Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-twqc4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-09T22:51:55.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Permanence of “Temporary” Migration: The “Structural Embeddedness” of Japanese-Brazilian Immigrant Workers in Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2010

Takeyuki Tsuda
Get access

Extract

For many decades, Japan was the only advanced industrial country in the world that did not rely on unskilled foreign labor. For many observers, the Japanese case demonstrated that a country could fully industrialize and sustain high levels of economic growth without becoming dependent on large populations of immigrant workers. Instead of importing immigrants, Japan was able to meet its increasing demand for unskilled labor power by effectively mechanizing and rationalizing production and further utilizing untapped sources of labor (female and elderly workers). Because of the country's insistence on ethnic homogeneity and its refusal to accept unskilled foreign workers, Japan had been forced to optimize domestic labor productivity and supply, creating a highly efficient and competitive industrial system capable of economic expansion without immigration. This implicitly sustained a “myth of Japanese uniqueness”—the notion that Japan's economic system was unique because it was based on distinctive Japanese ethnocultural qualities.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , August 1999 , pp. 687 - 722
Copyright
Copyright © The Association for Asian Studies, Inc. 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

List of References

Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Basch, Linda, Schiller, Nina Glick and Blanc, Cristina Szanton. 1994. Nations Unbound: Transnational Projects, Postcolonial Predicaments, and Deterritorialized Nation-States. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Publishers.Google Scholar
Befu, Harumi. 1993. “Nationalism and Nihonjinron.” In Cultural Nationalism in East Asia, edited by Befu, Harumi. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California Press.Google Scholar
Böhning, W. R. 1984. Studies in International Labour Migration. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Borjas, George J. 1989. “Economic Theory and International Migration.” International Migration Review 23: 457–85.Google Scholar
Brown, Judith M., and Foot., Rosemary 1994. “Introduction: Migration—The Asian Experience.” In Migration: The Asian Experience, edited by Brown, Judith M. and Foot, Rosemary. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 1975. “Immigrant Workers and Class Struggles in Advanced Capitalism: the Western European Experience.” Politics and Society 5(1):33–66.Google Scholar
Castles, Stephen (with Heather Booth and Tina Wallace). 1984. Here for Good: Western Europe's New Ethnic Minorities. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Castles, Stephen, and Miller, Mark J.. 1998. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Murray, and Prothero, R. Mansell. 1983. “Themes on Circulation in the Third World.” International Migration Review 17(4):597–632.Google Scholar
Chavez, Leo R. 1988. “Settlers and Sojourners: The Case of Mexicans in the United States.” Human Organization 47(2):95–108.Google Scholar
Chavez, Leo R. 1991. “Outside the Imagined Community: Undocumented Settlers and Experiences of Incorporation.” American Ethnologist 18(2):257–78.Google Scholar
Chavez, Leo R. 1992. Shadowed Lives: Undocumented Immigrants in American Society. Fort Worth, Tex.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.Google Scholar
Chavez, Leo R. 1994. “The Power of the Imagined Community: The Settlement of Undocumented Mexicans and Central Americans in the United States.” American Anthropologist 96(1):52–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Rodney. 1979. The Japanese Company. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, James. 1994. “Diasporas.” Cultural Anthropology 9(3):302–38.Google Scholar
