2020

References

Acemoglu, D. (1998) Why do new technologies complement skills? Directed technical change and wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(4), 1055–1590.10.1162/003355398555838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. (2002) Directed technical change. Review of Economic Studies 69(4), 781–809.10.1111/1467-937X.00226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Autor, D. (2011) Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In: Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 4, pp. 1043–1171, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Zilibotti, F. (2001) Productivity differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(2), 563–606.10.1162/00335530151144104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Gancia, G. and Zilibotti, F. (2015) Offshoring and directed technical change. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 7(3), 84–122.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Loebbing, J. (2022) Automation and Polarization (No. w30528). National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w30528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2017) Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets. Working Paper 23285, National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w23285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2018a) Low-skill and high-skill automation. Journal of Human Capital 12(2), 204–232.10.1086/697242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2018b) The race between machines and humans: Implications for growth, factor shares and jobs. American Economic Review 108(6), 1488–1542.10.1257/aer.20160696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afonso, O.. (2012) Scale-independent North-South trade effects on the technological-knowledge bias and on wage inequality. Review of World Economics 148(1), 181–207.10.1007/s10290-011-0109-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afonso, O. and Pinho, M. (2022) How to reverse a negative asymmetric labor productivity shock in the European Union? A directed technical change analysis with fiscal and monetary policies. Mathematical Social Sciences 116, 47–67. DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2022.01.004.10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2022.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afonso, O., Lima, P. G. and Sequeira, T. (2022) The effects of automation and lobbying in wage inequality: A directed technical change model with routine and non-routine tasks. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 32(5), 1467–1497.10.1007/s00191-022-00801-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afonso, O. and Sequeira, T. (2023) The effect of inflation on wage inequality: A North-South monetary model of endogenous growth with international trade. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 55(1), 215–249.10.1111/jmcb.12914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992) A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2), 323–351.10.2307/2951599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E. and Zucman, G. (2018) The elephant curve of global inequality and growth. AEA Papers and Proceedings 108(1), 103–108.10.1257/pandp.20181073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antras, P. and Yeaple, S. R. (2014) Multinational firms and the structure of international trade. Handbook of International Economics 4, 55–130.10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00002-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1999) Inter-generational equity and the rate of discount in long-term social investment. In: Contemporary Economic Issues, pp. 89–102. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-14540-9_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atalay, E., Phongthiengtham, P., Sotelo, S. and Tannenbaum, D. (2020) The evolution of work in the United States. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 12(2), 1–34.Google Scholar
Autor, D. H. and Dorn, D. (2013) The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review 103(5), 1553–1597.10.1257/aer.103.5.1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Autor, D. H., Levy, F. and Murnane, R. J. (2003) The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(4), 1279–1333.10.1162/003355303322552801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baharumshah, A. Z. and Almasaied, S. W. (2009) Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Malaysia: Interactions with human capital and financial deepening. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 45(1), 90–102.10.2753/REE1540-496X450106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004) Economic Growth, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Blanas, S., Gancia, G. and Lee, S. Y. (2019) Who is afraid of machines? Economic Policy 34(100), 627–690.10.1093/epolic/eiaa005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branstetter, L. (2006) Is foreign direct investment a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from Japan’s FDI in the United States. Journal of International Economics 68(2), 325–344.10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chui, M., Mayika, J. and Miremadi, M. (2016) Four fundamentals of workplace automation. McKinsey Q 2016(1). http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/business-technology/our-insights/four-fundamentals-of-workplace-automation Google Scholar
