Hostname: page-component-669899f699-ggqkh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-28T17:12:02.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the uses of variable rules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

David Sankoff  and
William Labov
David Sankoff
Affiliation:
Centre de recherches mathématiques, Université de Montréal
William Labov
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The introduction of variable rules ten years ago has provoked a variety of critical reactions; among these Kay & McDaniel's (1979) review appears as a clear and penetrating study of many issues neglected or unresolved in earlier discussions. It is refreshing to observe an approach to the problems of variation and sociolinguistics relatively free from the ideological constraints that other critiques have inherited from formal linguistics (e.g. Bickerton 1971, 1973; Gazdar 1976). They bring to the discussion of variable rules a clarity gained by several years' reflection on the early statistical approaches, together with a certain distance from current sociolinguistic methodological developments and problems. At the same time, there are some attendant disadvantages of such a distance; these appear in their treatment of the work that preceded probabilistic models, in their lack of attention to the interaction between the practical aspects of linguistic data analysis and the evolution of theoretical concerns, in their misunderstanding of certain mathematical facts, and in their neglect of the more recent developments over the past five years. The K & M analysis may best be evaluated as a reaction to the stage in variable rule analysis around 1971–4 when the first probabilistic models were being proposed and tested.

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 8 , Issue 2-3 , August 1979 , pp. 189 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, B. (1969). Toward a new perspective in Negro English dialectology. American Speech, 40. 171–7.Google Scholar
Baugh, J. (to appear). A re-examination of the black English copula. In Labov, W. (ed.), Quantitative analyses of linguistic structure. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1971). Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language 7. 457–92.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1973). Quantitative versus dynamic paradigms: The case of Montreal que. In Bailey, C.-J. N. & Shuy, R. W. (eds), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 23–43.Google Scholar
Biondi, L. (1975). The Italian-American child: His sociolinguistic acculturation. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H. J. (1973a). Interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H. J. (1973b). On the nature of variable constraints. In Bailey, C.-J. N. & Shuy, R. W. (eds), New ways of analyzing variation in English. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 13–27.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H. J. & Sankoff, D. (1974). Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language, 50. 333–55.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M., (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper &Row.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. (1970). The analysis of binary data. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Emirkanian, L. (1978). Phériomènes de coordination et de réduction dans Ia langue parlée. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. W. (1972). Tense marking in black English: A linguistic and social analysis. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. (1975). The Bailey wave model: A dynamic quantitative paradigm. In Fasold, R. W. & Shuy, R. W. (eds), Analyzing variation in language. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 27–58.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. (1978). Language variation and linguistic competence. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press. 85–95.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. (1976). Quantifying context. York Papers in Linguistics, 6. 117–29.Google Scholar
Grenander, U. (1967). Syntax-controlled probabilities. Technical report, Brown University, Division of Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
Guy, G. R. (1975). Variation in. the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. Pennsylvania Working Papers on Linguistic Change and Variation 1(4). Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Haberman, S. J. (1974). The analysis of frequency data. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heidelberger, Forschur, sprojekt, ‘Pidgin-Deutsch’ (1975) Sprache und Kommunikation ausläindischer Arbeitei, Analysen, Berichte, Materialien. Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag.Google Scholar
Heidelberger, Forschur, (1976). Zur Sprache ausländischer Arbeiter: Syntaktische Analysen und Aspekte des kommunikativen Verhaltens. Zeitschrjft für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 18.78–121.Google Scholar
Heidelberger, Forschur, (1977). Transitional grammars in the acquisition of German by Spanish and Italian workers. In Meisel, J. M. (ed.), Langues en contact—Pidgins—Creoles—Languages in contact. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Heidelberger, Forschur, (1978). The acquisition of German syntax by foreign migrant workers. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press. 1–22.Google Scholar
Horning, J. J. (1969). A study of grammatical inference. Technical Report CS 139. Stanford University, Computer Science Department.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 23 (2). 8–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. H. (1975). Probability estimation using a multinomial logistic function. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 3. 315–29.Google Scholar
Kay, P. (1978). Variable rules, community grammar, and linguistic change. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press. 71–83.Google Scholar
Kay, P. & Mcdaniel, (1979) On the logic of variable rules. Lins, 8(2), 151–87.Google Scholar
Kherts, M. M. (1968). Entropy of languages generated by automated or context-free grammars with a single-valued derivation. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaia Informatsia, Series 2. 29–34.Google Scholar
Klein, S. (1965). Control of style with a generative grammar. Language, 41. 619–3.Google Scholar
Klein, W. (1974) Variation in der Sprache. Em Verfahren zu ihrer Beschreibung. Kronberg/Ts: Scriptor Verlag.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J. B. (1965). Analysis of factorial experiments by estimating monotone transformations of the data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 27. 251–63.Google Scholar
