Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-gmt7q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-11T02:51:32.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Delayed contrast MRI for the evaluation of Ménière’s disease: an Australian perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2024

Emily Barrett*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
Rudolf Boeddinghaus
Affiliation:
Perth Radiological Clinic, Subiaco, Australia Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia
Andrew Thompson
Affiliation:
Perth Radiological Clinic, Subiaco, Australia Neurological Intervention and Imaging Service of WA (NIISwa), Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
Andre Wedekind
Affiliation:
Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia Department of Audiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia
Dayse Tavora-Vieira
Affiliation:
Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia Department of Audiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
Jafri Kuthubutheen
Affiliation:
Division of Surgery, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Australia
*
Corresponding author: Emily Barrett; Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Objectives

Ménière’s disease is a chronic inner-ear disease attributed to endolymphatic hydrops. Magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium allows visualisation of endolymphatic hydrops in vivo and may be an adjunct to diagnosis.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients suspected of having Ménière’s disease underwent T2 weighted three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and true inversion recovery sequence magnetic resonance imaging 4 hours post double-dose intra-venous gadolinium. Presence of endolymphatic hydrops was graded by two radiologists at 0 and 4 months. Correlation to clinical diagnosis was assessed using Fisher’s exact test.

Results

Hydrops was identified in 88 per cent, 17 per cent and 27 per cent of patients with Definite Ménière’s, Probable Ménière’s and Undifferentiated disease, respectively. A significant correlation existed between diagnosis and presence of hydrops. Sensitivity and specificity were 88 per cent and 67 per cent, respectively. Intra- and inter-observer agreement for presence and grading of hydrops was near-perfect and substantial to near-perfect, respectively.

Conclusion

Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates radiographic hydrops with significant correlation to clinical diagnosis and good intra- and inter-observer agreement.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Emily Barrett takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Lopez-Escamez, JA, Carey, J, Chung, WH, Goebel, JA, Magnusson, M, Mandalà, M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for Menière’s disease. J Vestib Res 2015;25:17Google Scholar
Pyykkö, I, Nakashima, T, Yoshida, T, Zou, J, Naganawa, S. Meniere’s disease: a reappraisal supported by a variable latency of symptoms and the MRI visualisation of endolymphatic hydrops. BMJ Open 2013;3:Google Scholar
Nakashima, T, Pyykkö, I, Arroll, MA, Casselbrant, ML, Foster, CA, Manzoor, NF, et al. Meniere’s disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016;2:Google Scholar
Bernaerts, A, Vanspauwen, R, Blaivie, C, van Dinther, J, Zarowski, A, Wuyts, FL, et al. The value of four stage vestibular hydrops grading and asymmetric perilymphatic enhancement in the diagnosis of Menière’s disease on MRI. Neuroradiology 2019;61:Google Scholar
Gürkov, R, Pyykö, I, Zou, J, Kentala, E. What is Meniere’s disease? A contemporary re-evaluation of endolymphatic hydrops. J Neurol 2016;263:S7181Google Scholar
Van, Steekelenburg JM, Van, Weijnen A, de Pont, LMH, Vijlbrief, OD, Bommeljé, CC, Koopman, JP, et al. Value of endolymphatic hydrops and perilymph signal intensity in suspected Ménière disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020;41:Google Scholar
Bernaerts, A. MRI in Menière’s Disease. J Belg Soc Radiol 2018;102:13Google Scholar
Nguyen, TT, Lim, GS, Chawla, S. Delayed post-contrast MRI in the assessment of Meniere’s disease—initial South Australian experience. Aust J Otolaryngol 2023;6:18Google Scholar
Orimoto, KY, Vartanyan, M, O’Leary, SJ. Systematic review of the diagnostic value of hydrops MRI in relation to audiovestibular function tests (electrocochleography, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential and caloric test). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023;280:Google Scholar
Neri, G, Tartaro, A, Neri, L. MRI With intratympanic gadolinium: comparison between otoneurological and radiological investigation in Menière’s disease. Front Surg 2021;8:Google Scholar
Baráth, K, Schuknecht, B, Naldi, AM, Schrepfer, T, Bockisch, CJ, Hegemann, SCA. Detection and grading of endolymphatic hydrops in Menière disease using MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:Google Scholar
Yamakawa, K. Pathologic changes in a Meniere’s patient. Proc 42nd Meet Jpn Otorhinolaryngol Soc 1938;44:Google Scholar
Nakashima, T, Naganawa, S, Sugiura, M, Teranishi, M, Sone, M, Hayashi, H, et al. Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere’s disease. Laryngoscope 2007;117:Google Scholar
Naganawa, S, Sugiura, M, Kawamura, M, Fukatsu, H, Sone, M, Nakashima, T. Imaging of endolymphatic and perilymphatic fluid at 3T after intratympanic administration of gadolinium-diethylene-triamine pentaacetic acid. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:Google Scholar
Naganawa, S, Nakashima, T. Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops with MR imaging in patients with Ménière’s disease and related pathologies: current status of its methods and clinical significance. Jpn J Radiol 2014;32:191204Google Scholar
Zanetti, D, Conte, G, Scola, E, Casale, S, Lilli, G, Di Berardino, F. Advanced imaging of the vestibular endolymphatic space in Ménière’s disease. Front Surg 2021;8:Google Scholar
de Pont, LMH, van Steekelenburg, JM, Verbist, BM, van Buchem, MA, Blom, HM, Hammer, S. State of the art imaging in Menière’s disease. tips and tricks for protocol and interpretation. Curr Radiol Rep 2020;8:114Google Scholar
Liu, Y, Pyykkö, I, Naganawa, S, Marques, P, Gürkov, R, Yang, J, Duan, M. Consensus on MR imaging of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with suspected hydropic ear disease (Meniere). Front Surg 2022;9:Google Scholar
Nakashima, T, Naganawa, S, Pyykkö, I, Gibson, WP, Sone, M, Nakata, S, Teranishi, M. Grading of endolymphatic hydrops using magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2009;129:58Google Scholar
Ito, T, Inoue, T, Inui, H, Miyasaka, T, Yamanaka, T, Kichikawa, K, et al. Novel magnetic resonance imaging-based method for accurate diagnosis of Meniere’s disease. Front Surg 2021;8:671624Google Scholar