Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-04T16:57:06.231Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tactical Balancing: High Court Decision Making on Politically Crucial Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Diana Kapiszewski
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article advances a new account of judicial behavior: the thesis of tactical balancing. Building on existing models of judicial decision making, the thesis posits that high court justices balance a discrete set of considerations—justices' ideologies, their institutional interests, the potential consequences of their rulings, public opinion, elected leaders' preferences, and law—as they decide important cases. Variation in a high court's balancing of those considerations as it decides different cases leads it to alternate between challenging and endorsing the exercise of government power. The way in which high courts carry out this “tactical balancing” reflects their broader strategy for prioritizing the different roles they can play in a polity, and thus has significant implications for the rule of law and regime stability in developing democracies. The thesis is illustrated through a detailed analysis of the Brazilian high court's rulings on cases concerning crucial economic policies (1985–2004).

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 471 - 506
Copyright
© 2011 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

The author wishes to thank Deborah D. Avant, Matthew C. Ingram, Druscilla L. Scribner, and Matthew M. Taylor for their thoughtful comments on earlier drafts of this article. Research for the article was supported by a Fulbright Research Fellowship (2005).

References

References

Ackerman, Bruce (1997) “The Rise of World Constitutionalism,” 83 Virginia Law Rev. 771–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arantes, Rogerio B. (2000) “The Judiciary, Democracy, and Economic Policy in Brazil,” in Nagel, S., ed., Handbook of Global Legal Policy. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Ballard, Megan J. (1999) “The Clash Between Local Courts and Global Economics: The Politics of Judicial Reform in Brazil,” 17 Berkeley J. of International Law 230–76.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence (2006) Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M. (2008) The Judicial Response to Police Killings in Latin America: Inequality and the Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., & Gibson, James L. (1995) “The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support,” 89 American Political Science Rev. 356–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cepeda Espinosa, Manuel J. (2005) “The Judicialization of Politics in Colombia: The Old and the New,” in Sieder, R. et al., eds., The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chavez, Rebecca B. (2004) Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies: Judicial Politics in Argentina. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Clayton, Cornell, & Gillman, Howard, eds. (1999) Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cooter, Robert, & Ginsburg, Tom (1996) “Comparative Judicial Discretion: An Empirical Test of Economic Models,” 16 International Rev. of Law and Economics 295–313.10.1016/0144-8188(96)00018-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Da Fonseca, , Manuel, A. R. (1998) “Brazil's Real Plan,” 30 J. of Latin American Studies 619–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugard, Jackie, & Roux, Theunis (2006) “The Record of the South African Constitutional Court in Providing an Institutional Voice for the Poor: 1995–2004,” in Gargarella, R. et al., eds., Courts an Social Transformation in New Democracies: An Institutional Voice for the Poor? Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1990) A Bill of Rights for Britain. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Ellett, Rachel (2008) “Emerging Judicial Power in Transitional Democracies: Uganda, Tanzania and Malawi.” Ph.D. diss., Department of Political Science, Northeastern University.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, et al. (2001a) “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government,” 35 Law & Society Rev. 117–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee (2001b) “The Supreme Court as a Strategic National Policy Maker,” 50 Emory Law J. 583–611.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stephen (2005) “The Rule of Law and Rule of Politics? Harmonizing the Internal and External Views of Supreme Court Decision-Making,” 30 Law and Social Inquiry 89–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca de Araújo Faria, Lilian (1998) “The Role of the Judicial Branch in Managing the Brazilian Government's Economic Policy.” Unpublished paper, Instituto Cultural Minerva, Institute of Brazilian Issues, The George Washington University.Google Scholar
Frühling, Hugo (1984) “Law in Society: Social Transformation and the Crisis of Law in Chile, 1830–1970.” Ph.D. diss., Harvard University School of Law.Google Scholar
Gerring, John (2007) “Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method?” 40 Comparative Political Studies 231–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyh, Charles Gardner (2010) “Judicial Politics, the Rule of Law, and the Future of an Ermine Myth.” Research Paper Number 165, Indiana University Maurer School of Law.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., et al. (2003) “Measuring Attitudes Toward the United States Supreme Court,” 47 American J. of Political Science 354–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillman, Howard (2001) “What's Law Got to Do With It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the ‘Legal Model’ of Judicial Decision-Making,” 26 Law and Social Inquiry 465–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillman, Howard, & Clayton, Cornell, eds. (1999) The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations. Lawrence: Univ. of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom (2003) Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen (2005) Courts Under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hilbink, Elisabeth (2007) The Politics of Judicial Apoliticism: Chile in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hilbink, Elisabeth (2008) “Assessing the New Constitutionalism,” 40 Comparative Politics 227–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran (2004) Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Florian F., & Bentes, Fernando R. N. M. (2008) “Accountability for Social and Economic Rights in Brazil,” in Gauri, V. & Brinks, D. M., eds., Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Howe, Paul, & Russell, Peter H., eds. (2001) Judicial Power and Canadian Democracy. Montreal: McGill-Queen's Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra (2010) “Judging With a Guilty Conscience: The Chilean Judiciary's Human Rights Turn,” 35 Law and Social Inquiry 99–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: Univ. of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Iaryczower, Matías, et al. (2000) “Un Enfoque Estratégico para Entender el Comportamiento de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación.” Presented at the Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo Institucional, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 27 Nov.Google Scholar
Ingram, Matthew C. (2009) “Crafting Courts in New Democracies: The Politics of Subnational Judicial Reform in Brazil and Mexico.” Ph.D. diss., Department of Political Science, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert, et al. (1978) “The Evolution of State Supreme Courts,” 76 Michigan Law Rev. 961–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana (2011) “Power Broker, Policymaker, or Rights Adjudicator? The Brazilian Supremo Tribunal Federal in Transition,” in Helmke, G. & Ríos-Figueroa, J., eds., Courts in Latin America. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Karst, Kenneth L., & Rosenn, Keith S. (1975) Law and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, Heinz (2000) Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa's Political Reconstruction. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Jack, & Epstein, Lee (1996) “The Norm of Stare Decisis,” 40 American J. of Political Science 1018–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koerner, Andrei (2006) “Decisão judicial, instituições e estrutura socioeconômica por uma análise política do pensamento jurídico brasileiro,” in A. Koerner, ed., História da Justiça Penal no Brasil Pesquisas e Análises. São Paulo: IBCCRIM.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald (1997) The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Tim (2003) Courts and Political Institutions: A Comparative View. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Larry D. (2004) The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lima Lopes, José Reinaldo de (2006) “Brazilian Courts and Social Rights: A Case Study Revisited,” in Gargarella, R. et al., eds., Courts and Social Transformation in New Democracies: An Institutional Voice for the Poor? Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., & Stepan, Alfred (1996) “Modern Nondemocratic Regimes,” in Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-Ayllón, Sergio, & Fix-Fierro, Hector F. (2003) “‘Faraway, So Close!’ The Rule of Law and Legal Change in Mexico 1970–2000,” in Friedman, L. & Pérez-Perdomo, R., eds., Legal Culture in the Age of Globalization: Latin America and Latin Europe. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir (2007) The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Bernardo (2001) “Institutions for Commitment in the Brazilian Regulatory System,” 41 The Q. Rev. of Economics and Finance 621–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Rodrigo (2010) “Politics Without Insurance: Democratic Competition and Judicial Reform in Brazil,” 42 Comparative Politics 313–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall (2002) China's Long March Toward Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popova, Maria (2006) “Judicial Independence and Political Corruption: Electoral and Defamation Disputes in Russia and Ukraine.” Ph.D. diss., Department of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Popova, Maria (2010) “Political Competition as an Obstacle to Judicial Independence: Evidence from Russia and Ukraine,” 43 Comparative Political Studies 1202–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchett, C. Herman (1948) The Roosevelt Court. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam (1995) Sustainable Democracy. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramseyer, Mark (1994) “The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach,” 23 J. of Legal Studies 721–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ríos-Figueroa, Julio (2003) “A Minimum Condition for the Judiciary to Become an Effective Power: The Mexican Supreme Court, 1994–2002.” Presented at the Congress of the Latin American Studies Association International Congress, Dallas, TX, 27–29 Mar.Google Scholar