Clifford, James. 1997. Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Robert E. 1971. Japanese Blue Collar: The Changing Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. 1992. “From Sojourners to Settlers: The Changing Profile of Mexican Immigration to the United States.” In U.S.-Mexico Relations: Labor Market Interdependence, edited by Bustamante, Jorge et al. . Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. 1994. “Japan: The Illusion of Immigration Control.” In Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, edited by Cornelius, Wayne A., Martin, Philip L., and Hollifield, James F.. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, Wayne A. 1998. “The Structural Embeddedness of Demand for Mexican Immigrant Labor: New Evidence from California.” In Crossings: Mexican Immigration in Interdisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Suárez-Orozco, Marcelo M.. Cambridge: David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Dale, Peter. 1986. The Myth of Japanese Uniqueness. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
De Vos, George A. 1992. Social Cohesion and Alienation: Minorities in the United States and Japan. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
De Vos, George A., and Suárez-Orozco, Marcelo M.. 1990. Status Inequality: The Self in Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dore, Ronald P. 1973. British Factory-Japanese Factory: The Origins of National Diversity in Industrial Relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dore, Ronald P. 1986. Flexible Rigidities: Industrial Policy and Structural Adjustment in the Japanese Economy 1970-80. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Employment Promotion Enterprise Group (Koyo Sokushin Jigyodan). 1994. Nikkeijin Koyo no jittai to Tenbo: Chosa Kenkyu Hokokusho (The Actual Situation and Outlook of Nikkeijin Employment: Research Survey Report). Tokyo: Koyo Sokushin Jigyodan.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gmelch, George. 1980. “Return Migration.” Annual Review of Anthropology 9: 135–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guarnizo, Luis Eduardo. 1997. “The Emergence of a Transnational Social Formation and the Mirage of Return Migration Among Dominican Transmigrants.” Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 4(2):281–322.Google Scholar
Gunatilleke, Godfrey. 1991. Migration to the Arab World: Experience of Returning Migrants. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
Hannerz, Ulf. 1996. Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heisler, Barbara Schmitter. 1986. “Immigrant Settlement and the Structure of Emergent Immigrant Communities in Western Europe.” In From Foreign Workers to Settlers? Transnational Migration and the Emergence of New Minorities, edited by Martin O. Heisler and Barbara Heisler. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 485: 76-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. 1994. Gendered Transitions: Mexican Experiences of Immigration. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association., Immigration 1995. Heisei Nananenban Zairyu Gaikokujin Tokei (Statistics on Resident Foreigners, 1995 Edition). Tokyo: Immigration Association.Google Scholar
Ishi, Angelo A. 1991. Nikkei Burajirujin Dekasegi Rodosha no Ibunka Komyunikeshon ni Kansuru Kenyu (Research about the Communication of Cultural Differences of the Brazilian Nikkei Workers). M.A. thesis, University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
Japan Institute of Labor (Nihon Rodo Kenkyu Kiko). 1995. Nikkeijin Rodosha no jukyu Shisutemu to Shuro Keiken (The Demand/Supply System and Employment Experiences of Nikkeijin Workers).Google Scholar
Japan Statistics Research Institute (Nihon Tokei Kenkyujo). 1993. Tokei Kenkyu Sanko Shiryo no. 38: Nikkei Burajirujin Shuro/Seikatsu Jittai Chosa (Statistical Research Reference: Survey of Brazilian Nikkeijin Employment and Living Conditions).Google Scholar
JICA—International Cooperation Enterprise Group (Kokusai Kyoryoku jigyodan). 1992. Nikkeijin Honpo Shuro Jittai Chosa Hokokusho (Report on the Survey of the Nikkeijin Working in Our Country).Google Scholar
Kajita, Takamichi. 1994. Gaikokujin Rodosha to Nihon (Foreign Laborers and Japan). Tokyo: NHK Books.Google Scholar
