Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-px5tt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-10T23:12:45.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Privatization of Public Safety in Urban Neighborhoods: Do Business Improvement Districts Reduce Violent Crime Among Adolescents?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

John MacDonald ,
Robert J. Stokes ,
Ben Grunwald  and
Ricky Bluthenthal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The business improvement district (BID) is a popular economic development and urban revitalization model in which local property and business owners must pay an assessment tax that funds supplementary services, including private security. BIDs constitute a controversial form of urban revitalization to some because they privatize economic development and public safety efforts in public space. This study examines whether BIDs provide tangible benefits beyond their immediate boundaries to local residents in the form of reduced violence among adolescents. The empirical analysis advances an existing literature dominated by evaluation studies by introducing a theoretically driven dataset with rich information on individual and neighborhood level variables. The analysis compares violent victimization among youths living in BID neighborhoods with those in similarly situated non-BID neighborhoods. We find no effect of BIDs on violence. However, we do find that youth violence is strongly correlated with neighborhood collective efficacy and family-related attributes of social control. In conclusion, we argue that BIDs may be an agent of crime reduction, but this benefit is likely concentrated only in their immediate boundaries and does not extend to youths living in surrounding neighborhoods.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , September 2013 , pp. 621 - 652
Copyright
© 2013 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

An earlier version of this article was presented at the American Society of Criminology meetings in San Francisco, CA, in 2010. GIS programming was provided by Aaron Kofner. Sampling algorithm and design were provided by Greg Ridgeway and Daniela Golinelli. Support for this project was made possible by the CDC under cooperative agreement 1U49CE000773. The opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not represent the official positions of the CDC, the RAND Corporation, or any of its clients.

References

References

Barr, Heather (1997) “More Like Disneyland: State Action, 42 U.S.C. 1983, and Business Improvement Districts in New York,” 28 Columbia Human Rights Law Rev. 393–429.Google Scholar
Briffault, Robert (1999) “A Government for Our Time? Business Improvement Districts and Urban Governance,” 99 Columbia Law Rev. 365–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Leah (2008) “Volunteering to Be Taxed: Business Improvement Districts and the Extra-Governmental Provision of Public Safety,” 92 J. of Public Economics 388–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, C. (2012) “Critics of SoHo Proposal Ask, You Call This Improvement?,” New York Times, January 29.Google Scholar
Busso, Matias, & Kline, Patrick (2008) “Do Local Economic Development Programs Work? Evidence from the Federal Empowerment Zone Program,” Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1090838 (accessed 24 March 2011).Google Scholar
Cohen, Lawrence E., & Felson, Marcus (1979) “Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach,” 44 American Sociological Rev. 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Philip., & MacDonald, John (2011) “Public Safety through Private Action: An Economic Assessment of Bids,” 121 Economic J. 445–62.Google Scholar
CPC (Carolina Population Center) University of North Carolina, add health. Available at: http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth (accessed 5 January 2009).Google Scholar
Davies, Mark S. (1997) “Business Improvement Districts,” 52 J. of Urban and Contemporary Law 187–223.Google Scholar
Dobrin, Adam (2001) “The Risk of Offending on Homicide Victimization: A Case Control Study,” 38 J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency 154–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunworth, Terrence, & Mills, Gregory (1999) “National Evaluation of Weed and Seed: Research in Brief,” Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, Delbert, Huizinga, David, & Menard, Scott (1989) Multiple Problem Youth: Delinquency, Substance Use, and Mental Health Problems. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvery, Joel (2009) “The Impact of Enterprise Zones on Resident Employment: An Evaluation of the Enterprise Zone Programs of California and Florida,” 23 Economic Development Q. 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, David (1989) “Early Predictors of Adolescent Aggression and Adult Violence,” 4 Violence and Victims 79–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Felson, Marcus (1987) “Routine Activities and Crime Prevention in the Developing Metropolis,” 25 Criminology 911–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelhor, David, & Ormrod, Richard K. (2001) “Factors in the Underreporting of Crimes Against Juveniles,” 6 Child Maltreatment 219–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garodnick, Daniel R. (2000) “What's the BID Deal? Can the Grad Central Business Improvement District Serve a Special Limited Purpose?,” 148 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 1733–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, Edward, & Sacerdote, Bruce (1999) “Why Is There More Crime in Cities?,” 107 J. of Political Economy S225–S229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Robert, & Engberg, John B. (2004) “The Impact of State Enterprise Zones on Urban Manufacturing Establishments,” 23 J. of Policy Analysis and Management 315–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanish, Laura D., & Guerra, Nancy G. (2000) “Predictors of Peer Victimization Among Urban Youth,” 9 Social Development 521–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard (2005) “Policing L.A.'s Skid Row: Crime and Real Estate Development in Downtown Los Angeles (An Experiment in Real Time),” University of Chicago Legal Forum.Google Scholar
Hawkins, James D., et al. (1998) “A Review of Predictors of Youth Violence,” in Loeber, R., & Farrington, D., eds., Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hochleutner, Brian R. (2003) “Bids Fare Well: The Democratic Accountability of Business Improvement Districts,” 78 N.Y.U. Law Rev. 374–404.Google Scholar
Hoyt, Lorlene (2004) “Collecting Private Funds for Safer Public Spaces: An Empirical Examination of the Business Improvement District Concept,” 31 Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 367–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, Lorlene (2005) “Do Business Improvement District Organizations Make a Difference?: Crime In and Around Commercial Areas in Philadelphia,” 25 J. of Planning Education and Research 185–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research Project on human development in Chicago neighborhoods. Available at: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/PHDCN (accessed 5 January 2009).Google Scholar
Keizer, Kees, Lindenberg, Siegwart, & Steg, Linda (2008) “The Spreading of Disorder,” 322 Science 1681–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, David J. (1996) “Restraining the Power of Business Improvement Districts: The Case of the Grand Central Partnership,” 15 Yale Law and Policy Rev. 283–330.Google Scholar
Kposowa, Augustine J., Breault, Kevin D., & Harrison, Beatrice M. (1995) “Reassessing the Structural Covariates of Violent Property Crimes in the USA: A County-Level Analysis,” 46 British J. of Sociology 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Bruce (1995) “A Report Criticizes Improvement Zones in New York City,” New York Times, Nov. 8.Google Scholar
Lewis, Nathaniel (2010) “Grappling with Governance: The Emergence of Business Improvement Districts in a National Capital,” 46 Urban Affairs Rev. 180–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, Mark, & Derzon, James H. (1998) “Predictors of Violent Or Serious Delinquency in Adolescence and Early Adulthood: A Synthesis of Longitudinal Research,” in Loeber, R., & Farrington, D., eds., Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders. Thousand Oaks, CA: 86–105. Sage.Google Scholar
Loeber, Rolf, & Farrington, David (1998) Serious and Violent Juvenile Offenders: Risk Factors and Successful Interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Heather (1996) “Bids Really Work,” 6 The City J. 29–42.Google Scholar
MacDonald, John, & Sampson, Robert J. (2012) “Immigration and the Changing Social Fabric of American Cities,” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, John, et al. (2009) Neighborhood Effects on Crime and Youth Violence: The Role of Business Improvement Districts in Los Angeles. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, John, et al. (2010) “The Effect of Business Improvement Districts on the Incidence of Violent Crimes,” 16 Injury Prevention 327–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCord, Joan, Widom, Cathy Spatz, & Crowell, Nancy A. (2001) Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Justice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