Laberge, S. (1977). Etude de la variation des pronoms sujets définis et indéfinis dans le français parlé à Montréal. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word, 19. 273–309.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1967). Some sources of reading problems for Negro speakers of non-standard English. In Frazier, A. (ed.), New directions in elementary English. Champaign, Ill: National Council of Teachers of English. 140–67.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45. 715–62.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972a). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972b). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W.. (1973). The linguistic consequences of being a lame. LinS, 2. 81–115.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1975) The quantitative study of linguistic structure. In Dahlstedt, K.-H. (ed.), The Nordic languages and modern linguistics. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell. 188–244.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1977). Categorical discrimination along a new phoneme boundary. 52nd LSA meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1978). Denotational structure. Papers from the 14th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Bower, A., Hindle, D., Dayton, E., Lennig, M. & Schiffrin, D. (1979). Linguistic change in Philadelphia. Technical Progress Report on NSF Grant SOC 7500245 Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Cohen, P., Robins, C. & Lewis, J. (1968). A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Philadelphia: U.S. Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Labov, T. (1977). Learning the syntax of questions. In Campbell, R. & Smith, P. (eds), Recent advances in the psychology of language. New York, Plenum Press. Also as: Das Erlernen der Syntax und von Fragen. Zeitsch rift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 23/24. Also as: L'apprentissage de la syntaxe des interrogations. Langue Française, 34. 52–80.Google Scholar
Legum, S., Pfaff, C., Tinnie, G. & Nicholas, M. (1971). The speech of young black children in Los Angeles. Technical report 33, Southwest Regional Laboratory.Google Scholar
Lemle, M. & Naro, A. J. (1977). Competências basicas do Portugues. Report, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Lindsey, J. K. (1975). Likelihood analysis and tests for binary data. Applied Statistics, 24. 1–16.Google Scholar
Lüdicke, A. (1977). Untersuchungen zum Gebrauch der Verneinungspartikel ne im gesprochenen Französich. Master's thesis, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
Mitchell-Kernan, C. (1969). Language behavior in a black urban community. Working paper 23. Berkeley: Language Behavior Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
Naro, A. J. & Lemle, M. (1976). Syntactic diffusion. Papers from the parasession on diachronic syntax. Chicago Linguistic Society. 221–47.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. (1975). Carrying the new wave into syntax: The case of black English BIN. In Fasold, R. W. & Shuy, R. W. (eds), Analyzing variation in language. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 162–83.Google Scholar
Rousseau, P. (1978). Analyse de données binaires. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Rousseau, P. & Sankoff, D. (1978a). Advances in variable rule methodology. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press. 57–69.Google Scholar
Rousseau, P. & Sankoff, D. (1978b). A solution to the problem of grouping speakers. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press. 97–117.Google Scholar
Rousseau, P. & Sankoff, D. (1978c). Singularities in the analysis of binomial data. Biometrika, 65.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1971). Branching processes with terminal types: Application to context-free grammars. Journal of Applied Probability, 8. 233–40.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1972). Context-free grammars and nonnegative matrices. Linear Algebra and its Applications, 5. 277–81.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1975). VARBRUL version a. Unpublished program and documentation.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1977). Statistical dependence and interaction within the variable rule framework. 39th LSA summer meeting, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1978a). Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1978b). Probability and linguistic variation. Synthèse, 37. 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, D. (1978c). Réduction d'un modèle logistique-linéaire de données multinômiales. 46th Congress of L'association canadienne-française pour l'avancement des sciences.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. & Laberge, (1978). The linguistic market and the statistical explanation of variability. In Sankoff, D. (ed.), Linguistic variation: Models and methods. New York: Academic Press. 239–50.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. & Rousseau, P. (1974). A method for assessing variable rule and implicational scale analyses of linguistic variation. In Mitchell, J. L. (ed.), Computers in the Humanities. Edinburgh University Press. 3–15.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D. & Sankoff, G. (1973). Sample survey methods and computer-assisted analysis in the study of grammatical variation. In Darnell, R. (ed.), Canadian languages in their social context. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc. 7–64.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. (1973). Above and beyond phonology in variable rules. In Bailey, C.-J. N. & Shuy, R. W. (eds), New ways of analyzing Variation fi English. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 44–61.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. (1974). A quantitative paradigm for the study of communicative competence. In Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J. (eds), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge University Press. 18–49.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. & Cedergren, H. J. (1971). Some results of a sociolinguistic study of Montreal French. In Darnell, R. (ed.), Linguistic diversity in Canadian society. Edmonton: Linguistic Research Inc. 61–87.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G., Kemp, W. & Cedergren, H. J. (1978). The syntax of ce que/qu'est-ce que variation and its social correlates. In Shuy, R. W. & Firsching, J. (eds), Dimensions of variability and competence. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. & Thibault, P. (1977). L'alternance entre les auxiliairesavoir et être en français parlé à Montréal. Langue Française, 4. 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soule, S. (1974). Entropies of probabilistic grammars. Information & Control, 25. 57–74.Google Scholar
Stewart, W. (1970). Toward a history of Negro dialect. In Williams, F. (ed.), Language and poverty. Chicago: Markham. 351–79.Google Scholar
Summerlin, N.-J. (1972). A dialect study: Affective parameters in the deletion and substitution of consonants in the Deep South. Ph.D. thesis, Florida State University.Google Scholar
Suppes, P. (1970) Probabilistic grammars for natural languages. Synthèse, 22. 95–116.Google Scholar
Also in Davidson, D. & Harmon, G. (eds), (1972). Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel 741–62.Google Scholar
Torrey, J. W. (1972) The language of black children in the early grades. Connecticut College, Department of Psychology Report.Google Scholar
Tousignant, C. (1978). La liason consonantique en français montréalais. Master's thesis, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Weiner, E. I. & Labov, W. (1977). Constraints on the agentless passive. 39th LSA summer meeting, Honolulu.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehmann, W. & Malkiel, Y. (eds), Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press. 97–195.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. (1969). A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W. (1974). Sociolinguistic aspects of assimilation: Puerto Rican English in New York City. Arlington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. (1970). Auxiliary reduction in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 1. 323–36.Google Scholar