Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-05T16:59:22.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Universe Waking Up: A Useful Idea for Atheists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2022

BRUCE MILEM Open the ORCID record for BRUCE MILEM [Opens in a new window]
BRUCE MILEM*
Affiliation:
STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT NEW PALTZ [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some writers have described human beings as participating in the universe waking up or serving as the means by which the universe comes to know itself. In this paper I argue that this idea can be given a straightforward explanation with minimal metaphysical commitments. As long as one grants that the universe has a kind of unity and that human beings are conscious, it is possible to see human beings as vehicles for the universe's consciousness and knowledge of itself. I also argue that this idea can be useful for atheists because it can satisfy what Thomas Nagel calls ‘the yearning for cosmic reconciliation’ (2010: 3) better than secular humanism can.

Keywords

atheismsecular humanismuniverseconsciousnessmeaning of life
Type
Article
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , March 2024 , pp. 135 - 152
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Philosophical Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

For their comments on this paper, I thank Jeffrey Fisher and Karmen MacKendrick. I am also very grateful to the journal's two anonymous reviewers. Their generous criticism and suggestions were invaluable to me when revising this essay. Finally, thanks to Sabine H. Seiler for the excellent copyediting and great last-minute suggestions. All remaining flaws are my responsibility.

References

Albahari, Miri. (2020) ‘Beyond Cosmopsychism and the Great I Am: How the World Might Be Grounded in Universal “Advaitic” Consciousness’. In Seager, William (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism (New York: Routledge), 119–30.Google Scholar
Baier, Kurt. (2008) ‘The Meaning of Life’. In Klemke, E. D. and Cahn, Steven M. (eds.), The Meaning of Life: A Reader, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 82–113.Google Scholar
Bakewell, Sarah. (2016) At the Existentialist Café: Freedom, Being, and Apricot Cocktails. New York: Other Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. (1976) The Ethics of Ambiguity. Translated by Frechtman, Bernard. New York: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. (1993) Meditations on First Philosophy, 3rd ed. Translated by Cress, Donald A.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Duyndam, Joachim. (2017) ‘Humanism as a Positive Outcome of Secularism’. In Zuckerman, Phil and Shook, John R. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Secularism (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 706–20.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Markus. (2015a) Why the World Does Not Exist. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Markus. (2015b) ‘Why the World Does Not Exist But Unicorns Do’. Interview by Richard Marshall. Accessed March 17, 2022. https://www.3-16am.co.uk/articles/why-the-world-does-not-exist-but-unicorns-do.Google Scholar
Gasparri, Luca. (2019) ‘Priority Cosmopsychism and the Advaita Vedanta’. Philosophy East & West, 69, 130–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, Philip. (2017) Consciousness and Fundamental Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. (2011) ‘Challenges for Secularism’. In Levine, George (ed.), The Joy of Secularism: 11 Essays for How We Live Now (Princeton: Princeton University Press), 24–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. (2010) Secular Philosophy and the Religious Temperament: Essays 2002–2008. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. (2012) Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. (1918) Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. (2010) ‘Monism: The Priority of the Whole’. Philosophical Review, 119, 31–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seager, William. (2020) ‘Introduction: A Panpsychist Manifesto’. In Seager, William (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism (New York: Routledge), 1–11.Google Scholar
Shankara, . (1947) Crest-Jewel of Discrimination (Viveka-Chudamani). Translated by Prabhavananda, Swami and Isherwood, Christopher. Hollywood, CA: Vedanta Press.Google Scholar
Smeenk, Christopher, and Ellis, George. (2017) ‘Philosophy of Cosmology’. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed June 29, 2022. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/cosmology/.Google Scholar
Stone, Jerome A. (2018) ‘Defining and Defending Religious Naturalism’. In Crosby, Donald A. and Stone, Jerome A (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Religious Naturalism (New York: Routledge), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. (2007) A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tillich, Paul. (1973) Systematic Theology, Vol. 1, Reason and Revelation, Being and God. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
White, Carol Wayne. (2016) Black Lives and Sacred Humanity: Toward an African American Religious Naturalism. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar