Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T13:13:01.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Shirley Brice Heath
Shirley Brice Heath
Affiliation:
School of Education, Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abstract “Ways of taking” from books are a part of culture and as such are more varied than current dichotomies between oral and literate traditions and relational and analytic cognitive styles would suggest. Patterns of language use related to books are studied in three literate communities in the Southeastern United States, focusing on such “literacy events” as bedtime story reading. One community, Maintown, represents mainstream, middle-class school-oriented culture; Roadville is a white mill community of Appalachian origin; the third, Trackton, is a black mill community of recent rural origin. The three communities differ strikingly in their patterns of language use and in the paths of language socialization of their children. Trackton and Roadville are as different from each other as either is from Maintown, and the differences in preschoolers' language use are reflected in three different patterns of adjustment to school. This comparative study shows the inadequacy of the prevalent dichotomy between oral and literate traditions, and points also to the inadequacy of unilinear models of child language development and dichotomies between types of cognitive styles. Study of the development of language use in relation to written materials in home and community requires a broad framework of sociocultural analysis. (Crosscultural analysis, ethnography of communication, language development, literacy, narratives.)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , April 1982 , pp. 49 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Basso, K. (1974). The ethonography of writing. In Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cazden, C. B. (1979). Peekaboo as an instructional model: Discourse development at home and at school. Papers and Reports in Child Language Development 17 1–29.Google Scholar
Chanan, G., & Gilchrist, L. (1974). What school is for. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Childs, C. P., & Greenfield, P. M. (1980). Informal modes of learning and teaching. In Warren, N. (ed), Advances in cross-cultural psychology, vol. 2 London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cochran-Smith, M. (1981). The making of a reader. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Cohen, R. (1968). The relation between socio-conceptual styles and orientation to school requirements. Sociology of Education 41: 201–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, R.(1969). Conceptual styles, culture conflict, and nonverbal tests of intelligence. American Anthropologist 71 (5): 828–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, R.(1971). The influence of conceptual rule-sets on measures of learning ability. In Brace, C. L., Gamble, G., & Bond, J. (eds.), Race and intelligence. (Anthropological Studies, No. 8, American Anthropological Association). 41–57.Google Scholar
Glaser, R. (1979). Trends and research questions in psychological research on learning and schooling. Educational Researcher 8 (10): 6–13.Google Scholar
Goody, E. (1979). Towards a theory of questions. In Goody, E. N. (ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, P., & Humphrey, F. (1978). Task and talk. In The study ofchildren&s functional language and education in the early years. Final report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Heath, S. (1978). Teacher talk: Language in the classroom. (Language in Education 9.) Arlington, Va.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Heath, S.(1980). The functions and uses of literacy. Journal of Communication 30 (1): 123–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, (1982). Questioning at home and at school: A comparative study. In Spindler, G. (ed.), Doing ethnography: Educational anthropology in action. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Heath, . (forthcoming a). Protean shapes: Ever-shifting oral and literate traditions. To appear in Tannen, D. (ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
Heath.(forthcoming b). Ways with words: Ethnography of communication in communities and classrooms.Google Scholar
Howard, R. (1974). A note on S&Z. In Barthes, R., Introduction to S&Z. Trans. Richard, Miller. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H. (1973). On the origins and foundations of inequality among speakers. In Haugen, E. & Bloomfield, M. (eds.), Language as a human problem. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. H. (1974). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Kagan, J., Sigel, I., & Moss, H. (1963). Psychological significance of styles of conceptualization. In Wright, J. & Kagan, J. (eds.), Basic cognitive processes in children. (Monographs of the society for research in child development.) 28 (2): 73–112.Google Scholar
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, M. (1979). Service-like events during individual work time and their contribution to the nature of the rules for communication. NIE Report EP 78−0436.Google Scholar
Ninio, A., & Bruner, I. (1978). The achievement and antecedents of labelling. Journal of Child Language 5: 1–15.Google Scholar
Payne, C., & Bennett, Ca. (1977). “Middle class aura” in public schools. The Teacher Educator 13 (1): 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. (1977). Language learning strategies. Language 53 560–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. (1979). The literate two-year old: The fictionalization of self. Working Papers in 'Sociolinguistics. Austin, TX: Southwest Regional Laboratory.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Toward an analysis of discourse. New York: Oxfoixl University Press.Google Scholar
Sutton-Smith, B. (1981). The folkslories of children. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umiker-Sebeok, J. D. (1979). Preschool children's intraconversational narratives. Journal of Child Language 6(1): 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witkin, H., Faterson, F., Goodenough, R., & Birnbaum, J. (1966). Cognitive patterning in mildly retarded boys. Child Development 37 (2): 301–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed