Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-xq6d9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-12T04:54:09.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exposure Reduction or Retaliation? The Effects of Domestic Violence Resources on Intimate-Partner Homicide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Laura Dugan ,
Daniel S. Nagin  and
Richard Rosenfeld
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rates of homicide involving intimate partners have declined substantially over the past 25 years in the United States, while public awareness of and policy responses to domestic violence have grown. To what extent has the social response to domestic violence contributed to the decline in intimate-partner homicide? We evaluate the relationship between intimate-partner homicide and domestic violence prevention resources in 48 large cities between 1976 and 1996. Controlling for other influences, several types of prevention resources are linked to lower levels of intimate-partner homicide, which we interpret in terms of their capacity to effectively reduce victims' exposure to abusive or violent partners. Other resources, however, are related to higher levels of homicide, suggesting a retaliation effect when interventions stimulate increased aggression without adequately reducing exposure. In light of other research on deficiencies in accessing and implementing prevention resources, our results suggest that too little exposure reduction in severely violent relationships may be worse than none at all.

Type
Papers of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 169 - 198
Copyright
© 2003 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agnew, Robert (1992) “Foundation for a General Strain Theory of Crime and Delinquency,” 30 Criminology 47–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, Robert (1999) “A General Strain Theory of Community Differences in Crime Rates,” 36 J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency 123–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allard, Mary Ann, Albelda, Randy, Ellen Colten, Mary, & Cosenza, Carol (1997) In Harms Way? Domestic Violence, AFDC Receipt, and Welfare Reform in Massachusetts. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Allen Craig, M., & Straus, Murray A. (1980) “Resources, Power, and Husband-Wife Violence,” in Straus, M. A., & Hotaling, G T., eds. Social Causes of Husband-Wife Violence, pp. 188–208. Minneapolis, MN: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Larry, & Straus, Murray A. (1984) “Sexual Stratification Pornography, and Rape in the United States,” in Malamuth, N. M., & Donnerstein, E., eds. Pornography and Sexual Aggression, pp. 186–209. San Francisco, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Baron, Larry, & Straus, Murray A. (1987) “Legitimate Violence, Violent Attitudes, and Rape: A Test of the Cultural Spillover Theory,” 528 Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 79–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, Richard A., Campbell, Alec, Klap, Ruth, & Western, Bruce (1992) “The Deterrent Effect of Arrest in Incidents of Domestic Violence: A Bayesian Analysis of Four Field Experiments,” 57 American Sociological Rev. 698–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, M. L., & Bernard, J. L. (1983) “Violent Intimacy: The Family as a Model for Love Relationships,” 32 Family Relations 283–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, Carolyn Rebecca (2000) The Chicago Women's Health Risk Study, Risk of Serious Injury or Death in Intimate Violence: A Collaborative Research Project. Final Report to the National Institute of Justice. Available at http://www.icjia.state.il.us/public/pdf/cwhrs/cwhrs.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, Angela & Bassuk, Shari S. (1997) “Intimate Violence in the Lives of Homeless and Poor Housed Women: Prevalence and Patterns in an Ethnically Diverse Sample,” 67 American J. of Orthopsychiatry 261–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, Angela & Williams, Kirk R. (1989) “Exploring the Effect of Resource Availability and the Likelihood of Female-Perpetrated Homicides,” 23 Law & Society Review. 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, Angela & Williams, Kirk R. (1993) “Gender, Intimacy, and Lethal Violence: Trends from 1986 through 1987,” 7 Gender and Society 78–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, Angela, Williams, Kirk R. & Dutton, Donald G. (1999) “Homicide Between Intimate Partners,” in Smith, M. D. & Zahn, M. A., eds., Homicide: A Sourcebook of Social Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Brush, Lisa D. (2000) “Battering Traumatic Stress, and Welfare-to-Work Transition,” 6 Violence Against Women 1039–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahn, Naomi R. (1992) “Innovative Approaches to the Prosecution of Domestic Violence Crimes: An Overview,” in Buzawa, E. S. & Buzawa, C. G., eds., Domestic Violence The Changing Criminal Justice Response, pp. 161–80. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.Google Scholar