McCulloch, Charles E., & Searle, Shayle R. (2001) Generalized, Linear, and Mixed Models. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Messner, Steven F., & Blau, Judith R. (1987) “Routine Leisure Activities and Rates of Crime: A Macro-Level Analysis,” 65 Social Forces 1035–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miethe, Terance D., Stafford, Mark C., & Sloane, Douglas (1990) “Lifestyle Changes and Risks of Criminal Victimization,” 6 J. of Quantitative Criminology 357–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Jerry (2001) “Business Improvement Districts and the ‘New’ Revitalization of Downtown,” 15 Economic Development Q. 115–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morenoff, Jeffrey, Sampson, Robert J., & Raudenbush, Stephen (2001) “Neighborhood Inequality, Collective Efficacy, and the Spatial Dynamics of Urban Violence,” 39 Criminology 517–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumark, David, & Kolko, Jed (2010) “Do Enterprise Zones Create Jobs? Evidence from California's Enterprise Zone Program,” 68 J. of Urban Economics 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, Deirdre, & Tsao, Hui-Shien (2006) “A New Way of Revitalizing Distressed Urban Communities? Assessing the Impact of the Federal Empowerment Zone Program,” 28 J. of Urban Affairs 443–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ousey, Graham (2000) “Deindustrialization, Female-Headed Families, and Black and White Juvenile Homicide Rates, 1970–1990,” 70 Sociological Inquiry 391–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pack, Janet Rothenberg (1992) “BIDs, DIDs, SIDs, and SADs: Private Governments in Urban America,” 10 The Brookings Rev. 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Christine E., et al. (2004) The Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey: Codebook. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. DRU-2400/2-1-LAFANS. Available at: http://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU2400.2-1 (accessed 5 January 2009).Google Scholar
Raudenbush, Stephen, & Bryk, Anthony (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Laurie (2004) “Taxes, Fees Assessments, Dues and the ‘Get What You Pay For’ Model,” 56 Florida L. Rev. 373–445.Google Scholar
Rich, Michael J., & Stoker, Robert (2010) “Rethinking Empowerment: Evidence from Local Empowerment Zone Programs,” 45 Urban Affairs Rev. 775–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riposa, Gerry (1996) “From Enterprise Zones to Empowerment Zones: The Community Context of Urban Economic Development,” 39 American Behavioral Scientist 536–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russ, V. (2012) “Democracy 101: Callowhill NID Foes Went up against Powerful Forces … and Won,” Philadelphia Inquirer, February 6, 2012.Google Scholar
Sampson, Robert J. (1987) “Urban Black Violence: The Effect of Male Joblessness and Family Disruption,” 93 American J. of Sociology 348–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Robert J. (2012) Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Robert J. (2013) “The Place of Context: A Theory and Strategy for Criminology's Hard Problems,” 51 Criminology 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Robert J., & Groves, W. Bryon (1989) “Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social Disorganization Theory,” 94 American J. of Sociology 744–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Robert J., Morenoff, Jeffrey, & Raudenbush, Stephen (2005) “Social Anatomy of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Violence,” 95 American J. of Public Health 224–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sampson, Robert J., & Raudenbush, Stephen (1999) “Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods,” 105 American J. of Sociology 603–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, Robert J., Raudenbush, Stephen, & Earls, Felton (1997) “Neighborhoods and Violent Crime: A Multilevel Study of Collective Efficacy,” 277 Science 918–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreck, Christopher J., & Fisher, Bonnie S. (2004) “Specifying the Influence of Family and Peers on Violent Victimization: Extending Routine Activities and Lifestyles Theories,” 19 J. of Interpersonal Violence 1021–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schreck, Christopher J., Fisher, Bonnie S., & Miller, J. Mitchell (2004) “The Social Context of Violent Victimization: A Study of the Delinquent Peer Effect,” 21 Justice Q. 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Clifford, & McKay, Henry (1942) Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas: A Study of Rates of Delinquents in Relation to Differential Characteristics of Local Communities in American Cities. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Shihadeh, Edward S., & Steffensmeier, Darrell (1994) “Economic Inequality, Family Disruption, and Urban Black Violence: Cities as Units of Stratification and Social Control,” 73 Social Forces 729–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogan, Wesley G. (1990) Disorder and Decline: Crime and the Spiral of Decay in American Neighborhoods. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, James H., & Ong, Paul (2004) “An Analysis of the Los Angeles Revitalization Zone: Are Place-Based Investment Strategies Effective Under Moderate Economic Conditions?,” 18 Economic Development Q. 368–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Andrew (1998) “America, the Gated?,” 22 Wilson Q. 58–79.Google Scholar
Stata Corporation (2005) STATA Version 10. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.Google Scholar
Stokes, Robert J. (2002) “Place Management in Commercial Areas: Customer Service Representatives in Philadelphia's Central Business District,” 15 Security J. 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornberry, Terence, & Krohn, Marvin (2000) “The Self-Report Method for Measuring Delinquency and Crime,” in Duffee, D., et al., ed., CJ 2000: Innovations in Measurement and Analysis. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Welsh, Brandon C., & Farrington, David P. (2009) “Public Area CCTV and Crime Prevention: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” 26 Justice Q. 716–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, James Q., & Kelling, George (1982) “Broken Windows: The Police and Neighborhood Safety,” Atlantic Monthly, March, 29–38.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E. (2011) The City That Became Safe. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Kessler v. Grand Central Dist., 152 F.3d 92, 124–25 (2d Cir. 1998) (Weinstein, J., dissenting).Google Scholar