Kearney, Michael. 1991. “Borders and Boundaries of State and Self at the End of Empire.” Journal of Historical Sociology 4(1):52–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, Toyoie. 1992. “Gunma-ken Oizumi-machi ni Okeru Nikkeijin Rodosha Hiaringu Chosa: Eijyuka Shikou to Ukeire Kibanseibi” (Survey Hearing of Nikkeijin Workers in Gunma-prefecture, Oizumi-town: The Intention to Become Permanent and the Fundamental Framework for their Acceptance). In Hito no Kokusaika ni Kansuru Sogoteki Kenkyu: Tokuni Gaikokujin Rodosha ni Kansuru Chosa Kenkyu o Chushin ni (General Survey on the Internationalization of People: Especially Focusing on the Survey Research about Foreign Workers). Tokyo: Toyo University.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Toyoie. 1993. Hamamatsu-shi ni Okeru Gaikokujin no Seikatsu jittai/lshiki Chosa: Nikkei Burajiru/Perujin 0 Chushin ni (Survey of Living Conditions and Consciousness of Foreigners in Hamamatsu City: Focusing on Nikkei-Brazilians and Peruvians). Hamamatsu, Japan: Hamamatsu Planning Section/International Exchange Office.Google Scholar
Kuwahara, Yasuo. 1993. “Nikkeijin Rodosha ga Nihon Dekasegi ni Fumikiru Made” (The Road to Becoming Japanese Dekasegi for Nikkeijin Workers). In Nanbei Nikkeijin Shuro ni Kansuru Jittai Chosa (Survey about the Employment of South American Nikkeijin). Tokyo: Institute of Statistical Research.Google Scholar
Lee, Everett S. 1966. “A Theory of Migration.” Demography 3: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberal, Democratic Party. 1992. Kokusaika jidai ni Taio Shite: Omo to Shite Gaikokujin Mondai ni Kansuru Teigen (In Response to the Age of Internationalization: A Proposal about the Foreign Labor Problem). Tokyo: Liberal Democratic Party.Google Scholar
Margolis, Maxine L. 1994. Little Brazil: An Ethnography of Brazilian Immigrants in New York City. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, Douglas S. 1986. “The Settlement Process among Mexican Migrants to the United States.” American Sociological Review 51: 670–85.Google Scholar
Minister of Labor Secretariat Policy Planning and Research Department. 1990–1995. Rodo Tokei Yoran (Labor Statistics Survey). Tokyo: Ministry of Finance Publishing Bureau.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 1994. Shutsunyukoku Kanri Gyosei no Genjyo to Tomen no Kadai (Administration of Immigration Control and Current Topics). Immigration Control Policy Committee.Google Scholar
Ministry of Labor. 1991. Gaikokujin Rodosha ga Rodomento ni Oyobosu Eikyoto ni Kansuru Kenkyukai (Research Group Study on the Impact of Foreign Laborers). Tokyo: Ministry of Labor.Google Scholar
Ministry of Labor. 1992. Gaikokujin Rodosha ga Rodomento ni Oyobosu Eikyoto ni Kansuru Kenkyukai Senmonbukai (Expert Research Group Study on the Impact of Foreign Laborers). Tokyo: Ministry of Labor.Google Scholar
Mintz, Sidney. 1998. “The Localization of Anthropological Practice: From Area Studies to Transnationalism.” Critique of Anthropology 18(2):117–33.Google Scholar
Mori, Hiroml. 1994a. “Nikkei Burjirujin Shukyosha no Teijyu Kibo Ishiki ni Tsuite” (Consciousness of Settlement by Brazilian Nikkeijin Workers). In Kenkyu Hokoku (Bulletin of the Japan Statistics Research Institute). Tokyo: Japan Statistics Research Institute.Google Scholar
Mori, Hiroml. 1994b. “Nikkei Shudanshi ni totte no “Dekasegi” no Motsu Imi: San Nikei Shudanchi no Dekasegi Keitai to Eikyo no Taihi o Toshite” (The Meaning of “Dekasegi” for Areas of Nikkeijin Concentration: A Comparison of the Composition and Influence of Dekasegi in Three Nikkei Communities). Ijyu Kenkyu (Migration Research) 31: 40–57.Google Scholar
Ninomlya, Masato, and Rodosho Shokugyo Anteikyoku Gyomu Choseika (Ministry of Labor Employment Stability Bureau Business Regulation Section). 1994. Nihon/Burajiru Ryokoku ni okeru Nikkeijin no Rodo to Seikatsu (The Labor and Lives of Nikkeijin in both Japan and Brazil). Tokyo: Nikkan Rodo Tsushinsha.Google Scholar
Nomoto, Hiroyuki et al. 1993. “Zainichi Nikkeijin Oyobi sono Kazoku no Seikatsu Jittai to Nihongo no Gakushu ni Kansuru Chosa Hokoku” (Survey Report of the Living Conditions of the Resident Nikkeijin and their Families and their Study of Japanese). Nagoya Kyoiku Kenkyu Nenpo (Nagoya Educational Research Annual Report) 10: 136–95.Google Scholar
Piore, Michael J. 1979. Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor and Industrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, and Rumbaut, Rubén G.. 1996. Immigrant America: A Portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Reichert, Joshua S. 1981. “The Migrant Syndrome: Seasonal U.S. Wage Labor and Rural Development in Central Mexico.” Human Organization 40(1):56–66.Google Scholar
Rogers, Rosemarie. 1985. Guests Come to Stay: The Effects of European Labor Migration on Sending and Receiving Countries. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Rouse, Roger. 1991. “Mexican Migration and the Social Space of Postmodernism.” Diaspora 1(1):8–23.Google Scholar
