Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-7l9ct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T02:38:27.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of different nasal septal areas between patients with and without nasal obstruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2024

Aris I. Giotakis Open the ORCID record for Aris I. Giotakis [Opens in a new window] ,
Gerlig Widmann ,
Felix Riechelmann ,
Herbert Riechelmann  and
Helen Heppt Open the ORCID record for Helen Heppt [Opens in a new window]
Aris I. Giotakis
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Gerlig Widmann
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Felix Riechelmann
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Herbert Riechelmann
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
Helen Heppt*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
*
Corresponding author: Helen Heppt; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

We intended to investigate the deviation of septal swell body, perpendicular plate, septal spur and vomer in patients with and without nasal obstruction.

Methods

We compared the deviation of these septal areas in computed tomography scans of patients scheduled for nasal surgical procedures (cases) and of patients without clinically relevant nasal obstruction (controls).

Results

Septal swell body was similarly deviated between 56 cases (median value: 6.5 mm) and 56 controls (6.4 mm; p > 0.2). Septal spur was more deviated in cases (5.6 mm) than in controls (4.7 mm; p < 0.001). The deviation of perpendicular plate (found in 28/112 subjects) did not differ significantly between cases (3.0 mm) and controls (2.2 mm; p > 0.2). The deviation of vomer (found in 71/112 subjects) was larger in cases (7.1 mm) than in controls (4.3 mm; p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Septal spur, vomer and perpendicular plate were more frequent causes of nasal obstruction compared to septal swell body.