Cuadros, A. and Alguacil, M. (2014) Productivity spillovers through foreign transactions: The role of sector composition and local conditions. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 50(sup2), 75–88.10.2753/REE1540-496X5002S205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Croix, D. and Delavallade, C. (2009) Growth, public investment and corruption with failing institutions. Economics of Governance 10(3), 187–219.10.1007/s10101-008-0057-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiNardo, J., Fortin, N. M. and Lemieux, T. (1996) Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973-1992: A semiparametric approach. Econometrica 64(5), 1001–1044.10.2307/2171954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinopoulos, E. and Thompson, P. (1999) Scale effects in Schumpeterian models of economic growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 9(2), 157–185.10.1007/s001910050079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feenstra, R. C. and Hanson, G. H. (1996) Foreign investment, outsourcing and relative wages. In: Feenstra, R. C. and Hanson, G. H.. (eds.), The Political Economy of Trade Policy: Papers in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Feenstra, R. C. and Hanson, G. H. (1999) The impact of outsourcing and high-technology capital on wages: Estimates for the United States, 1979-1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3), 907–940.10.1162/003355399556179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gil, P. M., Brito, P., and Afonso, O. (2013) Growth and firm dynamics with horizontal and vertical R&D. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17(7), 1438–1466.10.1017/S1365100512000181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graetz, G. and Michaels, G. (2018) Robots at work. Review of Economics and Statistics 100(5), 753–768.10.1162/rest_a_00754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, T., Salomons, A. and Zierahn, U. (2018) Racing with or Against the Machine? Evidence from Europe. CESifo Working Paper. Working Paper No. 7247, CESifo Working Paper.10.2139/ssrn.3275421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2008) Trading tasks: A simple theory of offshoring. American Economic Review 98(5), 1978–1997.10.1257/aer.98.5.1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2012) Task trade between similar countries. Econometrica 80(2), 593–629.Google Scholar
Jaimovich, N., Saporta-Eksten, I., Siu, H. E. and Yedid-Levi, Y. (2020) The Macroeconomics of Automation: Data, Theory, and Policy Analysis. Discussion paper, National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w27122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. (1995) R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103(4), 759–784.10.1086/262002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. E., Manuelli, R. E. and Rossi, P. E. (1993) Optimal taxation in models of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 101(3), 485–517.10.1086/261884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, L. and Murphy, K. (1992) Changes in relative wages, 1963-1987: Supply and demand factors. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107(1), 35–78.10.2307/2118323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krammer, S. M. S. (2010) International R&D spillovers in emerging markets: The impact of trade and foreign direct investment. Journal of International Trade Economic Development 19(2), 591–623.10.1080/09638190902792464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lankisch, C., Prettner, K. and Prskawetz, A. (2019) How can robots affect wage inequality? Economic Modelling 81, 161–169.10.1016/j.econmod.2018.12.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. Y. T. and Shin, Y. (2017) Horizontal and Vertical Polarization: Task-Specific Technological Change in a Multi-Sector Economy. Working Paper 23283, National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w23283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, X. and Liu, X. (2005) Foreign direct investment and economic growth: An increasingly endogenous relationship. World Development 33(3), 393–407.10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neto, A., Afonso, O. and Silva, S. (2019) How powerful are trade unions? A skill-biased technological change approach. Macroeconomic Dynamics 23(2), 730–774.10.1017/S1365100516001346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldenski, L. (2014) Offshoring and the polarization of the US labor market. ILR Review 67(3_suppl), 734–761.10.1177/00197939140670S311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2010) Offshoring in a Ricardian world. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2(2), 227–258.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (2004) Where Ricardo and Mill rebut and confirm arguments of mainstream economists supporting globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(3), 135–146.10.1257/0895330042162403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sequeira, A., Gil, P. and Afonso, O. (2018) Endogenous growth and entropy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 154, 100–120.10.1016/j.jebo.2018.07.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Y. and Liu, Z. (2016) The impact of foreign direct investment and human capital on economic growth: Evidence from Chinese cities. China Economic Review 37(C), 97–109.10.1016/j.chieco.2015.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Hu, Y. and Zhang, Z. (2021) Skill-biased technological change and labor market polarization in China. Economic Modelling 100, 105–507.10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. (2007) Trade, human capital, and technology spillovers: An industry-level analysis. Review of International Economics 15(2), 269–283.10.1111/j.1467-9396.2007.00694.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank Group. (2016) World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
Zeira, J. (1998) Workers, machines, and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113(4), 1091–1117.10.1162/003355398555847CrossRefGoogle Scholar