Safran, William. 1991. “Diasporas in Modern Societies: Myths of Homeland and Return.” Diaspora 1(1):83–99.Google Scholar
São Paulo Humanities Research Center (Sanpauro Jinbun Kagaku Kenkyujo). 1987–88. Burajiru ni Okeru Nikkeijin Jinko Chosa Hokokusho (Population Survey Report about Nikkeijin in Brazil). São Paulo, Brazil: Sanpaurojinbun Kagaku Kenkyujo.Google Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 1991. The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sassen-Koob, Saskia. 1978. “The International Circulation of Resources and Development: The Case of Migrant Labour.” Development and Change 9(4):509–45.Google Scholar
Sellek, Yoko. 1996. “The U-Turn Phenomenon among South American-Japanese Descendants: From Emigrants to Migrants.” Immigrants and Minorities 15(3): 246–69.Google Scholar
Simmons, Alan B., and Guengant, Jean Pierre. 1992. “Caribbean Exodus and the World System.” In International Migration Systems: A Global Approach, edited by Kritz, Mary M., Lim, Lin Lean, and Zlotnik, Hania. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skeldon, Ronald. 1990. Population Mobility in Developing Countries: A Reinterpretation. London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Carolyn S. 1997. On the Margins of Japanese Society: Volunteers and the Welfare of the Urban Underclass. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suárez-Orozco, Marcelo M., and Suarez-Orozco, Carol A. E.. 1995. “The Cultural Patterning of Achievement Motivation: A Comparison of Mexican, Mexican Immigrant, Mexican American, and Non-Latino White American Students.” In California's Immigrant Children: Theory, Research, and Implications for Educational Policy, edited by Cornelius, Wayne A. and Rumbaut, Rubén G.. San Diego: Center for U.S.—Mexican Studies, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
Tajima, Hisatoshi. 1995. “Laten Amerika Nikkeijin no Teijyuka” (The Settlement of Latin American Nikkeijin). In Teijyuka sum Gaikokujin (Foreigners Who Settle), edited by Komai, Hiroshi. Tokyo: Akaishi Shoten.Google Scholar
Todaro, Michael P. 1969. “A Model of Labour Migration and Urban Unemployment in Less Developed Countries.” American Economic Review 59: 138–48.Google Scholar
Tsuda, Takeyuki. 1998. “The Stigma of Ethnic Difference: The Structure of Prejudice and ‘Discrimination’ towards Japan's New Immigrant Minority.” The Journal of Japanese Studies 24(2): 317–59.Google Scholar
Tsuda, Takeyuki. Forthcoming 2. “The Motivation to Migrate: The Ethnic and Sociocultural Constitution of the Japanese-Brazilian Return Migration System.” Economic Development and Cultural Change.Google Scholar
Tsuda, Takeyuki. Forthcoming 2. “Transnational Migration and the Nationalization of Ethnic Identity among Japanese-Brazilian Return Migrants.” Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology.Google Scholar
United Nations Social Defence Research Institute (UNSDRI). 1973. Migration: Report of the Research Conference on Migration, Ethnic Minority Status and Social Adaptation. Rome: UNSDRI.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Masako. 1995. “Nikkei Burajirujin Jido/Seito no Zoka ni taisuru Kyoiku Genba deno Mosaku: Nikkei Burajirujin Shujyuchi no Hamamatsu-shi no Baai” (Attempts in Education to Respond to the Rapid Increase of Brazilian Nikkejin Children and Students: The Case of Hamamatsu City). Shakaigakul Shakai Fukushigaku Kenkyu (Sociology and Social Welfare Review) 96: 43–66.Google Scholar
Yamagoe, Toku. 1993. “Nanbei Nikkejin Rodosha no Nihon deno Seikatsu” (The Lives of South American Nikkeijin Workers in Japan). In Nanbei Nikkeijin Shuro ni Kansuru Jittai Chosa (Survey about the Employment of South American Nikkeijin). Tokyo: Institute of Statistical Research.Google Scholar
Yamanaka, Keiko. 1995. “Return Migration of Japanese-Brazilians in Japan: Nikkeijin as Political Construct and Ethnic Minority.” Manuscript.Google Scholar
Yamanaka, Keiko, and Koga., Eunice 1996. “Nikkei Burajirujin no Nihon Ryunyu no Keizoku to Ido no Shakaika no Shinto: Ido Shisutemuron o Tsukatte” (The Continued Inflow of Nikkei Brazilians and the Spread of the Socialization of Migration: Using Migration Systems Theory). Iju Kenkyu (Immigration Studies) 33: 55–72.Google Scholar
Yoshino, Kosaku. 1992. Cultural Nationalism in Contemporary Japan: A Sociological Enquiry, London: Routledge.Google Scholar