Keywords

inferior turbinatenasal obstructionnasal septal swell bodynasal septumperpendicular plateseptal deviationtomography
Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , First View , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Helen Heppt takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Hsu, DW, Suh, JD. Anatomy and physiology of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2018;51:853–65Google Scholar
Ardeshirpour, F, McCarn, KE, McKinney, AM, Odland, RM, Yueh, B, Hilger, PA. Computed tomography scan does not correlate with patient experience of nasal obstruction. Laryngoscope 2016;126:820–5Google Scholar
Sedaghat, AR, Kieff, DA, Bergmark, RW, Cunnane, ME, Busaba, NY. Radiographic evaluation of nasal septal deviation from computed tomography correlates poorly with physical exam findings. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2015;5:258–62Google Scholar
Janovic, N, Janovic, A, Milicic, B, Djuric, M. Is computed tomography imaging of deviated nasal septum justified for obstruction confirmation? Ear Nose Throat J 2021;100:NP131–6Google Scholar
Janovic, N, Janovic, A, Milicic, B, Djuric, M. Relationship between nasal septum morphology and nasal obstruction symptom severity: computed tomography study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2022;88:663–8Google Scholar
Riechelmann, H, Widmann, G, Kofler, B, Arminger, R, Url, C, Giotakis, AI. Nasal floor asymmetry is associated with nasal obstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2020;78:1833.e1–9Google Scholar
Giotakis, AI, Widmann, G, Mallien, E, Riechelmann, F, Heppt, H, Riechelmann, H. CT analysis of the anterior nasal airway based on the direction of nasal airflow in patients with nasal obstruction and trauma controls. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023;280:1765–74Google Scholar
Heppt, H, Widmann, G, Riechelmann, F, Runge, A, Riechelmann, H, Giotakis, AI. CT comparison of the nasal airway anterior and posterior to the piriform aperture in patients with and without nasal obstruction. Head Face Med 2024;20:20Google Scholar
Delank, KW, Keller, R, Stoll, W. [Morphology and rhinologic importance of intumescentia septi nasi anterior]. Laryngorhinootologie 1993;72:242–6Google Scholar
Arslan, M, Muderris, T, Muderris, S. Radiological study of the intumescentia septi nasi anterior. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:199–201Google Scholar
Giotakis, AI, Tomazic, PV, Riechelmann, H, Vent, J. Objective assessment of nasal patency. Facial Plast Surg 2017;33:378–87Google Scholar
Pritikin, J, Silvers, S, Rosenbloom, J, Davis, B, Signore, AD, Sedaghat, AR, et al. Temperature-controlled radiofrequency device treatment of septal swell bodies for nasal airway obstruction: an open-label, single arm multicenter study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023;13:1915–25Google Scholar
Wong, E, Deboever, N, Chong, J, Sritharan, N, Singh, N. Isolated topical decongestion of the nasal septum and swell body is effective in improving nasal airflow. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2020;34:417–21Google Scholar
Kim, SJ, Kim, HT, Park, YH, Kim, JY, Bae, JH. Coblation nasal septal swell body reduction for treatment of nasal obstruction: a preliminary report. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:2575–8Google Scholar
Yu, MS, Kim, J-Y, Kim, B-H, Kang, S-H, Lim, DJ. Feasibility of septal body volume reduction for patients with nasal obstruction. Laryngoscope 2015;125:1523–8Google Scholar
Moss, WJ, Faraji, F, Jafari, A, DeConde, AS. A systematic review of the nasal septal turbinate: an overlooked surgical target. Am J Otolaryngol 2019;40:102188Google Scholar
Wotman, M, Kacker, A. Should otolaryngologists pay more attention to nasal swell bodies? Laryngoscope 2015;125:1759–60Google Scholar
Meng, X, Zhu, G. Nasal septal swell body: a distinctive structure in the nasal cavity. Ear Nose Throat J 2021:1455613211010093Google Scholar
Veit, J, Rotter, N, Feucht, A, Rettinger, G, Scheithauer, M. [Persistent nasal obstruction following septoplasty: deviated nasal pyramid and perpendicular plate]. Laryngorhinootologie 2012;91:363–7Google Scholar
Gelera, JE, Ojar, D, Lim, JH, Wee, JH, Kim, J-W, Rhee, C-S. Radiographic changes of the nasal septal body among patients with sinonasal diseases. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2017;10:338–43Google Scholar
Setlur, J, Goyal, P. Relationship between septal body size and septal deviation. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2011;25:397–400Google Scholar
Setlur, J, Goyal, P. Relationship between septal body size and septal deviation. Laryngoscope 2010;120(suppl 4):S246Google Scholar
Wong, EH, Noussair, M, Hasan, Z, Duvnjak, M, Singh, N. Physiological changes in the size of the septal swell body correlate with changes in inferior turbinate size. J Laryngol Otol 2020;134:323–7Google Scholar
Elwany, S, Salam, SA, Soliman, A, Medanni, A, Talaat, E. The septal body revisited. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123:303–8Google Scholar
van Zijl, FVWJ, Timman, R, Datema, FR. Adaptation and validation of the Dutch version of the nasal obstruction symptom evaluation (NOSE) scale. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:2469–76Google Scholar
Marro, M, Mondina, M, Stoll, D, de Gabory, L. French validation of the NOSE and RhinoQOL questionnaires in the management of nasal obstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;144:988–93Google Scholar
Egeland, MT, Tarangen, M, Shiryaeva, O, Gay, C, Døsen, LK, Haye, R. Evaluation of strategies for increasing response rates to postal questionnaires in quality control of nasal septal surgery. BMC Res Notes 2017;10:189Google Scholar
Elias, CCL, Teixeira, AR, Souza, MEC, Rosito, LPS, Costa, SSD. Translation and cultural adaptation of “Glasgow Children’s Benefit Inventory” into Brazilian Portuguese. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2024;90:101353Google Scholar
Widmann, G, Fasser, M, Schullian, P, Zangerl, A, Puelacher, W, Kral, F, et al. Substantial dose reduction in modern multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT)-guided craniofacial and skull base surgery. Rofo 2012;184:136–42Google Scholar
Riechelmann, H, Karow, E, DiDio, D, Kral, F. External nasal valve collapse-a case-control and interventional study employing a novel internal nasal dilator (Nasanita). Rhinology 2010;48:183–8Google Scholar