Rocha, Jean Paul Veiga da (2004) “A Capacidade Normativa de Conjuntura no Direito Econômico: O Déficit Democrático da Regulação Financeira.” Thesis, Law School, University of São Paulo.Google Scholar
Rocha, Zélio Maia da, & Paulo, Vicente (2003) O Controle de Constitucionalidade nos Concursos Públicos. Brasília: Vestcon.Google Scholar
Rohde, David W., & Spaeth, Harold J. (1976) Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Sadek, Mara Teresa (1999) “O Poder Judiciário na Reforma do Estado,” in L. Carlos Bresser Pereira et al., eds., Sociedade e Estado em Transformação. São Paulo: Editora UNESP.Google Scholar
Santiso, Carlos (2004) “Economic Reform and Judicial Governance in Brazil: Balancing Independence With Accountability,” in Gloppen, S. et al., eds., Democratization and the Judiciary. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim (20032004) “A Realpolitik Defense of Social Rights,” 82 Texas Law Rev. 1921–61.Google Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1965) The Judicial Mind. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scribner, Druscilla L. (2004) “Limiting Presidential Power: Supreme Court – Executive Relations in Argentina and Chile.” Ph.D. diss., Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., & Spaeth, Harold J. (1993) The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. (1999) Majority Rule or Minority Will: Adherence to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian (2003) The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin M. (1964) Law and Politics in the Supreme Court: New Approaches to Political Jurisprudence. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin M. (1981) Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Martin M. (2002) “The Success of Judicial Review and Democracy,” in Shapiro, M. & Stone Sweet, A., eds., On Law, Politics, and Judicialization. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Martin M., & Stone Sweet, Alec (1994) “The New Constitutional Politics of Europe,” 26 Comparative Political Studies 397–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina, & Peruzzotti, Enrique (2003) “Societal and Horizontal Controls: Two Cases of a Fruitful Relationship,” in Mainwaring, S. & Welna, C., eds., Democratic Accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sólyom, László, & Brunner, Georg (2000) Constitutional Judiciary in a New Democracy: The Hungarian Constitutional Court. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey K. (2010) Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec (1999) “Judicialization and the Construction of Governance,” 32 Comparative Political Studies 147–84.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian (1996) “The Internal/External Distinction and the Notion of a “Practice” in Legal Theory and Sociolegal Studies,” 30 Law & Society Rev. 163–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian (2009) Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, & Vallinder, Torbjörn, eds. (1997) The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Matthew (2008) Judging Policy: Courts and Policy Reform in Democratic Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Trochev, Alexei (2008) Judging Russia: The Role of the Constitutional Court in Russian Politics 1990–2006. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (1999) Taking the Constitution Away From the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg (2005) The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Werneck Vianna, Luiz, et al. (1999) A Judicialização Da Política e Das Relações Sociais No Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Revan.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith (2000) “Once More Unto the Breach: Post-Behavioral Approaches to Judicial Politics,” 25 Law and Social Inquiry 601–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, Keith (2005) “Interpose Your Friendly Hand: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court,” 99 American Political Science Rev. 583–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Bruce (2007) “Claiming Individual Rights Through a Constitutional Court: The Example of Gays in Costa Rica,” 5 International J. of Constitutional Law 242–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Bruce M., & Rodríguez Cordero, Juan C. (2006) “Legal Opportunity Structures and Social Movements: The Effects of Institutional Change on Costa Rican Politics,” 39 Comparative Political Studies 325–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Constitution and Statutes Cited

Processo e julgamento da ação direta de inconstitucionalidade e da ação declaratória de constitucionalidade perante o Supremo Tribunal Federal, Law 9.868 (1999).Google Scholar
Revisão geral da remunerção dos servidores públicos civis e militares do Poder Executivo Federal e dá outras providências, Law 8.622 (1993).Google Scholar
Os critérios para reposicionamento de servidores públicos federais civis e militares e dá outras providências, Law 8.627 (1993).Google Scholar
The Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil (1988).Google Scholar