Campbell, Jacquelyn C. (1992) “‘If I Can't Have You, No One Can:’ Power and Control in Homicide of Female Partners,” in Radford, J. & Russel, D. E. H., eds., Femicide: The Politics of Women Killing, pp. 99–113. New York: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Campbell, Jacquelyn C., Rose, Linda, Kub, Joan, & Nedd, Daphne (1998) “Voices of Strength and Resistance: A Contextual and Longitudinal Analysis of Women's Responses to Battering,” 13 J. of Interpersonal Violence 743–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Jacquelyn C., & Soeken, Karen L. (1999) “Women's Responses to Battering Over Time: An Analysis of Change,” 14 J. of Interpersonal Violence 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, M., & Gartner, R. (1992) Woman Killing: Intimate Femicide in Ontario 1974–1990. Toronto, Ontario: Government of Ontario, Ministry of Social Services, Woman's Directorate.Google Scholar
Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1992) Women, Violence, and Social Change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dugan, Laura (1999) “The Impact of Policies, Programs, and Other Exposure Reducing Factors on Intimate Partner Homicide.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar
Dugan, Laura, Nagin, Daniel, & Rosenfeld, Richard (1999) “Explaining the Decline in Intimate Partner Homicide: The Effects of Changing Domesticity, Women's Status, and Domestic Violence Resources,” 3 Homicide Studies 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Greg J., & Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne (1998) “Urban Poverty, Welfare Reform, and Child Development,” in Harris, Fred R. & Curtis, Lynn A., eds., Locked in the Poorhouse: Cities, Race, and Poverty in the United States, pp. 21–32. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Dunford, Franklyn, Huizinga, David, & Elliott, Delbert S. (1990) “The Role of Arrest in Domestic Assault: The Omaha Police Experiment,” 28 Criminology 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edin, Kathryn (2000) “Few Good Men: Why Poor Mothers Don't Marry or Remarry,” January American Prospect 26–31.Google Scholar
Fagan, Jeffrey (1995) The Criminalization of Domestic Violence: Promises and Limits. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Federal Bureau of Investigation (1998) Supplementary Homicide Reports 1976–1996. Machine readable files and documentation obtained directly from the Uniform Crime Reporting program.Google Scholar
Ferraro, Kathleen J. (1995) “Cops Courts, and Woman Battering,” in Price, B. R., & Sokoloff, N. J., eds., The Criminal Justice System and Women Offenders, Victims, and Workers. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
Finn, Peter, & Colson, Sarah (1998) “Civil Protection Orders: Legislation, Current Court Practice, and Enforcement,” in Legal Interventions in Family Violence: Research Findings and Policy Implications. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Ford, David A. (1992) “The Preventive Impacts of Policies for Prosecuting Wife Batterers,” in Buzawa, E. S. & Buzawa, C. G., eds., Domestic Violence The Changing Criminal Justice Response, pp. 181–208. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.Google Scholar
Goetting, Ann (1995) Homicide in Families and Other Special Populations. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Gottfredson, Michael R., & Hirschi, Travis (1990) A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, Lawrence A., Rand, Michael R., & Craven, Diane, et al. (1998) Violence by Intimates: Analysis of Data on Crimes by Current or Former Spouses, Boyfriends, and Girlfriends. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Hart, Barbara (1992) “State Codes on Domestic Violence Analysis, Commentary and Recommendations,” 43 Juvenile & Family Court J. 1–81.Google Scholar
Harvard Law Review (1993) “Developments in the Law: Legal Responses to Domestic Violence,” 106 Harvard Law Rev. 1498–620.Google Scholar
Hirschi, Travis (1969) Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Hirshel, J. David, Hutchinson, Ira W., Dean, Charles, Kelley, Joseph J., & Pesackis, Carolyn E. (1990) Charlotte Spouse Assault Replication Project: Final Report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Hornung, Carlton A., McCullough, B. Claire, & Sugimoto, Taichi (1981) “Status Relationships in Marriage: Risk Factors in Spouse Abuse,” 43 J. of Marriage and the Family 675–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House Ways and Means Committee (1996) 1996 Green Book. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, Ruth (1978) The Social Sources of Delinquency: An Appraisal of Analytic Models. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langford, Linda, Isaac, Nancy, & Kabat, Stacey (1998) “Homicides Related to Intimate Partner Violence in Massachusetts: Examining Case Ascertainment and the Validity of the SHR,” 2 Homicide Studies 353–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerman, L. (1983) The Prosecution of Spouse Abuse. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Liao, Tim Futing (1994) Interpreting Probability Models Logit, Probit, and Other Generalized Linear Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lieberson, Stanley (1985) Making It Count: The Improvement of Social Theory and Research. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Lilly, J. Robert, Cullen, Francis T., & Ball, Richard A. (1989) Criminological Theory: Context and Consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S., & Taluc, N. (1999) “The Effects of Violence on Women's Employment,” 5 Violence Against Women 370–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, M. E. (1997) “Double Your Trouble: Dual Arrest in Family Violence,” 12 J. of Family Violence 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Messner, Steven F., & Rosenfeld, Richard (2001) Crime and the American Dream 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Pampel, Fred C., & Williams, Kirk R. (2000) “Intimacy and Homicide: Compensating for Missing Data in the SHR,” 38 Criminology 661–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pate, Anthony M., & Hamilton, Edwin E. (1992) “Formal and Informal Deterrents to Domestic Violence: The Dade County Spouse Assault Experiment,” 57 American Sociological Rev. 691–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Orlando (1998) Rituals of Blood: Consequences of Slavery in Two American Centuries. Washington, DC: Civitas.Google Scholar
Peterson, Elika S. (1999) “Murder as Self-Help: Women and Intimate Partner Homicide,” 3 Homicide Studies 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Richard (1997) “Changing Relationships Between Men and Women: A Note on the Decline in Intimate Partner Homicide,” 1 Homicide Studies 72–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, Richard (2000) “Patterns in Adult Homicide: 1980–1995,” in Blumstein, A. & Wallman, J., eds., The Crime Drop in America, pp. 130–63. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Diane E. (1975) The Politics of Rape. New York: Stein and Day.Google Scholar
Schechter, Susan K. (1982) Women and Male Violence: The Visions and Struggles of the Battered Women's Movement. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W. (1992) Policing Domestic Violence Experiments and Dilemmas. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., & Berk, Richard (1984) “The Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault,” 49 American Sociological Rev. 261–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, Lawrence W., Schmidt, Janell D., Rogan, Dennis P., Smith, Douglas A., Gartin, Patrick R., Collins, Dean J., & Bacich, Anthony R. (1992) “The Variable Effect of Arrest on Criminal Careers: The Milwaukee Domestic Violence Experiment,” 83 J. of Criminal Law and Criminology 137–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolman, Richard M., & Rosen, Daniel (2001) “Domestic Violence in the Lives of Women Receiving Welfare,” 7 Violence Against Women 141–58.Google Scholar
Tauchen, Helen V., Witte, Ann Dryden, & Long, Sharon K. (1991) “Domestic Violence: A Nonrandom Affair,” 32 International Economic Rev. 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjaden, Patricia, & Thoennes, Nancy (2000) Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women: Finding from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1973) Census of the Population, 1970. Volume 1, Characteristics of the Population. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1981) 1980 Census of the Population. Volume 1, Characteristics of the Population. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1993) 1990 Census of the Population. Social and Economic Characteristics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census (1998) “Marital Status and Living Arrangements: March 1996,” Current Population Reports 20–496.Google Scholar